Men
Chanel No 19 Eau de Parfum
Acordes principales
Descripción
Chanel No 19 Eau de Parfum by Chanel is a green floral fragrance for women. The top notes are green, bergamot and neroli; the heart notes are iris, rose, narcissus, lily of the valley and ylang-ylang; the base notes are oakmoss, vetiver, leather and sandalwood.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
green notes
-
Corazón
iris
-
Base
oakmoss
Comunidad
6,467 votos
- Positivo 83%
- Negativo 14%
- Neutral 3.4%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Chanel No 19 Eau de Parfum y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
39 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
For a distinguished woman who projects magnetism with simplicity, of any age (perhaps too sober for girls under 18). It is for women. It has one of the most elegant leather notes I have ever smelled. Vetiver, moss, cedar, iris, rose and narcissus combined exquisitely. Excellent longevity and just right sillage; a modest application lasts many hours.
It simply smells of ‘green’, like watering plants in the garden. Soft, with wet earth tones and powdery floral nuances. In my opinion, it does not fit the Chanel price tag; I’d rather stick with my watered garden.
I tried it out of curiosity and found it very elegant. It is herbal, floral and mossy, with an air of 1970s feminine fragrances. The green notes and fresh bergamot give an immediate sense of freshness. Then the floral emerges with ylang-ylang, rose and narcissus, maintaining the green character. After two hours, the masculine base with leather, vetiver, moss and sandalwood softens into woods. It is not very youthful, but rather for someone with maturity, ideal for spring and summer during the day due to its green-floral nature. It lasts quite a while with moderate sillage.
Fresh, floral and powdery, very distinguished and inspired by the 70s/80s. It is an old-school fragrance, suitable for those over 20. A little-known wonder that makes you unique.
Another Chanel classic. N°19 possesses elegance, personality and the allure of evoking moments from our lives. I am a man and find it very unisex thanks to its earthy, green aroma, although it does have a powdery touch and is quite chypre. It is a masterpiece of perfumery that knows no fashions, and that is the best part.
Once, Chanel defined the eternal feminine with N°19, the green and pastoral sibling of the legendary N°5. It is Coco’s farewell to perfumery, a fragrance that transcends sentimentality. I am speaking of the original formula, though the current version might best be ignored. N°19 evokes the vegetal beauty of civilised nature in elegant harmony. Green notes, moss, vetiver, rose and crisp citrus provide natural energy, amplified by a complex iris. The floral heart is fresh, rich and allegorical; rising from humility to reveal a bold, sophisticated floral arsenal. The base adds minimalist leather, a chypre punch and an oriental breeze of sandalwood. It is the memory of rural life in emerging metropolises, natural light and harmony between city and tree. I imagine the reformulation would be the fall of that balance due to urban overcrowding. With exceptional longevity and moderate sillage, it is distinguished, magnetic and sparkling. It is the starting point to distinguish a ‘Coco Chanel’ product from a ‘Karl Lagerfeld’ one.
No, no, no. The moss with the green notes creates a strong smell of wet earth and herbs that make you dizzy. It is the Chanel perfume I like the least.
My favourite Chanel, but… zero fixation, even less than Chanel No. 5 Eau. I do not like the 35ml bottle; it is too bulky. What a pity.
Pray for the soul of Chanel N°19. It is refreshing, delicate, beautiful, youthful, with a revitalising chypre edge and luminous. If Miss Dior evoked Greek ephesians for me, N°19 presents a 1930s metropolis: clean steel, gleaming crystals and rural life nearby. I tried it in a perfumerie and did not cry, but I did feel sadness and injustice. The bottle is the most beautiful and the green is the most beautiful hiding a fragrance that seems the tenth re-run of a usurer. It is no longer N°19, it is nothing. It does not recall the original nor does it last more than 45 minutes. R.I.P. (I am not obsessive about reformulations, but this is a disgrace).
Pray to God for the soul of Chanel No. 19, a refreshing and delicate fragrance, precious, youthful, with a revitalising ‘chiprez’, luminous, determined, intellectual, absolutely unisex. If Miss Dior always made me think of an idealised vision of young Greek ephesbi who cultivated body and mind, Chanel No. 19 presents the fantasy of an American metropolis in the 1930s, when the steel of skyscrapers smelled clean, the crystals shone, and rural life was less than a quarter of an hour’s drive away. I just tried it in a perfumery because I fancied buying something new, and I haven’t cried because I must have already spent all the tears God granted me. What sadness and what injustice they have done to it. The most beautiful of the bottles (in this, Chanel knows no one can beat them) and the most beautiful of the hidden greens now hide a fragrance that seems like the tenth cut made by a greedy usurer. This is not Chanel No. 19; it is nothing. It does not recall the original and does not last more than three-quarters of an hour from the start on the skin. R.I.P. (I am not a maniac about reformulations, but what they have done to No. 19 and Miss Dior is a disgrace).
