Skip to content

Modern Muse by Estée Lauder

Women 2013

Perfumer
Harry Fremont
Perfumer
Olivier Cresp

Description

Modern Muse by Estée Lauder is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. Launched in 2013, this composition was created by Harry Fremont and Olivier Cresp. The top note presents the freshness of mandarin; the heart unfolds sambac jasmine, Chinese jasmine, lily of the valley, honeysuckle, flower petals, and neroli; while the base settles on musk, woody notes, patchouli, patchouli…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 15%
  • Spring 38%
  • Summer 22%
  • Autumn 25%
  • Day 75%
  • Night 25%

Key notes

Community

3,716 votes

  • Positive 74%
  • Negative 20%
  • Neutral 6.4%
positive reviews 3.7 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

7,374 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

2,671 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,541 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Modern Muse

Main accord white-floral Year 2013 Gender Women Perfumer Harry Fremont · Olivier Cresp

Modern Muse by Estée Lauder is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. Launched in 2013, this composition was created by Harry Fremont and Olivier Cresp. The top note presents the freshness of mandarin; the heart unfolds sambac jasmine, Chinese jasmine, lily of the valley, honeysuckle, flower petals, and neroli; while the base settles on musk, woody notes, patchouli, patchouli leaves, amber, and Madagascar vanilla.

White flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

1,300 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,464 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

608 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

512 votes

Community reviews

33 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Oliver Cresp remains a total hit; it never fails. It’s a gem that blends creamy, citrusy, and sweet notes all at once. Honestly, I’m completely enchanted and even hypnotised by it.

    Reply
  2. Maquillajecancunmx

    One of my favourite perfumes. It’s a white floral scent, barely citrusy and very ambered. Smells deliciously like an elegant woman in the morning. It lasts for many hours; I can even detect it the next day, though it becomes more woody and sweet. It compares well with Narciso Rodriguez For Her and yes, it’s very similar, especially in the dry down.

    Reply
  3. Maquillajecancunmx

    One of my favourites. It smells of white florals with an amber touch and very little citrus. It’s delicious for an elegant woman in the morning. It lasts a long time; even the next day it becomes more woody and sweet. It’s very similar to Narciso Rodriguez’s Her, especially in the dry down.

    Reply
  4. Soyfemenina

    I tried this fragrance and didn’t notice the tangerine at first; rather, I sensed something floral in the heart, though weak. It finishes with vanilla and musk, also faint. It smells romantic, like those paintings of a virginal lady and gentleman. It’s not for me as I’m looking for something strong and noticeable; besides, it doesn’t last long and you need to carry a refill. It’s a fine, quality scent, but very expensive with no price drop.

    Reply
  5. JuliLeggiero

    A great disappointment. It’s complex yet linear, hardly changing since application, which annoyed me. From the start, it was unpleasant to me. It’s not ‘for ladies’ as they say; it’s very subjective. It has a repellent or insecticide note, very chemical and disruptive. I don’t recommend buying it blindly; it’s not for everyone. It doesn’t match its name: there’s no muse and it’s not modern. It’s hard to hate a perfume and this is one. It’s not well balanced, not fresh, neither floral nor feminine. I find it repulsive and nothing like cleanliness. I recommend testing it first, on your skin and your mother’s (on her florals dry sweeter); it smells quite bad.

    Reply
  6. @egrimalt

    Quality and artistry in perfume! I’m a collector and buy blind; I bought this in kamikaze mode because I hate patchouli and it’s listed twice… and I have no regrets! At first, it enveloped me in white flowers, jasmine and fresh bergamot, like a freshly watered garden. I thought it was for daytime or mild climates, just another summer freshie. After two hours, it changes almost 100%: it becomes wood and amber, the mandarin emerges (more bitter than citrus), and to my delight, THERE IS NO PATCHOULI! It resembles Bvlgari’s In Red; now it’s nocturnal, formal and sexy. That’s where the quality and artistry show, that unfolding of notes you don’t find in cheap perfumes. What a wonder! I love being surprised like this. The longevity is good, around 8-12 hours. Great sillage at first, then more intimate, which is why it feels so sensual.

    Reply
  7. Quality and art in perfume! I’m a collector and buy blind. I bought it in kamikaze mode; I hate patchouli and here is that note x2… I’m not regretting my bravery! At first, it enveloped me in white flowers, jasmine, and fresh orange blossom, like a freshly watered garden. I thought it was for daytime or temperate climates, something summery. After two hours, it changes almost 100%: wood, amber, and bitter tangerine. THERE IS NO PATCHOULI! It resembles Basi’s In Red, becoming nocturnal, formal, and sexy. That’s where the quality and art show, that unfolding of notes you don’t find in cheap perfumes. What a wonder! I love being surprised like this. The longevity is good, around 8-12 hours. Great sillage at first, then more intimate and sensual.

    Reply
  8. I find it a bit strong, suitable for a mature woman, perhaps over 30. I liked it, but didn’t love it. Generally, I buy perfumes for any occasion, but I felt this one was for evening events. It’s not for everyone, so I recommend asking for a tester in the shopping centre beforehand.

