Men
Arpège
Acordes principales
Descripción
Arpège by Lanvin is an aldehydic floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1927, this composition was created by Paul Vacher and André Fraysse. The top notes reveal aldehydes, valley lily, peach, honeysuckle, neroli and bergamot; the heart unfolds jasmine, ylang-ylang, valley lily, iris, coriander, rose, lily of the valley, geranium and camellia; while the base notes settle on sandalwood, amber, vetiver, musk, benzoin, vanilla and patchouli. This perfume is the winner of the FiFi Award Hall of Fame 2005.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
aldehydes
-
Corazón
jasmine
-
Base
sandalwood
Comunidad
4,643 votos
- Positivo 78%
- Negativo 18%
- Neutral 4.1%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Arpège y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
A MELODY. Arpege or arpeggio in the musical vocabulary means notes played on an instrument like a piano in succession, either ascending or descending. And so is this classic fragrance from the 1920s, made for the birthday of the French designer Jeanne Lanvin’s daughter, who played the piano. It is a perfume with a romantic melody like Chopin’s piano music. This concert begins with aldehydes very similar to those of Chanel No. 5. But they are softer and warmer. There are plenty of notes: honeysuckle, peach, neroli, valley lily, bergamot; camellia, coriander, iris, lily, jasmine, ylang-ylang, pink valley lily, and geranium; amber, sandalwood, patchouli, musk, vanilla, benzoin, and vetiver. Although it seems quite complicated, it is a sweet and simple fragrance. It’s a well-dressed young girl who is a bit late for a classical music concert. She sits down next to her father, and everyone’s eyes fixate on her. She is very lovely, slim, elegant. It could have been a perfume used by Hollywood actress Audrey Hepburn. She puts on the music, and it moves her greatly. On my nose, the rose and peach notes are the strongest and most prominent. It is sweet, very sweet. I can also smell the white flowers contained in this perfume: the valley lily, the camellia, and the jasmine. Sometimes it has a very sour, bitter taste; I don’t know if it’s the bergamot and neroli. There is something green and intense; it might be the patchouli. The original vintage formula from 1928 no longer exists. The black bottle with the gold cap is a new formula where they have added green notes, patchouli, vetiver, and musk. The original was much softer and sweeter, dominated by aldehydes, rose, peach, and white flowers. Nevertheless, here is a tribute to the original, and it appears towards the end. A divine fragrance.
I arrived at this emblematic fragrance through suggestive reviews, which I tested directly on the skin without hesitation, and the perfumed honeysuckle took all the awards, so much so that the saleswoman was impressed by how it expressed itself, with such elegance. Finally, it reached my perfumery sanctuary, and to my surprise, its sillage is not always the same on me; powdered honeysuckle for hours with a slightly unpleasant herbal finish at the end, preferable to use it during autumn-winter. Fortunately, and aside from these inconveniences, this undeniable classic of Lanvin integrates my heritage, evoking a fascinating era.
The 1920s gave birth to fragrances that made a great difference compared to previous decades, and consequently altered the future of the following years forever. Arpege is undoubtedly one of these fragrances. History tells us it was very popular in the 60s, almost 40 years after its launch. Nevertheless, since its market release, it has never lost popularity, gracing for decades the faces of the finest and most elegant women. Regarding its composition, its vintage version is a floral bomb with aldehydes, very narcotic and intense. The aldehyde chords are orchestrated and appear with the same intensity as in vintage Chanel No. 5; it’s the first point where the two fragrances are compared so often. Both are strident florals with jasmine notes, but the difference lies in the fact that while Chanel is a jasmine with a strong presence of ylang-ylang and neroli, Arpege is a more hyacinth-like jasmine with honeysuckle, lily, and fine geraniums. Chanel has subtle lemony tints, while Arpege leans more towards peach. The second point of comparison is that both fragrances have a very prominent musk note in their base, with an animalistic tint, accompanied by soft but noticeable vetiver and sandalwood notes. The only difference is that Arpege becomes spiced due to the contribution of coriander. They seem very similar, but when we smell both fragrances, Arpege makes us see Chanel No. 5 as a dreamy, romantic, innocent, fragile, laughing woman. Arpege is undoubtedly the opposite, showing a more mysterious, sexy, dark, complicated side, more mature, yet not losing the warmth that also inhabits No. 5, but demonstrating it in another way. Both are extremely fine fragrances, where Arpege makes more pronounced use of its base notes and Chanel No. 5 of its florals. Regarding the current version of Arpege: At first, it is 60 per cent the same as the previous one. The floral bouquet is almost identical; the base notes are less prominent in the new Arpege, and there is a very subtle presence of powdered vanilla in the background, making it distinct. However, when the new fragrance begins to mature on the skin, as hours pass, it is at that moment that it resembles the old one most, almost 90 per cent, showing that ultimately the central heart of both is practically identical.
