Men
Ungaro pour L’Homme III
Acordes principales
Descripción
Ungaro pour L'Homme III by Emanuel Ungaro is a green aromatic fragrance for men. Launched in 1993, this composition features vodka, lavender, coriander, sage, cedar, orange and lemon (sour lime) in the top notes; rose, geranium, jasmine and lily of the valley (muguet) in the heart; and sandalwood, patchouli, vetiver, oakmoss, cedar and musk in the base.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Vodka
-
Corazón
rose
-
Base
sandalwood
Comunidad
1,531 votos
- Positivo 86%
- Negativo 9.2%
- Neutral 4.9%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Ungaro pour L’Homme III y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Elegant, only for connoisseurs. Its scent is delicate, very masculine, only for a gentleman.
FINALLY!!! At last I have the bottle of the original formula made in France in 1993 (red box, red cap). The first time I bought this fragrance was in the mid-2000s thanks to reviews on this site (the English version I’ve been following for years). I bought it knowing it was a reformulation and I liked it quite a bit. The bottle ran out and I didn’t buy it again; it was a good fragrance but that was it. However, I couldn’t get it out of my head that I needed to try the original formula. A few weeks ago, an enthusiastic friend living in France told me: ‘I have an original Ungaro III from 1993, do you want it?’. I think the answer is obvious… Despite shipping to Mexico, it was over $150, but well, there was the opportunity. As soon as the box arrived, I applied two sprays to my wrist; I must say I was very disappointed at first. It smelled almost identical to Polo Green, completely woody with none of the roses or vodka people talk about. 30 minutes later, OH MY GOD! The scent of roses, lavender and coriander opened up in a super powerful way, not negatively, on the contrary, a delicious scent I never perceived in the reformulated formula. 4-5 hours later it changed to a citrus-musky scent and lasted on my skin for over 14 hours. Projection was over 8 hours. Definitely this original 1993 formula is the best. You’ll hardly find a fragrance more masculine and sexy than Ungaro III. It drives women crazy simply. A MASTERPIECE.
I love it, it makes me feel sober, elegant, a gentleman… and it seems somewhat similar to Chanel Allure Sport, with Allure being stronger. Regards.
It was my first perfume, but it stayed in the past because they didn’t move forward with new fragrances. Nowadays it’s only used by men over 40; I’m not saying it’s bad, it was the trend in the 90s and today it’s not, there are many better ones like the 2015 Dunhill Icon which has a similar (not identical) scent with better longevity. It’s a bit pricey but worth it, you won’t regret using it.
This fragrance is superlative in every way! Masculine, mysterious, sexual, it has something ‘gothic’, I don’t know how to explain it, but it’s the perfume I’d wear in Dracula’s castle. You have to dress in black when wearing it; with other colours I think it wouldn’t match. That rose tone is always nuanced by vodka and cedar, forming a flawless balance. I never thought a fragrance with a rose base would smell so masculine. I don’t consider it suitable for offices… I think it looks better exclusively at night, but that’s my opinion. 10/10.
A hidden gem, it was a total discovery for me. At first, there’s a fleeting citrus-green freshness, but quickly the rose, lavender, and to a lesser extent patchouli and vetiver are noticeable, giving it depth. It’s a classic yet original and avant-garde scent; the rose is the protagonist, dark and masculine, dominating the heart and giving it a distinctive touch. At first glance it seems classic, but the peculiarities of its aroma make it stand out, giving it unique and addictive originality. It has the potential to captivate; the rose is exquisitely crafted and doesn’t smell feminine at all. It’s a classy, reliable, masculine and original perfume that doesn’t disappoint. Indispensable.
A great discovery for me. Truly a hidden gem and a great work of perfumery. It starts with a fleeting citrus-green freshness, but quickly deep nuances emerge such as rose, lavender, and to a lesser extent patchouli and vetiver; together they create a unique and extremely pleasant harmony. It’s classic yet original, conservative yet avant-garde; it sounds contradictory but that’s how it is: it seems like a classic fragrance, but if you stop to reflect, there are many more things happening. What great handling of rose in a men’s perfume; a dark rose dominates the heart, giving it unique and sophisticated originality, purely masculine. It’s reliable in almost all settings and has the capacity to captivate. Indispensable.
