Men
Kriska
Acordes principales
Descripción
Kriska by Natura is a fruity floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1995, this composition features top notes of peach, plum, blackcurrant, orange blossom, blackberry, pineapple, galbanum, osmanthus, black cherry, bergamot, cardamom and green notes. The heart reveals carnation, neroli, ylang-ylang, rose, lily of the valley, gardenia, jasmine, hyacinth, freesia and lily of the valley. The base notes consist of vanilla, amber, benzoin, musk, sandalwood, tonka bean, patchouli, cedar and vetiver.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Kriska y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
31 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
It’s astonishing how similar it is to Tresor. I don’t like either of them, I think it’s because of the peach note.
Impressive similarity to Tresor. I don’t like either of them, I think it must be the peach note.
I first heard it a month ago and thought it was the perfume I used to wear as a girl, but I couldn’t remember which one. Today I realised it smells like Paco Rabanne’s Ultraviolet, the one I wore for years and which is now impossible to get hold of.
Starts strong and sweet, to the point where you feel like taking a shower, but after three hours it smells divine and lingers on the skin, even just on the wrists. It’s for people over 35, elegant, and not everyone will suit it. It has notes of Tresor and Ultraviolet, but if you’re looking for something affordable yet elegant, this is the ideal choice.
This perfume, which is actually an EDT, is very particular. It’s the typical perfume where you either love it or hate it. And I have a kind of strange relationship with this perfume. At first, the opening is a floral, sweet, fruity punch that pushes you back a little. As time passes, it settles and leaves a powdery, clean, vanilla scent that reminds me of the smell of dolls (that’s the aspect that enchants). It’s quite strong and needs to be used with moderation. The note composition is in itself a bomb and it’s a perfume quite difficult to describe. It’s the most mature perfume in the Krisca line, the original Krisca. Despite being sweet and vanilla, it’s too complex to use on young girls; I’d recommend it after 25 years old. For teenagers, there are other versions of Krisca like Libertad or Encanto which are much sweeter and far less complex. I find a nostalgic point to it. It’s very enveloping and has an oriental touch. It’s a perfume that doesn’t leave you indifferent and is ideal to use as a personal fragrance because it’s easily recognisable and very exclusive. That said, totally indicated for cold climates. Personally to me, although I tried to make it my own a few years ago, it turned out to be too overwhelming and I used to get dizzy. But without a doubt, one of the most original from Natura.
Lots of rose and lots of carnation as the opening note; it’s a perfume for someone much older, it just doesn’t quite convince me…
Full of rose and carnation at first, it smells like grandma; I just can’t get behind it…
Very good value for money. In the opening it reminds me quite a bit of Viva La Juicy, ideal for daily wear.
A very good perfume in terms of quality-price ratio; it reminds me quite a bit of Viva La Juicy at the start, recommended for daily use.
What a nonsense to categorise perfumes by age! It’s an elegant, intense floral with good longevity and a sweet, though not gourmand, scent. Is it on the Tresor side? Yes, even with a vintage touch from the nineties. Although it’s strident at first, once it dries down it’s delicious and subtle. For those who want something sweet without smelling like a cake, it’s a good option.
How tiresome they are with that habit of categorising perfumes by age, for God’s sake!! This is an EDT floral, elegant, intense, with good performance and sweet, though not from the gourmand line. Is it on the same side as Tresor? Yes. It even has a touch of 90s vintage fragrance. Although it comes out very strident, the dry down is delicious and subtle. For those who enjoy the sweet without smelling like a cake, it’s a good option.
The first time I tried this perfume was with a 15 ml sample that came with other Natura products I bought, and when I applied it, I smelled purple corn beer (a Peruvian drink), so I decided to buy it, but when I had the little bottle, I didn’t smell that scent anymore and it discouraged me a bit. I consider it a sweet scent, like the aroma of a peach very close to the seed, rough like when you bite an unripe peach, but rich. Its longevity is quite high; you apply a little and it smells almost all day. It’s not a bad scent, but as it is intense, it should actually please you to apply it, because the scent won’t go away easily.