I received a sample of this scent and, in one word… BEAUTIFUL! At first, it’s sparkling, like a soft melody… an arpeggio that repeats its notes and reminds us of the Chanel No. 5 aroma; the comparison is inevitable due to the aldehydes, but in Arpege, they are much gentler… It’s how I would describe it, a fizz of champagne and delicate talcum powder… giving way to a floral scent in which, at least on me, the ylang-ylang/iris/jasmine combo was the most noticeable… a slight peach with powdered sandalwood and vanilla towards the end make it very elegant and grant a halo of sweetness as it becomes almost skin-scented, yet still persistent, and it’s one of those scents that doesn’t go away easily… It’s part of old perfumery, the persistence that generates that identity of each perfume… You may share similarities with No. 5, but in the background, they are very different… it has a much softer and vanilla-imprinted mark, warmer and drier towards the end… in this phase, I find it similar to Chanel’s 31 Rue Cambon, which I had some time ago… It’s worth at least trying to smell a piece of perfumery history… the epitome melody of sophistication and class… Greetings from Chile, friends!
I bought it in 100ml; it is undoubtedly original, but no matter how much I try to appreciate it, unfortunately for me, it smells like vinegary Chanel No. 5… I find it incomprehensible that the beautiful history of this perfume, with all that mind-boggling nonsense about the multitude of ingredients it contains, ends up being too similar to the legendary Chanel aroma; I truly don’t understand it. I’ll try to test the perfume in various environments (cold, heat, humidity, etc.) to know it better and hope to edit my opinion in the future.
Arpege is elegance full of nuances; I’ve loved this perfume for a long time. It makes me feel sophisticated every time I use it, that aldehydic, woody, spiced aroma with floral touches that invades my senses. This is a gentleman’s perfume very similar to Chanel No. 5. Arpege is a perfume that has arrived to stay in my collection. Rating 10/10.
I didn’t get this one right; it’s the type of perfume that I feel belongs to another era in which I don’t see myself. The price didn’t make me too sad about it, but well, I’ll keep trying. ladamenoir is right; it’s not for everyone, at least not for me.
Arpege is a classy perfume. Complex, harmonious, and very feminine. When I apply it to my wrist, on my skin, a floral conglomerate stands out, leaving a woody aura with exotic tints once it has dried. They say it was the fragrance of the wonderful Greta Garbo until the end of her days. The perfume for a lady. A lady of classic airs, romantic, tender, but fundamentally contemporary and open to this world of change. Wonderful Arpege.
A beauty. To put it plainly: a sparkier Chanel No. 5. No. 5 is a soapy scent that eventually turns into something slightly gaudier and nocturnal, with iris powder and ylang-ylang. Arpege is practically the same but takes a happier path with solar, rebellious floral nuances. On my nose, the difference lies in the jasmine, which is more evident here—a fruity jasmine with neroli filaments that, in its latest reformulations, is guilty of having a slightly cheap finish. And considering the price Arpege sells for, it’s natural. It doesn’t smell anything antiquated; it’s an aldehydic floral full of joy, happiness, and light. It’s a pity that Lanvin hasn’t known how to position its perfumes where they deserve to be in recent years, especially given that with Alber Elbaz the house returned to the heights, only to be relegated to indifference after his departure. If there’s a Parisian house with a history of stunning, it’s this one.
