Men
Angel Schlesser Femme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Angel Schlesser Femme by Angel Schlesser is an aldehydic floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1999, the nose behind this composition is Alberto Morillas. The top notes reveal juniper, bergamot, mandarin and orange blossom; the heart unfolds with woody notes, Jamaican pepper and valley lily (lily of the valley); while the base notes close the olfactory pyramid with sage, musk and cardamom.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
- Salida Juniper
-
Corazón
woody notes
-
Base
sage
Comunidad
2,102 votos
- Positivo 79%
- Negativo 16%
- Neutral 5.2%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Angel Schlesser Femme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Smells incredibly unisex, leaning more towards a man than a woman.
Although considered feminine, I also think it works perfectly on men… I believe it’s the cardamom that gives it that masculine touch.
This fragrance is part of my uniform. It doesn’t overwhelm the air, and when I put it on, it gives me the confidence that no one will get a headache. I can’t quite describe it, but it adds a touch of seriousness.
A pleasant and austere fragrance. For those who appreciate musk and sturdy scents, less delicate, tending towards unisex due to woody notes. It’s an eau de toilette of moderate longevity, quite light but without any surprises. It offers nothing innovative or striking. A good option to smell pleasant, without more.
Excellent value for money. It smells clean and has character. Personally, I don’t wear it with evening gowns, but it’s perfect for work mornings.
I also owned the miniature version; it smelled very soft and clean with citrus notes, with a unisex touch.
This perfume is green yes totally green. It’s fresh like a walk early in the morning by a river. It opens very citrusy but soon transforms into something vegetal though it remains citrusy. Very unisex; if I didn’t know it was a women’s perfume I’d think it was for a man. It’s fresh perfect for spring and summer. It doesn’t have great longevity or trail but it’s pleasant. Ideal for the office or doing the shopping in the morning. I wouldn’t wear it to go out because I prefer more striking perfumes but I recognise it smells good and is wearable. Good option.
For me this fragrance is green floral not aldehydic. It smells of white flowers with a citrus touch that evolves into woods along with what seems to be black pepper (I was surprised to read that). Like other comments I see it as unisex because of that woody note. It’s fresh and suitable for almost any occasion. On me although the trail is soft the longevity is good.
Angel Schlesser Femme is a dry, austere citrus-woody scent. I consider it unisex. It’s not sweet or romantic. Perfect for everyday wear. It evokes for me a personality that is neat, meticulous, and detail-oriented; in the workplace, she is appreciated for being efficient and decisive, and in her private life for having a relaxed and approachable attitude. I’d compare it to a white shirt: depending on how you wear it, it can give an image that is more sober or more relaxed, but it always remains neat and fresh… I would never wear this fragrance for a romantic date or a formal dinner, but I think it could be a good card for an interview or a business lunch, and to look good in any situation when you don’t know what perfume to wear. I like it very much. Although its line doesn’t belong to the perfumes that are currently in fashion, I think it can have its place in any wardrobe. The bottle identifies the fragrance it contains completely: minimalist, austere, clean, straight lines.
Angel Schlesser Femme is a citrus woody dry and austere fragrance. I consider it unisex. It’s not sweet or romantic perfect for everyday wear. It evokes a neat meticulous and detail-oriented person; efficient at work and relaxed in private life. I’d compare it to a white shirt: sober or relaxed depending on how you wear it but always clean. I’d never wear it for a date or a gala dinner but it’s a good ace for interviews or business lunches when you don’t know what to wear. I like it a lot. Although it’s not in fashion I think it has its place in any wardrobe. The bottle is minimalist austere and clean with straight lines that totally identify the fragrance.
Perhaps one of the best Spanish perfumes in history. I wonder if I’m being objective about Angel Schlesser Femme when it contains everything I love in a scent that conjures comfort and safety, far from the ugliness and filth of the world. It’s a woody, almost edible fragrance, in the style of CK One or Colonia Intensa; just smelling it makes you want to throw in the towel for a siesta or bite someone’s neck. I’m fascinated. As previous reviews say, it’s totally unisex. It’s a comfortable, plush composition of woody notes with a gaseous, almost effervescent touch thanks to the juniper and bergamot, which instead of shining on their own enhance the rest of the notes, giving them spiced and luminous sparkles, bordering on a gaseous, natural wood. The dry-down is glorious: fragments of musk and cardamom that make you think of nice things, a newborn baby, a white shirt, those sheets that have absorbed the scent of the sleeper’s skin but still retain traces of the soap used to wash them… if I make an abstract, cinematic idea of what the Christian Heaven must smell like, it probably smells like Angel Schlesser Femme. There’s nothing in this fragrance that makes you think of bad things, and yet it’s not bland or innocuous, as it has a perceptibly erotic, herbaceous, and sulphurous nature. To put it simply: a minimalist, charming, intellectual, and super relaxing eau de toilette. PS. The longevity is quite poor, unfortunately.
