Men
Santal du Pacifique
Acordes principales
Descripción
Santal du Pacifique by Perris Monte Carlo is an olfactive fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2016, the nose behind this composition is Mathieu Nardin. The top notes are carrot; the heart notes include violet, Gurjum balsam, lip gloss, and orchid; while the base notes consist of sandalwood and musk.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Carrot
-
Corazón
violet
-
Base
sandalwood
Comunidad
571 votos
- Positivo 74%
- Neutral 15%
- Negativo 11%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Santal du Pacifique y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
21 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Beautiful perfume and packaging. Smells of wood and balsam from the very first moment. It’s masculine, with moderate longevity and projection. Highly recommended for lovers of woody fragrances.
Beautiful perfume and packaging. It’s woody and balsamic from the very first moment. It’s masculine, with moderate longevity and projection on par. Highly recommended for lovers of woody fragrances.
A very woody perfume with outstanding sandalwood in the base. It feels sweet and powdery. I’m currently testing four perfumes from Perris Montecarlo right now (Esence de Patchouli, Patchouli Nosy Be, Oud Imperial, and this one), and perhaps this is the one I like the least. It reminds me of Loewe’s 001 but softened, less spicy and more discreet. It smells good, and perhaps the problem is that my nose is saturated by the other three, which are more potent. Although they win in power and trail, the scent feels very natural. Ideal for elegant occasions without drawing too much attention. Scent: 9, Longevity: 7, Sillage: 6, Value for money: 5, Versatility: 9, Overall: 7
A very woody perfume with outstanding sandalwood. It has a sweet, powdery base. I’m currently testing four from Perris Montecarlo and perhaps this is the one I like the least. It reminds me of Loewe’s 001 but softened, less spicy and more discreet. It smells good, and perhaps the issue is that my nose is saturated by the other three, which are more potent. Although they win in power and trail, this one feels very natural. Ideal for elegant occasions where you don’t want to draw attention. Scent: 9, Longevity: 7, Sillage: 6, Value for money: 5, Versatility: 9, Overall: 7
Santal du Pacifique by Perris Monte Carlo is a creamy, sweet, almost tropical sandalwood (at times it reminds me of a fleshy coconut), of exceptional quality and long-lasting. Very natural, nothing synthetic. It’s unisex, perhaps with a slight masculine leaning due to its strength and dryness, balanced by a just-right sweetness that isn’t annoying. If you like sandalwoods, it’s a must-buy. Nothing like the classic Acqua di Parma type that smells like a barbershop; this evokes a tropical, woody, and sweet beach with a subtle dry touch. Well done, Perris Monte Carlo!
Santal du Pacifique by Perris Monte Carlo is a creamy, sweet, almost tropical sandalwood (sometimes it smells like a fleshy coconut), with top-tier quality and brutal longevity. It’s super natural, nothing screams or feels synthetic. It’s unisex, perhaps a bit more masculine due to its strength and dryness, but balanced by a just-right sweetness that doesn’t bother. If you like sandalwoods, it’s a must-have. It has nothing to do with the classic Sandalo by Acqua di Parma, which smells like a barbershop; this evokes a tropical, woody, and sweet beach with a dry touch. Well done, Perris Monte Carlo!
I find it extremely refined, nothing heavy. It’s masculine but without that alpha-male vibe that sometimes even they can’t stand. It’s enjoyable. In its utmost simplicity, it smells of woods with a herbal touch.
Looking for the ideal sandalwood, I was pleasantly surprised by Santal du Pacifique. It starts fresh and aquatic, something unusual for a creamy scent, but soon settles into a straightforward line. The sandalwood is clear, with a milky touch reminiscent of a light body lotion rather than a heavy cream. It’s a sandy wood that enhances the natural feel, with a musk note that adds cleanliness. As it evolves, it softens everything and adds an unexpected barrel-aged liquor note. It transports me to southern summers, the sea, a beach at sunset in total relaxation. It’s an interesting olfactive aura, with medium projection and longevity if applied well. Unisex, elegant through its discretion, perfect for smelling light and put-together on summer evenings. High price, so test on skin before buying. (Courtesy of Rafasant)
As a first impression, the opening was a quite recognisable aroma for me: those blends of sandalwoods, fig leaves, coconut, massoia, pepper… that one smells in Santal 33 and its clones, Stash SJP, Ferrari Silver… Perhaps finer and more polished, but heading in that direction. As it dries down, the sandalwood seems to me quite similar to that in Santal Majuscule. Good longevity with apparently discreet projection. It’s not bad, I should try it more and without interference from other perfumes, but a priori I wouldn’t pay what it costs given there are similar aromas already available.
One of the best sandalwoods I’ve ever smelled: woody, balsamic and creamy. The note feels of enormous quality.
I thought my search for the perfect sandalwood would end here… but it hasn’t. Disappointed? Absolutely not. It’s a good sandalwood perfume, but the sandalwood I’m looking for isn’t recognisable. This one doesn’t have the typical nuances of Indian sandalwood (‘warm’ wood, white, spiritual…); it acquires a scent that jumps from a woody level to an ‘aromatic timber’ level. It reminded me a bit of Zara’s Energetically New York, saving distances: Zara’s is synthetic and this feels very natural and high-quality. It’s a discreet scent with great class, good longevity on skin but little projection and sillage. Personally, I stick with Diptyque’s Santal Eau de Toilette and above all with Miller & Bertaux’s Indian Study / Santal +++ (despite its complicated launch that gives the impression of smelling wet cardboard).