Arpege is an absolute masterpiece; I’m surprised some say it smells old-fashioned, people who, coincidentally, adore candy perfumes. It’s luminous, deep, sophisticated, pure class in a bottle. It has an erotic touch when it dries down, simply wonderful. On my skin, it lasts about ten hours with a medium-to-high sillage. Greta Garbo, Marilyn Monroe, and Rita Hayworth adored it… long life to Arpege, which achieved the perfection that Chanel No. 5 never quite managed, this being a great perfume too.
I acquired it almost 15 years ago, a friend sold it to me new at a laughable price because she did not like it. I seized the opportunity and it went mad with happiness for my mother; it was one of her beloved youth perfumes. It is very similar to Chanel No. 5, quite so, but as it settles it acquires another expression: it is powder, spices, flowers and an undeniable brazen elegance. It is a pity it is no longer available in the shops in my city. I would make of this richness, suitable for fresh, cold climates and rainy nights. It is a work of art of the finest class, conceived in the centre of good taste. It is terribly sad that nowadays perfumes with this perfect and wonderful craftsmanship no longer exist.
A friend gave it to me because she did not like it; at first I thought wow, too particular, then I liked it a lot. It is very sophisticated and feminine, a classic. I do not find it similar to Chanel No. 5, it reminds me more of the First, but it is not the same either. It has a lot of character, it is not for everyone.
Perhaps I aimed too high when starting in perfumery. I bought Arpege blind based on the wonderful reviews. It arrived, I tested it and yes, it is difficult to interpret. It is unique, rare (like a jewel that is not easily found), I am still getting to know it. I feel I am missing a stage to discover it, perhaps my nose needs to mature. Without contradicting that it is a marvel, I intuit it is, I just need to assimilate it fully. It is a great piece in my collection, I respect it and give it its space.
It is exquisite. Extreme refinement, a jewel that exudes opulence and wealth. Although it has similarities with Chanel No. 5, here it is more glamorous. It is not for today’s teens, but for a woman who has long left the nest. It has an incredible story: Jeanne-Marie Lanvin sent someone to create a unique perfume for her daughter that would last generations, a birthday gift. The image on the bottle is when she delivers the gift. This was before Chanel No. 5 was launched.
Being the classic of classics, I thought perhaps the green might suit me for a mother-to-daughter gift. It is complex, perhaps for someone mature (35-40 years old), evoking all the retro of the 70s and 80s where glamour was mixing unmistakable scents. This is an unmistakable scent, with good longevity (hard to remove). I suggest buying a decant, because it is not for current consumption.
I think I have fallen in love. And it is forever.
I bought it blind based on the reviews and I was not wrong: it is exquisite. Very similar to Chanel No. 5 but not identical; I liked this one more, it does not last longer on my skin but I feel it is less ‘old-fashioned’. I have fallen in love!
SIMPLY BEAUTIFUL! I bought it blind, expecting an opulent Chanel No. 5 for formal occasions, but on me it became something elegant, cheerful, sweet and sparkling. It is very talc-like; the jasmine gives it that ‘clean’ scent. It is not boring at all; it is my daily fragrance because it gives me an incredible mood boost. Truly very cheerful!
It has more tweaks than Carmen Lomana’s face but it is beautiful. The olfactory face wash is very well executed. It no longer smells like what my mother used 35 years ago (more aldehydic and boring, nothing for a twenty-something); this reformulation is the one. It reminds me of a Dorian Gray determined to maintain youth at all costs, paying a price for a perfection that hides vices. The first hours are a dream of floral sweetness and benzoin. The dry down is a floral spectacle with peach, iris and attenuated aldehydes; the iris, which I hate, comes out fresh and bright. It reminds me of those square Puig pills from the 70s with soapy flowers. The blend of honeysuckle, ylang-ylang, jasmine, iris, peach and vanilla creates a sweet illusion that turns into disillusionment after 3 hours: Dorian wilts, the iris powders, the peach wrinkles and Arpege enters a politically correct decline. It only resembles the Chanel No. 5 Eau de Parfum (a disappointment compared to my mother’s vintage). It lasts until the seventh hour, without an overwhelming trail. Goodbye, Dorian, beauty does not last forever. If Lanvin had stepped into this, they could have made the most enduring change. It is singularly beautiful, but with that performance, I would have thought twice.
