Men
Dunhill for Men
Acordes principales
Descripción
Alfred Dunhill Dunhill for Men is a woody spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 1934, this composition features Amalfi lemon, Amalfi lime, lavender, geranium, and nutmeg in its top notes. The heart unfolds carnation, woody notes, iris, rose, and jasmine, while the base reveals leather, oakmoss, vetiver, sandalwood, Virginia cedar, and tonka bean.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
445 votos
- Positivo 85%
- Negativo 9.0%
- Neutral 6.1%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Dunhill for Men y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en AmazoneBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBayCaracterísticas
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
13 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:












To be a fragrance created in 1934 according to Fragrantica, I feel it is still current in a mature style, certainly. The opening is soft and natural citrus, with classic florals like lavender and geranium, also moderate, but nutmeg stands out. In the mid-notes, I did not perceive the iris, but I did sense the rose, jasmine, carnation, and soft woody notes. The dry-down is very beautiful and gives the impression of a powdery patchouli, but in this case it must be due to the combination of vetiver, soft tonka bean, oakmoss, and the mid florals. If you notice, it is a quite floral fragrance but extremely balanced with a few notes acting as counterweights: a soft lemon, a more prominent nutmeg, and a quite solid base, making this fragrance very masculine and classic in its conception, very English and stately in its discretion (although made in France). Some phases and the dry-down reminded me a lot of a softened and more natural version of Halston Z-14, without the strident citrus of the latter. In fact, they share 8 notes and almost all the base notes of the Dunhill are in Halston, so it is evident that Halston and similar fragrances must have been inspired by this Dunhill. My version is from the 90s, and they say -as usual- the recently reformulated version is unfortunate. Clearly for formal events or for a soft elegance in the office, for the day and suitable for all seasons except a very hot summer. For mature tastes, of course, over 35 or 40 years. The trail is moderate and the duration in my case exceeded fifteen hours, although the final notes, feeling closer to the skin.
If the 1934 fragrance still sounds as it did yesterday, it has class. It opens with a natural, citrusy touch, featuring soft lavender and geranium, but it’s the nutmeg that really stands out. In the heart, I detected rose, jasmine and carnation, though I didn’t notice the iris; this is where the soft woods come in. The dry-down smells powdery patchouli, but it’s actually the vetiver, tonka bean, oakmoss and florals that create that effect. It’s floral yet balanced, held together by a soft lemon and that distinctive nutmeg. Very masculine, classic, English and stately in its discretion, even though it’s French. It reminded me of a more natural version of Halston Z-14, without those brash citrus notes. They share eight notes and almost the entire base, so it’s obvious that Halston and others drew inspiration from this Dunhill. My bottle is from the 90s and I’ve heard the recent reformulation wasn’t good. Ideal for formal events or a subtle elegance in the office, suitable for any season except crazy summers. For mature tastes, around 35 or 40 years old. The trail is moderate and lasted over fifteen hours on me, though by the end it sits closer to the skin.
It is a wonderful, complex, and classic fragrance. It dates back to 1934. I love this type of fragrance, as one feels a bit of that era. It is as if there were a door connecting the present to interwar London, as if you could feel a bit of Victoria Station or Hyde Park, people dressed in other ways, trains with wooden seats, and flower stalls in the streets. How many fragrances from that era endure today? Simply the best, and this is one of them.
A perfume for collectors and lovers of perfumery. It is of high quality and elegant scent, but with weak longevity and projection. Its charm lies in its historical value, therefore it requires a perfumery lover and a refined olfactory sense. Apply it abundantly and reapply every three hours modestly, two or three sprays; consider it more of a cologne than a bathwater. Its scent is elegant but soft. If it had stronger fixatives and a six-hour performance with a strong trail, it would be a five-star perfume, but that is what it is: a VERY VALUABLE historical piece for collectors and lovers of perfumery. If bought with this expectation, one enjoys perfumery much as an art with historical development.
A perfume for collectors and connoisseurs of fine fragrance. It is of high quality with an elegant scent, though its longevity and projection are weak. Its charm lies in its historical value, so it requires a refined nose. Apply it generously at first, then add two or three more sprays every three hours; consider it more of a cologne than a bath oil. It smells elegant yet soft. If it had stronger fixatives and lasted six hours with a good trail, it would be five stars, but as it is, it is a VERY VALUABLE historical piece. If you buy it with that expectation, you will greatly enjoy perfumery as an art with history.
A few days ago I was at a country house with friends and among a huge pile of empty Guerlain bottles and old Avon colognes, I found this, which must have been several years old as it even stained when applied. It is not at all my style, but I like to try everything and stick with it until the end to see if it surprises me. What caught my attention was that two days later I remembered it, and upon checking the launch date, it seemed strange that it was from 1934. Because it does not smell like anything from that era at all. Upon trying it, I thought it might be a men’s cologne launched between the sixties and late seventies… Dunhill for Men is a cross between Versace L’Homme (1986) and the floral and spicy barbershop lotions that preceded it; Yves Saint Laurent Pour Homme could be one. It is slightly more melon-like than a Chanel Pour Monsieur, but that is the direction it takes. In this case, lavender, lemon, carnation, and geranium are the notes I detect most; they give it a more than woody, timbered touch. Looking for information, as I did not know it, I saw that on some blogs it was compared to Tabac. They are nothing alike; I love Tabac, it is nebulous, powdery, marble-like; this Dunhill is much more spicy and warm. Mandatory to try for lovers of ferns and classic perfumes. PS: I read several reviews saying the current version is a crime with no trail or longevity, but well, we are used to it.
A classic perfume with lavender as the dominant note. Perhaps years ago it was a monster in terms of trail and longevity. Today it is just another in this regard, as proof of how badly the current perfume industry treats classics with reformulations. A formal-cut perfume to wear in the office and business meetings.
