Men
Montana Parfum d’Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Montana Parfum d'homme by Montana is a leather fragrance from the leather family, launched in 1989. The nose behind this composition is Edouard Flechier. The top notes are aldehydes, lavender, cinnamon, pepper, bergamot, lemon, tarragon and mandarin; the heart notes are pine needles, carnation, sage, rose, geranium, jasmine and nasturtium; the base notes are leather, oakmoss, incense, patchouli, ambergris, labdanum, cedar, vanilla and sandalwood.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
aldehydes
-
Corazón
Pine Needles
-
Base
leather
Comunidad
533 votos
- Positivo 91%
- Negativo 6.4%
- Neutral 2.4%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Montana Parfum d’Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
It’s a marvel; I recommend it 100%.
At first, what I noticed most was the lemon (not as strong as in Montana Pour Homme), aldehydes, tarragon, and lavender. In the dry-down, a balanced floral structure with carnation, jasmine, rose, and geranium. The base has soft patchouli, leather, sandalwood, moss, cedar, labdanum, and vanilla with a slight sweet touch. This fragrance, at the start and end, reminds me of Halston Z-14, but softer and more polished. Its trail is heavy with aldehydes and citrus, perhaps reinforced by pepper. Longevity is over 12 hours. Although it’s a leather scent, it’s not as dense as others; with the citrus, it has potential for both heat and cold, but more for day than night.
What a cool perfume. I’m surprised the price is so comfortable for such quality. I’ll be getting another bottle of this underrated classic soon. Montana Parfum D’Homme is very much in the line of 80s fragrances, but much more friendly to modern ears. It has great projection and longevity. Many people dislike the packaging, but I love it; it’s a small architectural sculpture housing a refined fragrance. A true gift for both the eyes and the nose. Its only flaw is the atomiser: when you press it, the liquid squirts out instead of spraying, like many other fragrances. User priethcallas has already spoken much about its composition, with very interesting concepts. Highly recommended without a second thought for price, quality, and packaging. NOTE: I bought the 100ml version less than 24 hours ago. The opening is very strong, enveloping, and wonderful, dominated by leather, lavender, and sandalwood. It reminds me of Quorum by Puig, but cleaner and more aromatic. After an hour, the floral and citrus notes become more prominent. Unfortunately, after 2 or 3 hours, it smells very close to the skin; that’s when the cedar and vanilla become noticeable. The longevity isn’t as optimal as the version I had 17 years ago; they must have reformulated it. It’s now made in Italy. Anyway, it remains a classy, characterful fragrance. Scent: 9/10 Longevity: 6/10 Projection: 7.5/10 Price: 10/10
The only ‘but’ I would add is that it does not play well for night wear.
Great fragrance with an incredible quality-to-price ratio. It does keep some similarity with Aramis Havana, but I prefer this one: it is more refined and has better longevity and projection.
Smelling this fragrance again today brought back pleasant memories and a growing love for 80s perfumes. Montana Parfum d’Homme is synonymous with class and elegance; it has the same masculinity and vigour as Cartier Santos, Kouros, or Quorum, but it is softer, less dense, and less aggressive, which gives it great versatility and allows it to be worn even from the age of 25. The ferns, woods, and spices coexist in harmony with the vanilla and citrus. I am surprised that a cologne of this calibre is sold so cheaply, which is why it is worth so much. Stunning fragrance!
This is an excellent cologne!
Today, after some time, I sprayed about four sprays of Montana Parfum D’Homme. Feeling it on the skin is re-falling in love with this excellent fragrance; it is rare that it is not under the microscope of those reviewing creations of yesterday. It has a quality worthy of highlighting. Its scent is superb, elegant, and warm, with a leather base and well-balanced herbaceous and spicy nuances. The dry down is delicious, animal and fresh, settled on a bed of incense with a fine sweetness. I have always seen it as a link between the virile creations of the 80s and cleaner proposals of the 90s; it combines the best of both eras. Furthermore, its packaging is a sort of futuristic skyscraper. The designer Serge Mansau was inspired by the Tower of Babel. Highly recommended for lovers of classic masculine fragrances. Fragrance: 9.8/10, Longevity: 10/10, Projection: 9/10, Versatility: 8/10.