I grew up hearing the wonders my mother told me about this perfume, but I never had the opportunity to smell it. My mother longed for it, and I know she never used it again after she married, nor could she find it. I only knew that one day I would find it and give it to her. That day was today. I was about to buy Black Opium when I saw a beautiful vintage edition of Chanel 19. Without thinking, I left Black Opium and bought the Chanel. When I gave it to my mother, she even cried with happiness. She is so happy with her Chanel. I must also try it to understand my mother’s love. It is quite sophisticated, elegant, with class and poise. I would not say its scent is ‘too much’ in any way. It has a sublime balance between powdery and woody notes, even seeming slightly spiced. On my skin, the ylang-ylang, leather, moss, and iris stand out. The rose stays in the background along with the lemon and neroli. Totally bright green, like a fresh spring morning under the sun. It is a very gentle scent. Moderate trail and longevity. Although it is pleasant and cloudy, it is not entirely to my taste due to my aversion to the leather scent. However, I understand my mother’s fascination. It is truly a well-thought-out work of art.
CHANEL N.19 EDP: Magnificent! I smelled it on a companion playing cards and could not resist asking. She told me it was EDP and it suited me wonderfully. I remembered smelling it years ago on exquisitely dressed women, a perfume of goddesses. I thought it would not suit me, but today I went to try it and it is divine. It resembles nothing, is not in fashion and that makes it exclusive. It is a masterpiece, super feminine although a man could wear it; I like it more on a woman. It does not smell of leather. It starts green but then becomes infinitely better, very balanced, like a sweet melody where all instruments harmonise. It is not in nature; man has improved it. Is there anything more beautiful than a wild forest? Perhaps a cultivated garden. Only the tester remained. I enjoyed it for 7 hours with 2 sprays; at the card table, my companions noticed the rich aroma. It must be sprayed on the skin to ‘open up’. Heavy sillage and great longevity. It is not cheap but worth it. It will be my next acquisition and favourite. Regards.
Good morning, magnificent! I recently heard it on a colleague playing mus. I couldn’t resist and asked what she was wearing: ‘Chanel 19’. She told me it suited her perfectly; it was an EDP. I remembered hearing about it years ago on women dressed in a rather eccentric style; their scent made me take notice of them, and it seemed like a perfume for goddesses. I thought it wouldn’t suit me as well, but today I went to the department stores exclusively to try it. I couldn’t believe it! It is the perfume I remembered so vividly, and a colleague has brought it back to life for me. It is divine on my skin! It doesn’t resemble anything else. It isn’t trendy; if it were, I would have smelled it more often. The fewer people who wear it, the more exclusive it becomes. It is a masterpiece, a perfume for goddesses. In my opinion, it is super feminine (I love perfumes supposedly for men), and although a man could wear it, I prefer it on a woman. I couldn’t tell which note stands out (it doesn’t smell of leather). Its opening notes are green, but don’t let that confuse you; afterwards, it is infinitely better. It is very balanced, like a sweet melody where all instruments form a single harmony. It is not found in nature; man’s hand has improved nature. Is there anything more beautiful than a wild forest? Perhaps a garden cultivated by humans. They were out of stock, only the tester remained. I was glad to see how it evolves. It got better and better. I have been wearing it for seven hours, and with just two sprays on my wrist, it still lingers. Today I played mus, and my colleagues told me a rich scent reached them. You cannot judge a perfume on a strip of paper. For heaven’s sake, spray it on your skin and let it blend with you; that is the least a good perfume deserves. Only then does it ‘open’. Long trail, great longevity. Although it is not cheap, it is not expensive either. A little goes a long way. It will be my next purchase and is already one of my favourites.
A wonderful fragrance, an enveloping and elegant violet scent. One of my favourite perfumes. It’s not for a young girl, but for a more mature woman.
I sprayed it on my skin today while passing a department store. It reminded me of old times with my mother, who always wore it and adored it, just as I do. It is pure elegance, magnificently stately, evoking a majestic pleasure both in smelling and wearing. A beloved Chanel classic. I sensed it was slightly reformulated and lacked the strength it once had, which boasted a brutal trail. Nevertheless, I would happily own it again. The vetiver note stands out most to me, evoking the smell of wet earth. It is a work of art, something truly beautiful.
