Chypre-Siam

3 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

• ngarcia

  August 28, 2021

  

  Initially, a handmade chypre with a Manuel Cross-style oakmoss punch and that Kaffir lime I had never smelled before; it is exquisite, citrusy but not piercing, with body. The opening is a spectacle; it smells of civet but not dirty; it is classic yet modern, with a niche feel. After 45 minutes, it becomes creamy thanks to the ylang-ylang and a touch of benzoin, improving the blend with the citrus. It remains advanced and classic (not much, in my opinion, but it seems so). I recommend everyone tries it; for daily wear, you must see if it suits your style. From the second hour, a soapy and elegant phase emerges due to shy jasmine and emerging sandalwood. The following hour marks the negative part: the rich creaminess unravels, the freshness recedes and gives way to an animal leather that dominates everything from the 4th hour, lasting until 10+ hours. I like the opening more than Mousse Illuminée, but Mousse lasts better. A great perfume, worthy of trying and with a justified price. Scent: 7.9 (would rise if it lasted longer). Longevity: 8.6 (10+ with the leather). Sillage: 7.6. Emotional impact: Yes. Originality: 7.1. Price: 156€/75ml. Recommended: Medium-High.

• svazquez7

  June 8, 2023

  

  Chypre Siam is a rare chypre. It doesn’t revolutionise perfumery, but it is admirable that it revives the vintage essence that LMVH, L’Oréal and others have destroyed over the years. From the Mitsouko line, the lime (very strong) is almost linear, one of the best I have smelled from this indie house. The only downside is the price; we shall see when I try it in spray.

• jerry drake

  October 12, 2023

  

  If you’ve ever dreamed of a golden-era oakmoss chypre, you have two options: hunt down a very old vintage or turn to Manuel Cross. Imagine Chypre Siam as a rebellion against the bureaucracy that protects us from ingredients supposedly harmful to health, banned after causing allergies in 3-5% of people (curiously, after trying many perfumes, my only issues have been with three modern ones), so wearing it today has something subversive that multiplies its appeal. Although the oakmoss comes out quite rough and wild, I expected it to be more potent. It begins green and fresh with lime, very herbaceous, probably due to a generous basil note. Then white flowers appear, less prominent than the green, but I clearly detect the ylang and jasmine. The green, dry base of the oakmoss is softened by sandalwood and benzoin, without becoming sweet. The powdery, mossy, leather finish is a delight. It faithfully reflects 70s and 80s myths; if you are an unconditional vintage lover, you can only appreciate it. Performance: just adequate on my skin, nothing dazzling. Is it my problem or has it been reformulated?