Men
Red Jeans
Acordes principales
Descripción
Red Jeans by Versace is a fruity floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1994, the nose behind this composition is Jean-Pierre Bethouart. The top notes include peach, blackcurrant, freesia and blackcurrant; the heart is composed of rose, violet, lily of the valley, water lily and ylang-ylang; while the base notes are musk, vanilla and sandalwood.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Red Jeans y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I hold much respect, affection and nostalgia for this fragrance, as it reminds me of the person I gifted it to and even to her, despite the years. Its opening is clearly fruity: a tender, sweet peach, plum jam, alongside a touch of white floral, the acidity of blackcurrants and raspberries, provide a sweet-fruity, fresh-floral opening with a crystal soapy touch that envelops you in something special. A few minutes later, a sweet combination of roses and velvety violets appears, which, with the vanilla, becomes delicately exquisite, jovial, cheerful and radiant. Its base is a soft, earthy sandalwood; subtly, the musk adds balance, sustain and presence, ending in a charming and captivating scent. With a soft, delicate trail but constant (considerable time), like harp strings: each delicately plucked note is a delight. It is neither too childish nor adult; it is right in the middle, adolescent and youthful, elegant and versatile, suitable for day or night (but not in exhausting heat). A soft, sweet, powdery, soapy scent that denotes innocence, adolescent femininity, like those strawberry/peach flavoured lip balms. The minimalist little bottle is a beauty: reddish glass to see the pink liquid, a faceted cola bottle silhouette with lions (not yet the Versace Medusa), and a cap like a chess piece with another lion and a Greek key pattern. I met it in my student years and had the luck of meeting a special person; every time we met, I was impregnated with this scent, we had such great chemistry, we were the ideal couple, we agreed on everything, we discovered the world together. Sometimes I wonder why fate didn’t play in our favour, why we didn’t stay together. It evokes that youthful student stage, of believing in love for a lifetime, being innocent, cheesy, romantic and meticulous. I associate it with the first perfume of a shy, romantic teenage girl, reserved but intelligent, with beautiful dreams and first loves. Go on and gift it to her even if you think you have no chance, that she won’t peel, dodge or ignore you; with this perfume you will have one and only rare opportunity, take advantage of it and don’t let it go, as happened to me.
Although it is for a young audience, I recommend it to those who love extremely sweet and cloying aromas. Despite loving sweet and gourmand scents, this goes beyond my limits. It is pure sugar and strawberries; I perceive some cheapness after a while, but the freesia invades my senses for hours. It was making me dizzy and I took a long time to finish wearing it due to its strength; it was so sweet that at 12 years old, bees chased me with it hehe.
I ordered it for the notes and wanted something from the 90s, as I’ve realised I enjoy perfumes from that era. I couldn’t recall its scent or knew if I had smelled it before. I bought it and it arrived today. I sprayed it on the back of my hand: initially a bit alcoholic, but within seconds, the magic. It is very sparkling, synthetic without a doubt. On my skin, it is fruity at first with a blackcurrant acidity, very potent. As it settles, the flowers emerge: roses that don’t stand out, yes the lily of the valley, the ylang-ylang and perhaps the water lily. They accompany the fruits without the peach, more like apricot and blackcurrant. It sweetens little; it is acidic and sweet (but not cloying, just like a shadow), which is why it is sparkling and fresh with a 90s touch. The flowers are present, slightly powdery, just enough to identify unripe violets. The woods are felt little; the sandalwood adds depth. I have liked it very much and now I am sure I have smelled it in the 90s. It adapts to any climate, safe for daytime or in spring/summer. It is potent and can overwhelm with too much spraying. It lasts 5/6 hours on my skin, more so close to the skin and on clothes. I will have to test it well on my neck and wrists; surely it will be better. Happy to have it in my collection. Go on, dear lovers of fresh, fruity and 90s florals, though it adapts well to 2022 even if it is not gourmand.
A sweet, tender fragrance with a touch of fruit; it stays true to its 90s essence and surprises the nose. It has good longevity on the skin, though it could be better, and the trail is also quite good. I find it very versatile, but more suitable for a younger audience, as it lacks class.
Fruity? Mmm, let’s say it’s a bath of roses, but without fruit. I don’t detect the peach, nor the vanilla, nor the sandalwood. They are heavily musky roses; not bad, but I used it as an air freshener. My older sister tried it and loved it, so now it’s hers 🙂
I absolutely adore this perfume. I’ve been wearing it for around 6-7 years and it is eternally my favourite. For the price, it has good longevity and projection. It lasts about 7 hours. It’s not at all cloying and perfect for the evening.
