Skip to content

Phantom by Rabanne

Men 2021

Brand
Rabanne
Perfumer
Anne Flipo
Perfumer
Loc Dong

Description

Phantom by Rabanne is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2021, this composition was created by Anne Flipo, Dominique Ropion, Loc Dong and Juliette Karagueuzoglou. The top notes unfold with lavender, lemon zest and Amalfi lemon; the heart reveals a harmony of lavender, earthy notes, apple, smoke and patchouli; while the base notes complete the structure with vanilla,…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 24%
  • Spring 29%
  • Summer 19%
  • Autumn 29%
  • Day 52%
  • Night 48%

Key notes

Community

6,503 votes

  • Positive 59%
  • Negative 23%
  • Neutral 18%
positive reviews 6.5 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentAutumn CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

14,734 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

9,568 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

5,055 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Phantom

Main accord citrus Year 2021 Gender Men Perfumer Anne Flipo · Dominique Ropion · Juliette Karagueuzoglou · Loc Dong

Phantom by Rabanne is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2021, this composition was created by Anne Flipo, Dominique Ropion, Loc Dong and Juliette Karagueuzoglou. The top notes unfold with lavender, lemon zest and Amalfi lemon; the heart reveals a harmony of lavender, earthy notes, apple, smoke and patchouli; while the base notes complete the structure with vanilla, lavender and vetiver.

Flowers Fruits, vegetables and nuts Woods and mosses Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

3,970 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

3,836 votes

Character

Leading answer Leans masculine

4,201 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

3,736 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. I love almost all the notes, but there’s one that kills it for me: that smoky, earthy blend just doesn’t work. It’s a good fragrance overall, but for that detail, it’s not for me.

    Reply
  2. It’s sweet and earthy, not so much floral, though it starts with lavender and lemon. It suits me brilliantly in winter or autumn, and in spring, better in the evening. It features a sweet lemon, like a tangerine, not acidic, which transitions into vanilla and lavender. The smoky, earthy note is more prominent at first, clean like Tepeyac soap, but then settles to add depth.

    Reply
  3. My first designer scent: I liked it at first, but that toxic opening put me off so much I no longer wear it unless forced. It brings back good memories of when I started dating my girlfriend, but now I find it difficult. It smells childish and generic, rich but with an ending that’s just revolting.

    Reply
  4. JavierPerfumista

    The Little Robot was my first Christmas present, one of the few named ones that wasn’t from Lidl. For a seventeen-year-old in sixth form, it wasn’t bad. Upon spraying, the lavender hits hard and is noticeable in every note. Many people smell vanilla, but I always get lavender. A few hours later, the wood comes through and lingers longer. I think it’s a good scent that many enjoy, even if it’s not for my stage of life. For me, at seventeen, wearing The Little Robot was a symbol of an important day, a History exam, or a project with a teacher I really liked. Recommended for young people, and the bottle is very well designed.

    Reply
  5. My relationship with Rabanne’s Little Robot is complicated. I had a period when Phantom was my signature, but over time and with more fragrances, something changed: now I smell too much vetiver and have had a taste crisis. Perhaps my nose has evolved? Who knows. Leaving that aside, the fragrance is potent and sweet: lots of lavender and vanilla. The citrus notes of the opening pass quickly; the protagonist is that enveloping sweetness from start to finish. As it dries down, it maintains intense lavender with earthy notes and powerful vanilla. By the end of the day, the vanilla becomes creamy and slightly powdery, where the vetiver steps in to give it body. Is it rich? Yes, undoubtedly. The Little Robot is a success due to its versatility and delicious vanilla. It suits all ages, but if you’re a teenager, it gives sophistication without losing fun. Advice: test it on your skin for at least half a day. Only then will you know if it’s made for you. Rating: 7/10 for its versatility and spectacular vanilla.

    Reply
  6. metroidsoldier

    I tried it and loved it, but now I don’t like it because I smell more earthiness. Sometimes I notice lemon, lavender, and vanilla, but it didn’t work for me. I’ll never try it again because I find it very earthy compared to other Phantoms.