Perhaps one of the best Spanish perfumes ever. I don’t know if I’m objective about having everything I like in a water that makes you imagine comfort far from the dirt of the world. Femme is woody and almost edible in the style of CK One or Colonia Intensa; when you smell it you feel like sleeping or biting a stranger’s neck. I’m fascinated. It’s unisex as the reviews say. A comfortable plush mix of woods with a gaseous effervescent edge thanks to the juniper and bergamot which boost the notes with spiced and luminous distillations. The dry-down is glorious: musk and cardamom that evoke nice things a newborn baby a white shirt or sheets with the scent of the sleeper’s skin… if the Christian heaven smells like anything it smells like this. Nothing bad but not innocent either; it has an erotic herbaceous and sulphurous touch. Minimalist enchanting intellectual and super relaxing. PS: The longevity is quite poor.
Despite the winter I’ve bought the little bottle of Femme again the one I usually keep for spring. I was dying for that freshness amidst so many dense perfumes. It is citrusy yes but with a woody base that gives it a special warmth ideal for both everyday wear and something more romantic. It seduces without trying like a pretty woman with just her boyfriend’s jumper open. It’s a pity the longevity and trail are weak because otherwise it’s almost perfect.
Beautiful neat clean special. It smells of simplicity in the best sense. It’s a white scent pristine it makes me think of minimalism: a bright room with linen curtains large windows where fresh air and morning dew enter where sunlight is glimpsed among the foliage of the trees and where a sense of silence and stillness prevails.
It was my scent for a long time; it’s a marvel. It’s the perfect clean scent, not the smell of freshly washed clothes nor Marseille soap nor the musks of Narciso Rodríguez. It has a natural neatness that is astonishing. When you already think it stays at that clean scent is when the base notes appear, giving it a brutal elegance. It’s not an expensive perfume, but it deserves every penny paid for it.
It was my scent for a long time it’s a wonder. It’s the perfect clean scent: it’s not the smell of freshly washed clothes nor Marseille soap nor the musks of Narciso Rodríguez. It has a natural neatness that astonishes. When you already think it stays at that clean scent is when the base notes appear that give it brutal elegance. It’s not an expensive perfume but it deserves every penny paid for it.
Beautiful, neat, clean, special. It smells of simplicity in the best possible sense. It’s a white, pristine scent that makes me think of minimalism, a bright room with linen curtains, large windows letting in the freshest air and the morning dew, where sunlight is glimpsed through the foliage of trees and where a sense of silence and stillness prevails.
Very fresh lemony clean and its scent lasts quite a while. Everyone likes it.
I don’t know if they’ve reformulated it for the better but it has a quite decent trail. I also don’t find it as masculine as I thought at the time (maybe I’ve changed). I bought it without thinking.
Smells clean delicate woods would be very versatile but I wear it little because it has something synthetic in its scent that I can’t bear and it drives me up the wall.
If I had to choose one of the worst perfumes I’ve had it would be this. Tasteless with hardly any scent or at least no rich scent. Too fresh as if you were wearing water it doesn’t make you feel special or different the opposite of sexy. At most I’d use it to go to the beach.
If I had to choose one of the worst perfumes I’ve had, it would be this one. Insipid, with hardly any scent, or at least, without a rich scent, too fresh, as if you were wearing water almost; it doesn’t make you feel special or different, the opposite of sexy. At most, I would use it to go to the beach or something similar.