The 90% is similar to the Tsar by Van Cleef.
Truly delicious, with those 80s notes of pine, lavender, leather, and a touch of floral, tobacco, and woods. The opening recalls Quorum or Polo, but as it dries down, it becomes dry, magical, and sparkling, with that frozen lavender inherited from Drakkar Noir. It is cheerful and has great longevity. It is hard to describe something so complex. It has rogue and dirty traits of the fern, but without being so. It is an achievement to be both things. It is an exact photograph of the change in the 80s, like Aramis New West. Could Bogart One Man Show be the Sport version? Its creator, Edouard Flechier, also created the exquisite Aramis Havana. Aramis is a man in a white suit and pure; Montana is that same man with messy hair, a leather jacket, a t-shirt, and an eternal cigarette. Two versions of the same type, each valuable. Aramis Havana could be a flanker of Montana. The first version comes in a red box, made in Paris, with a dark bottle. Then it moved to Italy, red box but with a grey smoked bottle. Opinions vary, but I find the price very good. Be careful not to confuse it with Montana Pour Homme, blue box, which is a citrus floral musk. My verdict: a masterpiece, to whose feet I fell in love as a teenager in front of my Latin teacher.
For me, MPdH is more than leather: it is a dark, smoky fern, the reflection of a gloomy forest. Imagine a punk made up, full of piercings and wristbands, trapped in a time capsule. It is a faithful reflection of the 80s, the baroque era of perfumery. It is outdated but classy, masculine and powerful. I love it as much as Parfums de Peau. Rating: 9.
MPdH seems to me almost more than a leather fragrance, a dark, very smoky fern due to that mossy base; for me, it represents the reflection of a wet, dark, gloomy forest, just like a punky, made-up, pierced, leather-braceleted, all-black-dressed figure, all this captured in the bottom of a perfume bottle, like in a time capsule. The amalgam of notes that compose it never ceases to surprise me, making it a faithful and more than worthy reflection of the era in which it was created, the late 80s, undoubtedly, the baroque era of perfumery. Attributes like outdated and antique, but with great class, masculine and powerful, with three well-marked phases as is classic, I find just as wonderful as Parfum de Peau. Rating: 9/10.
This time, the aldehydes dominate, but relaxed leather, moss, and a soft pine follow the composition. Ambroxan is the centre of the personality, complex and prominent. The pepper takes over from the lavender, while the cinnamon is relegated. There is an interesting interplay between citrus, vanilla, and patchouli in the depth. The florals temper the leather and the woods. It is sweet, dry, and fascinating. This review is about the vintage.
Montana is pure hallucination. An explosion of fantasy for the senses. An offering loaded with joyful litanies for the soul. It’s a glorious ascent to the summit wrapped in morning mists. The word that best suits me to describe Montana is: Spell. Who would overlook this scent if you cross the street without knowing where it comes from? At first, you might turn your head looking for the woman wearing it, as it can remind you of the enigmatic, ravishing presence of Opium for Women. If Opium describes the urban charm of an updated Cleopatra, Montana wraps you in its wings, encoding dreams and desires in an ineffable code. Just as true first love leaves indelible photographs, Montana is an open possibility to the impossible. Without declaring itself the child of yesterday or tomorrow, it imprisons reason so the heart can fly free, beyond the real.
Montana is a pure hallucination, a burst of fantasy that lifts you like a glorious sunrise. If you cross paths with it on the street, you turn to look for the woman wearing it, because it smells of that urban and seductive charm of Opium. Montana Parfum d’Homme wraps you in its wings, capturing dreams and desires like true first love. It is not for the past or the future; it is for letting the heart fly free.
