Gucci Rush for Men

17 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

• alebrixe

  February 28, 2014

  

  One of the best Gucci has ever had… the downside is it was only seasonal. The woody notes are pleasant, but beware: only for evening and night. During the day, it’s too overpowering. Ideal for cold or mild climates with excellent longevity. I always wonder why Gucci pulls out the ones people love and keeps the ones they don’t.

• javorano

  October 1, 2014

  

  For me, this is the most incredible perfume I’ve ever tried. Although I lean towards woody scents, this is undoubtedly the best of them all. If anyone knows where to get it or if there’s a lotion that’s similar, please let me know. Best regards.

• juancar7777

  October 6, 2014

  

  Gucci Rush For Men appeared on the perfumer market shortly after Envy For Men, and both (according to my news) are discontinued. A pity because, to my taste, they were first-line fragrances in so far as their great quality is concerned. I believe Gucci misses because, as alebrixe points out, it leaves the straw on the market and removes the gold.

• javorano

  October 12, 2016

  

  Are you Burnet from D&G? Or if anyone knows where I can get this perfume… please I have been looking for it for years.

• Yeiarem1510

  October 16, 2016

  

  I like this perfume; it feels quite masculine. The opening with lavender and wood… I feel the cedar and patchouli hold up well. It’s a delight for my personal taste; the projection is medium-low, but the longevity on my skin was nearly 7 hours. I’ve used it in fresh and warm weather, but I felt it best in fresh conditions, like autumn or early spring. I haven’t tried it in cold weather; I’ll do so if possible this autumn and winter. I’ve always been a fan of Envy; I used this Rush once in the past with a sample, but I managed to get this 100ml for around $100. I liked it, what a pity it’s no longer produced alongside Envy.

• Yeiarem1510

  October 30, 2016

  

  I like this perfume, I think it is quite masculine, the opening with lavender and some wood… I feel that the cedar maintains itself throughout its life, and I think it is the patchouli, it is a delight for personal taste, as the projection it has is medium to low, not so its longevity, on my skin it was close to 7 hours. I have used it in fresh and warm climates, but I felt it better in fresh climates… I don’t know more, like autumn or early spring, I haven’t used it in cold climate, I will try it if possible this autumn and winter. I have always been a fan of Envy, I used this Rush once in the past, but I only had a sample and I got this one recently for 100 ml for close to 100 dollars, I liked it, pity that it is no longer produced along with Envy.

• Espartaco

  March 4, 2017

  

  Gucci Rush was pure drug. That sensation of boiling gums before doing something ‘bad’… can that apply to a perfume? I’d attribute it along with its brother from the era, By from D&G. I had both, switched between them, and although I’m older now and wouldn’t use such youthful perfumes, I’ve caught myself thinking ‘bloody hell, that smelled so good’… They are cyber-woody, premeditatedly synthetic, aniseed like a Fifth Element lotion, artificially talcated and varnished with transparencies, disco lights, and R&B youthful swagger. Capturing your moment in a perfume. Rush managed to make the wood sticky, like gum you can’t get off, but it didn’t smell sweet; rather of woods, lavender, cedar, and cypress in an acute and insolent way… a hybrid child of its time. Like By from D&G, it was a handsome, cool young man, confident to the point of wearing a transparent floral shirt. Masculine perfumes but tremendously feminine, like a peacock. It lasted two days, poor thing. And I miss it so much. What a quantity of longed-for perfumes Tom Ford made at Gucci: fragrances that didn’t ask for apologies, overwhelming, furious, sexual, hedonistic, and luxurious.

• Espartaco

  March 8, 2017

  

  Gucci Rush was a drug. That sensation of gums boiling and secreting saliva before doing something ‘bad’… can that be applied to a perfume? I attribute it along with its sibling from the same era, By for D&G. I had both, I went from one to the other, and although now I am seventeen years older and don’t wear such blatantly youthful perfumes more than once, I have caught myself thinking ‘bloody hell, this smelled so good’… Cybernetic woody, aromatic, and premeditatedly synthetic, aniseed like a lotion from Luc Besson’s The Fifth Element, talcated in an artificial way and passed through a varnish of transparencies, disco lights, and R&B youthful swagger, which was what was in vogue in its year. Capturing your moment in a perfume. Rush managed to make the wood sticky, like a piece of gum you can’t get off, yet it didn’t smell sweet in the least, but of woods, lavender, cedar, cypress in an acute and insolent manner… a hybrid child of its time. Gucci Rush like By for D&G was a handsome, cool young man who was so sure of himself he had no problem wearing a transparent floral shirt. Masculine perfumes but tremendously feminine, like a peacock. It lasted two days, poor thing. And I miss it so much. What a quantity of longed-for perfumes Tom Ford created at Gucci, fragrances that didn’t ask for apologies to enter a place, overwhelming, furious, sexual, hedonistic, and well-luxurious…

• MarcusRS

  June 1, 2017

  

