Men

Blue Cypress

3.47 de 5
574 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Blue Cypress by Goldfield & Banks Australia is a woody chypre fragrance, created in 2016 and designed for men and women. The nose behind this composition is François Merle-Baudoin.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 6.4%
  • Primavera 40%
  • Verano 42%
  • Otoño 12%
  • Día 84%
  • Noche 16%

Notas clave

  • Salida Sin dato
  • Corazón Sin dato
  • Base Sin dato

Comunidad

574 votos

  • Positivo 56%
  • Neutral 22%
  • Negativo 22%

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Blue Cypress y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

4 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • I took the Discovery Set and tried Blue Cypress, which I was eager to smell. The initial cucumber note reminded me of Aramis Always, very fresh. Then I compared it with Kenneth Cole Signature and… boom! It is identical to KCS. I have to put them side by side, but the first impression is a total coincidence. I’ve heard it compared to classic AdG and Profondo, but that is absurd; it’s like saying night is day. For me, they do not resemble each other in the slightest.

  • byrgertidesson

    Upon opening it, I conducted a My Scent Journey-style experiment… three blotters in my hand with my ADG bottles: one from 2008 and another from 2017. Atomised, the opening was identical between BC and ADG 2008, but the 2017 version felt more watery, so I discarded it for the second part. On skin, things change: we cannot say BC-ADG is like GIT-Cool Water (CW) because, although the difference is basically ingredient quality (which is noticeable), the scent is essentially the same unless you pay close attention. Here I do perceive differences: ADG is aquatic, whereas this BC is more of a fresh woody opening followed by an aquatic floral with a spicy touch. This makes it deeper, more evolving, and interesting, roughly 4 to 1 compared to ADG, though those extra nuances (complexity, if you like to call it that) will prevent BC from receiving the same compliments, as humans tend to prefer simplicity. Are they similar? Simple answer: yes, just as Black Label resembles Blue Label. (8.5/10)

  • byrgertidesson

    I performed the My Scent Journey test with three blotters and my AdG bottles (2008 and 2017). On paper, Blue Cypress and the 2008 AdG are identical; the 2017 version comes out more watery and I discarded it. On skin, the situation changes: it is not like Git or Cool Water, where the difference is merely ingredient quality; here there are real nuances. Blue Cypress is more woody and fresh at the start, then becomes aquatic and floral with a spicy touch. It is deeper and more evolving, a 4 to 1 against AdG. They are similar, yes, just as Black Label is to Blue Label, but that extra complexity will mean you receive fewer compliments. 8.5/10.

  • mauralofish

    To my nose, ADG smells like nothing at all; the anise and cypress are very present and natural. I understand the similarity, but here I definitely sense quality. It does not smell of ambroxan; rather, it smells natural.