Bought it blindly from a friend, second-hand. It was my first encounter with such a scent: green grass, dusty flowers, and a slightly off-key leather base. Very unfamiliar! Even though I already knew several Hermès gardens, I loved it. Later, when I tried to wear it again, it felt overpowering; the sharp opening was too intense, almost like cleaner. I thought my nose had changed its mind. I was heartbroken and resumed my search for Kelly Caleche EDP. But today, I put on Chanel 19 again, and what a delight. I’m feeling that delicate balance between greens, florals, and leather once more. What a pleasure. I believe the factor was the temperature: now it’s autumn, between 13 and 19 degrees, whereas before it was a stifling summer of 30 to 38 degrees. The cooler climate suits it; today it feels warm, with creamy and comforting florals. A treat for winter.
Chanel 19 EDP is exquisite, elegant, and full of personality. It is long-lasting and endearing, worthy of wear on any occasion and throughout every season.
I haven’t tried the old version, but this one was incredibly intense and lasted for hours. The pity is that it felt repellent to me; we simply don’t get along. It was green, but in a spoiled sort of way… with an overwhelming density. I’d love to experience it on someone who sweetens perfumes.
HORRIBLE. It is as if you stepped on grass and put it on your skin. One of the worst perfumes I have ever heard. It gave me retching fits. Only because it has the Chanel brand is it overvalued. If it reaches an unknown brand, it rots there. I do not understand how something that smells so bad sells so much simply because it has Chanel written on it. In any case.
Vladlena1994, you might say it gave you nausea. You might say people wear it only because of Chanel’s undisputed seal. You might say it smells like cut and scrubbed grass. You might say it is the worst thing you have heard. And I repeat, the most stupid thing I have read in your review is that people wear it only because it is Chanel… it cannot be. Simply put, it was not to your liking and does not match your tastes. So what? Those who value a classic (and no longer just classic), green, woody, and different fragrance… do they now smell like scrubbed grass and nauseating filth? What you added is not a personal review giving your opinion, but a lack of respect for those who may or may not like it, smelling of Dior Addict (vanilla), and I must state that. I, a humble server, feel completely addressed by this lack of respect and empathy when reading such absurd reviews about perfumes I love, and I feel completely identified. And now, well, let the criticisms rain down on me for not respecting an opinion, but I consider there are ways and ways to describe an opinion and write a negative review of a perfume, and this one precisely did not seem respectful to me.
I wore this Chanel 19, as well as the No. 5, in my youth (about 20 years ago) in Paris… oh, they were so expensive! But I deserved them, and they smelled—and still smell—divine. Now I am thinking of buying them again, although I have read and heard much that they have been reformulated and no longer last or smell as before. Is it true? I am in doubt whether to buy them or not. Best wishes to all perfume enthusiasts.
A wonderful fragrance, like a Debussy melody, a moonlit night in a garden under a starry sky. The reformulation has made it less intense, but the DNA remains the same, which is why I do not understand certain reviews that, in my opinion, are overly snobbish. Long live Chanel 19.
It is frankly disgusting; a simple perfume that smells only of grass, but not refined grass—no, just bad grass. Within minutes it turns sour, and I felt like vomiting. Moreover, it is quite watery and lacks decent performance for a perfume of this price; its longevity is only 3/4 of an hour. I thought that being Chanel, the performance would be better; the trail is barely noticeable, sticking only to the skin. What a shame, I was so excited about this fragrance.
This is a perfume for women, not for girls. It’s pure elegance, very classic, feminine, herbal, green and mossy. This is what a woman should smell like, not like a cupcake.
A very original, elegant and feminine perfume; yes, it has a vintage touch and suits me better for a mature woman. At first it smells tender and floral, then gradually becomes more mossy. Unfortunately, the longevity isn’t very good, maximum three hours even with heavy application. In conclusion, I wouldn’t spend so much money for these characteristics, though if you’re a woman who enjoys herbal and classic scents, it could be your fragrance.
Of all the perfumes from the Chanel house, this is my favourite. It’s unisex because at first it smells of rain, then becomes slightly powdery, and in the final phase turns floral.