  Gucci Rush opens with a deep and saturated impression of a wood touched by an aged, or rather, adult patchouli, where a fleeting and basic lavender appears briefly to give way to a saturated set of boreal order. The whole is encased in a dry, unbarnished cedar wood, rather lean and plain, through which the green notes of juniper and cypress filter, conferring a slightly minty and dry, very beautiful edge. Its overall performance is slightly below average, but nothing that over-application cannot resolve. Gucci Rush for Men, unlike its female counterpart, seems to focus on opposites: it is sober and elegant, contrasting the irreverent and portentous sexuality of its sister. In short, this beauty may owe its fame to the harmonic simplicity its aroma projects, which has very close crossovers with Gucci pour Homme I, especially in the advanced dry down. Gucci Rush is not a must-have scent, but if you collect, turn over stones; search, dig… If you find it at a good price, buy it with your eyes closed. Semi-formal to formal.

• MarcusRS

  June 8, 2017

  

  Gucci Rush Rush begins with a deep wood touched by an adult patchouli, where a basic and fleeting lavender gives way to a saturated set of Nordic order. Everything is wrapped in dry, lean, and smooth cedar, through which green notes of juniper and cypress filter, giving a lovely mentholated and dry edge. Its performance is slightly below average, but over-applying fixes it. Unlike its feminine version, this is sober and elegant, contrasting with the irreverent sexuality of its sister. Perhaps its fame stems from that harmonic simplicity; it has very close similarities to Gucci Pour Homme I when dried. It’s not a must-have, but if you collect, it’s a stone-turner. If you find it cheap, buy it blind. Semi-formal to formal.

• Bofifa

  July 21, 2017

  

  The first thing that catches the eye when applying this perfume is its timidity. You immediately realise it will be stuck to the skin all the time. The aroma, at first glance, doesn’t seem special either: a very timid green where only the edges of the cypress shine. But oh, friend, wait for the dry down. A creamy incense appears, very delicate, supported by woods under a sky of starry cypress. Three very concrete elements that compose a fragrance so minimalist it seems you’ve put on a mathematical formula. Gucci Rush is very much of the early 2000s, when this type of Japanese-aesthetic perfumes were abundant, proposed for the emerging male metrosexual, single, and with money in his pocket. It is a hyperrealistic photograph of that era, and it is normal that many were discontinued when the moment passed. Gucci Rush for Men compensates its ethereal character, almost like a skin cream, with quite good longevity and, above all, a bomb-proof likability. The truth is this little one has charisma, it goes down well, to the point that its character makes one forget the lukewarmness of its performance. I liked it, honestly.

• FanDeDuneVintage

  April 5, 2018

  

  To be frank, I expected more from this highly sought-after Gucci perfume, whose legend benefits from being discontinued and having launched when Tom Ford was at the house. The scent is interesting, attractive, and sophisticated. It features a rich creamy sandalwood (faintly incensed), contrasted with an oily cedar and a wild, green cypress (which reminds me of Rochas Aquaman), along with juniper, forming a very pleasant dry mentholated tone. In short, a striking and unusual blend. Its bottle reinforces its singularity; with a minimalist look, it seems to distance itself from 20th-century aromas, announcing it belongs to the new millennium, direct and less ornate, without losing beauty. Its drawback? A precarious performance on my skin. I like it, but apparently I don’t like it enough, as it lingers for less than 3 hours and bids farewell succinctly. As longevity isn’t its strength, it falls below other Guccis like Nobile, Envy For Men, or Guilty Absolute, which I consider excellent. Rush For Men is a well-crafted scent, but overall it falls short. Rating: 7.5/10.

• FanDeDuneVintage

  April 21, 2018

  

  To be frank, I expected a bit more from this highly sought-after Gucci perfume, whose legend is widely bolstered by its discontinuation and its emergence when Tom Ford was part of the creative staff at the house. As for the aroma, yes, very interesting; attractive and sophisticated. It presents a rich creamy sandalwood (faintly incensed), contrasted with an oily cedar and a wild cypress (which reminds one a bit of its behaviour in Rochas Aquaman), along with juniper, forming a dry, minty tone that is very pleasant. In short, a striking and not entirely usual blend. Its bottle reinforces its singularity; with a minimalist appearance, it seems to mark a distance from twentieth-century aromas, announcing that it belongs to the twenty-first century, to a new millennium, where that ‘baroque’ had fallen out of use to show itself more direct and less ornate, without dispensing with beauty. Its drawback? A fairly precarious performance, at least on my skin. I like this fragrance, but apparently I don’t like it as much as it likes me, because it lingers on me for no more than 3 hours and then departs swiftly, bidding a brief farewell. As durability is not its strong suit, it sits below other Guccis such as Nobile, Envy For Men, and the recent Guilty Absolute, which I consider splendid. Rush For Men is undoubtedly a scent crafted with care, but I feel that, in general terms, it falls short. Rating: 7.5/10

