Men
Tiffany & Co
Acordes principales
Descripción
Tiffany & Co by Tiffany is a floral fragrance for women launched in 2017, created by perfumer Daniela Andrier. Its olfactive pyramid unfolds with mandarin, bergamot, and lemon in the top notes; iris, rose, blackcurrant, and peach in the heart; and musk and patchouli in the base.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Tiffany & Co y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
36 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Truth be told, this is one of my favourites right now. It’s a delicate, sophisticated fragrance that hasn’t let me down. I must confess, I was initially wary after reading so many negative reviews, but as every pH is different, I’ve received very positive feedback when wearing it. As with any perfume, I’d recommend starting with a sample to see how it behaves on your skin.
Yes, it’s true, every pH is different and fragrances adapt differently. But we can’t deny it’s a scent we’d wish lasted longer. It’s rich! I think it’s a rich balance between citrus and floral, finishing with a subtle musk. It’s very rich, pity it doesn’t last more than two hours. Still, I enjoy applying it about three times a day. 7… longevity. 8… trail. 10… aroma!
Yes, it’s true, every skin reacts differently and fragrances adapt in their own way. But we can’t deny it’s a scent I wish would last longer. So rich! I think it achieves a very well-balanced blend of citrus and floral notes, finishing with a subtle musk. It’s very intense; the downside is it doesn’t last more than two hours for me. Still, I enjoy applying it about three times a day. 7… longevity. 8… sillage. 10… scent!
It’s an armed robbery. I tried it in the perfumerie and loved it, but when I saved up and bought it, it was a tremendous disappointment. Don’t tell me it smells different on every skin; the percentage of essence I tested has nothing to do with what I bought. For its price, it’s a rip-off; it’s the only perfume I regret buying and feel deceived by. I’ve had others where after purchasing I realised they weren’t my style, but in those cases it was my fault or a change of heart, not like this. It’s my humble opinion.
It’s an armed robbery. I tried it in the perfumerie and loved it, but when I saved up and bought it, it was a tremendous disappointment. Don’t tell me it smells different on every skin; the percentage of essence I tested has nothing to do with what I bought. For its price, it’s a robbery; I’m the only one regretting it and feeling cheated. I’ve had others I didn’t like due to style or a change of mind, but not like this case. It’s my humble opinion.
I recommend the Intense version a thousand times more; that’s the one I’d buy. If you like the fragrance, try the Intense because this seems a disgrace for its price. It doesn’t last more than 10 minutes on the skin, vanishing as if it was never there.
This perfume tries to be an elegant floral but… it falls short. Acidic, smelling of washing-up liquid, with a cheap musk and a mediocre scent. Far too expensive for what it offers, pretending to be perfume but ending up smelling of supermarket detergent. I think it follows the line of fresh, clean scents that’s massively popular in North America, but in terms of distinctive character, it has a long way to go. Poor fragrance 🙁
It tries to be an elegant floral but fails. It smells acidic, like washing-up liquid, with a cheap musk and a mediocre scent. It’s outrageously expensive for what it offers; it pretends to be perfume but ends up smelling like supermarket detergent. I think it follows the fresh scent trend popular in North America, but it lacks distinction. Poor fragrance 🙁
The trillionth iteration of something that wanders between L’Amour, Cacharel, Coco Mademoiselle and La Mort Est Belle. Like Tiffany launches it, it can’t be openly flashy, so they make it watery to seem classy, refined and non-intrusive. Sillage that’s a joke, longevity that’s a laugh, objective quality for peeing without leaving a drop, and the scent is purely a matter of taste; to me, it’s a vulgarity for a house with Tiffany’s pedigree to sell these tropical mists you can find in Primark. All wrapped in the brand’s lovely blue so you at least think you’ve bought luxury. I’d say it’s an aberration, but it’s been so long since I was surprised by the scam perfumery has become that I’m not even angry. A bathroom air freshener with laundry detergent musk bottled for eighty quid.
The thousandth version of a mix of Amor, Cacharel, Coco and La Mortelle. Like Tiffany, it can’t be loud, so they water it down to look refined and American. It’s a trail of laughter, joke longevity and quality to avoid staining, though to me it’s a vulgarity for a luxury house to sell Primark-style tropical mists. All wrapped in that lovely blue to make you think you bought something expensive. It’s an aberration, but I’m no longer surprised by the scam, so I’m not even angry. It’s a lavatory air freshener smelling of laundry detergent at 80 quid.