My ex-husband’s mother used to alternate this with the classic L’Eau d’Issey. Her style, by now, is legendary in that small Mediterranean coastal town where she lives. Almost always dressed in black, with a severe, high brown bob, and smoking constantly; she’s not easy to deal with. An Aries woman who speaks her mind, sophisticated and with a temper of another world. Her scent had to match her eternal tobacco and a glass or two. Looking at a bottle of Chanel Nº19, I see her. Of exquisite taste, she loved prawns and alcohol; her languid silhouette gave her away. Without needing to please the masses, elegant and strong-willed, she wasn’t for roses and sugar. Only for sophisticated tastes. Unforgettable.
Brilliant perfume with real character, standing out among the sea of identical scents today. A classic that smells modern; perfect if you’re tired of overly sweet fragrances. Imagine a walk through a greener-than-floral garden, with fresh, damp breeze; it’s a well-rounded aroma.
I’m going to bore you with a thread that probably no one cares about, but this jewel deserves more than six or seven lines. About six years ago I received a call from a not very intimate friend, one of those that puts you on alert. She told me she had just lost her grandmother and that she remembered I collected old perfumes because they had found bottles in her house. She invited me over to see if I was interested in anything before throwing it away. I accepted. I didn’t want to ask too much, it wasn’t the time to touch the wound, but I guessed things. Rosario must have been a young widow, with one son and never marrying again. From the house and what was in it, I deduced she lived comfortably and with opulent tastes, perhaps bordering on the ordinary. The room where she slept seemed taken from a black and white 50s film: double bed with a canopy full of velvet cushions, green curtains with ruffles, a faded floral screen and a dark wood dressing table with a three-mirror. A jewel that would have been the star of any antique shop. On it I saw several bottles. Some empty, others with just a film of oily residue. I started moving bottles and opening those with liquid, checking to my misfortune that most had gone bad. The last one was almost full, I turned it over and didn’t recognise it. When I brought it to my nose, I smelled something familiar that excited me. The liquid had an amber colour, like 30-year-old whisky but less bright. Curiously it didn’t accumulate dust; surely Rosario took very good care of her treasures. I turned the bottle and read the label. The first thing I thought was that it had been refilled. It wasn’t possible that Chanel n.19, which I knew, smelled like that. How wrong I was… Dear Rosario: May God hold you eternally in His glory. What a pity I can never thank you for the moments you gifted me by smelling this wonder. Perhaps that’s why I use it with so much respect and feel a connection with someone I never knew, but to whom I pay homage every time I use it. I don’t know when the edition is, but I calculate it’s from the 80s, probably it has more years than I do. I consider myself immensely fortunate to be able to enjoy it. Although I use it drop by drop, it’s already half gone and I’m aware it will end, I don’t want to think about it. It’s a fragrance where the ‘green notes’ reach their maximum expression. It has a fleeting but perceptible opening, slightly citrusy. A bitter citrus, very green, with zest you can almost chew. A few minutes later it smells like a very green garden, with flowers soaked in rainwater, sometimes I even notice the clay of the pots. Gradually, the flowers fade and I start to smell the earth, but the iris is still there, with a slight hint of orange blossom; it’s my favourite phase. By 7 hours nothing colourful remains, only wet, living green wood and more earth. It smells like wild, virgin nature, but let’s not deceive ourselves, it’s much more than that. May 3rd is Cross Day in my village. It’s a local festival and the custom is to put on your oldest tracksuit and spend the day lying in the field with family or friends. That’s how it’s been since I was little. I remember being 15 or 16, when you want to grow up faster, family days sound like an infinite lead weight and the only thing you desire is to spend that rainy day at a friend’s house watching Titanic for the thirtieth time. I used to wander all day around my grandparents’ country house, getting my trousers wet with the dampness of the shrubs that reached my knees, leaving footprints in the soft, dark earth that had drunk from a shy, cold spring. From time to time I would go into the woodshed between two pines, with the roof half collapsed, to smell the wet wood and smoke a cigarette in secret. This perfume evokes those days with all its essence: the temperature, the humidity, the happiness of my carefree innocence, the light of those longer days, the distant crackle of a bonfire in the open, the wet ivy climbing green up the walls, the dust in the rooms that were never used, the sensation of having cold feet, the almost metallic shine of the soaked earth… Many people have called me irresponsible, crazy, capricious, for spending an amount they consider high. Fortunately, finding Chanel n.19 was a wonderful stroke of fate without cost to my wallet, but when they say something like that I always ask them how much happiness is worth to them… Many times I’m not able to describe how a perfume makes me feel, where it transports me or what memories it brings; but when something is so powerful as to make you smile from within, simply it has no price. I adore perfumery. Thanks, Rosario.
