Men
Fantasme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Fantasme by Ted Lapidus is a fruity floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1992, the nose behind this composition is Pierre Bourdon. The top notes include peach, pineapple, violet, green notes, and bergamot; the heart features raspberry, Damask rose, iris root, jasmine, and valley lily; while the base notes reveal vanilla, musk, sandalwood, and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Fantasme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
24 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I regret buying this perfume. I purchased it and was disappointed; it seemed excessively sweet and, simply, I didn’t like it.
I regret having bought it; it disappointed me greatly; it seemed excessively sweet and simply I didn’t like it.
Although it is excessively sweet, it has very good fixation and sillage, ideal for winter or the night. It is cloying, yes, but very rich.
To me, it smells of honey and pineapple. As I love sweetish scents, I always buy it. It’s economical, has excellent fixation and good longevity; it does everything Sissy Emperatriz describes.
To me, it smells of honey and pineapple, and as I love sweetish scents, I always buy it. It’s economical, has excellent fixation and good longevity; it fulfils everything Sissy Emperatriz describes.
I think this perfume is for a woman who is already a mother. I have the impression that it is a fragrance for a very warm and sweet woman. I bought it a few months ago and use it to sleep in; it relaxes me, it’s ideal for the night. I think it would be a perfect gift for an aunt or a mother. I would say it is elegant.
I think this is for a woman who is already a mother. It gives me the impression of being a fragrance for someone very warm and sweet. I bought it a few months ago and use it to sleep in; it relaxes me, it’s ideal for the night. It would be a perfect gift for an aunt or a mother. I would say it is elegant.
A world of tastes… sparkling, youthful and charmingly synthetic, deeply flirtatious without being heavy or old-fashioned. I have a lovely story with it that dates back to teenage loves; I tell it on my blog. Sillage: acidic, synthetic red raspberry, nuanced with peaches, vanilla and musk which sometimes leaves earthy, wet notes. I think it has been reformulated; I remember it as more intrusive and sparkling. Very good longevity and projection.
I love it, in the past, present and future: a super sensual scent.
Take a pineapple, mix it with a splash of Cointreau, and that is Fantasme. That nostalgic sweetness of early 90s night perfumes. Your leg warmers, your shoulder pads, your teased hair… what nostalgia? Please, bring back the 90s!
Take a pineapple, mix it with a dash of Cointreau and that is Fantasme. That nostalgic sweetness of early 90s night perfumes. Your knickers, your shoulder pads, your teased hair… what nostalgia! Please let the 90s return!
Horrible. I bought it solely for its ingredients: peach, Damask rose, lily-of-the-valley root, freesia, sandalwood, musk, vanilla, and cedar, scents I love, and which make up most of the perfumes I adore… Oh, disappointment. It’s not at all powdery or fruity… It disappointed me completely; it smells like cheap perfume. Yes, I know it’s cheap, but in my case, not even gifted; there are perfumes costing less than half this price that are absolutely delicious, so this one isn’t worth even 10% of its cost. It is extremely heavy; it just smells of violet and jasmine to me, which are scents I detest when they are too predominant. That said, its nauseating smell is quite durable.
It didn’t convince me. I bought it blindly, trusting the notes, without realising I already knew it: it was the smell of a friend of my mother’s from my childhood and I never liked it; I recognised it immediately. It’s like a failed version of Lancôme’s Tresor. The peach is so synthetic it reminds me of old doll plastic or, if I’m optimistic, peach juice in a sachet. I love the bergamot opening: impactful and lively, but here it gets tangled with the violet and results in something heavy and jarring. The good thing is its trail and longevity: about eight hours on skin and much longer on clothes. For the price, if it’s to your taste, it’s a treasure. Despite being sweet, it doesn’t feel cloying to me; I suppose the acidic touch saves it. For now, it’s a resounding no, but I’ll try it in winter to see if it improves.
I didn’t like it. I bought it blindly based on its notes, thinking I didn’t know it. Mistake; I do know it. It’s an aroma my mother’s friend used when I was a child, and I never liked it; I recognised it immediately. It’s like a failed version of Lancôme’s Tresor. The peach note is so synthetic it reminds me of the plastic of old dolls, or perhaps I’m still optimistic, a pouch of peach juice. I really like bergamot as an opening note: impactful and lively, but in this perfume it gets tangled with the violet and feels heavy and jarring. Points in its favour are its trail and longevity. On my skin, about 8 hours; on clothes, much longer, and considering the price… if it’s your taste, you’ve found a treasure. Another point is that despite being sweet, I don’t find it cloying; I suppose its acidic touch prevents that. Anyway, I’ll try it in full winter to see if my impression improves; for now, it’s a resounding ‘no’.
I owned it a long time ago and don’t quite remember its aroma, but I know I loved it; I haven’t seen it around here for a while now, so I’ll try to get hold of it again. I do recall it was very long-lasting and sweetly warm.
Fantasme is a perfume I had a long time ago and almost didn’t remember, until I got a new one; I bought it because it cost very little and for 100 ml I do not regret it at all. It is enveloping, voracious, sweet and cloying like few others; that is this almost vanished Ted Lapidus bottle. If you want a soft and youthful perfume, Fantasme is the opposite: a few drops are enough for your whole body to smell of sweetness. It is extremely strong and warm, with tremendous longevity, but if you use it well, the sillage is not heavy. That persistent peach and pineapple scent makes it ideal for cold, rainy winter days when you lack energy. Fantasme wakes you up and leaves you at 1000 per hour without asking permission; you just need to know how to wear it to enjoy it to the maximum. It is a characterful perfume, not suitable for women who prefer the ethereal and subtle.