You know @Espartaco, what did the saleswoman say when I tried it? That that blue shade is patented by the brand, and she said it with an air of it being the most important thing in the world… I looked at her blinking, as if to say: ‘But dear, when I try a perfume, what matters most isn’t the colour? Yes, it’s pretty, but what about the scent?’
I found a set with 75ml, a miniature, and cream on Amazon for less than half the price in department stores, so I don’t feel it was a waste. On the opening, I noticed a very strong bitter citrus, then it stays close to the skin and the fruity-floral notes emerge, though it does remind me of Ariel detergent, my favourite for washing clothes. To try it, the price was good; I’ll never pay the commercial price, I would consider it a rip-off.
Oh, what a pity about the longevity! I loved the sample; the opening with citrus ‘bittered’ me a bit by standing out too much against the musk, but then harmony arrives and the rose and iris become apparent. It smells clean and pure, with a youthful character. The problem is that after a few hours, it disappears completely. The value for money is disappointing. I think, like many from great houses, they either lower the price or reformulate, and it’s a shame because I really like the scent.
Another fragrance heavily criticised for its longevity and sillage that, quite the opposite, fascinates me. It exudes cleanliness, elegance and femininity. It’s excellent for skin types where sweet aromas become unbearable, making it ideal for sensitive noses. Totally recommended to test on skin: on me, it lasts 6 to 7 hours with moderate to soft sillage towards the end. It’s an elegant, clean scent, perfect for daytime special occasions.
Another fragrance heavily criticised for longevity and projection, yet it fascinated me. It has great tidiness, elegance, and femininity. It’s excellent for sensitive skins that dislike intense sweet scents. Totally recommended to test on skin: on me, it lasted 6 to 7 hours with a moderate to soft trail at the end. It’s elegant, clean, and perfect for special daytime occasions.
Personally, I didn’t like it, perhaps because it’s not the type of perfume I enjoy. I find the scent excessively dry. However, I do find it elegant. It’s a clean, non-offensive smell. Moderate sillage. Longevity… there I agree with other comments. But if it really depends on pH, then I can only say it lasted a short while on my skin to be a perfume.
Personally, I didn’t like it, perhaps because it’s not my style. I find the scent excessively dry, though it does seem elegant and not offensive. The trail is moderate and the longevity matches other comments, depending heavily on skin pH. On my skin, it lasted too short a time to be considered a perfume.
A rich but fairly generic aroma. It doesn’t stand out as anything novel; it smells good and is perfect for everyday wear.
Nothing new or surprising, yet it conveys the brand’s message perfectly. It smells extremely clean, reminding me of when I used to go with my husband to Tiffany to buy myself jewellery for trips to New York and look my best in my Chanel pieces. If you want to smell like money in a very clean way, this is your perfume.
My friend gifted me a bunch of samples, and I must say that, given the brand’s prestige, it’s a disappointment. It smells elegant and classy, like cleanliness and tidiness, reminiscent of EAU DE CARTIER, but lacks its complexity. The citrus, rose, and fruit notes are well-balanced; it’s unisex, but the longevity and projection are shameful; it fades in 10 or 15 minutes and feels like a fraud. What a pity such a minimalist and elegant bottle doesn’t contain a rich perfume. I wouldn’t recommend it for fun.
A completely bland aroma with no personality of its own.
A rather bland aroma with no personality.
I arrived looking for an elegant citrus and wanted their Flanker Love For Her, which wasn’t available, so I turned my attention to this one due to the good price. I liked the bottle, the box and that lovely colour. I looked up the notes and decided to buy it. I really like it: a citrus opening that isn’t overpowering, followed by musk with blackcurrant and white peach giving it a natural sweetness. The florals sit in the background; it feels slightly powdery but isn’t bothersome due to its softness. In short, it’s elegant, fresh, clean, soft and has high longevity. Suitable for warm autumns, spring and summer, for daytime wear, and it’s a real joy… 💖
I was looking for an elegant citrus scent and stumbled upon this at a great price; the bottle and box are lovely too. The opening is citrusy yet soft, followed by a natural sweetness from musk, blackcurrant, and white peach. The florals sit in the background, slightly powdery but not annoying. In short: elegant, fresh, clean, with good longevity, ideal for warm autumns, spring, and summer, perfect for daytime wear and lots of enjoyment. 💖
Extremely boring and bland, a fitting description. It’s a citrus opening that settles as a very soft, powdery floral. It has a certain elegant character, but projects low and lasts 1.5-2 hours on my skin. For me, it’s not worth it; perhaps I’ll try the Intense version. Scent 4/10, Longevity 2/10, Sillage 4/10, Value for money 3/10, Versatility 4/10, Packaging 7.5/10. Would I buy again? I didn’t buy it.
