Men
Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui
Acordes principales
Descripción
Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui by Oscar de la Renta is a leather fragrance for men. Launched in 1980, this composition features aldehydes, lavender, juniper berries, basil, galbanum, sage, caraway, anise, and bergamot in its top notes. The heart reveals carnation, patchouli, cinnamon, geranium, cedar, vetiver, and cyclamen, while the base notes settle on oakmoss, leather, labdanum, sandalwood, and musk.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
This fragrance isn’t bad at all; it’s like Invictus or One Million from the 80s, it hits you hard and fills the room with that scent to stand out, a latin lover scent, an 80s hit for that era.
I have two versions: the reformulated and the non-reformulated – as far as I can imagine, because I don’t know how many reformulations there are. The reformulated one is a cologne; the non-reformulated one is more of what it used to be, a bomb of things that ends in woods with patchouli. They classify it as ‘leather’, but for me, that’s iso-butyl quinoline with flowers, i.e., Chanel’s Russian Leather or Knize 10. This isn’t iso-butyl quinoline – this is spices (anis) with flowers (geranium, roses, heavy flowers in any case) with other things that end up in something very original but that is by no means to my liking. It’s fine for smelling something novel despite its age, I think that gives it several groans. Because, come on, the ones nowadays don’t have much surprise to say the least.
A terrible perfume, don’t buy it. It smells of synthetic lavender from floor cleaner, it doesn’t evolve, you have to bring your nose close to your arm to smell it, and it doesn’t last at all. It’s the clear example of a cheap and bad perfume; they should have discontinued it long ago.
An old-school fragrance, as they say, it smells like a gentleman; imagine someone in a suit.
Marvelous. A proper perfumón.
They’re from almost the same decade, the 80s or 81, along with Chanel Antaeus, so I don’t know which is the clone… for me, they smell practically the same. I liked the fragrance.
I’ve tried both the vintage and current versions, and frankly, the current one leaves much to be desired. The vintage was an 80s soapy wonder, with clear notes of geranium, oakmoss, leather, and lavender. Moreover, its performance was excellent. For years now, a version has been sold that isn’t made in France and whose bottle varies slightly, but the real difference lies in the scent (it’s more smoothed out) and, above all, the longevity (it lasts half an hour on my skin). That’s why I don’t recommend the current version; it seems they’ve ruined it with a terrible reformulation.
Exquisite fragrance. The aldehydes, lavender, and oakmoss are noticeable as the dominant notes on my nose. Acceptable longevity, good projection. Ideal for evening wear and slightly cold weather.
I loved it! I bought it blind following recommendations from here… thanks! It reminds me hugely of the classic Azzaro. The scent is very pleasant and the longevity is more than enough.
Not at all; old-school scents aren’t my style.
Another eighties bomb. We complain that nowadays all fragrances are sweet and very ‘similar’, but it’s nothing new. In the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 2000s, it happened too, just on a different scale. It’s true that back then they were richer in ingredients and more complex, but they also ‘copied’ and versioned fragrances from other houses. Examples are this type of Antaeus-cut fragrances, Pour Lui, Pour Homme by Van Cleef, Quorum… They are all similar and yet disparate, moving almost in unison. The same will happen with Eau de Sauvage, YSL Pour Homme, Boucheron Pour Homme, Chanel Pour Monsieur… in another era. This Pour Lui is halfway between the fragrances it versions. The Van Cleef one revolves around the rose with that coconut touch. Antaeus goes more for the animal side. Quorum leans more towards green and tobacco. Pour Lui is more aromatic and aldehydic. That’s why I say they are similar at first but very disparate from each other. Of this type of eighties fragrances, for me, the undisputed queen is Antaeus. I believe it has the class and sophistication that the others lack (or at least I don’t consider them sophisticated). I can’t speak about the version sold now because I don’t know it. I have one from the late 80s and I base this review on it.
An old school cut fougère, clean, and its opening might remind you a bit of Chanel’s Antaeus, without the animal touch and, in my opinion, with considerably less depth. That said, for a fraction of the price, it remains interesting if you like this type of aroma.