An olfactory bridge between Chanel No. 5 and Van Cleef’s First. That historical soap aldehydic cleanliness, born from the tail of No. 5, but here calmer and softer, with less sparkle. Arpege is uniform and constant like the First. The perfect alternative to a pure aldehyde: light, softness and calm in a subtle, discreet version that remains very much alive.
I turned two weeks old and my mother asked what to get me. I saw this perfume, read the reviews, and asked her to buy it based on them… and they were right! It smells delicious. It’s vintage yet elegant, smelling clean with a very slight sweetness followed by white flowers. I can’t describe the notes well, but I loved it.
This composition is magic on my skin, an addiction for my nose. It’s wonderful, multifloral and multifaceted. The opening is citrusy with well-balanced flowers; I detect plenty of geranium and rose. As it dries, the resins take centre stage: amber, woods like sandalwood and vetiver, and benzoin. It settles into herbal, resinous, and amber roses. It’s very similar to Chanel 5 EDP but with fewer aldehydes and no civet. I only wear it in winter because it embraces me and creates an aura that stays with me for hours.
It’s a jewel, a classic that doesn’t feel outdated. It reminds me of Chanel No. 5 but is sweeter and more talc-dusted, with less prominent aldehydes. On my skin, it has better projection and performance. It’s lovely.
I don’t know why I sense a note of honey in this beautiful perfume… am I the only mad person who perceives it, or is there anyone else experiencing the same thing?
Hedy Lamarr once said anyone can have glamour, but she was so much more than a pretty face; she invented frequency modulation to save American ships. This Arpège reminded me of that complex woman: elegant, with well-worked aldehydes over a luminous floral that isn’t primly spring-like. The soapy base gives it an attractive freshness without being hygienic. It’s perfect for those who value more than just physical appearance. The projection and longevity are decent; I don’t mind if it feels youthful, I simply love it. Recommended.
A timeless classic of great quality. A delicious, clean, and creamy scent. On my skin, it smells like a bar of Dove soap.
Arpège EDP, recent batch. A marvel at first spray: opens with peach and light aldehydes. As it dries, soapy and creamy notes of jasmine and lots of rose emerge. The sandalwood is addictive, slightly animalic but nothing as intrusive as Cabotine. The camellia is unique in my collection; over time, it makes sense and provides a distinguished creaminess that pairs beautifully with the jasmine and rose. It lasts a long time on clothes; on skin, after three months of maceration, it reaches 9-10 hours. As a lover of No. 5, I understand the comparison, but they aren’t alike: Arpège is complex yet less complicated than No. 5’s aldehydic opening. Ideal for sunny autumns or cool nights. It becomes a great signature scent with daily use; very addictive.
Arpège Extract, old batch. What a pity it doesn’t have its own section; it’s an incredible olfactory experience. The spices really shine, featuring one of the best sandalwoods I’ve tried. They complement the jasmine and rose soapiness that develops, soft and talc-dusted. It’s sweeter than the current EDP, like honey. An intimate perfume lasting over 15 hours. Without aldehydes, it’s a warm floral bomb; I recommend layering it with the EDP—it’s another world entirely. Compared to an old batch of No. 5, there are similarities, but Arpège is more complex and warm, while No. 5 is more complicated and effervescent.
Fun fact: this is Eva Perón’s favourite perfume. Cheers!
I agree that Arpege by Lanvin and Chanel No. 5 belong to the same family, as does L’Interdit, though they diverge quickly after the initial burst. I’m talking about the current versions: Arpege is a woody lily, soapy with yellowish hints; No. 5, which I’ve worn since childhood (my grandmother and mother used it), is a deep, talc-dusted rose. Arpege feels fresher and more youthful, whereas No. 5 is more mature and seductive. Two historical treasures worth owning if you’re not afraid of the vintage vibe.
