Men
Beautiful
Acordes principales
Descripción
Beautiful by Estée Lauder is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1985, this composition was created by Sophia Grojsman, Bernard Chant and Max Gavarry. In its top notes, galbanum intertwines with rose, lily of the valley, blackcurrant, fruity notes, cassia, mandarin, bergamot and lemon. The heart reveals a floral harmony with neroli, carnation, calendula, mimosa, narcissus, jasmine, ylang-ylang, chamomile, lily of the valley, geranium, magnolia, orange blossom, lilac, freesia, pink violet, sage and neroli. The base settles on sandalwood, amber, vetiver, musk, cedar and vanilla.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
galbanum
-
Corazón
Tuberose
-
Base
sandalwood
Comunidad
4,104 votos
- Positivo 71%
- Negativo 23%
- Neutral 5.7%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Beautiful y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
34 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
A light version of Coco Chanel.
Beautiful woman’s scent. Extremely feminine, very elegant and timeless. For conservative and romantic women. It is calming and pleasant, yet invigorating and awakening the senses. I loved it. I first tried it many years ago and still buy it every time it runs out.
Beautiful!!! It is a beauty; it will make the woman within you shine, totally feminine. It is a classic floral fragrance, well-formulated, with incredible longevity; one of Estée Lauder’s best-sellers in the US. Although it is not the national anthem like Coco Mademoiselle by Chanel, it is worthy of any woman regardless of age, timeless, and one of my favourites. And as a bonus, you will always be recognised by it; the quality of Beautiful and its scent are of the same stock as Coco Chanel, very much in agreement with Kirtash.
Beautiful woman’s scent. Extremely feminine, very elegant and timeless. Ideal for conservative and romantic women. It is calming and pleasant, yet invigorating and awakening the senses. I loved it. I first tried it many years ago and still buy it every time it runs out.
What a beauty! It highlights the woman you are inside, making you look incredibly feminine. It’s a classic floral, well-made, with an incredible longevity. It’s one of Estée Lauder’s bestsellers in the US, though not quite as iconic as Chanel’s Coco Mademoiselle. It suits any woman, regardless of age; it’s timeless and one of my favourites. Plus, people will always recognise you by it. The quality and scent are on par with Chanel’s Coco, I agree with Kirtash.
My first encounter with perfumes was through my aunt; she adores them and always has several. I still remember that at 15, I saw Beautiful as a treasure among her fragrances; it was my favourite. Every time I visited, I would secretly try it on. It was intoxicating, vain, extravagant, enveloping, and luxurious; Beautiful never went unnoticed, and its tenacity seemed to surpass any other; few dared to compete. Beautiful is marked by the 80s, and in its DNA, we find characteristics of that decade. However, it differs from the others: Passion (1988) by Elizabeth Taylor focuses more on leather, Coco Chanel (1984) on spices, and Poison (1985) on fruits. Beautiful represents more of the floral side, aiming to be the scent that evokes a bride’s bouquet. Although more than the bouquet, it attempts to reflect the purity, beauty, elegance, and tidiness of the bride. It is a collection of countless notes, none shining over the other, but its floral nature is undeniable; although more than simple floral, I also see it as chypre. Unlike Paris by Yves Saint Laurent (1983), the finish of Beautiful is dry and not juicy; it has more citrus presence, where chamomile and calendula play an important role. In my opinion, the rose and jasmine do not reign here; they don’t stand out as the other flowers that compose it. It is very special to me; it was created the same year I was born, and that unites us. If you are a fan of opulent florals and the 80s, this perfume must not be missing from your collection.
Few perfumes are truly feminine, and this is one of them… sweet, beautiful, and floral, yet without feeling old or heavy. It’s easy to wear and very romantic. Notes of lilies, neroli, roses, mimosa, and magnolias surrounded by a sweet citrus like ripe fruit. A special fragrance for women whose style doesn’t seek glamour. A magnificent creation; I recall Kirtash saying it’s like an adaptation of Coco, just more wearable for any occasion. My mother used it in the 90s and still has a miniature in her collection. Powerful trail, soft, and excellent longevity.
Of the florals I’ve tried, this is the one I liked least. Fortunately, I only bought the sample size.
Of the miniatures I bought looking for a charming scent, this is the only one that I liked more or less, although I wouldn’t buy it. It’s a bit baroque for my taste.
As I can see in the photo, this is the Parfum version, not a mini of the Eau de Parfum. NO! It’s the extract, the concentrated perfume. It’s surely the same scent but more concentrated, something I haven’t been able to find in any perfumeries, neither in Chile nor abroad. It must be delicious, a field full of flowers.
It’s my personal fragrance. A love that this December turns 24. Fortunately, the reformulations haven’t made it unrecognisable. It remains luminous, luxurious, and feminine, with decent longevity and sillage. It’s worn on any occasion, day or night, all year round. It’s a true jewel; I love it so much! (Forgive the lack of accents; my mobile keyboard doesn’t have the Spanish alphabet).