I can’t believe I wanted to swap it for another. When I first smelled it, Versace L’homme came to mind and I was slightly disappointed because I wanted something different. It didn’t satisfy me, and besides, I tested it on summer days. Bad choice. This fragrance is for cold weather. The other day, the afternoon rain refreshed the air; autumn was knocking at the door, which thrilled me because I love this season. That night, as I was going to bed, it whispered: ‘psst, psst, hey, give me a chance, let me spend the night with you’. And so it did; I sprayed it three times and got into bed. And we reconciled. Sometimes we meet people in the wrong place and time and judge them for their behaviour in those circumstances. The same goes for perfumes. Pour Lui happened to me; it wasn’t our time and I failed to appreciate it, my fault. Now, now, its soapy lavender, its moss and leather accompany me, giving me warmth, and its touches of forest wood make me feel elegant and special. I’m glad to have it; it will be an essential this autumn.
Pour Lui is clearly inspired by Antaeus, almost clones. Suddenly, in the dry-down, it reminds me of Cartier’s Santos without the coconut note. It’s a refined barbershop fragrance with woody/sweet nuances, lacking the musky quality of Antaeus. It’s heavy at first but softens as it evolves; as it changes, it feels like a strange, sweet yet irresistible incense. Performance is moderate (even though it’s a late-90s vintage formula); I expected more of a beast, but anyway, you can perceive it for 6-7 hours, and that’s even better considering I picked it up on eBay for $16 for 90ml. It has a generous atomiser with good distribution. Vintage versions are found at good prices if you compare them to others in this category at exaggerated prices, like old Kouros or Antaeus. My conclusion: if it fails you or you don’t want to spend as much as Antaeus costs, go for this.
I’m 39 years old and this 1980s perfume feels very elegant and delicious to me. I loved it! It’s a different bet and a very masculine scent.
Good performance. Proper vintage, an eighties soapy gentleman’s fragrance, smelling clean. Totally valid for use today. I like it, very much; it suits an adult aged 30 and above. Highly recommended, mostly for the price rather than anything else. If you like the vibe of eighties perfumes and want to smell like a real man, this is it. An alpha male silverback perfume, but it can be worn today without offending sensitive noses that are used to the rubbish from Paco Rabanne and Carolina Herrera: sweet things that smell like air fresheners.
Very poor performance in projection; it smells like soap. If you want to smell like soap, this is it. I bought the USA-made version and I do not recommend it; it’s far too weak. It’s an Eau de Cologne, nothing like an Eau de Toilette. It smells like a cheap perfume. If you want to pay extra for the same performance as a 5-euro bottle but in a pretty container, this is your perfume. I bought it blindly thinking it was wonderful, but it isn’t. The new reformulations have nothing spectacular about them. I’ll complain on the website to urge them to improve the product because it’s depressing. I admit the dry-down feels different, but it’s only noticeable up close. People don’t even notice or speak of how good the fragrance is. At most, in the first few minutes, they might say: ‘Hey, you smell like soap’, and that’s only right after spraying and from 50cm away.
Whether it’s old school or not, if it is, it’s for men, not for wimps who like little sweet things.
I was genuinely surprised by how sweet it is, at least for me. The opening is strong but settles down quickly. It smells like Ted Lapidus but more refined. It feels timeless; if a niche brand released it today, people would happily pay three figures. I’m talking about the original formula (I’ll compare it to the new one someday). The dry-down surprised me, and after wearing it a couple of times, I know I’ll never run out of it. I have the miniature with the old logo (10ml); it’s cheap and a good size. The brand really shone here, unlike those 1.5ml samples which are absolute rubbish. That’s why I hold it in respect.
Old school that blows your mind. Spectacular perfume, but beware: if your thing is Dylan Blue or Blue de Chanel, better pass.
When I want to smell lavender, patchouli, and leather, I resort to this exquisite: Pour Lui by Oscar de la Renta. It smells clean, it’s a delight with lasting longevity and strong sillage. It is a refined work of art in perfumery. Greetings.
A classic with that sharp, sweet powder-room scent; strictly for old school souls, not for sensitive noses.
