Animale Animale for Men by Animale
Men 1994
Description
Animale Animale for Men by Animale is a woody oriental fragrance for men. Animale Animale for Men was launched in 1994. The top notes are pineapple, lavender, lime, galbanum, lemon and valley lily; the heart notes are honey, nutmeg, ylang-ylang, rose and jasmine; the base notes are vanilla, tobacco, patchouli, amber, sandalwood, musk and cedar.
Show more ↓Quick summary
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
5,810 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Like it
1,784 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Winter
2,095 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Night
1,313 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About Animale Animale for Men
Animale Animale for Men by Animale is a woody oriental fragrance for men. Animale Animale for Men was launched in 1994. The top notes are pineapple, lavender, lime, galbanum, lemon and valley lily; the heart notes are honey, nutmeg, ylang-ylang, rose and jasmine; the base notes are vanilla, tobacco, patchouli, amber, sandalwood, musk and cedar.
Fruits, vegetables and nuts Flowers Green, herbal and fougère Sweet and gourmand Spices White flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Animale
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Long-lasting
1,017 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Strong
1,105 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally masculine
450 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Excellent value
417 votes
You may also like
Community reviews
40 reviews
Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.
This Animal Animal for men is a different story from the classic; fresh, summery and 100% masculine. As a collector, I say it is a timeless gem and very wearable today. I’m sure your circle will love it, even if they don’t say so. Forget the negative reviews; it’s an excellent blind buy that surprises and doesn’t break the bank on longevity. Best regards from Mexico to the fragrance addicts.
A perfume madness!
I used it again after 20 years and it sounds strange; even my boyfriend doesn’t smell it the same. It no longer sounds sweet to me, now it has a milky note I don’t remember. I don’t know if it’s the reformulation or my forty-something nose, but if I smelled it blind I’d say it’s a different perfume. I’ll let it rest for a few days and let you know if it stays the same.
Hello, I’m intrigued by this fragrance because the opinions are split into two poles: some say it lasts and projects little, others that it’s a beast. I’d like to know what’s true before buying a bottle.
The scent is rich, smells like honey. But the disappointment is that the performance is poor; Starwalker falls short in comparison. It doesn’t last more than two hours on skin and the trail is skin-level.
What a perfume! It’s an exact dupe of A-Men by Thierry Mugler. First came Angel Woman with that caramel and milk aroma, and then this hidden gem that made Mugler release the male version. It’s the quintessential gourmand, attracts compliments (and some negative ones), but for me it was a gem on the skin. 100% recommended for winter evenings; in the office you’d overwhelm everyone’s nose within 5 metres. Rating 9/10 for being not very versatile.
I was born in the 90s and my older brother used this perfume, I thought it was the best scent in the world. Now in 2024 they gave it to me and upon using it, wow! It was fantastic to remember it. Maybe it doesn’t smell 100% like the 90s version, but I loved it in this moment. It’s a very masculine scent despite having lots of pineapple and honey. It lasts quite a bit even outdoors, it has a strong opening but gradually releases its aromas: vanilla with amber, ripe lemon… it’s as if it had different scent capsules bursting throughout the day. Very impressive, I loved it.
Very strong scent, I find it completely suffocating. Not pleasant.
The truth is I didn’t like it, although I only used it once in summer, it sounded very dated. I gave it to my father and he loved it; he received many compliments on its scent and projection. My dad suits it perfectly if he uses it at night with cooler temperatures.
If anyone has a 100ml or 200ml bottle, I would love to buy one.
What a pity this perfume! I don’t know if I’m the only one, but on the opening I found a nauseating smell, between sweat and urine that made me instantly sick. Once dried it feels better because that sweat smell goes away and leaves a honey note like Naxos and Amen. I wouldn’t buy it just for the opening because the idea of smelling that sweat for five minutes disgusts me.