I loved it! I’m one of those who adores sweet and vanilla perfumes, and although I like the Shock, I prefer the Classic. At first, I’m a bit bothered by the opening, strong and fruity like chewing gum, but once it dries down on the skin it becomes sweet, delicate and floral; I’m fascinated by it. The sweetness lasts all the time, but without being overwhelming; it’s elegant and sophisticated. That’s why I prefer it to the Shock, which smells the same from start to finish, with no evolution, just caramel. The Classic has another layer of complexity and evolution. The longevity is excellent; it lasts a long time, but you need to moderate the sprays to avoid overdoing it. Without a doubt, I would buy it again; it’s versatile. I wouldn’t wear it in the heat, but in cooler seasons it’s perfect for work, dinner, a date, or a spring evening.
I loved this perfume! It seems delicious to me! I should clarify that I’m one of those women who loves gourmand perfumes, sweet, vanilla scents, that smell like dessert. Yet, I find this perfume richer on my skin than Krisca Shock, which I also like very much, but I prefer the classic Krisca. The classic Krisca initially bothers me a bit in its opening; I must admit that I feel it quite strong with a fruity gum-like aroma that I don’t particularly like, I don’t know why, but as time passes and it dries down a bit, perhaps stuck in my skin, it becomes sweet, delicate, and acquires exquisite floral nuances, I’m fascinated! It keeps that sweetness always, from start to finish, but it’s no longer an annoying, overwhelming sweet, but a delicate sweet, not gourmand, nothing vulgar but quite the opposite; I feel it’s elegant and sophisticated. That’s why I like it more than Krisca Shock, because in the Shock I don’t find much novelty or change in the fragrance, honestly. I think it’s a fragrance that comes out the same, dries down the same, and disappears the same, pure caramel, pure sweet, with very little evolution. I’m not saying I don’t like it or that it’s not rich to my nose because it certainly is, but I feel I’ve used similar fragrances a thousand times, even in body splashes. However, I feel the classic Krisca has another type of evolution; I didn’t detect many similar fragrances and feel it has another complexity in its notes. The longevity on my skin is excellent; it lasts a long time, but I consider it one of those fragrances where you shouldn’t abuse the sprays; if you want to maintain a delicate, feminine scent on the skin that doesn’t cause discomfort. Without a doubt, I would buy the classic Krisca again; I feel it’s a very versatile scent. Honestly, I wouldn’t wear it on hot days, but in cooler seasons I feel it could go perfectly for any occasion that isn’t a very formal event, but yes for a work day, a dinner, an afternoon date, or a spring or cool summer night, always applying moderately. I love it, I feel it’s rich on my skin!
I bought this perfume as I recently acquired Krisca Drama and loved it… but this one disappointed me a bit at first as I thought it would smell entirely of vanilla. While it is sweet, I initially feel it like a more mature sweet scent. It’s an aroma that needs trying several times before you start to love it. I don’t recommend buying it blindly; ask for a sample first as it’s not the typical cloying vanilla scent. I feel it’s more for evening or something more elegant/professional. I don’t feel it’s youthful and I agree with an opinion I read that it has an air of Tresor… perhaps due to its elegance :). I’m 24 years old and I wear it and like it!, but when it starts to dry down, the opening impacts me a little bit hahaha, nevertheless I still like it 🙂
I’ve just bought it. I always imagined it differently: a youthful, sparkling sweet scent at the start, floral but not overwhelming or turning vintage. Well, it’s quite the opposite. It’s complex from the start, I’d say intense. Then it remains complex throughout its development. It’s a floral and barely sweet, very little. At least that’s how I feel. There’s one note that bothers me; I can’t quite identify it. I hope I’ll come to love it soon, as some of you did. I’m sure it’s not something to buy blindly. Something I do and dream of doing regularly: I never learn 😬
Love at first sniff… I adore it. I own all the other flankers in the line, but this one fascinates me…. Am I crazy, or does it remind me of Kenzo Flower? Sweet, but not gourmand. Vintage yet current, soapy but not too much… I love it, it’s rich and distinguished.
I finally got it and what a difference: with the sample it was okay, but straight from the bottle it’s another level. It’s the best in the Krisca line; it’s not as cloying or tiring as the Drama or the Libertad. It reminds me of perfumes from the late eighties and nineties: complex, floral, elegant, with a dark and mysterious touch. I wouldn’t wear it in summer; it’s more for fresh, daytime hours. The trail is moderate but noticeable. Here, the cardamom and flowers dominate, while the vanilla and patchouli are barely felt, though I appreciate them. That blend is exquisite and irresistible. It’s subtle and delicate, without the punch of the Kenzo Jungle. No single flower is the queen; they all contribute a little to create that mysterious air. It reminds me a bit of the classic Poison, but without the honey. The wood is very subtle and I don’t detect the fruits. It’s worth it; it’s a classic that Natura shouldn’t discontinue.