Fantasme is a perfume I owned for a long time and had almost forgotten until I acquired another bottle recently, solely because it cost me very little, and for being 100ml, I have absolutely no regrets. It is enveloping, voracious, sweet, and cloying like few others; that is this nearly vanished bottle of Ted Lapidus. And if you want a soft, cheerful perfume, Fantasme is clearly the opposite, because a few drops are enough for your whole body to smell of sweetness. It is extremely strong and warm, with tremendous longevity, but if you use it appropriately, the trail it leaves is by no means heavy. That persistent peach and pineapple scent makes it ideal for cold, rainy winter days when you lack energy. Fantasme wakes you up and leaves you at 1000% per hour without asking permission, provided you know how to wear it to enjoy it to the maximum. A perfume with character, not suitable for women who prefer ethereal and subtle scents.
It’s a rich and delightful aroma; I tested it in SUMMER (around 20/25°C) on my skin. It opens with a delicate scent of violet soap or soft flowers before giving way to a soft peach body cream; I assume this is due to the clean musk that is always present from its initial phase. In its development, it smells like a raspberry or red fruit shampoo, sweet and soft, nothing annoying, like those children’s shampoos. Upon drying down, I smell a creamy vanilla ice cream half-melted, fragrant and delicate. In summary, it smells totally clean, fresh, as if just out of the shower. I don’t detect the green notes, the lily-of-the-valley root, or the other notes. The trail is soft for the first hour, then it stays skin-close. Longevity is about 7 hours; it projects well for the first hour. Price is more than accessible. NOTE: In the middle of WINTER, its projection is incredible and its aroma of sweet, ripe peaches is truly overwhelming; its resemblance to Lancôme’s Tresor is undeniable, and it costs only a fraction of what that one does.
I grabbed a tester at a ridiculous price and, being a peach fan, bought it on the spot. I loved it from the first spray. Although it screams the 90s with its notes, it works perfectly today. On my skin, it opens with violets, then moves to a creamy, vanilla-peach over soft sandalwood and a permanent musk. I can’t quite detect the rest, but in another era, like the height of summer now, it would surely shine brighter. I disagree with those who say it smells cheap; it’s fun and informal, but that doesn’t make it low quality. It’s a lovely, striking scent with a touch of iris that gives it character. In short, I loved it immensely and I’m keeping it in my collection forever.
I found a tester at a ridiculously low price and bought it solely based on the notes, especially since I’m a lover of peach in perfumery. I loved it from the very first spray. While it has very marked reminiscences of the 90s, starting with the sheer number of notes, it is perfectly wearable today. On my skin, it opens with a predominance of violets before transitioning into a creamy peach and vanilla scent, underpinned by a soft sandalwood and a permanent musk. I haven’t managed to perceive the rest of the notes yet, but I imagine they will shine better in another season (I’m testing it in the middle of summer). I disagree with those who categorise it as a cheap-smelling fragrance; I believe it is directly fun and informal, but that doesn’t make it a ‘cheap’ perfume. Rather, it is a pleasant, particularly beautiful and striking aroma, which even possesses a hint of iris that occasionally peeks through, giving it a distinct touch. In short, I have liked it very much and intend to keep it permanently in my small collection.
I was surprised! It smells exactly like perfumes from the 90s, where they used muuuch too many notes and were very intense. It feels like Ted Lapidus Homme, but with violets. Perhaps because they share many notes like rose, cedar, lily, sandalwood, etc.? But here’s the thing: within a couple of minutes, it stops smelling almost completely. It leaves a very skin-close, heavily vanilla-scented trail. What a shame…
It’s no longer available in Mexico; I just received one I ordered from Fragrancenet in the US. It’s a serious shop; I’ve bought a lot there, but this time it was a huge disappointment. It’s not even a pale shadow of what it used to be: it doesn’t last, doesn’t project, and bears no resemblance to the great perfume it once was. It would be better if they stopped selling it than to risk delivering this rubbish, which is genuine trash.
It’s no longer available in Mexico; I just received one I bought from Fragrancenet in the US. It’s a reputable site—I’ve purchased many items from them—but this time the perfume was a huge disappointment. It’s not even a pale shadow of what it once was; it doesn’t last, doesn’t project, and bears no resemblance to the wonderful fragrance it used to be. It would be better if they stopped selling it entirely rather than daring to deliver this rubbish, which is truly absolute trash.
Bought it blindly following the notes and reviews. At first, it explodes with an intense, synthetic yet unmistakably peach scent. Over time, I detect a hint of pineapple and some raspberry, though the peach still dominates, followed by a touch of lily of the valley that only becomes apparent when holding the bottle very close to the nose. Once dried down, it leaves a warm, pleasant sensation of vanilla, sandalwood, and musk. There is no trace of the other notes listed on Fragrantica. What caught my attention was a label at the bottom of the bottle stating the profile as: ‘FRUITY, FLORAL, VANILLA. Blackberry, cassis, raspberry. Rose, jasmine, iris, magnolia and Freesia. Sandalwood vanilla and musk.’… So, not a single mention of peach, which is what smells the most; I can barely guess at a touch of cassis and a sweet whisper of freesia… I wonder if it’s a new formulation? In my personal opinion, it’s not an unpleasant aroma, though it does remind me of Lancôme’s Tresor due to shared notes. But Fantasme is to Tresor what Benetton Hot is to Allure. A synthetic, budget-friendly version that a trained nose can easily distinguish, so don’t be fooled. It’s not bad for the price, but it’s not comparable in subtlety or longevity to the niche perfume it resembles (after three hours, only a faint trace of peach-sandalwood-vanilla remains… synthetic). I won’t be buying it again.