Men
Phantom
Acordes principales
Descripción
Phantom by Rabanne is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2021, this composition was created by Anne Flipo, Dominique Ropion, Loc Dong and Juliette Karagueuzoglou. The top notes unfold with lavender, lemon zest and Amalfi lemon; the heart reveals a harmony of lavender, earthy notes, apple, smoke and patchouli; while the base notes complete the structure with vanilla, lavender and vetiver.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
6,503 votos
- Positivo 59%
- Negativo 23%
- Neutral 18%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Phantom y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en AmazoneBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBayCaracterísticas
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:






I understand some may not like it and find it flat, but I love it. It has good sillage and longevity, and the blend of vanilla with the citrus and quality lavender works very well. It has met my expectations; it can be worn at the disco or on nights out. Once again, Paco Rabanne has succeeded.
It smells too much like cheap perfume with excessive marketing for what it is. For me, it’s a mediocre fragrance. Forget the kitch robot bottle, which seems like a silly idea, because the scent tells me nothing: it sounds vulgar and unappealing to someone over 30 or who knows a bit about perfumes. It’s an unforgiving, absurd fantasy. It starts citrusy, then becomes an overdose of heavy-headed lavender, heavy vanilla, and at the base a patchouli with something earthy that smells like a sweet dessert, like Angel’s Share from a housing estate, trying to copy famous gourmands from afar. The truth is they haven’t had any wit. It smells synthetic and causes rejection. They’ve added many fixatives to make it last hours and deceive the young, its target audience. It’s heavy, boring, stupid, and without originality. Paco Rabanne pushes this on me. Now prepare for years of clones of this Rabanne robot.
It smells sweet and very good. On my skin it lasted all day and on clothes for several days, always subtle. Many who have smelled it on me have loved it.
With this maddening perfume I started my obsession with fragrances. I loved it and only wore it because I bought it in winter for uni; I didn’t receive many compliments because here, speaking out without permission is almost a crime. Once I went out with a classmate and she said it smelled nice and nothing more. I like it; it’s noticeable that it’s synthetic, which is understandable given it was made by AI, but that doesn’t make it as bad as people say. After using it for a whole year, only about 10% remains, so I won’t use it again just for the memories. I don’t recommend buying the EDT for the price; go for the Parfum instead :))
Greetings! Paco Rabanne Phantom smells of citrus and vanilla, a beautiful and well-balanced blend of lemon, lavender, and vanilla. It brings back summer memories, like a fresh and sweet breeze. It’s an easy scent to enjoy and one that others usually like. As always, I respect differing opinions.
I didn’t like it, at least with the testers. The citrus and lavender opening is too pronounced for me. Then the earthy vanilla side takes over and is what I dislike most; the earthy notes just aren’t for me.
Hello. It’s a light vanilla scent, very different from the usual. The interesting part is the dry down: sweet, slightly sticky, yet sexy and masculine. Ideal for enjoying alone.
It’s fresh, not sweet as some claim, but rather earthy lavender. Perfect for everyday wear in the office.
It smells very sweet and synthetic to me. I was intrigued because they say it’s AI-created and the bottle is too; I thought it would be unusual, but it didn’t surprise me. It’s not bad, just that my expectations were different.
I wandered into a perfumery without a specific aim and Phantom stole my heart. Its sweet, vanilla-infused opening with a citrus note is the best part. Dry down remains excellent; it becomes sweeter, almost like bubblegum. It’s a characterful vanilla, nothing as monotonous as others. Some may not find it suits them, but it’s a great perfume. The bottle is a work of art; I fail to understand the criticism. I’d give it a 9/10.
It just doesn’t quite convince me. The marketing pitch is a citrus-vanilla fragrance for young people and parties, but I’m not sure it achieves its goal compared to giants like Scandal, One Million, or Bad Boy, which I find much better for those occasions. The lavender factor gives it a ‘classic’ character that clashes with a young audience and fails on its own to project a mature or formal image. So it ends up in a limbo: neither for young nor older, neither fun enough nor serious enough. It’s pleasant, yes, but I find it hard to recommend… and I can’t see myself wearing Phanrom outside of a moment of eccentricity or a passing whim. The bottle and digital aspects are interesting at first, but bland in the end. A case of style over substance that ultimately leaves me indifferent.
This fragrance is a futuristic ‘Le Male’. Perhaps you’ll think I wrote this review while completely high; however, the concept and philosophy of both are identical, just in markets of two totally different eras. (Anyway, you’ll be right).
