Nina (1987)

4 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

• Selene

  June 28, 2017

  

  The fragrance opens with an intense accord of green notes, black pepper and basil, with a talcum aura and a sparkling presence of aldehydes. I would like to analyse the civet note, which is the weak point: it does not feel comfortable with the basil, the talcum powder and the spiciness, and that environment does not play in its favour, making the animalistic side end up sounding musty. Fortunately, it fades with time. At first, the citrus and rose have a small but noticeable participation. After a few minutes, the initial notes drop in volume and the mimosa, very timid in the background, resurfaces above everything, just like the rose with chypre touches. The talcum and aldehydic base seals the base with an interesting moss note; it is there when the fragrance becomes more enjoyable. In the middle, it shows more violet, rose, mimosa and now I do detect the calendula. Conclusion: the beginning is not very pleasant, it risks with strange notes different from its previous creations. With time it shows its beauty by calming those notes and lighting up its delicate florals. The creamy and talcum aspect stands out. Neither hate nor love, but it was interesting to smell it. It is not the best of the 80s, but it is approved. I like that it is rare and distinct. Many compare it to Azzaro 9, but for me it is more in the style of Estée Lauder Beautiful; they have something in common but are distinct. That said, the bottle is a gem! One of the best of the 80s.

• charlotinable

  March 12, 2018

  

  It is a very lovely delight, but it reminds me quite a bit of Chanel No. 5. It is soft, floral, talcum-powdered and a little dry due to the vetiver, patchouli and basil that give it a very herbaceous touch. Then comes that explosive citrus note that makes it a bit fresh. I do not detect the fruits on my skin, but I still love its powdery and long-lasting dry-down, which closes with a splendid rose and sandalwood charm. That is why I love it, because it suits me wonderfully on my pH.

• Mayoral

  June 16, 2022

  

  Nina 1987 is a lovely fragrance and a piece of my miniature collection. The bottle design is sober yet elegant, just like its contents. It is an aldehydic floral with the DNA of L’Air du Temps and Chanel No. 5, but here mimosa takes centre stage and a powdery heart that I adore. I would break down this aldehydic family thus: Chanel No. 5 (1923) has ylang and rose as protagonists; L’Air du Temps (1948) the carnation; Fidji (1966) a green hyacinth-jasmine complex; and Nina (1987) the mimosa. I hope this analysis serves some scholar of this beautiful art to understand the magic of perfumery: how by keeping a central skeleton, nuances are changed and these works of art emerge (even if my analysis is superficial and global).

• jerry drake

  June 17, 2022

  

  I confess there are notes I get along with, either by taste or because they evoke that elusive lady of today. I long to meet a woman who wears something like this, where aldehydes take centre stage, adding a powdery touch that bewitches and transports you to another world. To me, they are effluvia that ignite passion, trails of latent sensuality that invite love as the notes grow in harmony. Nina is wonderful: feminine to the point of satiety, yet nothing vulgar or excessive. It is the scent of a woman who knows how to be attractive, kind and smiling; voluptuous but elegant in every gesture. A beautiful floral chypre, light and rich in nuances, subtle and discreet, with refined animalism preceded by a spiced green fruit. In the heart, a coordinated floral dance where ylang-ylang and jasmine are noticeable, followed by a slightly powdery-resinous base that gives it that indispensable touch of sensuality. A beautiful creation like a caress, sensual, moderate and with good longevity that captivates me. It is wonderful to get lost in this spell.