Tastes differ… I’ve read almost all the negative reviews and I love it. I bought it at El Corte Inglés looking for a new signature scent, as my work colleague used mine and I became disillusioned. The Tiffany stand caught my eye, so I chose the original. On my skin, it performs very well: it’s musky, fresh, has personality, and is very sexy. Nothing to do with those ridiculous comments. Since then, I’ve tried many signature scents until I have a huge collection, but none resemble this Tiffany one. It’s so sexy and refined. Everyone follow their own tastes and ignore the bad comments; the world would be boring if everyone liked the same thing.
Clean, fresh, and above all light. It’s lovely and impossible to dislike. It’s giftable 100% and will make a refreshing, appreciated gift. But… I’m left waiting for the story to begin and… silence. I expected a jewel with personality; even being light, it remains too innocuous. Also, the longevity is scarce. The colour chart in the presentation is pastel, and that reflects that lack of intensity and chromatic depth. I expected more.
Hello, I find something unique in this perfume that I don’t have in anything else. It’s a clean, transparent, extremely fine and delicate scent. It’s not expansive; it accompanies the body’s movements, it’s there with you, calm and discreet. It’s wonderful and fully enjoyable.
Hello. I find something in this perfume that no other offers. It’s a clean, transparent, extremely fine, delicate and very subtle scent. A fragrance that, without being expansive, accompanies the body’s movements; it’s there with you, calm and supportive. It’s wonderful and fully enjoyable.
I’m pleasantly surprised; I never paid it much attention and its poor performance in the samples disillusioned me, but I’ve come to like it. It’s not very original, reminding me of something I’ve tried before, but I can’t place what. It’s not bad, nor is it great, but it’s pleasant. I adore iris, although here it’s drowned in an intense, industrial musk. On my skin, I feel a combo of patchouli, mandarin, and rose that doesn’t tire me, despite being mass-produced. More luxury is expected from Tiffany; they went for something safe and clean, refined but without originality. Daniela Rocher created a lovely, crystal-clear balance. I can’t assess the real longevity because I was gifted a sample set, but with two sprays on my elbow, it smells good in my room. I wouldn’t buy it myself, but many people will love it.
A beautiful, elegant and versatile feminine perfume. It’s an all-rounder, a safe bet. One of those you can buy and give as a blind gift without underestimating it. It’s of good quality, refined and long-lasting. The dry-down is very lovely. With notes found in many perfumes, ranging from the complex Beautiful by Estée Lauder to recent releases: a successful citrus opening, iris, rose and peach in the heart (slightly powdery, flirty with a modern fruity touch), and a balanced base of musk and patchouli. Notes common in such diverse scents as Chypre by Cacharel, Citta di Kyoto, Soir de Lune, Talismán and Laguna. Diversified by including other notes. A ‘wardrobe staple’. It’s not vintage, not overly sweet and won’t surprise you, but you’ll like it. Ideal for the office, daily wear, family occasions or a date at the cinema or park. Yes, I recommend it.
Nice, elegant, and versatile. It’s a safe bet, a sure success you can gift blindly. It’s of good quality, refined, and durable, with a beautiful dry-down. It has a citrus top, iris and peach heart, and a musk and patchouli base. It’s a wardrobe classic: not vintage or sweet, but you’ll like it. Ideal for the office, daily wear, or a date at the cinema. Yes, I recommend it.
Clean, subtle, crystal-clear, and elegant. It leaves no trail; no one will ask what you’re wearing, it simply becomes part of your skin. It’s a fragrance just for you, light and enveloping. It’s lovely, but don’t ask for more. You can wear it to bed with white sheets; it won’t stain or overwhelm, very feminine and immaculate.
I was gifted a miniature this winter. It’s aquatic, light, and fresh. At first, I wasn’t convinced, thinking there was too much white floral, but perhaps it’s the musk. It lasts about three hours, doesn’t project much, but it lingers on clothes and smells nice. I’m not sure if it’s worth the price.
I love it, although it needs reapplying. It’s clean, volatile, and defines the modern, meticulous woman: it screams beauty. It’s aquatic, floral, and citrusy, reminding me of the discontinued Eau d’Eden, Omnia Cristalyne, and Jimmy Choo Floral. For my nose, it’s exquisite, even if it doesn’t last long—I love it!
Oh dear, what a letdown! If you buy a Tiffany, you expect something spectacular, not a whisper. The longevity is ridiculous; you have to sniff your arm like a dog. It smells of menthol and iris with a touch of talcum powder, but for the price, it’s a rip-off. Don’t buy it.