Men
Givenchy pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Givenchy pour Homme by Givenchy is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 2002, this composition was created by Alberto Morillas and Ilias Ermenidis. The top notes unfold with mandarin, grapefruit, coriander and violet; the heart reveals vetiver and lavender extract; while the base notes settle on cedar and labdanum.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Givenchy pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
23 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Highly recommended; I wear it in the morning and at night, and its aroma is clearly noticeable.
It is a very good fragrance; the woody aroma is well apparent in the opening. In my opinion, it is one of my favourites. It’s a pity that Givenchy has discontinued it; at least in my country, it is no longer available in stores, only online. It is a very formal yet casual scent, ideal for formal wear. It has moderate longevity, and the trail is noticeable at about four metres for the first two hours, but over time it stays on the skin and the trail diminishes. Nevertheless, it is very good and I love it.
I tested this fragrance without knowing what it was about; the bottle seemed striking and sophisticated. At first, it didn’t grab my attention much, with a typical citrus opening featuring lemony notes and grapefruit. After half an hour, I noticed other notes that transported me to a kitchen… in a good sense: I sensed grapefruit mixed with herbs, perhaps rosemary and pepper (the pepper made my nose tingle). Then came a soft trail of lavender and dried lemon peel, and that’s when I was captivated. The dry-down is powdery, dry, classic, soft, and elegant. At times, I sensed it as sweet and woody. I believe everyone has their own experience when applying it to their skin; I liked it, even though I hadn’t noticed this EDT before. Suitable for the 25 to 50 age range without issues, perfect for daily and semi-formal wear.
Today I tested this fragrance on my skin without knowing what it was about; the bottle seemed striking and sophisticated. The first few minutes didn’t grab me much, with the typical citrus opening, herbal notes, and grapefruit. After half an hour, other notes emerged that transported me to a kitchen, in a good sense: I sensed the grapefruit and another citrus mixed with herbs, perhaps rosemary and pepper (the pepper is evident and made my nose itch). Then came a soft trail reminiscent of lavender and dried lemon peel, where I was captivated. The dry-down is powdery, dry, classic, soft, and elegant. An aroma that at times smells sweet and woody. I believe everyone has their own experience when applying it to the skin; personally, I liked it, although I hadn’t even noticed this EDT before. Ideal for the 25 to 50 age range, for daily and semi-formal use.
Well… from the potency of the 2002 version to the timidity of this 2016 one (I have had it for a few months)… It still reflects Givenchy’s DNA: elegance and formality, but rough and simple, with that sensuality of another era without tonka bean. A classic woody scent with a marked citrus opening and an alcoholic touch; the other notes go to the background (or I do not perceive them). It is from another era, virile, but for personal enjoyment. Low sillage and moderate longevity on the skin.
Well, the potency of the 2002 version has become rather timid in this 2016 edition I’ve had for months. Nevertheless, it carries the Givenchy DNA: elegant and formal, yet rough and simple, with that old-school sensuality, without the tonka bean. It’s a woody classic with a marked citrus opening and an alcoholic touch; the rest of the notes sit in the background or go unnoticed. It smells of another era, virile and for personal enjoyment. Its trail is low and the longevity on skin is moderate.
A good woody/citrus fragrance, cultured, very masculine, and wearable. I love that it is by Alberto Morillas, but unfortunately the reformulation is a catastrophe in terms of performance: it lasts a maximum of three hours on my skin and the projection is barely an hour. It is very close to the legendary YSL M7, also by Morillas. You can detect lavender, cedar, mandarin, and grapefruit; perhaps other notes are very subtle, but the scent is one of the best. With this reformulation, the ranking drops. Ideal for semi-formal occasions, for men aged 25 and over, refined and serious, more for daytime use as it lacks romantic sweetness. Longevity: 3/10, Versatility: 9/10, Projection: 5/10, Fixation: 4/10, Quality: 5/10, Sillage: 7/10, Scent: 8/10, Total: 5/10. If it were vintage, it would be better.
Givenchy Pour Homme is woody, citrusy, spicy, and herbal. Citrus, vetiver, and cedar emerge, bringing freshness and elegance. The spices are fresh, like coriander and something similar to cardamom, plus a herbal labdanum note that I already noticed in Cartier Roadster. Its development is almost linear and of a formal style. Although it is spicy, it works well in spring and autumn because the citrus notes remain present and it is not heavy. It lasted five hours, but close to the skin; I do not know if the early formulas were more potent. Unlike the Blue Label, this version is drier and more formal, which made it less popular and it is now discontinued. I liked it, but the poor performance takes off points. It is a mix between Cartier Declaration, Boss Bottled, and Gucci Pour Homme I. Recommended for lovers of that style.
Givenchy Pour Homme is a woody, citrus, spicy, and herbal fragrance. Citrus, vetiver, and cedar emerge, bringing freshness and elegance. The spices are fresh, like coriander and something similar to cardamom, plus a herbal note of labdanum that I already noticed in Cartier Roadster. Its development is almost linear and of a formal style. Although it is spicy, it works well in spring and autumn because the citrus remains and it is not heavy. It lasted five hours, but close to the skin; I do not know if the early formulas were more potent. Unlike the Blue Label, this version is drier and more formal, which made it less popular and now it is discontinued. I liked it, but the low performance takes away some points. It is a mix between Cartier Declaration, Boss Bottled, and Gucci Pour Homme I. Recommended for lovers of that style.
Beto Ruiz: Is it your skin’s pH or has it been reformulated? I have a 2008 bottle and can testify to its great longevity. Without lying, I would put it on in the morning and could still smell it the next day, though it clung very close to the skin.