    Reply
  9. Rosario.90

    It’s a very rich, feminine, and elegant perfume. But on my skin, it lasts nothing; at best two hours. I used it and finished it, but I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  10. I agree with those who say it resembles Narciso Rodriguez for Her EDT (95% to my nose). Although it’s a pleasant and clean scent, on my skin it only lasts a couple of hours, at least more than the NR. If you catch it on offer, it’s half price, but due to its poor longevity and sillage, I don’t think I’ll buy it again.

    Reply
  11. I love all Estée Lauder perfumes: floral, feminine and fresh. Tired of smelling sweet and cloying things, when I was given a sample of Modern Muse it was a joy. I don’t agree with those who say florals are for older people; it’s like saying those who like sweet things are childish. Tastes break down genres and ages. I’ve received many compliments, even from men. It lasts about seven hours on me; it’s not much compared to others, but it depends on everyone’s pH. A simple perfume, very floral, with jasmine predominating. I don’t detect the mandarin, but in the woody notes I notice a touch of pepper. I wear it all year round.

    Reply
  12. I love Estée Lauder perfumes: floral, feminine, and fresh. Tired of smelling sweet and cloying things, when I was given a sample of Modern Muse, it was a joy. I don’t agree with those who say florals are for older people; tastes break down gender and age barriers. I’ve received many compliments, even from men. On me, it lasts about seven hours; not much compared to other fragrances, but it depends on pH. On me it lasts seven hours, on others four. It’s a simple perfume, very floral, with jasmine predominating. I don’t feel the tangerine, but in the woody notes I note a touch of pepper. I use it all year round.

    Reply
  13. I remember the first time I tried it and I loved it, until I bought it and it was a huge disappointment. It rarely lasts anything on my skin; I think the maximum is an hour and a half. People around me don’t smell it, and I certainly don’t. If I apply more, it becomes strong and makes me dizzy; I can’t stand the intensity. Furthermore, two sales assistants said it was for older people, but in my opinion, young girls or older ladies can wear it. In short, I would never buy it again. As my first perfume from a recognised brand, it left me totally disappointed: so expensive and its scent lasts absolutely nothing.

    Reply
  14. I remember the first time I tried it and I loved it; I saved up to buy it, and it was a great disappointment. It usually lasts nothing on my skin; I think at most an hour or half. People around me don’t smell it, and I even less so. If I apply more, it becomes very strong and I get completely dizzy; I can’t resist the intensity. Besides, two sales assistants said it’s for older people; I don’t know what to think, but in my opinion young girls and ladies can use it. In short, I would never buy it again. To be my first perfume from a recognised brand, it left me totally disappointed, so expensive and the scent lasts absolutely nothing.

    Reply
  15. Chrystiane

    Fresh and woody, it smells distinct from the competition and truly sets itself apart.

    Reply
  16. I’ll say it, but at least it doesn’t smell like those over-saturated gourmand fruit bombs out there. For an Estée Lauder scent, I was expecting something more.

    Reply
  17. VainillaDulce

    I absolutely love Modern Muse; it sticks and stays with me all day. It’s sensual, feminine, and intense, where Sambac jasmine takes the lead before settling elegantly with amber and vanilla. For me, those three notes really stand out. When I wore it, I felt like I was walking surrounded by beautiful jasmine blooms. In my opinion, it smells similar to Narciso Rodríguez for Her and Sarah Jessica Parker’s Lovely. Rating 8/10.

    Reply
  18. One of the worst from Lauder. A house with masterpieces like Estée Lauder deserves respect, not from its clients, but from its own history. Lauder is the perfect fusion between French mastery and American simplicity. It is the brand that unites those two worlds and from the start has respected that concept: slow, worked-over launches, with care, unique and not following trends. For me, it is the younger sister of the great French houses that are now further away (Guerlain, Chanel, Dior, Saint Laurent). A Lauder perfume is usually a safe bet for quality due to its longevity and personality. Aromatics Elixir, Youth Dew, Pleasures, Cinnabar, White Linen, Aromatics in White, even Happy (although I don’t like citrus), were talking about something, about the change of century… they are fragrances that tell a story and convey the brand’s integrity. They all come to stay; they are not products made to last five seasons and disappear. In Modern Muse I see none of this. It is a generic, weak scent, a fragrance that asks permission not to bother, not to make noise. And even so, it doesn’t say anything. There are perfumes that are enjoyed up against the skin, intimate, and yet are magnificent. This Modern Muse wants to be nothing; it has no ambition. It simply tells you that you’ve already heard it in many places. If Modern Muse is irrelevant, the latest version, Modern Muse Le Rouge Gloss, is infinitely worse. It is not only disappointing that Lauder has entered the game of flankers, so vulgar, so shoddy, so typical of loud fashion houses. The worst part is that it is a nauseating aberration of what is currently in style in women’s perfumery. A pity to see Lauder copying others. It was never like that.