I don’t know what’s happening with my sense of smell lately. I tried this perfume and the experience didn’t match the glowing reviews describing an enveloping, boozy scent with a sophisticated rose at niche level. I expected more from a 1996 bottle, when most perfumes performed well. It smells very different and better in the atomiser and box than on the skin. The smell on the cardboard and the initial blast promise a magnificent dry rose with smoky wood, and the matte black bottle with gold details sells elegance. But on the skin, it’s something else: a fresh, citrusy, floral opening, with a soapy lavender that smells like a light cologne, almost like a soft drink. Projection is very shy and fades in under half an hour, leaving a pleasant woody and spicy dry down, but that’s it. After 12 hours, barely a trace remains. It reminds me of Herrera For Men, which shares lavender, lemon, geranium and sandalwood, but without that dense tobacco and sandalwood accord that smells like pencil shavings; this Ungaro has very decaffeinated woods. I see it as versatile, for daily use, without climatic issues or anything making it special, not for special occasions. To be honest, it disappoints me. Perhaps I’ll use it daily. Maybe I rushed my first impression. Scent: 6.5/10, Longevity: 4/10, Projection: 5/10, Versatility: 9/10.
Ungaro Pour L’Homme is woody and floral with fresh spices. It smells wonderful and very masculine, evoking the late 80s and early 90s when florals dominated woods, refreshed with coriander and herbs. Rose and lavender are the star notes. It reminds me of YSL Jazz, Cartier Pasha, or Herrera for Men. It’s fresh, better for daytime, but also works on fresh evenings. Projection is low, lasting only about 45 minutes off the skin, but on skin it lasts over 12 hours. Given the scent and price, it’s worth it, especially if you like classic perfumes.
I’ve been wearing Ungaro III since 1994 and it’s simply delightful. It’s a shame they discontinued I and II, but these are true jewels. Ideal for fresh or cold days.
A slap with a white glove – Chapter III (Ungaro). More than 30 years in the world of aromas have not taken away my confidence in first impressions; I keep stumbling over the same stone. Fortunately, there are fragrances so special that they win us over patiently until we value them. I said in my first review that it was nothing special and that I would empty my vintage bottle from 1996 to make way for something new. How wrong I was! What nonsense I was about to make. It is a liquid concoction with surprising exquisiteness, reaching peaks of delight. It fluctuates between sophisticated freshness and a pleasant floral frame. With sandalwood, patchouli and sage weaving a gallant canvas, it brings to light an intoxicating rose bathed in vodka, plus a clean, coquettish and opulent lavender. In the end, a woody musky base with a soapy touch. Performance: intermediate projection and excellent longevity. I consider it nocturnal, very versatile, with presence at family gatherings, formal events or romantic dates. It integrates elegance with nonchalance. A serious ace up the sleeve. It conveys to me a man with an unforgettable smile and high personal worth. Rating: 10.
With the reformulation, I would wear it on warm nights (spring-summer), something more nocturnal like Declaration Un Soir or Ultime de Galérie Lafayette, for something casual, a party or drinks with friends. I loved it at first sniff.
I was lucky enough to try the 90s formula thanks to a collector friend who sold me a 5 mL sample. It differs in two things: 1. The opening. In the vintage, the lemon is pristine, noticeable and strong; the transitions are slower and more defined. In the current version, from the start it is a conglomerate that does not let the lemon and lavender breathe. 2. The organic sensation. The 90s version has a niche-like creaminess in the heart. Afterwards they are almost identical, with the same longevity and projection. In summary, the reformulation went well; they did not load it up like so many others. It remains a very rich perfume. Very masculine, elegant and comforting.
I don’t know since when it was reformulated and I am unaware of the first version. I tried it a few years ago and tried it again recently. It seemed like a disaster to me. An unpleasant mixture that, fortunately, has little body and presence, so it frees us from its existence. No rose, no lavender, no vodka (haha) or nothing. It is spiced and nonsensical. In terms of quality, it is among the worst. Lamentable performance in trail and longevity, which is good. The only positive: the price. I’m sorry.
Despite the rose which is usually associated with opulent perfumes, this is very calm, nothing exaggerated and even seems muted at times. I have enjoyed it quite a bit; it is fresh but nocturnal. It has major performance issues… I don’t know what happened in another era… it sits watery on the skin. A pity because for the scent and price it would be well recommended. I am sure that at one time it was a great fragrance.
An incredible and cheap perfume, ideal for the battle of love. They say it was reformulated but the fixation is good. Surely any girl who smells it will find it very sexy… although I have used very expensive perfumes and nothing, this one scores higher. Therefore, price does not always indicate quality or guarantee success.
I love it for its versatility; at first it seems simple but hides sophisticated and well-thought-out work. It starts fresh and aromatic, then subtle floral notes enter to give it depth, and finally woods and sandalwood (I don’t detect vetiver). I use it daily, for weekends, romantic dinners and even in summer. It smells delicious, is not intrusive and women find it sexy. All this at an excellent price. A winning formula. I love it! Au revoir.
Not bad, but on my skin it smells stale :S The price is ridiculous and the longevity is equally poor. For the same money, there are better options available.