My mother, the most beautiful woman in my eyes, bought this fragrance several years ago. She used it very rarely and then didn’t like it because she found it too strong (ironically, she smells like Paloma Picasso), so she handed it to me as if it were a bouquet of white flowers from the perfume bottle. It is aristocratic, yes, but a timeless aristocratic scent. I’m not a young woman anymore; 35 breathes on my neck, and I love being an adult woman to wear something so beautiful with great confidence. It has a strong presence; you won’t go unnoticed on the day you wear it because it is also very heavy. Thank you, mother, for gifting me such a precious bouquet of white flowers in a bottle that reminds me of you.
Batch from 2019. A gift for my mother who loves Chanel No. 5 but always buys from Fraiche or pirates; my finances don’t stretch to a Chanel, and I sometimes doubt due to the brand’s own reformulations. She adored it; it’s an aristocratic and elegant scent, a very good substitute for Chanel No. 5. It’s a dupe, BUT Arpege follows a different path, it’s more soapy yet very economical. In short: a soapy Chanel No. 5, you can’t go wrong.
Colour note: Eva Perón used Lanvin Scandal.
A vintage scent that smells expensive, opulent, elegant, and warm. It arrived two days ago; I’ve sprayed it twice on my neck ten hours ago and still smell it constantly. Very similar to Chanel No. 5, much more economical, with spectacular performance. My husband doesn’t care for vintage aromas, yet with this one, he’s given compliments on how good I smell.
Wonderful pure Sandalwood, nothing like the original Arpege nor the 90s reformulation. Back then, reformulations aimed to enhance the fragrance; nowadays, prices rise and quality and longevity fall. Minimal costs, million-dollar profits, yet it’s brilliant to spend 300 euros on a perfume that ceases to exist in 10 minutes. This fragrance is no exception, although I bought the black bottle a year ago; previously, the extract of the 90s reformulation, nearly from the year 2000, was anything but Arpege. I believe that to have something like this, it’s better to withdraw it from the market rather than sell it eventually at a bargain or real price. That’s the issue.
I adored it; it transports me to another era without actually being there. It smells like those body creams from a century ago—I have no proof, yet no doubts either. The opening doesn’t quite take my fancy, reminiscent of burnt plastic, though on my skin it becomes creamy and floral. It’s a pity it lasts only three hours.
I wonder how the original would have smelled; I suppose it would have made more than one sigh. The current version, purchased in 2025, declares its classic character with that soapy floral charm. It evokes the atmosphere of mothers from the past, from the 70s and 80s, who would welcome you late on a Friday with a warm hug and a sandwich, so wholesome, clean, and perfumed, in their cardigans and knee-length skirts. Ready to take a walk with you and your father to cheer you up after an exhausting week. Very feminine, elegant, and timeless. For me, it still holds charm and a welcoming personality, lasting on clothes until the next day. Even if it’s not quite the same as before, how beautiful it seems! A perfume to remember as much as the people who wear it with pride.
I wonder how the original would have smelled; I suppose it would have made more than one sigh. The current version, purchased in 2025, declares its classic character with that soapy floral charm. It evokes the atmosphere of mothers from the past, from the 70s and 80s, who would welcome you late on a Friday with a warm hug and a sandwich, so wholesome, clean, and perfumed, in their cardigans and knee-length skirts. Ready to take a walk with you and your father to cheer you up after an exhausting week. Very feminine, elegant, and timeless. For me, it still holds charm and personality, lasting on clothes until the next day. Even if it’s not quite the same as before, how beautiful it seems! A perfume to remember as much as the people who wear it with pride.
I love it. It’s like Chanel No. 5 but without that aldehydic fizz. While similar when sprayed, Arpege evolves into a soapy, white floral bouquet, far more sophisticated. I feel it suits everything, but particularly summer evenings with a midnight freshness. Excessive heat amplifies the woody notes, making it coarse. I haven’t tried it in winter yet, and I’m eager to.
Arpege is a gem, akin to Chanel No. 5 but more potent and resinous. If you enjoy that vibe, go for it; I hold it in high regard and prefer the discounted version of Chanel.