Men
Nudiflorum
Acordes principales
Descripción
Nudiflorum by Nasomatto is a musky floral woody fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2018, this composition was created by perfumer Alessandro Gualtieri. Its olfactive structure unfolds with a top note of rhubarb, giving way to a heart of raspberry, amyl salicylate and rose. The base reveals a combination of leather, animalic notes, oakmoss and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Nudiflorum y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
15 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Trying it right now and what a delight. It’s not the sweet floral I expected, but something intense, oriental, with a dirty and animalic touch. I can’t find the official note list, but my inexperienced nose detects jasmine, rose, oud, leather, resins, woods, and musk. It reminds me of an oriental I tried but can’t recall… Huberta by Kelsey Berwin? Mmm, I think so. They’re not the same, but that mix of flowers with oud and resins is very similar. Nudiflorum is more potent, intense, creamy, and dirty, but they have a point in common. Has anyone who has tried both confirmed? And most importantly, has anyone cracked the code on its notes? Scent: 10, Longevity: 10, Sillage: 8, Value for money: 5, Versatility: 6, Overall: 8.5
Trying it right now and what a delight. It’s not a soft, sweet floral as I expected, but an intense, oriental perfume with a very dirty, animalic nuance. I can’t find the official note list, but my inexperienced nose detects jasmine, rose, oud, leather, resins, woods, and musk. It reminds me of an oriental I tried, could it be Huberta by Kelsey Berwin? Mmm, I think so. They’re not the same, but that mix of flowers with oud and resins is very similar. Nudiflorum is more potent, intense, creamy, and dirty, but it has that little point of similarity. Has anyone who has tried both confirmed? And most importantly, has anyone cracked the code on its notes? Scent: 10, Longevity: 10, Sillage: 8, Value for money: 5, Versatility: 6, Overall: 8.5
Sounds like a blatant copy of Soleil by Jeddah and Nur by SHL, with slight variations but the concept is identical; I’d stick with Humbert Lucas’s versions. The official notes aren’t listed anywhere, except on noseparis: rhubarb, raspberry, rose, salicylate, animalic, cedar, leather, oakmoss. To me, olfactorily, it’s leather, lemon, and chamomile with that oakmoss and a touch of birch giving it a smoky nuance. It’s fairly linear: starts citrusy, then floral from the chamomile, and as it dries, the leather becomes dry and rough. Aside from that, it evolves little. Performance is brutal, above average; two sprays last the day and the projection is beastly. Unisex? To me, it leans more masculine due to that smoky leather, but it’s subjective. Clearly a winter fragrance, at most autumn; although I’ve used it in spring, not in heat. Personally, I prefer Soleil by Jeddah: it has more nuances, better evolution, and higher-quality notes, it smells rounder. Still, it’s a worthy perfume, although the price is outrageous.
Sounds like a blatant copy of Soleil by Jeddah and Nur by Stéphane Humbert Lucas, with slight variations but the concept is identical. I’d stick with the SHL ones. The notes aren’t listed anywhere, except on noseparis (not sure if they’re correct): rhubarb, raspberry, rose, salicylate, animalic, cedar, leather, oakmoss. To me, it smells of leather, lemon, and chamomile (shared with the aforementioned) plus a touch of oakmoss and perhaps birch, giving it a smoky nuance. It’s fairly linear: starts citrusy, then floral from the chamomile, and finally dries down to smoky, dry, rough leather. Little change in evolution. Performance is very good, above average; two sprays last all day and it projects massively. Unisex? To me, it leans more masculine due to that marked, smoky leather, though it’s subjective. Clearly a winter fragrance, maybe autumn; although I’ve used it in spring, avoid it in heat. Personally, I prefer Soleil by Jeddah: it has more nuances, better evolution, and higher-quality notes. I like how it smells more; it’s rounder. Still, it’s a worthy perfume, although the price is outrageous.
Vegetal aroma over a base of oud and leather with a strange floral touch; honestly, it doesn’t work for me as a fragrance. Rating: ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
A vegetal aroma over a base of oud-leather and a strange floral. Personally, I don’t like it as a fragrance. Rating: ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
Fantastic fragrance, delicious floral animalic. Putting it on reminded me of Charade by Sahara Baker; it smells very similar, I detect lots of neroli with that animalic part. It’s linear, evolves little; starts with citrus, then the leather and neroli with cedar come out. Smells good, it’s sexy, performs well on skin but doesn’t project much. Scent: 8/10, Longevity: 9/10, Projection: 6/10, Presentation: 9/10 (RECOMMENDED).
What a beast, a super rich floral-animalic. The moment I put it on, I was instantly reminded of Sahara Baker’s Charade; it smells identical. Although it doesn’t state it contains neroli, I can detect it very strongly, blended with that animalic facet. It’s linear, evolving only as it dries down; initially there are citrus notes, then leather and neroli emerge prominently with cedar. Smells fantastic. In my view, it’s a sexy scent. Lasts incredibly well on the skin, though it doesn’t project much. Scent: 8/10 Longevity: 9/10 Projection: 6/10 Presentation: 9/10 (RECOMMENDED)
They say it’s intimacy and bare skin, but here the only thing bare is the perfume. It’s unrefined and unpolished: brash flowers, full-on sandalwood, and quinoline for the leather. Nothing works well; it smells washed-out. It seems the finish wasn’t considered.
Nudiflorum is an olfactory intimacy, an interpretation of being touched—a caress of bare skin merging with yours. Natural, primitive, and sensual, flowers that lead us to the edge of ecstasy. Despite this, here the only thing that is bare is the perfume itself. Let’s be honest; it cannot be sensual or natural. I’m not talking about ingredients, but the finish. The composition is unbalanced and lacks refinement. There’s a strident floral note at the start due to benzyl acetate, which suggests white flowers, all sitting atop an overdose of sandalwood and plenty of Iso Butyl Quinoline to create a leather effect. Nothing works together; everything overlaps and ends up washed out. They say it’s the tranquility of letting go without limits. That’s what Gualtieri must have felt, unconcerned with limits, finishes, or harmony. Why moderate the Quinoline? Why control the benzyl acetate upon spraying? Undoubtedly, the perfume is bare, but not in a sensual or caressing way. It seems they didn’t bother to think about how it wears in the morning. Regards.
Delightful, lasts all day and my girlfriend notices too. Don’t overthink it: it’s dirty animal leather, sweetened and toned down with flowers. It’s not meant to go unnoticed.
What a gem. The name is misleading; it’s floral only to soften the leather, saffron, and animalic notes. An exquisite, complex, potent, elegant, and very sensual perfume, and I’d say it leans more towards masculine.
Brilliant. The name is misleading: it’s floral only to soften the leather, saffron, and animalic notes. Exquisite, potent, elegant, and sensual, though leaning more towards the masculine side.
Pushed to try it for the rose, but on my skin it’s all glove leather. I like it, but it smells more like a characterful man. Lasts over 8 hours, perfect for the cold.
I was pushed to try it because I love rose, and this one features an aquatic rose. Personally, I detect no rose at all; on my skin, it’s all leather, like wearing leather gloves. I like it, but I see it as more masculine, suited for a man with strong personality. Good longevity and a sillage lasting over eight hours; I’d recommend it for cold weather.