    Reply
  7. Clearly designed for a young audience, with a fresh opening of lemon, lavender, and an earthy base that gives it character. Every time I wore it, I received compliments, and it seems to be one of those easy-to-enjoy fragrances, to the point that I don’t know anyone who doesn’t like it. I consider it an underrated proposition, with moderate longevity and sillage that perform well for everyday wear.

    Reply
  8. I’m not an expert in fragrances; I understand it’s not a unique scent, but I believe ‘old works’. It’s a fragrance with a wonderfully rich lavender smell that complements the lemon perfectly. The only reproach is its poor longevity on skin (approx 3 hours) and on clothes 6/8 hours, but that’s understandable as it’s an EDT.

    Reply
  9. jdleon25

    I don’t understand the hatred it gets; it’s a good perfume for any occasion, smells masculine and is very rich. The longevity is good, you just need to put between 7 and 10 sprays.

    Reply
  10. Well, to be honest, I bought the bottle because of the robot ad and that catchy song, haha. Since I only started into perfumes two years ago, that was what pushed me. The scent is sweet-citrusy; I’m not a huge fan of sweetness, but it’s rich and not cloying if you don’t over-spray, especially in the heat. The vanilla is very pleasant. It suits me well in fresh spring, autumn, winter, or rainy days; definitely not in the heat. It lasts almost all day on skin, over 8 hours, projects well at the start and then throws out bursts. The trail is medium-high. Girls, especially younger ones, love it because it’s a rich sweet. It works for the office in those seasons, casual outings, dates, or parties, but nothing for business or formal events; it’s more fun. It’s not my absolute favourite because I’m not a fan of sweetness, but I will definitely buy the refill again. I recommend it if you like sweets or want to turn heads at a casual date.

    Reply
  11. It’s good, but it’s too sweet. I wouldn’t recommend using it in enclosed spaces due to the intensity of the aroma.

    Reply
  12. When I first bought it, I thought it was super rich, but over time it started to bother me. It has an extremely irritating opening that makes my nose itch; the mix of lots of lavender and lemon is annoying. The drydown is rich but nothing special. I see it for teenagers who want to use it in winter during the day or night.

    Reply
  13. Van der wiel

    Those people who say it’s a unique scent probably have three or four perfumes in their collection, haha. I don’t see any originality in it; there are plenty of similar things on the market. That chocolatey note is in fashion; for a moment it reminded me of that Mugler gourmand; it’s rich, youthful and tasty, but definitely not original. There are many similar ones, especially in the new Bad Boy.

    Reply
  14. Do you know anything that smells the same? NO. This makes it unique; it doesn’t matter if you like it or not, look at the bottle, the sweetness, blah blah blah… the mix of lemon with lavender, something smoky and that earthy sweet sensation is perfectly integrated. Excellent performance, generates compliments, doesn’t saturate, casual semi-formal use, good all year round and across a wide age range… few perfumes offer this. Totally recommended. Only those seeking ‘difficult’ aromas will define it as a ‘no’, though nothing can be faulted in it.

    Reply
  15. juanlandero

    It’s a good fragrance; you don’t go unnoticed and it has very good longevity.

    Reply
  16. This is clearly the most hated and underrated perfume I’ve ever seen. For a long time I avoided it reading destructive reviews, until 3 days ago when I smelled it and I can’t describe what I felt. It’s exquisite, a truly unique scent, no matter what they say about it being similar to anything else. Its citrus opening with that earthy vanilla alongside the lavender makes this perfume a delight; I love it. Plus, it’s a compliment bomb; women love it. The only thing is I feel its longevity is short, at least on my skin; after 2 hours there’s no trace, but it projects very well. In conclusion, don’t listen to those critics and judge for yourselves. 100% recommended.