I bought this fragrance because of the comments that it shares the DNA of Thierry Mugler’s A*Men. I used to wear A*Men years ago and always found it elegant and commanding. The opening of Animale Animale is absolutely overwhelming; the honey and green lemon (almost sour) combined with lavender stun the senses the first time you spray it. However, after 15-20 minutes, the feast begins. Nutmeg and sandalwood appear, giving that powdery touch, while vanilla alongside the honey and lingering lavender notes make the perfume sweet enough to capture attention. It was a blind buy, but I admit it’s not for everyone. It is a scent with presence, nothing like the current trending fragrances. Nevertheless, I recommend it. The projection is good and the longevity on my skin is 8 hours.
At age 10, I tested a perfume in a bottle with a star (Mugler’s A*Men) and it left me absolutely floored. At 20, with Animale Sport, I thought it smelled the same, but after researching, I realised Animale Animale was the original. Upon trying it, what a sensation! It is sweet and vanillaised, without being cloying, ideal for everyday wear. At first, it smells strongly of honey and synthetic notes, but then it transforms into something deep, masculine, and reminiscent of dulce de leche with tobacco. The longevity is brutal, lasting 23 hours on my skin. The only drawback is the atomiser, which sprays when it wants to and without much force. A 9/10.
A chaotic fragrance; a sweet but not cloying opening, slightly plastic, which calms down as it dries. Comparable to Mugler? I don’t see it, because Mugler has identity and depth that this lacks. It is enjoyable and brings back memories, but it tends to be linear and generic. I have it and enjoy it, although I haven’t been able to get hold of Mugler’s in years. It’s not a copy, try a Jovan and you’ll see they are similar. If you want something enjoyable without annoying your colleagues, it is a safe purchase and doesn’t cost a fortune.
This is one of the few I have failed to pull off. The honey note is too much for me and gives me a headache. It’s not a bad perfume, but it just didn’t work for me. Normally I buy blind based on the notes and get it right 98% of the time, but not with this one. I have it stored away; perhaps I will give it another try this winter. If I can’t bear the pain in my soul, I will have to gift it away. It lasts a long time and projects quite well.
Upon opening, it smells 100% like Pure Havane and then shifts to the original Remi Latour; two icons revolving around sweet cigar notes.
I have been a Mugler fan for years; I own A Men, Pure Havane, Pure Malt (my favourite), Pure Tonka… Inspired by the reviews, I bought this Animale, which is reasonably priced, but… it has nothing to do with Mugler’s subtlety. It has a brutal alcoholic opening, a strong punch that smells like a department store cologne. It may briefly recall A*Men, but as it dries, it drifts further away. I just couldn’t handle it, not even on the coldest days.
The story of this perfume in my family is lovely: it was the one my father used all the time when he was courting and dating my mother. It is a pleasant aroma, slightly sweet but not cloying; I think it would suit someone aged 25 to 30 perfectly.
I have been using this since the early 90s; Mugler copied from this. I recommend Animale because it is more potent in the opening and trail.
Price-to-quality ratio: It is worth triple the cost. Powerful opening for outdoor wear, 5 to 8 sprays and you are in beast mode; for indoor use or a date, 3 to 5 because it can be shocking at first. For a romantic outing, apply it 5 to 8 times a couple of hours before and you will smell like a great caramel that everyone will want to eat.
Brutal value for money. Smells 90% like Michael Jordan’s Legend but with more punch and a vintage twist reminiscent of Ted Lapidus. Ideal for mature men (30-70 years) in cold weather or for evening wear. You can feel the power; it’s pure animal. Recommended.
Rough cloying and annoying scent. I think I bought the reformulated version as it smells terrible to my nose; poor longevity and nothing like what I expected.
The only one I own is A’Men and it bears a striking resemblance to Animale Animale. It’s an exquisite fragrance a nectar strictly for winter and night when going out as a dandy at a club.
