Men
A*Men Stellar
Acordes principales
Descripción
A*Men Stellar by Mugler is an oriental fougère fragrance for men. This new creation was launched in 2025. The top notes are pistachio and bergamot; the heart notes, lavender and mint; and the base notes, tonka bean, coffee, styrax and musk.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
366 votos
- Positivo 71%
- Negativo 17%
- Neutral 12%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para A*Men Stellar y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en AmazoneBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBayCaracterísticas
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
18 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:





In the midst of this frenzy of industry launches, Mugler hasn’t fallen behind, releasing two flankers for A*Men, Fantasm and Stellar, at breakneck speed. With Mugler, I have mixed feelings: the exhaustion after the pandemic and the saturation of constant launches are broken by surprises. Angel and Stellar don’t surprise because they’re brilliant, but you can certainly feel the will to create something honest with the house’s stamp. Sugar Star fans can rejoice; the bet on a toasted approach is firm. Stellar is faithful to Mugler’s pillars. Why change what works? In this shower of stars, Mugler’s ship leaves nothing in the wings. Pistachio, the trendy ingredient to re-engage the faithful, adds almond nuances to the lavender and mint. Plus, there are candied citrus peels and tonka bean in the base. The coffee note, almost a wink from the brand, is also present. The fixative on my skin is brutal, between 9 and 10 hours with extra wake-ups. I’d only ask for more risk in the bottle design, perhaps without the rubber casing for the future.
Smells fantastic and lasts incredibly long! However, I don’t detect any pistachio at all. It feels very similar to the original A*Men and at times reminds me of Fantasm. I wish it had more coffee, much more! Still, I’m buying it because I adore the line and this isn’t any less impressive.
It has a spectacular opening: dry, powdery pistachio, earthy and toasted by the coffee. The heart notes give a sweet sensation in its evolution, but it practically ends up avoindled with a very subtle nut, with a powdery sensation as if it were a carnal patchouli. I liked the female version much more and it lasts longer, but this is not bad at all. Now, calling it ‘parfum’ both for the Fantasm and this one is a mockery of what the Thierry Mugler house was, where an Eau de Toilette was already a bomb; imagine a Parfum back then… haha.
For me, it is more correct to say that this is a flanker of the A*Men Fantasm, something that follows the path opened by that original, where the DNA of the original is domesticated and moulded more to current times. What I notice is a very sparkly opening, with a more marked citrus and a transition towards something creamier and spicier than the Fantasm, where the sweetness was more prominent. The coffee note is felt at the start and gradually fades; despite this, I do not see a resemblance to the now-extinct Pure Coffee, which was much more memorable in my opinion. I do see a resemblance with the Fantasm, which shares that patchouli and chocolate skeleton, although in Stellar it has everything except body. When the coffee, mint and fresh notes fade, the perfume is left almost without a soul. Its performance, at least at the beginning of the bottle, is disappointing: it projects little and leaves a pleasant bubble for about 6-7 hours, but you have to get very close. If with just two releases we are like this, I believe L’Oreal should stop releasing a flanker every year and start to blur the work of Clarins with this captivating saga. The Fantasm had charm for adding something different, but here the feeling is that they took the same base and changed four things without complicating themselves. Thierry Mugler was synonymous with transgression and L’Oreal with banality. Definitely, a brand like this should never have fallen into their clutches.
I tried it today and I loved it. It has the same vibe as Fantasm, but it swaps the chocolate for mint; the smell resembles a chlorophyll gum.
I completely agree with the previous review. As an aroma, it is very rich; I like it more than the Fantasm, which I found a bit sweet. I feel it is more masculine and very versatile; I wore it in summer with intense heat without any problems. It lacks a bit in performance; I will have to see how it behaves in cooler temperatures.
I tried it today and I loved it. It has the same vibe as the Fantasm, but it swaps the chocolate for mint; the scent resembles a chlorophyll gum.
It arrived at my place today without me asking and I’m using it intensively. It outperforms Fantasm in performance but doesn’t quite reach the classic status. It’s fruity with that characteristic earthy touch of the Angel line, although it doesn’t declare patchouli. It opens with a strong crunch and something citrusy; there it’s explosive. Then it warms up to a soft coffee and tonka, preceded by mentholated and notable lavender. It has the Mugler magic without being a beast; it’s perceived very well and is striking. It’s something unisex, leaning masculine, to stand out and attract attention. It’s a good Mugler, fortunately.
It arrived unannounced and today I wore it to the full. It outperforms the Fantasm in terms of performance but is not the classic. It is fruity with that typical earthy touch of the Angel line, although it does not say patchouli. It opens strong, crunchy and citrusy, exploding right there. Then it warms up towards a soft coffee and tonka, preceded by a very noticeable mentholated lavender. It has the Mugler magic without being a beast, it is very noticeable and draws attention. Something unisex, with a masculine tendency, to stand out. It is a good Mugler, fortunately.