My father had it, and I perfectly remember this aroma as it transports me back to my childhood, to parties, 15th birthdays, people I love, weddings, as he used to wear it on those special occasions. It’s an indescribable scent; it can be described as fresh woody, but without a very marked style, it’s multifacetic… Really, I can’t make an objective review about this perfume; it’s incredible, it’s the best thing I’ve ever experienced, it’s class, it’s sophistication, it’s happiness, it’s emotion, it’s tears of joy, it’s family, it’s the centre of attention, it’s UNIQUE!
My father had it; I remember this scent perfectly, it transports me to my childhood, to parties, 15th birthdays, people I love, weddings, since he wore it on those special occasions. It’s an indescribable scent; it can be described as fresh woody, but without a very marked style, it’s multifacetic… Really I can’t make an objective review, it’s incredible, it’s the best thing I’ve ever lived: it’s class, it’s sophistication, it’s happiness, it’s emotion, it’s tears of joy, it’s family, it’s the centre of attention, it’s UNIQUE.
A perfume of full 80s style, very aromatic but not invasive, persistent, strong and delicate at the same time, with many nuances. I perceive a spicy freshness that fits rainy days well, those days when you fancy being in front of a fireplace in good company, with the aldehydes and pine well present, which give nostalgic emotions. It offers good longevity and is well-constructed, a good option for lovers of this style. Undoubtedly suitable for special occasions; if my sense of smell isn’t betraying me, I note a fusion between Krizia Uomo and Azzaro Old. Respectable proposal I discovered thanks to Bofifa.
Exuberant and cool, a peacock made into perfume. It’s no surprise the creator is the same as Havana’s; both Parfum d’Homme and Aramis are to perfume what a Versace shirt is to clothing: something overdressed and baroque, yet masculine. Parfum d’Homme is the new step in 80s fougères; they felt drier or greener, here the ferny aspect isn’t lost, but you smell a new, bold, and youthful current, between green and blue, with a magnetic, resinous sweetness. In this late-80s transition, I see three paths: the aromatic-spiced, the new marine fougères and plummy ones, and the overloaded ones with a thousand notes like Zinno or Egoiste. Parfum d’Homme opts for the second, destined to perfume the necks of the coolest guys in the bar. It knows about Kenzo’s oceanic lavenders and Cool Water, and modern fougères like Drakkar Noir, but it wants to hang a gold medal around its neck. It’s a perfume I don’t like for myself, though I find it more interesting than the previous ones for its wonderful flashes of incense-pine, like a hippie resin of pine, patchouli, and orange. That explosion of sweet, balsamic greenness sets it apart from its twin, Aramis Havana, which is bluer, with an antiseptic aura, more marble-like, and with a certain floral and tobacco gravity. Montana has its own personality when the carnation snaps with the incense and pine; you die of delight at that herbaceous, ecclesiastical sweetness, like a Miami Sound Machine or Jean-Claude Van Damme version of the classic Magno or Badesse. Undoubtedly, it’s very much of its time, but it holds up better than Kenzo or Cool Water thanks to its androgyny and composure between discotheque and sacramental. PS: It feels a bit artificial, but most of the new 90s wave was like that; they didn’t want naturalness. PS II: It has nothing unisex about it, unlike its female companion Parfum de Peau, one of the best chypres/leathers ever made, which all men tired of today’s rubbish should try. Still, I invite women without prejudice; more than one will be surprised when the heart notes arrive. PS III: Editing to add another similarity: Aztek by Yves Rocher.