Super artificial. It smells of mixed fruits with liquor. It smells like air freshener to me. I detect nothing powdery and don’t see it as easy to wear. It feels like pure alcohol and gives me a headache… too sharp. It smells like a spoiled perfume, one that goes off over time.
This perfume reminds me of putting red rose petals in water and then being left with that delicious rose scent. Personally, I don’t sense any fruitiness; if you are a lover of red rose scents, this will be your ideal perfume.
I gifted it to my mum out of curiosity, as my first fragrance was ‘Blue Jeans’—same bottle, different colour—and it felt like an interesting blind buy. When it arrived at my mum’s house, she found it familiar but in pink. Upon application, it smells of fresh roses with a few drops of water on top, though the dry-down notes become soapy, cheap and powdery. The trail is average, lasting around 5-6 hours; while it’s quite difficult to wash off your hands, it’s fairly good. I’d describe it as when you’re gifted some roses and someone sprays a little water over them; that fresh scent is its aroma, compliments guaranteed. Despite being vintage, anyone aged 16 and up can wear it; it’s very versatile and recommended.
I didn’t like it… I tested it before buying it blindly. The opening notes were wonderful; I could have said I was buying the fragrance at that moment, but I let the moment pass and tested it on my skin. Over time, the sweet and fruity notes disappeared, leaving extremely talc-like aromas and the rest imperceptible. On my skin, it just seemed like talcum powder with essence, so I discarded it.
I tried this perfume and the truth is, the initial burst has nothing to do with the dry-down; the latter becomes an unbearable, stinging sweetness. It is absolutely not my style.
I bought it blindly because I read it had two of my favourite notes: rose and violet. However, I agree with Rosa Ruth; it smells to me like children’s cough syrup (it’s a medicine for kids), although the scent isn’t entirely unpleasant, I’ll just finish the bottle, but I won’t buy it again.
It was a blind buy because it was on super sale. Based on the brand, I expected a more delicate and refined aroma, but instead, I find it super strident and synthetic. I’d sum it up as a super-sweet, overripe apricot about to go bad. I don’t find it refreshing; I find it cloying. Quite calmly, it could be a perfume for teenagers available in any pharmacy at a third of the price.
I wanted this perfume to be my favourite. It’s the one my mum used to put on me as a child. Pause to admire my mum’s cool style in Versace on a toddler the size of a Nenuco doll. But I find it too linear and overly sweet. It has notes I love (peach, freesia, ylang-ylang…), but I have a low tolerance for rose and feel it swallows everything else. The start has some interesting touches, but they’re extremely brief. Soon it turns into a very synthetic and sugary scent. Over the years, I’ve converted to Blue Jeans, which I find as special as Red Jeans seems generic to me. That’s the one my mum gifts me now.
Red Jeans has a lot going for it, but it doesn’t quite win me over. Price? Bargain. Bottle design? Looks like Baz Luhrmann designed it. Scent? Clean! Okay, all correct, we’re doing well, but… the trail is non-existent. On skin, it clings moderately, staying shyly close to the skin. The violet, a note I usually hate, is drowned out by a slap of fruit and toothpaste. The phases move faster than a tornado: moments of Cheap and Chic Moschino, a small veil of tobacco that dies quickly… and then, boom, the hit of locker-room smell, stifling shower after sports at school, some detangler product after the pool, and freshly spat-out mouthwash. All this at a speed I’d rather Alonso handle. Red Jeans is fast, nostalgic… and doesn’t convince me: stuck like a mummy in the 90s, Claire Danes, floral dresses, and half-peeled Nirvana posters. Nope.
This little perfume is beautiful. I was eager to try it and add it to my collection for its notes and the lovely bottle. I perceive a coquettish and fun scent; I’ve seen many reviews on other perfumes mention it reminds them of Barbie dolls’ smell—I didn’t understand what they meant until I used Red Jeans. It smells very nice; I recommend it for daily wear and for any age.
What a delightful perfume. Honestly, I bought it out of nostalgia, as when I was little, my mother bought Baby Blue for me, Blue Jeans for my older brother, and Red Jeans for herself. I bought Blue Jeans recently and found it repulsive, so I decided to gift Red Jeans to my mother, mostly for the memory. I love it; it’s super simple: sweet rose, nothing more, ultra-feminine and very sexy, a wonder. Every time I see the pot, I can’t help but unscrew the cap and smell it; it seems irresistible. I don’t understand the usability of women’s perfumes; with the sweetness level so well-balanced, it feels like it should work both day and night; if I were auntie, I’d wear it during the day, as for the night I prefer others, but the sweet point makes it totally suitable for evening too. Performance in winter or summer I don’t know, but given the price, I can say it’s nice, cheap, and sexy.