• georgequeue

  April 23, 2018

  

  I had the opportunity to try Gucci Rush For Men last week, as my brother has a 50 ml bottle. I sprayed it on my wrist on Sunday night, and by the next day, it was still faintly perceptible. It is a very pleasant and singular aroma, with a certain similarity to Boss Bottled due to its woody notes; cypress, incense, and cedar predominate, with a fresh and original camphoraceous touch. However, after 40-60 minutes, it feels generic and somewhat dull. The projection and trail are very low for a perfume sold at astronomical prices today, which is why I understand it has been discontinued; Gucci Rush is a very beautiful perfume, but stingy due to its pale performance, which does not justify its status as an object of cult. In summary, it was good to know this fragrance, but it is NOT worth spending so much money on it, especially given how little it offers. For the price, I would prefer other alternatives like Jules or M7. Fragrance: 8/10 Longevity: 6/10 Projection: 3/10 Trail: 3/10 Value for Money: 3/10 Average: 4.6/10

• AntonioLeón

  November 8, 2024

  

  Sandalwood is my favourite wood, sweet and serene. What’s better? Oud? I doubt it; sandalwood is more bearable and versatile. It’s a discontinued fragrance, but its legacy lives on in dupes, as in my case, so I’m not 100% sure, trusting that the dupes are faithful to the few fragrances I’ve confirmed. To the point: if asked whether I prefer Santal 33 or Gucci Rush, I choose Rush. Not only because I don’t like 33, but because Rush goes much further. From start to finish, sandalwood is the protagonist: it opens with a sharp, fresh, and spicy sandalwood that dries quickly leaving almost only sandalwood with a bit of cedar. It gives me the sensation of a green, fresh, and rainy place. Its trail and longevity are poor, and that’s to be expected, not just because it’s a dupe but because of dry ingredients. It’s for those who like sandalwood and fresh, woody scents, to smell and reapply; ideal for cloudy and cold days or in wooded areas. Now that it’s starting to get cold and cloudy, I think these days will be the perfect moment to apply it.

• AntonioLeón

  November 16, 2024

  

  Sandalwood is my favourite wood, a sweet and serene wood. What could be better than that? Oud? I doubt it; sandalwood is more bearable and versatile. A discontinued fragrance whose legacy remains alive in dupes, as was my case when I discovered it, so I’m not entirely sure about the fidelity of the clones, but anyway, to the point: If I were asked whether I prefer Santal 33 or Gucci Rush, I would definitely choose Rush, not only because I don’t like 33, but because Rush goes much further. From start to finish, the sandalwood is the protagonist: it opens with a sharp, fresh, and spicy top note, then dries down quickly leaving almost only the sandalwood with a touch of cedar; it gives me the sensation of a green, fresh, and rainy place. Its trail and longevity are very poor, which is to be expected not only because it is a dupe but because it is a fragrance made of dry ingredients. It is for those who like sandalwood and fresh, woody scents, for someone to smell around their head and reapply, ideal for cloudy and cold days, much better in wooded areas (to give just one scenario, because I don’t live in such a place haha, now that it’s starting to get cold and somewhat cloudy, I think these days will be the perfect moment).

• FanDeDuneVintage

  December 10, 2024

  

  Olfactory immaturity plays tricks on us, I declare it personally. At this stage, it’s painfully obvious that the true grace of a scent lies in the harmony between notes, the uniqueness and creativity of its assembly, in setting itself apart from the conventional, and the sheer pleasure it brings to the nose. I’m talking about attributes that turn a perfume into a cherished piece, hard to imitate, almost irreplaceable; and of those, I’ve had the fortune to know and own many. That’s why I believe so many discontinued fine perfumes end up becoming objects of cult and incessant searching. Gucci Rush for Men is a quintessential example of what I want to express. It is an exemplar whose execution embodies meticulousness, creativity, talent, passion, and emotion. From the very first second until the end of its cycle on the skin, it delivers strokes of class and joy. The lavender-cypress combo generates a fascinating contrast between cleanliness and boreal freshness, with the exquisite softness of sandalwood raising the bar, accompanied by woody notes that confer a fascinating smoky backdrop. It is admirable that a perfume so expressive and rounded exists with so few notes. Many of us have taken years to understand that beauty does not reside strictly in performance and potency, properties easily achieved with cheap fixatives (think of Arabic perfumery, for example). It has become a feat to find fragrances that everyone notices and that last hours; many brands aim for that, resulting in repetitive and predictable perfumes that sideline quality. That is why niche perfumery is positioning itself strongly among collectors seeking to distance themselves from what is easily available. I like a Mexican expression a lot: ‘How beautiful is beautiful!’ Gucci Rush for Men brings that phrase to mind. Its making speaks of a complex process to achieve an apparent simplicity, a simplicity with deep layers and laden with excellence. Simplicity and complexity fuse to materialise this splendid perfume. Rating: 9.5/10