I’ve finally got my hands on it. I knew it from samples, but wearing it straight from the bottle is a whole different story. I paid it much more attention than I did with the sample. To me, it’s the best in the Krisca line. Why? It’s not as sweet, cloying, or tiring as Drama or Libertad. It feels very much like the late 80s and early 90s. Lots of notes, several flowers, elegant, feminine, with a touch of dark mystery. I don’t wear it in summer; it’s for cooler, daytime hours. It has moderate sillage and you can tell. More than the vanilla and patchouli (which I’m glad are barely noticeable), the cardamom and flowers really come through. That combination is exquisite and irresistible to me. It stands out well without reaching the potency of Kenzo Jungle. It’s subtle and delicate. Of all the flowers, which are my favourite, none is the queen; there’s a little of each to give that mysterious air. It reminds me a bit of the classic Poison, but without the honey. They aren’t similar, but they follow the same line. The wood in the classic Krisca is very subtle, and I don’t detect any fruit notes. It’s worth having; it’s among the classics and for a reason it’s been on the market for so long. Natura isn’t keen on discontinuing it 😀👍
Very usable for the first colds of autumn or early spring. It carries a very 90s DNA. Powdery/soapy (the clove leaves that vibe). Very for everyday wear. It has a duration of 8 hours on skin and much longer on clothes. If you want to buy blind, go ahead, because if you don’t like it, perhaps your slightly more mature family member will.
It is not listed but I sense a certain similarity to Versace Red Jeans. They share notes, but this one is less powdery and slightly sweeter without being cloying. As they say, it has a 90s style. My 67-year-old mother loved it, but a younger woman can use it without problems. At first, it is a floral bomb that kills you (especially for me who goes more for citrus), but the dry down is less of a bomb. It lasted about 6 hours, quite good for an EDT. It is about to be discontinued, so if you like it, better get it now.
I gave it several chances but I couldn’t make it work… it smells like an old lady and cheap talcum powder, it gives me a headache. I’ll give it away or leave it in the bathroom, and I doubt I could stand it even then; it’s truly an uncomfortable scent.
I tried giving it several chances but definitely cannot make it work anymore… it smells like a lady and intense powder like cheap Avon perfumes, it gives me a headache. I will gift it or leave it as a bathroom air freshener, and I doubt I would tolerate it even then; it is really uncomfortable.
I simply could not stand it. I bought it for the sweet notes, but upon trying it, it seemed super vintage, reminding me of the smell of a depilatory cream I used (Touch Me), and it made me sick. I ended up giving it to my sister so she could enjoy it.
Simply, I couldn’t stand it. I bought it for the sweet notes, but when I tried it, it seemed super vintage to me. It reminded me of the smell of a depilatory cream I used before (Touch Me) and it made me feel sick. I ended up giving it to my sister so she could enjoy it.
How limited must a human be to subscribe a perfume to an age group? I am tired of reading ‘lady’, ‘old lady’, ‘adult’. Respect each other a little and do not expose your cognitive failings by opining brutalities. Fragrantica is the peak of misunderstood free expression and shows a lack of intelligence. I am better off emigrating to Fragrantica because it is annoying to read poor and biased reviews. Appreciate that there is no such thing as ‘smelling like unintelligence’.
I bought it blind because it shares notes with the discontinued Chloe Narcisse; I knew it would be a typical vintage bomb from the 80s and 90s… and well, it didn’t even evoke my beloved CN, but wow, it is very similar to Tresor. For an EDT, the performance is excellent, dries down very softly, and is recommended for cold weather. I agree with Javiera1989; that is what they mean by ‘smelling like a lady’.
At first, it reminded me of Givenchy Organza, but Kriska feels disjointed in its notes and then loses that resemblance. My mother uses it, although she prefers the flanker Arrasa.
It is identical to Kenzo Flower.
My mum gave this to me when I was 13, I think it came in 100ml. I loved it. It smells a bit ‘mature’ or vintage as people say, but I remember it quite powdery. It lasts moderately and is enjoyed more in fresh weather.
A sweet and floral perfume that lasts all day. It features notes of black raspberry, plum, and vanilla. Not vintage, ideal for daily wear and very feminine. Suitable for women over 20; I don’t think it would suit teenagers. It leaves a light to moderate trail and lasts about 5 hours. I give it 8 out of 10.