A fruity and refreshing opening of an enveloping, juicy peach nectar, sweet and tropical, dominating the start. A few minutes later, that sugary fruit note settles with floral touches, which are practically the protagonists until the end. The fruity chords loosen to give way to the rose, soft and talc-like, with hints of violet. Reaching the final phase, these floral notes continue to dominate strongly, a mix of many flowers because each note is hard to distinguish, accompanied by a sweet dry-down, slightly musky, with vanilla in the background to delight with a timid woody base given by sandalwood.
I never thought much of it and didn’t own it, but now I do like it and have it. I know that sounds absurd, but to me, it smells like a fresh Tresor, leaning aquatic due to the strong water-lily note. Very Nineties, from when fruits became absolute stars. Peaches and ripe apricots in abundance, with flowers in a swirl. As an eau de toilette, it’s not too heavy, very wearable, and very feminine. Always complimented. Designed for young girls, but now I think it suits any age. The packaging is original and still catches the eye, even though it’ll be 30 next year—very commendable. I like that brands offer a wide price range, accessible for every budget. The pity is that they automatically classify the cheaper ones as inferior scents, which isn’t always the case, especially with this one. I’m sure more experienced and sophisticated noses will dismantle my arguments with two words. I’ll keep enjoying this Red Jeans, after all, that’s what it’s for.
If you love vintage scents, this is your perfume. It has that magic blend of rose, talc, and soapy notes—a nostalgic fragrance reminiscent of our mothers’ classic creams. To me, it’s a real treat. If you’re looking for something trendy, don’t buy it; but if you want to innovate with an old-school aroma (almost a paradox), it could be your option.
Oh dear, what a disagreeable scent for me. It smells like cheap perfume roses from a remote village grandmother, as if it had been kept away for 20 years for special occasions. It’s piercing, shrill, and the worst part is that it lasts and projects. It gave me a migraine and upset my stomach. It smells of nothing but attacked roses. Nothing fruity. Definitely not for me.
I bought it blind… otherwise, I never would have! Besides lasting nothing, it smells quite bad. Very acidic. I don’t like it at all. In contrast, the Blue Jeans for men is one of the richest men’s perfumes in the world ❤️
Undoubtedly, it’s very sweet and I see it as exclusive for women. It has good longevity and is super feminine. My mum has it. Given the price, it’s quite good, and as a man, I say it looks great on a woman.
I bought it and it’s a pretty fragrance. My bottle initially smells of alcohol, but in seconds that sweet rose is noticeable; on my skin, it stays like that, no more. It’s feminine, but it lasts very little: after 20 minutes it drops and stays close to the skin for about two more hours. If it’s on offer and you like it, go ahead; if not, given the performance and that there are cheaper options, the price is high. The men’s Blue Jeans is better thought out, smells rich, and is different: it projects and is stronger. Just as Red Jeans is feminine, Blue Jeans is masculine. I confess I bought it for the tin 😂
It reminds me of soap and talcum powder, very 90s. I love it! Ideal for spring or summer, perfect for the day. It leaves a super clean and neat feeling.
It’s a totally 90s scent; personally, I’m not a fan because the powdery note makes me want to sneeze. Besides, I don’t perceive anything more than the peach and the powder. In my opinion, it’s a very simple perfume, but I understand why it might appeal to others.
At first, I was indifferent; I picked it up for the promo and the beautiful-looking packaging, but now I don’t agree with my perfumer friends. If it’s a pretty perfume, it doesn’t fit my usual style (I’m more into sweet scents; the Versace Red Jeans isn’t). It’s the only floral in my collection, and yet I like it. When you want to feel fresh in the heat, I highly recommend it. It’s different from what I usually wear, but yes, I would definitely buy it again. It’s a step out of your comfort zone. Not at all for older ladies; I’m 24 and I love it! It has no age; it’s timeless. Although I admit I wouldn’t put it on a 14-year-old, I would on a girl from 19 onwards. You just need to have an open mind. It has moderate sillage; it’s not overwhelming. I picked it up again weeks later and enjoyed it a lot.