    Reply
  19. The worst from Lauder. To a house with masterpieces like Estée Lauder, one demands respect, not from its clients, but from its own history. Lauder is the perfect fusion between French mastery and American simplicity, a firm that unites those worlds respecting that concept: slow, worked-out launches, with care, unique and not following trends. To me, it is the younger sister of the great French houses that are increasingly further away (Guerlain, Chanel, Dior, Saint Laurent). A Lauder perfume is usually a safe bet for quality due to its longevity and personality. Aromatics Elixir, Youth Dew, Pleasures, Cinnabar, White Linen, Aromatics in White, even Happy (though I don’t like citrus scents), are fragrances that tell a story and convey integrity. They all come to stay; they are not products to last five seasons and disappear. In Modern Muse I see none of this. It is a generic, weak scent, a fragrance that asks permission not to bother, not to make noise. And even so, it doesn’t tell you anything. There are perfumes enjoyed up against the skin, intimate, and yet magnificent. This Modern Muse wants to be nothing; it has no ambition. It simply tells you you’ve already smelled it in countless places. If Modern Muse is irrelevant, the latest version, Modern Muse Le Rouge Gloss, is infinitely worse. It is not only disappointing that Lauder entered the flanker game, so vulgar, so shoddy, so garrulous of a fashion house. The worst is that it is a nauseating aberration of what is currently in style in women’s perfumery. A pity to see Lauder copying others. It was never like this.

    Reply
  20. I owned it some time ago and it was one of those disappointing purchases. It doesn’t smell bad, truth be told, the aroma is nice but nothing spectacular to my taste. It smells floral and woody, but very linear; it doesn’t change from the moment I apply it until it stops projecting. The longevity was an hour and a half on my skin and the sillage very poor, only right up against the skin. I used it daily but had to reapply it several times because it vanished quickly. It smells clean and fresh, and that’s all. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  21. I owned it a while back and it was one of those disappointing purchases. It doesn’t smell bad, the truth is the aroma is pleasant, but nothing spectacular to my taste. It smells floral and woody, yet very linear; it doesn’t change from the moment I apply it until it stops projecting. The longevity is an hour and a half on my skin and the sillage is very poor, only right up against the skin. I wore it for the day but had to reapply it several times because it faded instantly. It smells clean and fresh, and that’s all. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  22. It smells very delicious and the bottle is very pretty, but it lacks strength; it is too weak, suggests nothing, and no one remembers it. It lasts on my skin around an hour… or less.

    Reply
  23. It smells pleasant, quite soft, floral and musky; I also detect wild musk. It is modern, yes, but the projection is quite low, in other words, this perfume doesn’t tell me anything, no matter how much I want to give it a chance… It is expensive for what it offers. I imagined it to be in the style of L’Extase or Sì by Giorgio Armani, but no, nothing like that… The one I want to try is Modern Muse Le Rouge.

    Reply
  24. This modern muse feels a bit flat and plain: it smells nice enough, but has a touch that makes it feel outdated, nothing magnetic or seductive, resembling dozens of fragrances already saturating the market… I’d categorise it as a boring musk-floral. Its trail is minimal and its longevity precarious… in my opinion, I wouldn’t recommend it.

    Reply
  25. It is a pleasant, soft fragrance, but nothing special that makes it stand out. Common and of short duration on my skin. Expensive for what it offers.

    Reply
  26. This modern muse turned out to be rather timid and simple: the scent is not unpleasant, but it has a note that makes it smell a bit obsolete; it is not magnetic or seductive, it is similar to many other fragrances flooding the market… I would place it in the category of a boring musk-floral. Its sillage is very limited, its longevity precarious… in my opinion, it is highly not recommended.

    Reply
  27. Simplistic and not long-lasting. The saleswoman sold it to me as a jewel, the brand’s novelty, which even had technology, claiming it practically mutated. Well, I put it on and the scent didn’t seem at all pleasant or spectacular; I waited for it to change (mutate) into something better and the only thing that happened was that it disappeared. Neither here nor there, a bad perfume, besides I remember it was expensive, I wouldn’t buy it for the life of me, worse than an imitation perfume.

    Reply
  28. Simplistic and short-lasting. The saleswoman offered it to me as a jewel, the brand’s novelty, even saying it had technology and practically mutated. Well, she applied it and the scent didn’t seem pleasant or spectacular to me; I waited for it to change (mutate) into something better and all that happened was that it disappeared. Neither here nor there, a bad perfume, plus I remember it was priced high; I wouldn’t buy it for the love of it, worse than a knock-off perfume.

    Reply
  29. Super feminine fragrance, soft with that enchanting floral musky touch. The jasmine and wild orchid shine, but the lily truly takes the lead, very intense. The amber and vanilla give it that perfect sweetness, although I can’t detect the patchouli at all. Ideal for young girls, aged 15 to 25, and for days that aren’t stiflingly hot.

    Reply
  30. Super feminine fragrance, soft with that enchanting floral musky touch. The jasmine and wild orchid shine, but the lily truly takes the lead, very intense. Amber and vanilla give it that perfect sweetness, though I can’t detect any patchouli at all. Ideal for young girls, aged 15 to 25, and for days that aren’t stiflingly hot.

    Reply