Men
Lacoste Pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Lacoste Pour Homme by Lacoste Fragrances is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2002, the nose behind this composition is Claude Dir. The top notes unfold with plum, apple, grapefruit, and bergamot; the heart reveals cinnamon, pink pepper, cardamom, and juniper; while the base settles on vanilla, rum, musk, sandalwood, cedar, and labdanum.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Lacoste Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
34 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
On opening, soft citrus with sweet touches of apple and plum (the apple stands out more). It gives a strong sense of cleanliness and youth. As it evolves, I notice the pink pepper; the base is deep and ambered, but in reality it’s vanilla and musk that dominate, with soft cedar and more marked sandalwood. It reminded me of the apple handling in Hugo Boss, but what surprises me most in a Lacoste is the longevity: it surpassed 12 hours. If you apply too much, the trail is heavy. Although it’s classified as aromatic woody, for me the strength lies in the fruits that give it youth, although it is one of the most serious and formal from the brand, especially due to that musky and woody finish. It goes well all year, but more for evening wear.
At first, soft citrus with sweet fruits, especially apple. It gives a strong sense of cleanliness and youth. I only notice a bit of pink pepper in the middle and the base is deep and ambered, with vanilla and musk dominating, while cedar and sandalwood are more muted. It reminds me of the apple handling in some Hugo Boss scents, but what surprises me most is that it’s Lacoste and lasts more than 12 hours; if you overdo it, the trail is heavy. Although it’s classified as aromatic woody, for me the strength lies in the fruits that give it youth, although it is one of the most serious and formal from the brand, thanks to that musky and woody finish. I see it for all seasons, but better for the evening.
Soft and fresh, but without that summer air; clean and with noticeable longevity, although the trail is discreet, perfect for not being a walking ‘perfume department’. Ideal for work, and although many reserve it for the evening, I use it day and night in autumn and winter. A very pleasant fragrance.
Few fragrances have deceived me as well as Lacoste Pour Homme. Its citrus opening made me think of another citrus, pepper, and wood combo, but nothing could be further from the truth. The vanilla and cardamom make it warm, and the rum gives it a liquorish touch. Lacoste doesn’t usually stand out, but this is a good offer, quality/price for it to be in everyone’s wardrobe. Sometimes we are deceived by the bottle or the marketing, but here there is a gem. I wear it in cold or mild climates with fewer applications.
It was a gift from my aunt in the summer of 2009, one of my first perfumes with which I fell in love and met my partner. It was very mine, my scent. After discovering that my previous bottle had been horribly reformulated, I bought it again and… surprise! The reformulation is just as bad. Before it lasted all day with three sprays; now I need six or seven. The aroma is similar but not the same. The current formula is only 35% of the original. Perhaps it never had great quality as a mass designer brand, but perfumery has degraded dramatically and the prices are crazy.
It smells to me of strawberry caramel and violet. It’s not intrusive and improves with time, ideal for class, the office, or a quick outing in spring and summer, but not for special occasions. It’s pleasant and youthful, but it won’t make history.
The opening is brutal; it gave me a headache. After 20 minutes, it unleashes what it has: a synthetic sweetness between plum and indistinct notes that sound like an unfortunate blend. It feels generic and intrusive. Although it holds up for moments, I didn’t like it. The dry-down close to the skin is interesting with vanilla, musk, and rum, but it doesn’t convince. If this had come out earlier, it would have been a great perfume at a good price. Unfortunately, I had to suffer for a rich finish that only smells on the skin. I ended up disappointed. The trail is moderate and lasts three hours. It’s a toss-up between repulsion, anger, and joy, but there are those who will like it. For me, it’s a no-go.
The opening is unpleasant; it gave me a headache. After twenty minutes, it releases everything inside: a sweet blend of something plum-like and other synthetic notes I can’t quite identify, all very generic and intrusive. Honestly, although it’s bearable at times, I didn’t like it. It has an interesting skin-scent finish with vanilla, musk, and a hint of rum, which would have made a good perfume if it had opened better. Unfortunately, I had to suffer through that rich finish that only appears once it’s clinging to the skin. I ended the day disappointed. The trail is moderate and lasts three hours. It’s a mix of repulsion, intrigue, anger, and delight, but in the end, I’ll use it one last time.