I loved it! It reminds me of Givenchy III. With those wonderful green and mossy notes.
Does anyone know if it’s similar to Givenchy III or Y by Yves Saint Laurent? I have both and I’d like to know the difference if they have the same vibe or which is better. I like them a lot, they are beautiful, for summer and spring, they give me joy and I feel in a green, fresh field. Thanks!
I’ve surrendered to this masterpiece. The other day I tried it at an airport and all its nuances and olfactory twists fascinated me. I don’t have much experience in perfumery, but I assure you they no longer make fragrances like this, with that desire for immortality. I’m eager to try the different versions of Chanel 19 to see which suits me best. I really want to smell Chanel Poudre and another called Bel Respiro, which according to Fragrantica are very similar. I’m sorry, it’s not a critique, it’s pure instant love after smelling this great perfume for the first time.
One of the most classic, elegant and sublime aromas in the world. Undoubtedly one of my favourites from Chanel. If I do not own it, it is because I have 19 Poudré, although this one surpasses it in performance. It is natural, green, earthy, with a soapy and powdery base. It is the scent of a forest fairy bringing a ray of sun between the trees. Very polished; neither the green notes, the oak moss nor the iris are out of tune. Compared to similar fragrances, it is more powdery, fresh and less rugged than Silences by Jacomo. 19 Poudré is sweeter and more powdery with more iris. Jontué by Revlon is sweeter and more floral due to the mimosa and ylang. All four fit in a collection for lovers of greens. On my skin, moderate projection and 9-10 hours of longevity. Scent 8.5/10, Longevity 9.5/10, Sillage 7/10, Value for money 7/10, Versatility 6.5/10, Packaging 7/10. Would I buy it again? I did not buy it.
For me, it’s one of the most classic, elegant and sublime scents in the world. Without a doubt, one of my favourite Chanel perfumes. I don’t have it in my collection because I have 19 Poudré, although they are very different and this outperforms in longevity. It’s a natural, green, slightly earthy scent, with a soapy and powdery base. It’s the scent a forest fairy would wear, bringing a ray of sun between the trees to give us joy. It’s very polished; neither the green notes, nor the oakmoss, nor the iris stand out or clash. Compared to similar scents, it’s more powdery, fresher and less rugged than Silences de Jacomo. 19 Poudré is sweeter and more talcum-like, with more iris. Jontué de Revlon is sweeter and more floral due to the mimosa and ylang. All four are distinct and can be worn together if you like greens. On my skin it has moderate projection and lasts 9-10 hours. Scent 8.5/10, longevity 9.5/10, trail 7/10, value for money 7/10, packaging 7/10. Would I buy it again? I didn’t buy it.
I have an obsession with herbal green fragrances. I understand this is the category leader and I was eager to try it. The first time I smelled it, almost a tear fell. It reminded me of my grandmother’s smell, who never used perfume as far as I knew, but she smelled like Chanel 19… surely it was her Pravia Hay soap, which no longer exists. It affected me so much I had to wait before trying it again, and now I can finally pay attention with my pH. I liked it a lot, although it’s still out of my budget for now. It’s a goal I’ve set myself to reach along with some professional milestone. Not today, not tomorrow, someday it will be my olfactory signature.
I love it, it’s a timeless perfume. I feel super special when I wear it, as if it was made for me. That’s what it’s about: finding the perfume that represents you and cheers up your day.
I loved it, it smells tied and green, like a creamy soap. It feels unisex to me. I don’t know why, but it reminded me of my grandmother and her Ponds cream.
Cream of vast green meadows. It evokes that 70s atmosphere when green, earthy, root-and-soil perfumes were triumphant. Some survived like Cabochard, Magie Noire, Ô de Lancôme or Chanel 19. It was Gabrielle Chanel’s green and wooded farewell contribution. What a wonder: it’s an elegant, luminous and subtle scent, nothing invasive. It has a green aura that evokes gardens and meadows full of trees. For me, it takes me to British green landscapes like in ‘The Remains of the Day’, ‘The Secret Garden’ or ‘Jane Eyre’. It’s classic, timeless and modern at the same time. Contemporary beauty verdancy.
The first perfume with the full juice of the iris infusion, something super expensive that only Myrurgia and Guerlain used to make. Nowadays, as with everything, reformulations are driven by costs and the concentration is lower, and like sheep, we keep buying it… are we like that?