Couldn’t agree more with Spartacus: it is undoubtedly the most surprising perfume I’ve come across in a long time. I know I’m late it’s been on the market for over 20 years and has probably undergone reformulations so I can’t compare but the one on sale today seems a genius. Its opening is citrusy and invades you without mercy making you think it’s fresh summery and youthful but after a few minutes the scent begins to mutate I say begins because it never ceases to evolve into something quite different. The dry-down is extraordinary of an elegance and refinement unequalled where the woody notes take centre stage. From then on you can’t help but bring your nose to your wrist to discover a new and suggestive tone every now and then. It’s tremendously chameleonic. Alberto Morillas would have embroidered it if its longevity and sillage were more intense as on my skin I feel it for about 5 hours and then the magic dissipates. Still it will be my next acquisition as the price seems ridiculous compared to such a masterpiece.
They gave it to me along with the lotion centuries ago and it didn’t thrill me. As one should be grateful when born good I wore it until I finished it. I wouldn’t do it today I suppose I’m not so well-born anymore. I hated it so much that I walked past whenever I saw the bottle. Many years like that. Poetically fate wanted our paths to cross again. They gave it to me once more from someone who did it with great enthusiasm so I had to open it in front of her and say the expected ‘how delicious’ and show myself grateful. Forced to bring out the well-born one. I cursed inwardly and proceeded. ‘Oh-how-delicious… wait… hey but how good!!!!’. It happens to more than one. I don’t know if my sense of smell has changed if my taste has refined or if it’s the reformulation. I also didn’t dislike the person who gave it to me the first time he’s still my husband so that’s not it. Redundant to say it won’t please everyone; to me it comes across as cold. Not in the sense that it’s only for high temperatures which it isn’t. It opens citrusy and evolves into pleasant woods. I detect little of the flowers and something of cardamomo at the base. That with my wretched nose. Clean but not soapy. Dry and yet creamy. Elegant but informal. Delightfully confusing yet simple. Different without fuss. And what a bad describer I am. So try it and judge. I’m just the messenger. For an EdT it has decent performance; many current EdPs would envy it. Glad to have made peace and to enjoy it so much.
They gave it to me centuries ago along with the body lotion. I wasn’t exactly thrilled. As one is taught, being grateful is proper, so I wore it and endured it until it ran out. These days, I wouldn’t do such a thing; I suppose I’ve stopped being well-bred. I hated it. Both this Femme, and by unjust extension the house in general, which I quickly walked past whenever I saw it. And so it was for many, many years. Poetically speaking, fate wanted our paths to cross again. They gave it to me once more. Besides, it was from someone who was gifting it to me with great enthusiasm, so I had to open it in front of them, try it, and say the expected ‘oh-how-rich’, and show myself extremely grateful for such a ‘correct’ choice. I was obliged to bring out the well-bred one. I cursed inwardly and proceeded. ‘Oh-how-rich’… wait… let me see… hey, but what good!!!! It’s happened to more than one of you with some perfume or other. Nothing new. I don’t know if my sense of smell has changed, if my taste has refined, or if I can use the already worn-out excuse of reformulation. The person who gave it to me the first time didn’t make a bad impression on me either. Today, he’s still my husband, so that’s not it. I have no idea. Redundant to say it won’t be to everyone’s taste; to me, it seems like a cold fragrance. Not in the sense that it’s indicated for high temperatures exclusively, which it isn’t. Although it opens citrusy, it evolves into pleasant woods. I detect few flowers, and at the base something of cardamom. That with my wretched nose. Clean, but not soapy. Dry and yet creamy. Elegant but informal too. Delightfully confusing yet simple. Different without fuss. And what a bad job I’m doing describing it. So you know: try and judge. I’m just the messenger. For an EdT, it has decent performance; many current EdPs would envy it, unfortunately. Happy to have made peace and to be enjoying it so much.
The original is one of my favourites: it has character and elegance with a trail and longevity that are brutal and last all day. Ideal for summer and spring as it’s super fresh but the new formula has nothing to do with it. I’m disappointed because it’s lost all its personality and originality. Now it smells less citrusy almost lacks woody notes and smells clean as if you were wearing a normal body lotion. Before it was empowering and more unisex which I loved. If you can get the old version I recommend it 100% to stand out and smell different but the new one isn’t even remotely good.
The bergamot hits me hard; it’s fresh and unisex but I don’t see anything special about it. It smells like flat lemon almost without nuances. To me it sounds like White Tea although others say it’s similar I don’t believe it. White Tea is softer creamier and prettier.