I see Lacoste Pour Homme as one of those 21st-century fragrances that dared to cover all male fronts, from the office to the party, without any issues. It opens super fresh, fruity, and clean, with that soapy touch and a hint of alcohol that soon gives way to herbaceous Virginia juniper and the spicy trio of cinnamon, pepper, and cardamom. Cardamom is the king here, lasting until the very end and blending with musk, cedar, and that barely perceptible rum. The bottle is sober yet classy, just like the woman’s version, with its textured silver cap and the embossed crocodile giving it an extra visual touch. The box is top too, with its texture, colour, and chrome edges; it’s one of the best designer packaging I’ve seen. It’s not a masterpiece or of spectacular quality like its female version (that’s a great job by Olivier Cresp), but it delivers and smells good. Fragrance: 8/10 Longevity: 8/10 Projection: 6.5/10 Versatility: 9/10
Have you ever not known what fragrance to wear due to the weather, occasion, or mood? This one solves the dilemma. I don’t know why I associate Lacoste with Nautica, Guess, or Diesel, rather than houses like Versace or Chanel. The bottle is simple but incredibly beautiful and elegant. It resembles Allure pour Homme by Chanel only at the start (not everyone likes that) and Dior Homme Eau in the dry-down. What I perceive most is a ‘powdery vanilla’ scent, a bit of the ‘spicy’ from the cinnamon, and quite sweet, but not cloying. Warning: it can be penetrating to the nasal passages and intrusive at times. Lacoste pour Homme isn’t pompous or ‘all-star’; it doesn’t pretend to be what it isn’t nor hide behind a brand. It’s a ‘UTILITY’ perfume, one for running out the door. This lizard is versatile: office, gym, formal, informal, any hour, season, or age. My bottle is from 2013, with nuclear projection and longevity. I don’t exactly love it, but I can’t deny the good quality of this ‘silver crocodile’.
Have you ever not known which perfume to put on due to the weather, the occasion, or your mood? This one gets you out of the mess. I don’t understand why sometimes I put Lacoste in the same line as Guess or Diesel, and not with houses like Versace or Chanel. The bottle is simple but incredibly elegant. It resembles Chanel Allure pour Homme at the start (not everyone likes it) and Dior Homme Eau at the final dry-down. What I notice most is a pleasant ‘powdery vanilla’ scent, with a spicy cinnamon touch and quite sweet, but not cloying. Be careful, it can be very penetrating for the nose and sometimes intrusive. Lacoste Pour Homme is not pompous or ‘all-star’; it doesn’t pretend to be what it isn’t nor hide behind the brand; it’s a ‘UTILITY’ perfume, one of those for when you’re running out and have no time. This crocodile is super versatile: office, gym, formal or informal, day or night, any season or age. My bottle is from 2013 and has nuclear projection and longevity. I don’t love it, but I can’t deny the good quality of this ‘silver crocodile’.
The best part is its aroma of cinnamon, rum, vanilla, and plum. When I had it in 2005, it wasn’t as soft; they must have reformulated it like many others. A good perfume for meetings or outings with friends; nothing complicated. Longevity 5 hours, trail 1 hour. Costs between $25 and $35 online. I give it a 6.5/10.
That combination of plum, cinnamon, rum, and vanilla… wow, it’s indescribable. I loved it; I was sceptical but it was a very pleasant discovery. It’s an all-rounder: day, night, any season, even on the train.
The subtlety is the secret to this rich fragrance. Imagine a glass of plums bathed in rum, with cinnamon and a slice of apple. After a few hours, that sweetness provided by a subtle but intense vanilla emerges. Very sweet, yes; strong, no. It’s a subtle, elegant, and exquisite sweetness that invites relaxation. Initially fresh, woody, and spiced, then the spice fades to make way for something soapy, clean, and elegant, with a sweet woody base. Its simplicity gives it versatility; it projects class, tenderness, and sweetness. One of Lacoste’s best. I recommend it; it should be in your collection. Projection and trail are soft but sufficient to generate compliments. Sometimes shy, but always fulfilling.
Subtlety is the secret of this rich fragrance. Does anyone like a glass of plums with rum, a cinnamon stick, and a slice of apple? After a few hours, that’s the sweetness you notice, enhanced by a subtle but very sweet vanilla. Very sweet? Yes. Strong? No. It’s a subtle, elegant, and incredibly rich sweetness that invites you to relax. At first it’s fresh, woody, and a bit spicy; then the spice and wood fade and give way to something soapy, projecting a clean and elegant aroma with that sweet and woody base. In summary, its simplicity gives it great versatility, projecting cleanliness, class, tenderness, and sweetness; it’s rich, one of the best from Lacoste. I recommend it and it should be in your collection. The projection and trail are soft on my skin, but sufficient to generate compliments and make a mark. Sometimes it’s shy and discreet depending on the weather, but always fulfilling.
I owned it years ago and always received compliments. It’s fresh yet sparkling, with citrus and a very pleasant touch of sweetness. I plan to buy it again because it drives me crazy. I’ve read it was reformulated, but I don’t mind; when it’s a timeless fragrance, reformulated or not, you buy it for the feelings and memories.
A very sweet aroma that didn’t give me a headache; it was addictive. The downside is it didn’t last at all, so I tended to overapply. I think it suits young people with a Hollister style; it fits them well.
I bought this in 2006 on a trip to the Canaries; I didn’t know it and loved it the moment I smelled it. I purchased it at El Trébol perfumery and brought back about nine perfumes; my girlfriend thought I’d gone mad. It’s a sweet scent but not cloying, clean, and everyone liked it. It didn’t last long, but then again, it was 2006. Fifteen years later, who knows how long it lasts now; I’ll give it another try.