Note: this isn’t a perfume it’s an EDT with a wide blend: fruity with a strong opening of lime/pineapple and honey. No changes from start to finish. Sweet but not cloying it smells better than many others. It’s heavy and mature nothing for the young. The downside is its short typical EDT longevity at a laughable price (19-20€ on Notino). It’s a bit cheap but smelling like this is a luxury. Versatile for any time and suitable for 30+. Notes: lemon amber honey sandalwood cedar musk rose ylang-ylang pineapple tobacco vanilla lavender. Type: oriental spicy.
I see it has been reformulated and it turned out well. It smells very similar to Mugler’s creations reminding me of Angel and Pure Havanne. It’s not a bomb; it’s skin-scented which suits it perfectly. It’s synthetic but improves as it dries. For the low price it’s totally worth it.
A gem 👌
Sweet intoxicating and very pleasant. Its dry-down is addictive. At first it seems the honey might be off-putting but it’s the opposite: it becomes sober stable and sweet yet controlled. It’s not a powerful bomb but its scent is always present and it garners many compliments. Highly recommended for romantic outings social events or semi-formal gatherings.
Finally a review for this beauty from Indonesia/USA/France. That’s why I pay tribute to it on my channel: ‘Moy Olaf’ on YouTube. It certainly keeps surprising.
Animale Animale: rough but sweet resinous animalic mature yet playful. It’s a tongue-twister ranging from classic 90s fougères to modern gourmands. Strong opening slightly alcoholic and synthetic. It’s for people with strong character who go ‘all in’. Citrusy at the start (5-10 mins) then it reveals its immutable identity. It sits between two poles: on one hand classic dark notes (tobacco cedar sandalwood nutmeg patchouli) that give seriousness and maturity; on the other honey pineapple vanilla sharp citrus and an aromatic sweetness of rose and lavender. What I feel most: honey pineapple and vanilla; then rose lavender and nutmeg; finally tobacco cedar and patchouli. They say it doesn’t evolve but it has a subtle slight evolution. After two hours projection is moderate to strong and it evolves into herbal and floral notes (rose lavender sweet jasmine lily of the valley). The dry-down is woody and tobacco-like with a sweet trail. Brutal performance: heavy sillage for 4 hours then skin-scent for 12 hours (I’ve reached 24). Climate: semi-casual outdoors at night or cloudy days nothing with sun. Romantic for close encounters though its mature character can be cloying up close. More for groups discos clubs. It overlaps with others. Nothing formal due to the synthetic nature; it would look ridiculous compared to higher-quality perfumes. I liked it but not entirely due to the synthetic and mature aspects. What lowered my score was my mother’s opinion: I overapplied (more than 10 sprays the sprayer is precarious) and she said it smelled old. Don’t overapply or you’ll have a very mature aroma. Scent: 8.5/10. Performance: 9.5/10. Versatility: 6.5/10. Price: 10/10 (15-18$ for 100ml). Final note: 8.5/10. I liked it quite a bit; it’s not the gourmand I expected given the mature notes but it’s pleasant nonetheless. Performance is nothing to say about. An aroma everyone should try for its price and availability. PS: Compared to Mugler’s Angel the opening has over 90% similarity which seemed incredible. The friend testing Angel beside me seemed weird and gave up as if comparing it lowered its quality. I felt Angel was more subtle less rough and natural. In development it was just a first impression.
Tragically reformulated: I tested it today and it’s merely a skeleton of what it used to be. It has a faint scent of the previous version but with a sugary aftertaste like Carolina Herrera with lamentable performance and projection. I knew it in 2001 and it was much denser and more intense than this current water plus it lasted longer. On my skin: the old version had moderate to heavy sillage and lasted 10-12 hours; the current one is moderate to low and lasts a maximum of 4 hours. The old notes were strong potent and I detected a delicious mango scent (I speculate it was a mix of pineapple vanilla and honey). The current ones smell very diluted softened and ethereal. It could be a great fragrance for those who haven’t known it before but for me who heard it in the early 2000s the current version is a disaster. I thought about buying it to remember those times but thank God I tested it first and saved myself. Advice: test it before buying.