I walk through my house and marvel at how many fragrances I have accumulated, preserved, and deemed necessary over the years. I know everything has its time and I wonder how long I can defend this passion or if one day I will have to renounce it, start saying goodbye to them, and give part of myself and my memories to others, and if so, to whom. Perfumes, all those that marked an era, the lived experiences, those bought or gifted by those who are no longer with us or were only for a short time, constitute a wealth that speaks of love. Olfactorily, this vintage Dunhill for Men Cologne is superb. Do you live in the neighbourhood, right? Paula was almost 35 that day I met her. An entrepreneur, extremely sexy; every time I passed by, there was a magical scent in the air, an intense and enveloping floral fragrance. Sometimes a breeze would move her hair, making her even more fascinating. I was 20, freshly turned, with little experience. Thanks to a friend who gave me the push, I signed up (coincidentally) for her gym and got to know her a bit more; she let me. I liked her smile, clear as a sunny day, her irony; I was impressed by the importance of her work, and I liked her… viscerally, so feminine and unattainable that it awakened my most primitive instincts. On a beautiful day, she invited me for a drink (at that moment my heart missed a beat) and for a walk; I had long hair and she was the owner of a chain of hairdressers, a perfect match. And you liked my Dunhill for Men and asked how I could know such a perfume being so young. If you have the opportunity to try the vintage, it is something that opens the door to a completely different world and time. It is an harmoniously conceived and highly wearable scent, wonderfully old-fashioned (in the best sense), suitable for boys seeking extraordinary classics that last hours. A well-perceptible lemon surrounded by cloves opens the fragrance. Invigorating, masculine, green, slightly floral, with a fine lavender. However, it is particularly interesting for its base with a leather note rounded out by cedar and vetiver, scents I greatly appreciate. A more serious rose, actually recommended for men (dry), forms a recognisable trail in the heart phase: wonderfully tense and charismatic. It is a scent with which I felt secure and I also wore it at night in the disco. I couldn’t believe I was spending the whole day and night with you. I discovered she was also kind, fun, not the perfect robot everyone imagines. There was an alchemy between us; I wanted you to hug and kiss me, and perhaps you did too. And you did in your home; afterwards, two bodies accompanied by their souls merging, and I was completely lost in you, in one of the most intense nights of my life. Perhaps I was a game or an adventure for you, you were a dream come true and a breath of fresh air.
I own the Boucheron Pour Homme Eau de Parfum and it shares about 70% similarity with the Dunhill Pour Homme (also known as Dunhill Brown). Here, the Dunhill brings aromatic lemon, an exquisite carnation and rose that are not muddled. In contrast, the Boucheron offers a sharp bergamot, followed by something very muddled and earthy, with great longevity. Both are powerful fragrances, fougères featuring moss, sharp bergamot, then rose, and a new-leather scent that adorns this hidden gem. If you like Azzaro Pour Homme or Versace Pour Homme, this is your blind buy.
Undoubtedly an essential. Excellent quality and magnificent scent. It is a proper fougère, in my opinion the classic of the Loewe line. Fantastic citrus notes accompanied by spices, geranium, and woods that give it a dry yet refreshingly crisp air. Intense upon application, without any nonsense; this is simply elegant. Wow, what elegance. Unfortunately, things like this are no longer made; what a pity. It lasts just enough, five or six hours with effort, but it is a genuine delight, a little gem well worth enjoying.
Dunhill for Men is a classic that defines the elegant and sophisticated man. It begins with the freshness of Amalfi lemon, blending perfectly with the softness of lavender, geranium, and the spicy touch of nutmeg. In the heart, carnation and woods provide robust structure, while iris, rose, and jasmine add elegance and sophistication. The base is rich and seductive: leather for sensual depth, oakmoss for an earthy touch, and vetiver to intensify masculinity. Sandalwood, Virginia cedar, and tonka bean close with warmth and lasting elegance. It is the perfect choice for those seeking freshness, sophistication, and classic masculinity, making this Dunhill (1934) an timeless and distinctive option.
Dunhill for Men is a classic that captures the essence of the elegant and sophisticated man. Upon opening, Amalfi lemon gives a refreshing citrus note that combines perfectly with the soft aromatic touch of lavender, geranium, and the warm spice of nutmeg. In the heart, the carnation and woods provide a robust, masculine structure, while iris, rose, and jasmine add elegance, creating an enveloping harmony. The base is rich and seductive: leather for sensual depth, oakmoss for an earthy feel, and vetiver that intensifies the masculine character. Sandalwood, Virginia cedar, and tonka bean finish with lasting warmth and elegance. Ideal for those seeking a balance between freshness, sophistication, and classic masculinity, making Dunhill for Men (1934) a timeless and distinctive choice.
For over 90 years, few fragrances have won my heart quite like this. The refinement of its blend more than compensates for the drop in performance following so many reformulations. It is a floral, citrus, and woody combination that yields a sublime result: it smells like vintage barbershop soap, yet it is not a fougère; citrusy without being summery, floral without being feminine. Elegant in its sobriety, unpretentious and devoid of nouveau riche ostentation, reinforced visually by a whisky-glass bottle with a touch of sophistication. It is not just Humphrey Bogart; one would need Marlon Brando and Hemingway to describe it. Ideal for fresh climates, though I dare to wear it in summer for work or serious dates. It requires maturity to avoid looking like your grandfather’s perfume, and beware: you need a conditioned nose. Why wouldn’t a child enjoy unsweetened coffee? Because their palate is too calloused. The same applies here. If you own Stroger or Scandal, do not buy it, do not use it, and do not make us suffer with reviews full of denunciations born of nostalgia.