Batch 3×01 from October 2013. Citrus, spicy, and woody. Pour Homme blends the citrus notes so well that none stands out alone, achieving just the right balance between acidity and sweetness. There’s an herbal-spicy note, probably due to coriander. It closes with a cedar base and a very subtle thread of soapy lavender. A perfect harmony is noticeable. It seems to be a relaunch after being discontinued, with changes to the notes. Very masculine and pleasant for the office or daily wear, highlighting masculinity and sobriety. I keep it among my favourites for adding maturity and a unique masculinity. The trail and longevity are moderate in this batch; if later batches fade even more, it’s not worth it as it becomes discreet after two hours. I’d give it 4/5.
October 2013 batch: citrus, spicy, and woody. Givenchy Pour Homme blends the citrus notes well, balancing the acidity and sweetness without either dominating. I detect a spiced lemon note, perhaps from coriander, and it closes with cedar and a very soft, soapy lavender thread. The harmony is perfect. It seems to be a relaunch after a hiatus, with subtle changes. Very masculine and sober, ideal for the office or daily wear; it imparts a mature masculinity that few achieve. Sillage and longevity are moderate in this batch (around two hours), so if later batches performed even less, it’s not worth it for being so discreet. 4/5.
I’ve already found it and it will be my next purchase, and not blind.
It’s one of my favourites. I’m on the second 100 ml bottle and will buy another to stock up. It has an elegant and exquisite trail; my wife finds it very masculine but with a kind virility. It must be due to the balance between the woody base and citrus with pleasant notes of fruits and flowers. It’s not a common scent; I don’t associate it with any other perfume. Good longevity, at least six hours, although on skin I’ve noticed more than 24.
Buy blind. And it’s not bad, it’s terrible. Nothing at all. As if Alberto Morillas had created something of such poor quality. A generic aroma with no trail or longevity.
Its citrus opening is very good and the wood blend works perfectly. I’ve had it for several years and use it for important outings. I agree with others: it smells like lemonade. The downside is the trail and longevity; you need to apply more. Ideal for daily wear, work, and informal daily outings, all year round. I have the 2013 batch; you won’t regret its scent. Try it first on skin.
This review is for one I bought in 2008. Givenchy Pour Homme was excellent, very balanced, with a moderate trail of about three hours and a proverbial 24-hour longevity on my skin. I don’t know much about notes, so I’ll leave that to the experts, but it had very natural woods; smelling it felt like a sawmill with freshly cut cedar, the best wood scent I’ve ever known. It conveyed elegance, maturity, sophistication, security, serenity, and virility. It was very classy. Although I would miss it, I’m terrified to buy it now due to reports of bad reformulations affecting performance and trail. It’s a pity to throw away such a work of art.
I luckily found this 2015 Bach bottle; I tested it before but my commitments prevented me from buying it. Pour Homme by Givenchy was a classic with many followers. Olfactorily, Morillas and Ermenidis created something semi-classical where the wood yields to floral and spicy notes. The opening is lavender with dark wood and citrus that disappear in 15 minutes but return subtly if the temperature rises. It instantly reminds me of Memoir d’Homme by Nina Ricci. It’s semi-formal, elegant, and blends past and present. It’s a linear beauty that demonstrates a great understanding of the brand’s status. I don’t know when production stopped, but they say it was reformulated and the performance dropped. My 2015 bottle lasts decently for 8 hours, although it lacks hours in the top notes. A must only if you like the classic and away from trends. If you’re a collector, seek out the few remaining ones. Four seasons.
This review is based on a Bach bottle from 2015 that arrived in my collection by chance… I recall testing it when it was launched, but my commitments did not allow me to buy it. Pour Homme had a long presence, a following, and suffered the glory and fall of this emblematic scent under the Givenchy insignia. Olfactorily, Morillas and Ermenidis propose a semi-classic aroma where wood is held hostage by the floral (labdanum, iris) and spicy elements. The opening shows classic accords: lavender harmonised with semi-dark wood and a slight illusion of ebony, polished with citrus juices that depart after 15 minutes to subtly re-emerge if the temperature rises. It brings me instant memories of Memoir d’Homme by Nina Ricci, sharing its style and launch year. It is a semi-formal to formal ensemble that emanates acidified wood, with one foot in the past and another in the present. To be honest, it is a linear beauty that shows great understanding between the creators and the Pour Homme emblem. I do not know when production stopped, but it has been disappearing; some report reformulation and a drop in performance. My Bach 5B01 bottle behaves well, lasting up to eight hours without issues. I would just like greater longevity in the top notes. A must if you enjoy classic approaches and this style that distances itself from fashion. If you are a collector, seek out the few remaining bottles. Four seasons.
I agree it reminds me of Memoir d’Homme by Nina Ricci. I bought it by mistake while looking for a substitute for Givenchy Blue Label, my favourite when I started with perfumes. I love the freshness of the cardamom. Perhaps I liked Blue Label more; I’m not sure.
It smells like a loving and protective man, very attractive to women looking for a husband and to gay men seeking a serious relationship. Perfect for cold weather; imagine Turin in autumn, with a silk scarf at the café Al Bicerin, enjoying a cortado with whisky and chocolate cake. The downside is that it has been reformulated and no longer lasts or has the trail it used to.
To me, it smells very much like Herrera for Men, following that same line.
Smells like Bulgari Aqva but without the overwhelming marine notes, finishing with a touch reminiscent of Cartier. It’s fresh, soft, and elegant—perfect for the office as no one will complain. It has a sensual sweetness suitable for dates with a known partner, though being timid and lacking projection, it’s not for hitting on people or going out to noisy clubs at night. It only works on hot nights up close. Its major flaw is that it lasts very little.