A timeless classic that never goes out of style. While it bears a slight resemblance to Ralph Lauren Safari, it follows a different path: darker, more intriguing and elegant, with a vintage yet modern air. Ideal for architects, doctors, or lawyers who wish to project success without appearing pretentious. It is the discreet elegance of a accomplished man, not for the young. Best worn at night for formal events. Scent: 9.0, Projection: 7.0, Longevity: 8 hours (from the fourth hour onwards, closer to the skin). Recommended.
One of my all-time favourite fragrances. It brings back the best memories from the 90s. The recent reformulation hasn’t done it as much damage as it has to others. Recommended 200%. I love it and I think I will always wear it.
A woody fragrance that smells like a successful man in a suit. The price is a bargain; it has such a rich, potent scent that it seems worth far more.
Terrible. Smells like pharmacy perfume. Like an old-fashioned English cologne or something similar. I’m shocked it has a 4 out of 5 rating.
I would love to see an EDP version of this fragrance, as the batch I have is terribly short-lived and a real shame… it doesn’t even last on clothes… I have to reapply constantly. Even being generous, it lasts me about three hours with a projection of just one hour, which is extremely poor… it is economical, yes, but it’s not pleasant to keep reapplying so frequently… its scent is a very special spicy, boozy rose, in no way intrusive… very intimate, I’d say too intimate.
Ungaro Pour L’Homme III. I’ve wanted to buy this fragrance for some time but never got around to it until Víctor, a fellow enthusiast, recommended it to me, and I just couldn’t wait any longer. I had to own it. As soon as it arrived and I tested it, it completely turned me upside down; I certainly didn’t expect this scent at all. It begins fresh, very aromatic and floral, with a lavender that is simply outstanding—floral, talc-like, with that soapy note very much present. I suppose the vodka is what gives it that fresh quality; I wouldn’t call it aquatic, but it conveys a similar sensation. After a few minutes, it becomes spicy, the fresh aspect remains, and it acquires a metallic nuance characteristic of geranium. This is where the rose appears, joining the current aroma and contributing its floral character to the composition. Combining the rose with that fresh, slightly metallic and spicy sensation reminded me of Moschino Toy Boy; they aren’t the same, but they share a similar approach to the rose, in a rose-water style. Finally, I must highlight the patchouli, which, although not as perceptible as I would like, is still noticeable. It is earthy and green, carried by a classic facet without any hint of sweetness or chocolate. It has an average longevity, in the middle range… about six hours of wear with a projection of between one and two hours and a moderate sillage. I suppose in the past it would have been something else entirely, at least much more potent than it is now. It is a very versatile fragrance, ideal for use throughout the year, both day and night. As for occasions… It is an elegant scent that won’t look out of place in more casual settings (except for sports). A very solid choice as a signature fragrance. I don’t think it is unisex; despite its heavy floral load, it feels very masculine. Nevertheless, as I always say, ladies, try it and judge for yourselves. If you want to see more related content, pop over to my YouTube channel to see if you like it: Perfúmate Con JL.
The Gentleman of the Rose smells like a million roses bathed in Rock and Roll. JFK, L. Del Rey, a proper classic fougère, similar to Jazz, Pasha, Safari, and others. The opening is astringent with mosses, crushed herbs, and an expectorant, mentholated lavender. Citrus notes and geranium emerge later, reminiscent of masculine herbal soap. In the heart, it leans floral, featuring a prairie hay coumarin with alcoholic undertones, dusted with cedar and mahogany. Finally, everything fades into a dark rose submerged in patchouli and wood, reminding me of some ‘feminine’ fragrances. It is lovely, classic, and elegant. It is certainly old-school, but as it dries down, it softens, becoming slightly more relaxed and even casual. The issue I have with fougères or ‘green aromatic’ scents is that most of them seem very similar, with only subtle nuances distinguishing one from another. For instance, Pasha leans more towards spice, while Safari is greener and more soapy. Ungaro III, on the other hand, is more floral: a dark rose and lavender dancing together in the full moon of the forest.
Over time, my opinion of this fragrance has changed; it is now one of my favourites. The scent seems like the perfect blend of elegance and sexiness; to put it plainly, it smells like a ‘good man’. It’s super versatile, especially for evenings, and smells absolutely delicious.
I wouldn’t call it my favourite fragrance due to its short longevity, but it is undoubtedly my favourite scent. It’s incredibly versatile, sexy, and while somewhat fresh, it always makes it clear that the wearer is a true gentleman. It’s timeless and addictive.
A classic, formal scent that after an hour reminds me of YSL’s Jazz.