I thought my search for the perfect sandalwood ended here… but it didn’t. Disappointed? No. It’s a good sandalwood, but not the one I was looking for. This one lacks the nuances of Indian sandalwood (warm, white, spiritual wood), instead jumping from a woody level to an aromatic resinous one. It reminds me a bit of Zara’s Energetically New York, although Zara’s is synthetic and this feels very natural and high quality. It’s discreet, classy, with good longevity on the skin but little trail. I stick with Diptyque’s Tam Dao and Miller & Bertaux’s Indian Study (though the latter initially smells of wet cardboard)
A highly refined fragrance that is nothing for me. At first, the prominent powdery sandalwood saturates me greatly, along with a balsamic or resinous note. Then, little versatility. I only see myself wearing it when I’m 70, having tea with some British monarch in a room full of ornaments and tapestries. Nothing. It just doesn’t fit me. And look, I perceive it as quality, but meh.
An ultra-refined perfume that simply doesn’t suit me. At first, that dusty sandalwood overwhelms me, mixed with balsamic or resinous notes. Then, there’s little versatility; I only see myself wearing it at 70, sipping tea with a British monarch in a room full of ornaments and tapestries. Nothing, it just doesn’t fit. And look, I can smell the quality, but meh.
I bought this fragrance blind… I’ve had it for nearly a month, here’s my take: It feels like pure quality, it’s almost entirely woody, I can’t doubt the ingredients. The wood scent predominates, as if you were smelling aged wood directly from the bottle; the carrot note is slightly perceptible. After an hour, that aged wood scent stops being so pronounced and becomes a bit softer, with a floral touch, although its dry-down doesn’t stray far from the initial scent. I consider it not for everyone: you must like the woody aroma because that accord dominates everything. After about four hours it stops being perceptible to the wearer, but others can still smell it. It has a special charm, but you must be open-minded. It works much better in temperate or cold climates than in warm ones. I only recommend buying it if you are a fragrance lover; if you just want to smell nice, there are better options at that price, which in my opinion is a bit high.
This perfume is a delight. As a lover of woody scents, whenever I use it I apply at least 10 sprays and I adore the aura it generates. It has the particularity of being subtle yet confusing because it lasts forever and lingers on clothes for weeks. I’ve sprayed it on jackets to go out for a while, and days later, when I enter the room, the scent reaches me. It’s an elegant perfume, it smells like a boss, of spectacular quality. It has fascinated me.
This perfume is a delight. As a lover of woody scents, I always use at least ten sprays and love the aura it generates. The curious thing is that it’s subtle yet confusing because it lasts forever and is noticeable on clothes for weeks. I’ve sprayed it on jackets for a quick outing, and days later, when I enter the room, it still smells. It’s an elegant perfume, smells like a boss, of spectacular quality. It has me fascinated.
A sandalwood fragrance, essentially soft, with a touch of sweetness, totally masculine and moderate in sillage and projection. Elegant and discreet, very pleasant, as class and luxury should be. As always, try it for a few hours before buying.
This perfume features natural Australian sandalwood as its star, which I adore. It makes me think of dry wood in a desert environment, like getting close to smell sandalwood dust, that commercial sawdust. To my nose, alongside that sandalwood, there are hints of fig and coconut, even lactonic notes; paradoxically, although I perceive that creaminess and a certain sweetness, I feel it as a dry woody fragrance. It’s as if the wood no longer has sap, parched by the sun of the Australian deserts. Several people perceive it as more masculine, but to my nose it is totally unisex. It lasts about 10 hours with notable projection. Like other woody scents, it conveys sobriety and calm. Scent 8.5/10, Longevity 10/10, Sillage 8/10, Value for money 6.5/10, Versatility 7/10, Packaging 9/10. I would consider buying the full bottle when my travel size runs out.
Trying this perfume makes Santal 33 seem vulgar and cheap. In my opinion, Santal du Pacifique is the best expression of sandalwood I’ve tried: high-class, sophisticated, natural, with a perfectly balanced aroma, almost with a silky texture that caresses the olfactory senses. Those around you will love it. I see it as suitable for semi-formal occasions, unisex. If you like sandalwood and haven’t tried this, forget the rest and go for it: it’s spectacular.
Well, this perfume caught me off guard. At first, I thought, ‘pff, it smells like those cheap wood shavings’, but then I’d stick my nose in my arm every three minutes. I absolutely love it: it starts with a realistic wood scent, followed by lovely floral notes. I applied it at 9 AM and by 3 PM people were saying they could smell me from two metres away; although I couldn’t detect it myself, the longevity and sillage are incredible. Plus, it smells different on my partner: no realistic wood at all, just a creamy iris. It’s a hit for me, though I feel it’s mature and formal, so I wouldn’t say everyone will like it. That said, it cost a third of what a Santal 33 costs and in quality it gives that chemical mess a run for its money.