Chloé Eau de Parfum by Chloé

So feminine and sweet, floral yet incredibly soft, nothing invasive. It arrived in a mini size and I fell in love at first sight; I knew I had to own it to enjoy it without doubt. It’s an easy-to-please all-rounder; the freesia, peony, and lily mix perfectly without rose notes, creating a youthful, flirtatious, and feminine floral scent. I’ll definitely buy it again when this bottle runs out.

What I love most about this perfume, more than the scent itself, is its longevity.

A delicate, timeless fragrance, a classic must-have. Its balance makes it ideal for quiet equinox afternoons. It suits any age, isn’t invasive, with a moderate trail and light projection. I see it as perfect for blending with other scents. The best part: I just bought a 100ml set with cream and a wallet-sized perfume atomiser at an incredible price, a third of the real value, cheaper than an 80ml Zara which has risen 20% here. Re-edit: I used it for two days and it’s very fine and delicate but too light. Short longevity, doesn’t seem like an EDP, barely a perfumed water. What a pity.

Does anyone else find a resemblance to Issey’s L’eau from 1992?

And there it continues, becoming a true classic. It may be liked more or less, but this Chloe is a powdery floral that will withstand the test of time because it’s timeless, untouched by fashion. It’s delicate, elegant, very chic (house trademark) and perfect for all ages. My nose perceives a softly fruity and citrusy opening, perhaps due to the lychee, which is soon nuanced by the freshness of the peony. It’s a small, well-tended garden, innocent, with rose bushes among indeterminate white flowers. The amber encloses a clean, radiant, and very feminine perfume. It’s the perfume May Welland would undoubtedly wear. I understand its success; it presents itself as a gentle aroma, a little shy, perfect for spring mornings. Despite being well-constructed and pleasant, like many new perfumes, I feel it has a personality that is too docile for my taste, although it’s not timid at all, because you can tell where it’s going. I like sniffing it on other people, but I don’t see it for myself.

Finally, I got my hands on this one; it’s a gorgeous, unique addition to my collection. While I own several rose scents, the initial lychee burst is quite sharp for me, though it quickly mellows into delicious florals. I barely detect any wood, which is a blessing; it smells slightly of talc and is very personal—I almost feel I need to bathe in it to get a proper hold of it. I’ll let it macerate for a few months to see if it improves, as the trail isn’t wide enough at the moment and no one has commented on it. For the price, I expected more; I bought the 75ml, and I don’t think I’ll repurchase just due to the cost and longevity. It reminds me greatly of Orlane’s Bouquets Autour de la rose, which shares similar notes, though I prefer the latter. Despite being an EDT, it lasts all day with good projection, at a fraction of the price of Chloé.

What a beautiful perfume 🥹 Chloé never misses. Their fragrances are designed for a refined, classy, and very clean woman. Chloe EDP is one of the few that doesn’t follow the ‘less is more’ rule; here, ‘more is more’ applies. It’s ambivalent: it’s fresh yet perfect for winter too. It strikes the right balance between floral, green, and sweet. For an EDP, I’d ask for more longevity; on my skin, it lasts a maximum of 4 hours. The bottle is gorgeous with silver details. Beautiful; I give it 9/10 for its projection.

I love it; it smells super fresh with a very delicate touch of white roses. I’d wear it in autumn or summer. I had it saved to try it, and in the end, it convinced me. It smells of ‘rich girl’ and sophistication to me; I feel like a king’s daughter. It’s youthful and invites freshness. I like that it lasts. It’s distinctive and uncommon, but I see it more for daytime; I don’t think it’s for the evening.

The opening is exactly as described, but in the heart, I only notice the magnolia and the valley lily, ending in that woody part where the white flower never disappears, leaving it fine, elegant, and clean. I don’t detect the amber. In summary, it’s elegant, well-blended, with a great trail and longevity. Recommended.

It smells quite feminine. In the classification game, it’s undoubtedly feminine, but not through sensuality. Some say it smells like a pretty, innocent, neat, and delicate girl, and I agree. I was gifted a sample, and it reminded me of Mercadona’s Rose Nude. Of course, there are quality differences, but not so great that I can’t admire the clone’s good work. The opening didn’t suit me much, I think due to the forced-sounding lychee, but the development is pleasant. I focused on the rose, which is very well crafted, and the other flowers and base notes elevate it in a simple, elegant way. There are no undercurrents; from the bottle to the end, it’s transparent in its simplicity (not to be confused with simplicity). Decent projection and good longevity. Curiously, I don’t see it for older women, but it depends on personality. I liked it. They say it’s trendy, and I don’t deny it’s noticeable, but I find it pleasing and classier than other modern offers. Recommended.

It smells very soft and powdery; I’ve used it a lot. At first, I absolutely love it, but eventually, it flattens out and becomes tiring. It’s wearable for daily use, and people tell me I smell good, yet I end up trying other things. I’ve been using its Mercadona clone for years, which is incredibly identical, but now I smell it everywhere and haven’t used it in ages.

I tested this fragrance in a huge perfumery and was so fascinated that I bought a 75 ml bottle. It has something nineties and minimalist about it. I find it delicate, feminine, and floral. On my skin, the freesias dominate with a touch of magnolia. It’s pretty, daytime-appropriate, and suitable for warm weather.

Mixed feelings about Chloe… on one hand, I agree about its longevity on skin, but my disappointment is that its scent is so well-known; I think it’s been imitated too much. Unfortunately, I don’t think it’s worth the expense for such a common smell.

Before smelling it, I didn’t understand why so many people talked about it, and honestly, after buying a 5 ml blind sample, I could understand all the love for this fragrance. For me, it’s spectacular, with a perfect balance between notes, good projection, and hours of longevity on the skin. After years of trying to dethrone the classic Pleasures in my collection, I have been utterly captivated by this beauty. A dream made into perfume, floral, innocent yet distinguished. A pretty girl, but one of those who puts on heels and walks strongly through life.

I thought I would like it for its floral scent, but I haven’t liked it much. I find it too simple, common, and somewhat childish. I don’t feel it stands out. It is true that over time the scent becomes more pleasing to me, and I believe it lasts quite a while on the skin.