Good heavens, it bears no resemblance to Safari, Rochas Aromatic Touch, or Amouage Lyric Man… We’re lightyears away from any of them. Sometimes I wonder if those who vote based on similarities realise they’ve never even heard of the perfumes in question. That said, I have to admit it’s very good. It reminds me of the shaving gels I use: it smells clean and, good heavens, it smells very masculine. Please forgive my aversion to unisex scents, but that just isn’t for me. At first, it’s a little boozy, presumably due to the vodka, with lavender and citrus taking the lead; at times I can detect geranium and rose, and it finishes with the same lavender, vetiver and cedar. All of this, one must admit, does verge on being synthetic… but for the price, one cannot ask for more, can one? In my opinion, the first version of Ungaro Pour L’Homme was the best of them all. But the truth is, it’s a pleasant, masculine fragrance, and from time to time, it earns you one or two compliments.
What a wonderful scent! I’ve been wearing it for over a decade since my twenties, and it smells nothing like anything else I’ve tried. Perhaps it bears a slight resemblance to other barbershop fragrances such as Ungaro III, but it isn’t very similar to any classic. I buy it, finish it, and repurchase it a year or two later; every time I wear it, I remember why I’ve owned at least five bottles. It’s not a beast in projection, but it lasts a long time, luckily. I’ve just managed to get the Bold and Gold version, which is no longer bottled but still available, and I recommend it more because it’s denser and projects better. The notes are spot on: Estelar rose, a scent I adore and which I believe is the vodka note, some sandalwood and lavender. For me, it’s timeless and elegant.
A wonderful scent that reminds me of my father, who used it before passing away at 54 years old. Masculine, elegant, complex, warm, and woody scent.
I think anyone looking for a fragrance wants that small moment of happiness when atomising it. Ungaro III since the 90s manages to draw a smile from ear to ear on me. It is not only timeless, it is fine in all aspects, smelling like a hyper-luxury barbershop. It projects enough to leave a memory on whoever wears it. I do not enter into reformulation topics because I simply do not like them and I think profiting or saying that a batch is better is just to raise prices and deceive the consumer. The story of Ungaro III is not erased even with thousands of reformulations. How many fragrances would wish to transcend as it has done, is doing, and will continue to do this beauty.
For the price paid, it is an excellent fragrance very easy to wear with everyday life. Too fresh and it suits me well being a teenager; I have received many compliments. After the first two hours, it radiates a lot leaving a trail. It is also a very uncommon scent. Excellent perfume.
Wow! What a scent. At some point, I felt a similar one on my father; that evokes memories and feelings. It is an excellent fragrance for the price paid. If you like citrus and woods, it is a safe blind buy.
A very masculine opening scent, a bit strong for my taste, but it softens as the hours pass. I believe lavender predominates and I find a resemblance to Carolina Herrera for Men, only more intense. I would not buy it again.
Poor longevity and a soft trail. It is a classic fragrance for personal enjoyment. It is a wonderful old-school masculine fragrance with a predominance of lavender and the retro notes already mentioned. Avoid if you prefer trendy sweet scents; you will love it if you want something subtle but classy and unconventional these days. I am commenting on the current version. Do not confuse it with the initial versions from decades ago which are no longer available. You will not be annoying because it stays on the skin instantly, leaving a scent so pleasant that you will want to replicate it always, despite its poor performance.
It has an old-school vibe from the 80s and 90s, classic, green, and 100% fougère. Very mature and masculine, smelling of citrus with geranium, rose, and herbal and woody notes; very much in the line of 80s powerhouse fragrances like YSL Jazz, Ralph Lauren Safari, and the recent Cartier Pasha, but fresher and less heavy. Lasts 6-7 hours without problems. You need character to wear it daily if you are under 40. If you like the previous ones, go for it. Also, it is economical. Today, as happens with Maison Emanuel Ungaro, it is difficult to find. Look for it, it is worth it. Runaways, fashionistas, or fans of sweet chicle scents, stay away.
It has a green note but it is not vintage; I see it as current, although I have been wearing it for a few years. It is not like Quorum or Paco Rabanne Pour Homme. It has a modern green note and dries down to a barbershop fragrance. It reminds me a lot of Tous Man Intense, although it doesn’t have its performance, but its opening is richer. It is good for work, nothing strident, lasts 6 hours without problems, and has a very reasonable price. There are many in that league, but this one stands there.
In my opinion, it is an old-school scent. The opening is a slightly bitter explosion with citrus and vodka, and as it dries down, it leaves that woody accord with a very striking and elegant rose. Special for a night out.
I’ve had this bottle of Ungaro III since 2019, and to be honest, I didn’t give it a second glance until the end of 2025. Now that I truly know it, it’s a good fragrance: it smells wonderful, with rose and geranium notes over wood with a green touch. It smells like the 90s, but it doesn’t go out of fashion; it’s different from what is worn today. Ideal for the office and intermediate seasons. The trail is very masculine and pleasant. For the price, it offers much more than it costs, and no one will smell exactly like you. JGS