I stumbled upon this in 2006 during a trip to the Canaries; I didn’t know it and was instantly smitten when I smelled it. I believe the perfumery was called El Trebol. I bought about nine perfumes, and my girlfriend thought I’d gone mad, haha. It’s a sweet scent but not cloying, clean, and everyone loved it. It didn’t last long, but it was 2006; who knows what it would hold up to these days. I’ll give it another try.
I just bought it and thought it was brilliant. Upon smelling it, I’m reminded of an office manager, someone serious yet fresh. It’s sweet but conveys that you enjoy wearing it and that your earnings aren’t low. Excellent perfume.
I just bought it and thought it was brilliant. Upon smelling it, I’m reminded of an office manager: serious yet fresh. It’s sweet and suggests you enjoy wearing it and that your income isn’t low. Excellent perfume.
It starts very citrusy, almost staying there, but a few minutes in the warm, soft middle note takes over and lingers. There’s no extreme projection or longevity; it stays close to the skin for about 5 or 6 hours. Best suited for fresh weather or climates that aren’t too hot.
It’s my office fragrance of choice. I can’t quite identify the notes, but it smells clean and fresh. I’ve received so many compliments and highly recommend it: perfect for hot days, though worn close to the skin it’s ideal for cool spring evenings.
A disaster! Don’t buy it blindly or let yourself be fooled by YouTube reviews. It’s one of the most generic perfumes I’ve ever smelled, a complete fiasco. It stands out for nothing at first and only smells very faintly of rum once dried. The longevity is also awful. Don’t buy it; you’ll thank me later.
It’s all synthetic. I’ve had it for years and given it many chances, but it has never been to my liking.
A perfume disaster! Don’t buy it blindly or let yourself be swayed by YouTube reviews. It’s one of the most generic scents I’ve ever smelled, a total fiasco. It doesn’t stand out in the opening and only smells faintly of rum once it dries. The longevity is also awful. Don’t buy it; you’ll thank me for the warning.
A great perfume, unjustly forgotten. It’s clean, slightly sweet (though I hate sweet scents, I like this one), and has a touch of rum. It’s the younger brother of ‘The Tragedy of Lord George’ by Penhaligon: niche, superior quality, and more distinct notes, but the Lacoste has that clean touch. Very wearable in any season, although not in summer during the day. It’s an elegant signature fragrance that doesn’t project or bother anyone. Some younger people won’t like it, but most will. It’s not old school, but it’s for men over 30. It lasts six hours. Good value for money, except for not including outrageous ingredients.
I love it! Fresh opening with bergamot, grapefruit, plum, and apple, which then turns sweet with vanilla, cinnamon, and rum, giving it a slightly boozy touch. That warmth dominates until the end, where woods like sandalwood and cedar add elegance and maturity. Ideal for semi-formal situations. It suits almost any weather except extreme heat. Longevity is low, around 5-7 hours, but the projection is very good.
It’s not a beast, as Lacoste scents often are, but in my opinion, it’s the best current one alongside the Booster. Those who say it smells like Hugo Boss Bottled are exaggerating. It doesn’t smell like fresh apple or rum. To me, it’s a mix between Blue de Chanel and Fierce by Abercrombie. It lasts 4-5 hours on skin. I’ve had Lacoste since the 80s, and none exceed five hours, even with many sprays. Perhaps the current ones are reformulated. It smells good, is economical (€40-50 for 100ml), fresh without being summery, elegant without being posh, and versatile for men aged 25 to 50. For going out at night, it lacks punch. It doesn’t overwhelm; it smells rich without being overly modern or using impossible leathers. It’s quite traditional.
It’s fruity, spicy, and woody. The opening is fresh, with spices and a dry but creamy base, perhaps sandalwood and vanilla. After four hours, the spices fade, leaving a musky touch. It reminds me of Boss Bottled in structure, not in scent. It’s timeless and elegant, good for the office or outings in spring and autumn. It lasted over eight hours, though the trail is average. If you’re looking for something similar to Boss but different, it’s a good option.
I liked it, though I didn’t love it. It starts citrusy with grapefruit and bergamot, then moves to spices like cinnamon and cardamom. Longevity and projection are decent, around 3 or 4 hours. Previously, under P&G, it had an unbeatable booster that is no longer available. Now, as a gift, it’s my option for informal outings on mild evenings. Rating: 6/10.
I neither liked nor disliked it; I used it because it was a Christmas present. At first, I thought about selling it, but I tried it until I finished it. It’s sweet and casual, nothing more. The longevity is low, it doesn’t project, and the trail is weak, with no one complimenting me. I wouldn’t buy it myself.
At first, I saw nothing special, until I noticed that fruity and musky resemblance to Rasasi Hawas Ice. It’s like its more serious and mature version, albeit less potent. Ideal for work or formal situations where you don’t want to draw too much attention.
It was my first gifted fragrance, but in my youth I ignored it in favour of louder options like Eros. Recently, finding a last drop, I realised that while the plum note is strong, the trail is a delight. Perhaps I’ll buy it out of nostalgia, though I recommend it more for those with more experience.