A vintage leather fragrance that must not be missing in the wardrobe. Its floral and aromatic notes blend with woods and dry aldehydes. On my skin and clothes it looks spectacular. I recommend it to classic men looking for masculine and complex aromas.
A great perfume of the old school. This 80s old school for very masculine men (neither macho nor grumpy grandpas) who wanted to leave a mark and did. To me it smells like a mix of One Man Show, Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, and Puig’s Quorum (without pine smell), very far from Chanel’s Antaeus. It’s lavender, aldehydes like a blanket, anise, juniper, cinnamon, cyclamen, geranium, carnation (a floral note that needs to be reclaimed), patchouli, vetiver, and a soft leather and musky wood base. Longevity is long, about 8 hours on skin with a sillage of a metre and a half. It’s not for heat, it’s enchanting, very masculine and seductive. It’s for gentlemen over forty who have character. Economical price, between twenty-five and forty euros in Spain. Hard to find in normal shops, but it’s not discontinued and you can find it on perfumeria websites.
This jewel is a masterpiece of the old school that reminds us of the glory of perfumes of the past, when men smelled of neatness and elegance, not those generic, egg-headed ones of today without character or artisanal touch. It is pure luxury alongside Carlo Corinto, two fragrances that by their style and finesse are the ones I hold most respect in my collection.
At least the Sanofi version from 1980, very soapy, resembles Paco Rabanne Pour Homme more. It has nothing of Anteus (castoreum), nor VC&A (rose and leather), nor Caractère (incense-like). Bogart Signature? Not even close. They resemble each other no more than by the era in which Fragantica says they do, but absolutely not. I have them all present, some in old and current versions. Believe me, OdlR PL is more ‘dress’ than PR, but of similar cut and concept in results, referring to pre-reformulation PR. I suppose they can be substituted if you are looking for something more elegant. PR is unique and wonderful, with a but or virtue depending on how you look at it; despite its mastery, it has something of popularity. Oscar de la Renta is a perfume self-conscious of its extreme refinement. To say both are masterpieces I don’t think is an exaggeration.
It’s a classic perfume, soap-like. I don’t know the Anteus de Chanel, but I do have the One Man Show by Jac Bogart; they have the same air, this one is more refined though without notes as elevated as OMS. Its sillage and projection are moderate. If you like 80s classics and early 90s, totally recommended.
If reviewing a reformulated perfume, one must clarify which version you are commenting on because it changes everything. The current one, made in the US, is a soft and wearable cologne but with little sillage, as if they had given it tap water and washed away the fine details. It lacks that lyricism and poetry found in the vintage; don’t be fooled. In Spain it costs around twenty euros, but Quorum can be had for half the price. That’s all.
I bought it blind without knowing what to expect. Upon application, the first impression was strong and unpleasant, something that clings a lot. But as the hours pass, the top notes change and it becomes more tolerable, with a sense of cleanliness. My feeling is that it smells like a man over fifty, like the fragrances my uncles used in the 80s. Although generally it’s a good fragrance, it’s an acquired taste. It’s not for everyone, but it definitely deserves a second chance.
Arrived home with fifty dollars from my father, and since the universe owed me, I headed straight to the perfumerie. Among the classic bargains, my eye landed on Oscar de la Renta Pour Lui. The sales assistant, helped by a young girl, first showed me the Benneton Cold, but my target was clear. When I tested the cap of the Z14, I was disappointed by that smell of over-ripe oranges and cinnamon, so I went straight to the OdlR. Upon smelling it, the vapours reminded me of Chanel’s Antaeus. I bought it on the spot. In a spicy taco restaurant in Zacatecas, I applied it and was surprised: the opening is synthetic, yes, but it doesn’t smell like cleaner nor is it poor quality. With a bit of wear, the nuances improve. It’s a French lavender, floral and soft, with textures reminiscent of the veins of a tobacco leaf. It evokes Paco Rabanne Pour Homme greatly, with high-quality aldehydes, carnation, cinnamon, and a base of oakmoss, musks, and a smoky leather touch. The longevity is decent; with ten sprays it lasts well on my skin, better than the old Drakkar or Bentley. It’s fresh, powdery, and timeless, ideal for a business casual look or older gentlemen, avoiding overly casual attire. It works in autumn, spring, rainy summer, and warm winter. The current formula is a light chypre, not a heavy leather. The projection fades quickly due to the oakmoss and leather, but the sillage is good. After using it for a few days, I noticed that on my shirt it projects for a couple of days with rich bursts of oakmoss and musk as the body heats up, something many new perfumes fail to achieve. It’s dense, aldehydic, and sweet only from the musk. Recommended.