What a perfume! :S It’s super versatile, clean, and very cosy. It has a feminine, warm, and vintage touch that feels great for any occasion, although it doesn’t have much sillage; it tends to go unnoticed unless you’re close. It’s ideal for daily and intimate use, so don’t look for it to delight others; it’s a perfume for you. Still, people have told me I smell good with it? Yes, I won’t deny it, but nothing exaggerated. It’s modest, and I think what’s decisive is personality rather than age, as it’s a pleasant and very natural scent (the soapy rose and violets are what stand out most on my skin). Anyway, I recommend testing it before buying, because it doesn’t resemble any current perfumes :9
I feel a bit confused by this perfume because the notes don’t seem to match what it really is. It wasn’t a blind buy; I tested it in-store and thought it smelled of sweet, delicious berries (the red bottle and initial fruity notes didn’t help me judge well). But I should have read reviews before purchasing, as it is definitely an incredibly clean, soapy, and powdery scent. If a Dove bar of soap were a perfume, this would be it from Versace. The packaging and tin are adorable; I think this line makes excellent gifts (especially given the price; I got mine for 360 MXN with a discount). Although I haven’t loved it, I use it when I’m not going out and want something soft and fresh. I feel it’s quite linear and very strong at first, with moderate projection and longevity; at home, with little movement and in the sun, it lasts about four hours, which doesn’t bother me. I wouldn’t buy it again, but I’d like to try the other Versace Jeans scents.
Lovely perfume, good price, a summery little peach with a ’90s soul.
It’s a delight, super light and easy to wear, ideal for blind gifting if someone loves florals; smells super floral, as if you’d just walked through a natural florist. It lasts on the skin but is soft, with little sillage, so you can feel it yourself without bothering anyone.
At first, I smell the fruity notes and currants strongly, then the roses emerge. It’s not ugly, but it doesn’t kill me either; perhaps it resembles too many others and lacks originality. For lovers of roses or florals, it is a valid option and is heavily stocked in perfumeries, but I’ll pass.
On paper, it seems modern and innocent, but it carries the spirit of another decade. It smells like a rebellious older sister with blonde curls and a motorcycle, diving into 90s disco videos. It smells like a university student from Stranger Things on the outskirts of Madrid. It smells like an Alaska and Nacha Pop cassette tape, like straightening hair with the mother’s iron. Today, it feels neither youthful nor sexy, but it is interesting and has personality.
It’s a disaster. The great coincidence is that every violet-based perfume I’ve tried has disgusted me terribly.
I bought it out of curiosity and for the good price. Upon smelling it, I felt a strange déjà vu. To me, it’s a pleasant vintage floral-fruity scent, a rare blend of flowers and fruits that I enjoy. I detect peach, apricot, rose, violet, and vanilla. It feels very nineties, youthful, and unpretentious. Fresh, casual, sparkling, soft, and slightly talcum-powdered. It works as a wildcard for me, transporting me back to the 90s. I understand why many people hate it; does it smell good? It smells odd, different, uncommon, but I like it and can see myself wearing it daily for casual outings. The bottle is pretty and makes a nice ornament. No regrets.
Peachy skin with little flowers and lots of light. Reminds me of a feminine Acqua di Giò, fresh and light, with that velvet aura that smiles. A youthful classic, fruity, and wearable forever. It speaks the same hydrated fruity language as Tommy or 90s teen formulas. What joy that Versace still releases it; for a young person in the making, it’s a sure success.
It arrived late to my collection and I love it. Cheerful, fresh, and fruity/floral with a 90s stamp but very current. Opens with sweet peach, then shy rose and powdery violet (reminds me of Halloween). I detect the aquatic water lily, which I adore. Excellent longevity for an EDT. Shares that clean/sapony air of Tommy or CK One. Don’t buy it blindly if you hate powdery scents. Perfect for spring/summer: vintage yet modern and versatile.
Unisex and zero sweetness; it feels more fresh and powdery than fruity. I’ll be giving it away because it doesn’t suit my taste.
I had this as a child, inherited from my mother. When I tried it in an airport, I discovered it doesn’t smell like little rose as I remembered. It opens with blackcurrant and settles into subtle peach and water lily. It’s light, feminine, and transports me back to the 90s, but perhaps not for a young girl today. Linear, lasting 7 hours. Functional for everyday wear: pleasant, but not particularly original.
My first scent from school, gifted by my mother. Ideal for Mediterranean heat, but it doesn’t quite work for me: the sandalwood ruins the peach and floral symphony once the spicy note hits, giving me a headache. Good entry into the world of perfumery for the price, though it is too particular.