Flowers, flowers, and more flowers: that is Beautiful. It’s a complete floral bouquet that makes you feel sitting in the middle of a garden full of all kinds of flowers and colours. To me, Beautiful embodies spring and floral beauty. This fragrance has always stood out since the eighties, when fruity and oriental bombas were predominant; Beautiful dusted off the proposals of that beautiful era, adding modernity. It took those old floral ideas and made them more intense and aldehyde-free, perhaps following very closely the pattern of Quelques L’Original Fleur (with which it shares great similarity upon first spray). It’s a bomb of flowers that, as it evolves, becomes slightly sweet, woody, and powdery. Although it has been reformulated, it retains great similarity to its vintage version and still has good longevity and sillage. If you like flowers, this is your perfume; they will undoubtedly love it.
Flowers, flowers, and more flowers; that is Beautiful. It is a whole floral bouquet; it makes you feel as if you are sitting in the middle of a garden full of flowers of all types and colours; for me, Beautiful embodies spring and the beauty of flowers. Beautiful is a perfume that has always stood out since it was launched in the 1980s; at that time, fruity and oriental bombs predominated, but Beautiful came to market, dusting off the proposals of the first perfumes, those of the beautiful era, incorporating their modern air. It took those floral proposals of the past and made them more intense and without aldehydes, perhaps following very closely the guideline set by Quelques L’Original Fleur (with which it shares great similarity in its opening). This fragrance is a bomb of flowers that, as it evolves, becomes somewhat sweet, woody, and powdery. Although it has been reformulated, it retains great resemblance to its vintage version and still maintains good longevity and trail. For those who like flowers, this is their perfume; without a doubt, they will like it.
I refuse to agree with everyone, but this perfume is so annoying and stressful that it doesn’t evoke a beautiful garden to me, but rather rotting water with flowers that have been in a vase for over a week without changing the water. For me, it’s one of the Estée Lauder perfumes with the least charm; yes, the bottle looks nice, but the contents are horrible.
It’s one of my favourite perfumes; it defines the feminine, elegant, charming, and conservative woman. Without a doubt, it’s not for every woman, because upon perceiving it, you can’t help but turn around. Fresh flowers predominate with a touch of elegance. If you walk into a meeting wearing it, you’re sure to catch attention; I always must have it. It’s a clean, white fragrance that denotes purity and tidiness, almost as if education itself became perfume. I’ve been wearing it for years and always find something different; I even realised it changes depending on how much you apply, just like other Estée Lauder scents. It’s a jewel.
Three times, with different people at different times, I’ve smelled a very strong, rather nasty, cloying, and even foul perfume. I asked them what they were wearing and all three answered very proudly: ‘Beautiful by Estée Lauder’…???. That’s enough for me not to try it on my skin, let alone buy it… I’d rather stick with the fresh floral of Pleasures.
It has happened to me three times with different people at different times: they smell a very strong, ugly, cloying, and even foul perfume. I ask them what they’re wearing, and they all proudly reply: ‘Beautiful by Estée Lauder’. That’s enough for me not to try it on my skin or buy it! I’d rather stick with the fresh floral of Pleasures.
This review is for a mini from the early 2000s. On my skin, it opens with an explosion of floral, green, and citrus notes. I love that initial burst; it’s like walking into a florist that also cuts lemons. It remains floral to the bone, but with green notes like chamomile, calendula, sage, and geranium that I like. I barely notice the white flowers, perhaps the orange blossom. What does stand out are pollen-heavy flowers like lilies and narcissus. It smells like a blooming garden with branches, little trees, and wet earth. It’s floral but not sweet, not innocent or creamy; it’s green and deep. It has gravity and timelessness. The amber drydown is lovely, with a shy touch of vanilla and a hidden musk as I like it. It gives a sense of cleanliness and clarity, but it has a certain coldness that makes me hesitate. I haven’t tried the current reformulation yet, but for now, I wouldn’t buy it. Although there are things I like, something doesn’t conquer me. That coldness.
It smells like a classic, powerful, and super vintage floral. There are so many flowers that I can’t distinguish which one stands out. I don’t dislike it, but I don’t love it either; it’s not my style. I wouldn’t wear it at night for a formal event because its scent screams elegance and maturity.
For women over 50, it smells vintage, just like the blue Charly. Personally, it doesn’t work at all for me; it gives me a headache and feels too heavy.
A journey to the splendid floral and green perfumery of the 80s. A fruitful era marked by the generosity of ingredients. Beautiful is the child of an era where slightly greenish floral fragrances with earthy and woody highlights were understood as beautiful. Always from a very feminine, elegant, and opulent point of view. I can’t help but think of Chanel’s No. 19 or Hermès’ Amazone formulas. Beautiful is a sum of a thousand notes that lead to a unique and compact scent evoking flowers, plants, trees, and vintage gardens. Perfumery history that very well represents the taste of an era and that still works. *edit: that note that leads to woody without really being so is the galbanum and hyacinth. Like Feaubourg, No. 19, original Miss Dior… Fashion notes of that era.