    Reply
  17. Forget comparisons and just tell me if it’s worth it: it’s a total hit. That blend of sweet and citrus caught me off guard, and I absolutely love it. If it lasted longer on the skin, it would be pure gold. In short: buy it, it’s delicious.

    Reply
  18. Super youthful scent with no rush. Does it bring anything new? Not really, but so what? It fulfils its mission: captivating the 15 to 25-year-old crowd. From the very first moment, it’s clear it’s linear, with no drastic changes; it smells sweet yet fresh, like a piña colada. The trail is a bit heavy (but not a bad thing) and lasts quite a while (over seven hours). The bottle catches the eye and suits the target audience perfectly, even with those QR codes on the packaging. I agree it gives a nod to ‘Le Male’, but as a 2020s version. I insist: it’s for young people; there are plenty of older individuals getting annoyed because it follows current trends.

    Reply
  19. Johan parfum intense

    A scent that many love and others find infuriating. For me, it’s a gem, though there are better options. It smells like a cookie or something very sweet; it’s delightful and gives a youthful vibe.

    Reply
  20. To be honest, I think there’s a mistake on the website regarding the accords. It smells very metallic in the heart notes, yet the description states there is nothing metallic, only smoky, which I certainly haven’t noticed. It could be a confusion, but yes, it does smell of metal, something the page doesn’t record.

    Reply
  21. They say it’s generic, but it doesn’t remind me of anything specific. It’s fine if you like these scents, but it’s exclusive for people under 20, for dates or parties, day or night. Perhaps for everyday wear, the vanilla is a bit too overpowering. It’s not very masculine; it doesn’t smell of ‘man’. I’ve worn it several times to go out and my girlfriend says it smells super unisex, like something a woman would use too. If you can get it cheap, go for it, but at retail price, there are better options.

    Reply
  22. Like it or not, this is a perfume that offers nothing new, yet I absolutely adore it. It smells of biscuit and loads of lavender, it’s so relaxing, and I wear it at home just to smell good. 8/10.

    Reply
  23. I love the scent. It’s nothing groundbreaking, but it’s very rich. It’s like chewing gum (in fact, it reminds me a bit of Invictus) but with that lavender that makes it more intense, plus a smoky note that I really like. It lasts quite well, around eight hours on the skin, and it earns plenty of compliments. It’s certainly youthful, perfect for daily wear (except in summer) and night outs.

    Reply
  24. molletmod.73

    An unbearable aroma, ultra-synthetic grapefruit, vanilla-sweetened, cloying, and soapy lavender. On top of that, it lasts long enough to be a real nuisance. You’ll get the house’s ‘chewing gum’ touch, common in Invictus, One Million, and so on, and you’ll suffer it here too. Four perfumers for this? They’re throwing good money after bad. The kitch robotic bottle is the work of a psychologist on call. Leave the Moschino illuminati to their greasy mess. Now, to vary things and show off their imaginary risk, they’ll release a flanker son to the robotic one, just as boring as the father, every nine months. For millennial kids or infantilised idiots with Play-Doh-level judgement.

    Reply
  25. santirome

    This fragrance is a futuristic ‘Le Male’. Perhaps you’ll think I wrote this review while completely high; however, the concept and philosophy of both are identical, just in markets of two totally different eras. (Anyway, you’ll be right).

    Reply
  26. zmjuanpablo

    It just doesn’t quite convince me. The marketing pitch is a citrus-vanilla fragrance for young people and parties, but I’m not sure it achieves its goal compared to giants like Scandal, One Million, or Bad Boy, which I find much better for those occasions. The lavender factor gives it a ‘classic’ character that clashes with a young audience and fails on its own to project a mature or formal image. So it ends up in a limbo: neither for young nor older, neither fun enough nor serious enough. It’s pleasant, yes, but I find it hard to recommend… and I can’t see myself wearing Phanrom outside of a moment of eccentricity or a passing whim. The bottle and digital aspects are interesting at first, but bland in the end. A case of style over substance that ultimately leaves me indifferent.

    Reply