An unbearable aroma, ultra-synthetic grapefruit, vanilla-sweetened, cloying, and soapy lavender. On top of that, it lasts long enough to be a real nuisance. You’ll get the house’s ‘chewing gum’ touch, common in Invictus, One Million, and so on, and you’ll suffer it here too. Four perfumers for this? They’re throwing good money after bad. The kitch robotic bottle is the work of a psychologist on call. Leave the Moschino illuminati to their greasy mess. Now, to vary things and show off their imaginary risk, they’ll release a flanker son to the robotic one, just as boring as the father, every nine months. For millennial kids or infantilised idiots with Play-Doh-level judgement.
I love the scent. It’s nothing groundbreaking, but it’s very rich. It’s like chewing gum (in fact, it reminds me a bit of Invictus) but with that lavender that makes it more intense, plus a smoky note that I really like. It lasts quite well, around eight hours on the skin, and it earns plenty of compliments. It’s certainly youthful, perfect for daily wear (except in summer) and night outs.
Like it or not, this is a perfume that offers nothing new, yet I absolutely adore it. It smells of biscuit and loads of lavender, it’s so relaxing, and I wear it at home just to smell good. 8/10.
They say it’s generic, but it doesn’t remind me of anything specific. It’s fine if you like these scents, but it’s exclusive for people under 20, for dates or parties, day or night. Perhaps for everyday wear, the vanilla is a bit too overpowering. It’s not very masculine; it doesn’t smell of ‘man’. I’ve worn it several times to go out and my girlfriend says it smells super unisex, like something a woman would use too. If you can get it cheap, go for it, but at retail price, there are better options.
To be honest, I think there’s a mistake on the website regarding the accords. It smells very metallic in the heart notes, yet the description states there is nothing metallic, only smoky, which I certainly haven’t noticed. It could be a confusion, but yes, it does smell of metal, something the page doesn’t record.
A scent that many love and others find infuriating. For me, it’s a gem, though there are better options. It smells like a cookie or something very sweet; it’s delightful and gives a youthful vibe.
Super youthful scent with no rush. Does it bring anything new? Not really, but so what? It fulfils its mission: captivating the 15 to 25-year-old crowd. From the very first moment, it’s clear it’s linear, with no drastic changes; it smells sweet yet fresh, like a piña colada. The trail is a bit heavy (but not a bad thing) and lasts quite a while (over seven hours). The bottle catches the eye and suits the target audience perfectly, even with those QR codes on the packaging. I agree it gives a nod to ‘Le Male’, but as a 2020s version. I insist: it’s for young people; there are plenty of older individuals getting annoyed because it follows current trends.
Forget comparisons and just tell me if it’s worth it: it’s a total hit. That blend of sweet and citrus caught me off guard, and I absolutely love it. If it lasted longer on the skin, it would be pure gold. In short: buy it, it’s delicious.
This is clearly the most hated and underrated perfume I’ve ever seen. For a long time I avoided it reading destructive reviews, until 3 days ago when I smelled it and I can’t describe what I felt. It’s exquisite, a truly unique scent, no matter what they say about it being similar to anything else. Its citrus opening with that earthy vanilla alongside the lavender makes this perfume a delight; I love it. Plus, it’s a compliment bomb; women love it. The only thing is I feel its longevity is short, at least on my skin; after 2 hours there’s no trace, but it projects very well. In conclusion, don’t listen to those critics and judge for yourselves. 100% recommended.
It’s a good fragrance; you don’t go unnoticed and it has very good longevity.
I feel it smells like ripe mango 🫣😆
Do you know anything that smells the same? NO. This makes it unique; it doesn’t matter if you like it or not, look at the bottle, the sweetness, blah blah blah… the mix of lemon with lavender, something smoky and that earthy sweet sensation is perfectly integrated. Excellent performance, generates compliments, doesn’t saturate, casual semi-formal use, good all year round and across a wide age range… few perfumes offer this. Totally recommended. Only those seeking ‘difficult’ aromas will define it as a ‘no’, though nothing can be faulted in it.
It’s literally a vanilla bomb! If you like JPG, buy it and enjoy it.
Those people who say it’s a unique scent probably have three or four perfumes in their collection, haha. I don’t see any originality in it; there are plenty of similar things on the market. That chocolatey note is in fashion; for a moment it reminded me of that Mugler gourmand; it’s rich, youthful and tasty, but definitely not original. There are many similar ones, especially in the new Bad Boy.
