23 by Michael Jordan
Men 2004
Description
Michael Jordan 23 is an aromatic fragrance for men, launched in 2004.
Show moreQuick summary
When to wear it (votes)
Key notes
-
Notes
Watermelon
Community
140 votes
- Positive 73%
- Negative 16%
- Neutral 11%
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
348 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Like it
140 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Summer
175 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Day
86 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About 23
Michael Jordan 23 is an aromatic fragrance for men, launched in 2004.
Fruits, vegetables and nuts Flowers
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Michael Jordan
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Moderate
85 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Moderate
94 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally masculine
39 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Excellent value
37 votes
You may also like
Community reviews
4 reviews
Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.
What did you expect? If it’s a cheap cologne, hah. But for how economical it is, it’s not bad for daily use, the gym, etc.
Today I want to talk about this fragrance, another copy of Acqua di Gio. On my skin it works well; I consider the trail good. It’s a fresh perfume, you can smell a bit of wood but mostly the green side with that citrus freshness. For now I can’t comment on longevity as this is the first time I’ve worn it, but after nearly two hours it projects and gives a good trail; you can feel it in the air. It really works on my skin. Although inspired by Acqua di Gio, it has a slightly different vibe, more floral with green and musky notes. I think it’ll work for something casual and in the office without being annoying. When I use it more regularly, over a week, I’ll give my conclusion on its performance, reactions and longevity.
Terrible.
It smells like what it is, cheap cologne. And I mean cologne, not perfume, because it reminds me of any supermarket own-brand. The opening might recall Acqua di Gio, but it lasts only a breath; afterwards it becomes ordinary.