Exuberant and dashing, a peacock made into perfume. It’s no surprise the creator is the same as Havana’s; both Parfum d’homme and Aramis are to a perfume what a Versace shirt is to clothes: over-the-top, baroque and yet manly, a mess. Parfum d’homme is the new step in the fougères of the 80s, which felt drier or greener; here the fougère aspect isn’t lost, but in the horizon one smells a new brazen and youthful current, between green and bluish, with a magnetic and resinous sweetness. In this transition of the late 80s I see three paths: the aromatic spiced one, the new marine fougères, lavender and leaden, and the over-the-top ones with a thousand notes like Zinno, Egoiste and Heritage. Parfum d’homme opts for the second path, destined to perfume the collars of the coolest guys in the bar, a fougère that knows oceanic lavenders like Kenzo and Cool Water and modern fougères like Drakkar Noir exist, but that wants to hang a gold medal around its neck. It’s a perfume I don’t like for myself, though I think it’s more interesting than the previous ones because it unfolds, splashing like a choir of drunk crickets, wonderful flashes of incense-pine, as if revealing a hippie pine resin, patchouli and orange à la Karma Lush. That explosion of sweet and balsamic greenness distinguishes Parfum d’homme from its twin Aramis Havana, and watch out, they’re very similar. According to my tests, the Aramis one is more bluish, with an antiseptic aura like a little piece of blue-toned myrrh, more marble-like and with gravity between floral and tobacco; accords that this Montana also boasts, but with its own personality when the carnation snaps with incense and pine and you want to die of delight feeling that herbaceous and ecclesiastical sweetness, a Miami Sound Machine or Jean-Claude Van Damme version of the classic Magno or Badedas. Undoubtedly it’s very of its time, but it withstands the passage of time better than Kenzo or Cool Water, thanks to its androgyny and its strange composure between discotheque and sacramental. PS: It feels a bit artificial, but most of the new wave of the 90s was like that; they didn’t want naturalness. The blue-bottle Havana already had a manufactured product aftertaste. I’m not saying it’s noticeable as a criticism, but they had that indefinable thing of their era. PS II: It has nothing to do with unisex, just like its female companion, Parfum de Peau, one of the best chypre/leathers ever made and that all men tired of the rubbish sold today should try. Still, I invite women without prejudice to see how it sits on their skin; more than one will be surprised when the heart notes arrive. PS III: Editing to add another perfume with a certain resemblance: Aztek by Yves Rocher.
I miss it. I wore it around ’97 and fell in love: the wood and the variety of flowers that blend with every skin, an explosion of sophistication and sensuality. I can’t get it in Argentina anymore. If it were available, I’d get it again without a second thought. Highly recommended.
UNIQUE, MALE, MANY COMPLIMENTS, NO LONGER AVAILABLE IN ARGENTINA. AN EXCELLENT MEMORY OF A PERFUME THAT MARKED AN ERA.
What a spectacular men’s perfume, what a pity they’ve discontinued it. For now, to remember its scent, there’s the Montana Black Edition black bottle, which looks very similar.
Now I have to go on a campaign to get it; so many good reviews can’t be wrong. At first, I hated it; I don’t know why. I loved Montana as a designer, got lucky wearing his clothes and was fascinated by his bottles, but I couldn’t stand this fragrance: it seemed very alcoholic, very pine, very spicy, very lavender… very everything. The worst part was that everyone wore it. Back then, the scents of the late 70s (pure pine) and early 80s (sophisticated, spiced, oriental) coexisted; Montana combined all of that and for me it was too much. A few years later, Gaultier with Le Male used the same tactic but it didn’t shock me as much, even I liked it. That’s why I’m going to look for it to have it in my collection and not be left with only that wrong memory.
Rest in peace.
A miniature in my collection made me realise it’s not worth crying over this perfume: it is a totem, yes, but it doesn’t deserve the fortune speculators are asking, considering it’s very similar to its younger brother, Montana Black. I’m not saying one is better; they have nuances that suit each person’s taste more or less. The original is more vibrant, warm and green; the recent one is harsher, with musk and incense notes. Anyway, they’re almost the same.
In fact, I tried the ‘Light’ version, which isn’t listed here. It’s less potent than the original, intense and mature. It’s not for everyone; perhaps it doesn’t fit these times anymore, but when it first came out, I fell in love. Sensual, powerful, it smells of leather, something animalistic.