When I first bought it, I thought it was super rich, but over time it started to bother me. It has an extremely irritating opening that makes my nose itch; the mix of lots of lavender and lemon is annoying. The drydown is rich but nothing special. I see it for teenagers who want to use it in winter during the day or night.
It’s good, but it’s too sweet. I wouldn’t recommend using it in enclosed spaces due to the intensity of the aroma.
Well, to be honest, I bought the bottle because of the robot ad and that catchy song, haha. Since I only started into perfumes two years ago, that was what pushed me. The scent is sweet-citrusy; I’m not a huge fan of sweetness, but it’s rich and not cloying if you don’t over-spray, especially in the heat. The vanilla is very pleasant. It suits me well in fresh spring, autumn, winter, or rainy days; definitely not in the heat. It lasts almost all day on skin, over 8 hours, projects well at the start and then throws out bursts. The trail is medium-high. Girls, especially younger ones, love it because it’s a rich sweet. It works for the office in those seasons, casual outings, dates, or parties, but nothing for business or formal events; it’s more fun. It’s not my absolute favourite because I’m not a fan of sweetness, but I will definitely buy the refill again. I recommend it if you like sweets or want to turn heads at a casual date.
I don’t understand the hatred it gets; it’s a good perfume for any occasion, smells masculine and is very rich. The longevity is good, you just need to put between 7 and 10 sprays.
I’m not an expert in fragrances; I understand it’s not a unique scent, but I believe ‘old works’. It’s a fragrance with a wonderfully rich lavender smell that complements the lemon perfectly. The only reproach is its poor longevity on skin (approx 3 hours) and on clothes 6/8 hours, but that’s understandable as it’s an EDT.
Clearly designed for a young audience, with a fresh opening of lemon, lavender, and an earthy base that gives it character. Every time I wore it, I received compliments, and it seems to be one of those easy-to-enjoy fragrances, to the point that I don’t know anyone who doesn’t like it. I consider it an underrated proposition, with moderate longevity and sillage that perform well for everyday wear.
I tried it and loved it, but now I don’t like it because I smell more earthiness. Sometimes I notice lemon, lavender, and vanilla, but it didn’t work for me. I’ll never try it again because I find it very earthy compared to other Phantoms.
My relationship with Rabanne’s Little Robot is complicated. I had a period when Phantom was my signature, but over time and with more fragrances, something changed: now I smell too much vetiver and have had a taste crisis. Perhaps my nose has evolved? Who knows. Leaving that aside, the fragrance is potent and sweet: lots of lavender and vanilla. The citrus notes of the opening pass quickly; the protagonist is that enveloping sweetness from start to finish. As it dries down, it maintains intense lavender with earthy notes and powerful vanilla. By the end of the day, the vanilla becomes creamy and slightly powdery, where the vetiver steps in to give it body. Is it rich? Yes, undoubtedly. The Little Robot is a success due to its versatility and delicious vanilla. It suits all ages, but if you’re a teenager, it gives sophistication without losing fun. Advice: test it on your skin for at least half a day. Only then will you know if it’s made for you. Rating: 7/10 for its versatility and spectacular vanilla.
The Little Robot was my first Christmas present, one of the few named ones that wasn’t from Lidl. For a seventeen-year-old in sixth form, it wasn’t bad. Upon spraying, the lavender hits hard and is noticeable in every note. Many people smell vanilla, but I always get lavender. A few hours later, the wood comes through and lingers longer. I think it’s a good scent that many enjoy, even if it’s not for my stage of life. For me, at seventeen, wearing The Little Robot was a symbol of an important day, a History exam, or a project with a teacher I really liked. Recommended for young people, and the bottle is very well designed.
My first designer scent: I liked it at first, but that toxic opening put me off so much I no longer wear it unless forced. It brings back good memories of when I started dating my girlfriend, but now I find it difficult. It smells childish and generic, rich but with an ending that’s just revolting.
It’s sweet and earthy, not so much floral, though it starts with lavender and lemon. It suits me brilliantly in winter or autumn, and in spring, better in the evening. It features a sweet lemon, like a tangerine, not acidic, which transitions into vanilla and lavender. The smoky, earthy note is more prominent at first, clean like Tepeyac soap, but then settles to add depth.
Ideal for summer; it smells super youthful and I recommend it from the heart.
Nothing new under the sun.
I love almost all the notes, but there’s one that kills it for me: that smoky, earthy blend just doesn’t work. It’s a good fragrance overall, but for that detail, it’s not for me.