I met it in 1992-94 when it was barely an infant, in a vial, and its masculine aroma left a mark on me. I bought it years ago and have used it a lot. The opening has lavender, violet, and basil, bergamot citrus, the sweetness of geranium and carnation, and a base of leather, vetiver, and cedar, very much old-school barbershop. After the alcohol settles, you feel more vetiver, cedar, moss, and leather, embraced by lavender and a powdery patchouli. On blotter, you notice more sandalwood and labdanum. It goes from casual to elegant, not for daily wear or the office, but for outdoor activities due to its trail and longevity. I consider it for men over 38, although a risk-taker around 30 with a leather jacket or suit could use it. Unfortunately, the aldehydes seem oxidised and give an acidic touch at the start. It’s cheap, around 450 Mexican pesos (27 dollars); I’d prefer a 30ml or 60ml version to avoid oxidation, although I would still try to buy it again.
My tastes have evolved and this is one of my top 60 fragrances. I bought it two weeks ago and have been wearing it every day since. At 27, it fits me perfectly. I usually dress in jeans and a shirt, the ideal outfit for this gentleman’s perfume. I know some reviews mention a certain age, but I think it suits a confident man. I’ve received compliments and it makes me feel very masculine. Try it. It suits all weather except extreme heat; it can be semi-formal or formal. It’s the aldehydes that give it that fresh touch.
I have it in my hand and smell it constantly; it’s elegant and causes me great nostalgia, probably because I heard it when I was young and it got etched into my memory. I recommend it 100% for night and elegant wear.
A great vintage perfume, old school. It must be one of the few times I agree with Fragrantica: it’s a blend of Chanel’s Antaeus and Jacques Bogart’s One Man Show. It’s more measured than the latter, which is brashly green. The combination of aldehydes and carnation brings it close to that whole era’s vibe. The only downside is that the current performance is a bit weak. It’s a must-have if you’re a vintage lover.
For me, it’s a PERFUMAZO. It’s solid and masculine, but not dense or dark. A timeless success in great form. It’s old school, not following commercial trends. It gives me a sensation of damp tobacco with oakmoss, but clean and soapy. It’s a gem to discover, not for those who already adore cheap vintage. Try it; it smells like a charming, formal man and its performance beats several current or reformulated EDTs like Issey Miyake or Polo Green. Ideal for mid-season and winter, for day or night depending on the cold.
Little gem of perfumery; every time I discover more interesting nuances. It’s a perfume for any season; those soapy aldehyde and floral tones with hints of leather and oakmoss send a message of masculinity and seduction.
I’m sorry, I think I’m concluding my vintage exploration with this one. It smells old. I know it’s subjective, but my olfactory memory doesn’t lie. I’ve only smelled these aromas in places for elderly people, like Karl Lagerfeld or GBH for the home. I can’t fool my nose. I’d prefer to leave them behind and gift them to my grandfather, as they aren’t popular. For vintage, I’ll stick with Kouros.
I’ve just started collecting vintage perfumes and this was a blind buy success. I’m exploring it and find it very pleasant and masculine. At first, with the citrus and leather, it reminds me of Antaeus, but then it shifts to a well-crafted floral accord that softens it and adds depth. It feels ideal for intermediate seasons, neither too cold nor too hot. It’s versatile, suitable for day and night, works in the office or at social events, and projects a mature image on dates.
You can’t cover the sky with your hands; it smells old-fashioned. The aldehydes threw me off at first, but over time they balanced out. Now everything fits better; it remains that spiced, floral barbershop scent with a lavender base. I like it and use it a lot, although I think the 4/5 rating on Fragrantica is too high. The current version can be worn all year round, even in summer.
Sounds like the O from Lancôme to me, but I absolutely love it on my boyfriend.