Feminine and a source of compliments. I wore it for many years about three decades ago. It lasts more than 24 hours on the skin. On clothes, I lose count of the days, especially on winter wool jumpers that aren’t washed often. I would like to find a perfume with the predominant notes of a current version. If anyone knows which one… thanks.
To those who have come this far to criticise this beauty, I want to ask you what you wear. Tell me, because to say the nasty things I’ve read, I’m intrigued to know if you have the money to buy an Estée Lauder. Because it’s not just about wearing the perfume on your skin; it’s about knowing how to carry it with the right clothes, the correct shoes, and above all, with style… so when you reach that level, C R I T I Q U E.
To those who have reached this far to criticise this beauty, I want to ask you what you wear. Tell me, because to read the nasty things I’ve read, I’m intrigued to know if you have the money to buy an Estée Lauder with Beautiful. Because it’s not just about wearing the perfume on your skin; it’s about knowing how to carry it with appropriate clothing, suitable shoes, and above all, with style… so when you reach that level, C R I T I Q U E.
A classic, elegant, floral, and intense without being overwhelming. Ideal for feeling confident and vivacious. It will always make you feel feminine and of good taste. I like it because it’s not one of those cloyingly sweet ones that grate on you after five minutes. I love it.
Rich, romantic, and luxurious. A fragrance of a thousand flowers. Inspired by Evelyn Lauder’s vision to make any woman feel the most beautiful in the place. Always romantic, beauty is represented by a bride symbolising the most feminine, romantic, and beautiful aspect of a woman.
The vintage version of Estée Lauder’s Beautiful doesn’t go unnoticed: at first, it may seem out of touch because nowadays it’s not common to find titans with such aldehydic-floral notes. But that gives it sovereignty for the right woman who wears it with confidence. It has a medium-to-heavy weight that makes it seem almost light among the bombshells of its era. It starts with a touch of anise and then green mandarin. The flowers dominate but don’t suffocate, offering delicacy amidst that powerful eighties feel of high standing. The pleasure lies in the heart phase. On my skin, the heart continues to pump flowers far more than expected, merging with a velvety, creamy, woody base. Beautiful reflects what we seek in perfumery: perfect interaction for magical moments, such as when two people meet, with that special warmth that flows through an irreplicable moment.
My aunt used to wear it and I remember it with affection, but now it seems to have aged terribly. It feels overwhelming to me; the flowers aren’t natural or fresh, but all mixed together and they suffocate me. It’s not my style; I’m looking for something more natural without that concentrated ‘perfume’ smell. It can be quite invasive for others.
My aunt used to wear it and I remember it fondly, but now that I’ve tried it, I feel it has aged terribly. It overwhelms me; the florals don’t sound natural or fresh, but rather clumped together and give me a bit of a turn. It’s not my style; I’m looking for more natural fragrances without that concentrated ‘perfume’ smell. It can be quite invasive for others.
What needs to be read… This fragrance, along with Amarige by Givenchy, seems to me to be one of the best florals in history. The quality is undeniable, but it is also undeniable that they are not made for everyone (and they don’t need to be). I love seeing how they try to convince us that this fragrance is ‘baroque’, ‘old-fashioned’, or ‘cloying’. Nonsense; there are people who don’t know how to appreciate the quality of certain fragrances. It has the same galbanum as L by Loewe, and that I love; I also love L, but this fragrance moves much more through white flowers (lily, magnolia, freesia…) and fruits. Its woody-green base is wonderful. It is a perfectly balanced fragrance within the explosion it is in itself. Very long-lasting and with a great trail. If you like florals, try it; this will not leave you indifferent. Personally, I love it.
What you need to read… Alongside Givenchy’s Amarige, these are the best florals in history. The quality is undeniable, though they aren’t for everyone (nor do they need to be). I love that they describe it as baroque, old-fashioned, or cloying… it doesn’t matter; there are people who don’t know how to appreciate certain things. It has the same galbanum as Loewe’s L, and I adore that, but here the white flowers (lily of the valley, magnolia, freesia…) and the fruits take the lead. The woody-green base is top-notch. It’s perfectly balanced despite being an explosion. Very long-lasting with great sillage. If you like florals, give it a try; it won’t leave you indifferent. I love it.
It’s a beast; it smells like a giant bouquet where no single flower wins, all set against a green backdrop. It reminds me a bit of Givenchy’s Amarige due to the mimosa. The longevity and sillage are medium-to-high. Although they say it’s for special occasions, I wear it every day if I want to feel elegant.
Very vintage.
Pure vintage.