This perfume is a marvel. I was given a 1.2ml decant for buying the Al Haramain Gold Edition and it’s spectacular. Scent: Wonderful, unique, with quite a sweet smell, but when you feel the pistachio, it highlights incredibly with the coffee and tonka bean adding a sweet and coffee-like touch, and the mint, nothing to say, finishes perfecting this work of art. Longevity: It lasts its 6 hours between clothes and skin without problems and perhaps longer on clothes. Projection: It’s not one of the best, but friend, it’s simply a perfume marvel with mint and pistachio and something sweet, fantastic! Recommended for people aged 18 to 45, I feel it’s youthful-adult and 100% masculine. With a coquettish outfit for a date, I feel this perfume would go phenomenally well. Regards.
Absolute masterpiece. I was given a 1.2ml decant when buying the Al Haramain Gold Edition and it is spectacular. Incredible and unique aroma; although it is sweet, the pistachio stands out incredibly with the coffee and tonka bean, which add sweetness and coffee notes. The mint perfects everything. Longevity: 6 hours on skin and clothes without issues. Projection: not the best, but it is a marvel of a perfume with mint, pistachio and sweetness. Fantastic. Recommended for 18 to 45 years old, youthful-adult and 100% masculine. It would go phenomenally well with a coquettish outfit for a date. Cheers.
Tested on a decant and very surprised: it smells different and out of character for a designer house. Opening is sweet and gourmand with an aromatic touch and a coffee base. If you sniff incisively, you note the pistachio like Dubai chocolate, the tonka and the lavender. But as a whole, it smells like soft, sweet powdered coconut. It is a youthful perfume, to be enjoyed and worn out. It seems totally androgynous; I am sure it would suit my girlfriend better than me. It is that modern ambiguous line that I like. It is not that a man cannot wear it; in fact, when I tested it on my wrist, I could not stop smelling it. It is addictive and rare at the same time. It is very good. Longevity and projection are up to the house’s standard. If you overapply, it becomes overwhelming. At 58 euros for a 100ml bottle, it is a good alternative for a young man who does not want to smell like Rabanne, Stronger With You or Gaultier. Very good overall.
Tested on a decant and very surprised by a design house scent that smells different and out of the mould. Sweet gourmand opening with something aromatic and a hint of coffee in the background. If you get incisive, you can distinguish almost all the notes: Dubai-style chocolate pistachio, tonka, lavender… But as a whole, it smells to me like soft, sweet powdered coconut. It’s a cheerful perfume, to enjoy and go out in. It seems zero masculine; I’m sure it would suit my girlfriend better. It fits that modern androgynous line I like. I’m not saying men can’t wear it; in fact, when I test it on my wrist, I can’t stop smelling it. It’s addictive and rare at the same time. It’s very good. Longevity and projection are up to the house’s standard. Both are good, but if you overapply, it becomes cloying. At 58 euros for the 100ml bottle, it’s a good alternative for a young chap who doesn’t want to smell like Rabanne, Stronger With You, or Gaultier. Very good overall.
At first, it literally smells like Vicks VapoRub (if you are from Mexico, you will understand). The mint is brutal, like Le Male Terrible by Gaultier, and dominates alongside the lavender, creating a cold sensation for at least an hour. After 30 minutes, the pistachio appears and it becomes sweet. I am not sure if it is a good choice for me; it feels strange to smell like Vicks.
Rich skin scent for about 10 minutes, then nothing remains, much less on clothes, no trail to imagine… the worst purchase I’ve made in my 40-plus years of perfume… any of the Chinese ones project and last longer, I wish I had heard such a comment to save my money…
It smells rich on skin at first, but after 10 minutes, there is nothing left. On clothes, it is even worse; no trail and no trace whatsoever. The worst perfume purchase of my 40 years. Any Chinese brand projects and lasts longer. I wish I had read a comment like this before spending my money.
This perfume is polarising, but here is my honest take: at first, it smells of hazelnut liqueur with hints of pistachio, coffee and tonka bean. It is gourmand, but the mint, lavender and bergamot refresh it significantly, cutting through the excessive sweetness. After half an hour, the sweet notes recede and the tonka bean rises, adding a resinous, balsamic and almost smoky touch (I believe it is styrax). I love this dry-down phase more: spicy, peppery and not cloying, reminiscent of Prada L’Homme Intense. The projection is good, nothing invasive thanks to the balance, and it lasts quite a while. It is personal, enjoyable and well-balanced, ideal for any season except summer.
Well, this perfume certainly generates divided opinions. Let me tell you what I feel: the opening reminds me of Frangélico (hazelnut liqueur). Pistachio and coffee stand out (although I detect this note less) and the tonka bean. In this opening, it feels somewhat gourmand, although it also has fresh notes that balance it and make it versatile: bergamot, lavender, and above all mint. I never find the fragrance very sweet, and even less so in the dry down. Half an hour in, the gourmand part loses prominence and the tonka bean takes over with a more resinous, balsamic, and even slightly smoky touch, which I believe is styrax. The opening isn’t bad, but I like the dry down part much more. It’s a spicier or peppier tonka bean, nothing cloying, more like the one in Prada L’Homme Intense. It has good projection, although not so much as to be invasive, surely thanks to the balance given by the strawberry notes. It also has good longevity. It leaves a perfume with personality, very tasty and balanced for any season except summer.