Men
Chance Eau Splendide
Acordes principales
Descripción
Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel is a creation from the fruity floral olfactive family, designed for women. This new fragrance, launched in 2025, has been composed by Olivier Polge. In its opening, the top notes reveal a vibrant combination of red fruits, raspberry, rose, violet and peach. The heart of the composition is sustained with the elegance of iris and geranium, while the base notes leave a soft trail of white musk and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Red Fruits
-
Corazón
iris
-
Base
white musk
Comunidad
1,881 votos
- Positivo 68%
- Neutral 20%
- Negativo 13%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Chance Eau Splendide y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I tried it in-store and liked the fresh, youthful scent. I thought it might be Guerlain Insolence, but it wasn’t; it evolved until it became unnoticeable. I like potent aromas with a high sillage. Perhaps I would buy it for my 15-year-old daughter.
I tried it in-store and loved that fresh, youthful scent. Suddenly, I thought it resembled Guerlain Insolence, but it wasn’t. The scent changed until it became so insignificant it went unnoticed. I like potent scents with a good trail. Perhaps I’d buy it for my 15-year-old daughter.
A disappointment coming from Chanel. On my skin, violet dominates, very watery, and it reminds me of Marly Palatine Parfums, which I also didn’t like. Similar alternatives: Cheirosa ’59 by Sol de Janeiro, or with more punch, Dolce Violet by Dolce & Gabbana.
I tried it in-store today: it’s fresh, feminine and elegant. A sparkling citrus-fruity opening that then settles into an elegant musky floral. I would buy it if I had the money, but Chanel isn’t accessible for the ordinary person.
I tried it a few days ago. I liked it, but it’s no novelty. Typical red berry scent with a floral and musky base. Pretty? Yes. Innovative? No. Would I buy it? No. If someone gave it to me, would I use it? Of course.
I tried it in-store and it’s fresh, feminine and elegant. On my skin, it starts with a sparkling citrus and fruity opening, then settles into a very elegant musky floral. I would buy it if I had the money, but Chanel isn’t accessible for the ordinary person.
The new Chanel flanker has a restrained charm. When I saw the ad, I was excited about the iris in the pyramid, but it’s so softened it’s hard to recognise; its powdery touch is eclipsed by a fruity blend dominated by very sweet and synthetic red berries. The floral heart is diffuse, and the musky base adds cleanliness without harshness. Nothing clashes, but I miss the soul, that adult and characterful touch other creations from the house have. It’s balanced, versatile, with moderate longevity and a delicate trail: ideal for daily life. Faithful to the spirit of the line, although Chance Eau Tendre EDP remains my favourite for its youthful bouquet. In Eau Splendide, I recognise the will to please and the orientation towards a young audience looking for something pretty and easy. It’s okay, but for those who expect more than mere correctness from Chanel, it leaves a commercial déjà vu feeling. It’s designed to please, but it stays halfway between charm and risk.
Smells lovely. The longevity is about two hours, nothing in best mode. It sounds like something I’ve smelled before, but I can’t identify what it is. It’s like a doll scent, feminine and subtle.
Chanel perfumes usually have a particular DNA, but this new flanker has lost it; it doesn’t even feel like Chanel. If they had let me smell it blind, I wouldn’t have recognised it. It’s a standard floral with an acidic red fruit opening that hides the other notes; the iris I love isn’t there. It softens after a while but remains linear. They compare it to YSL Baby Doll, but I disagree: that one is beautiful and well-balanced. This reminds me more of Marly Delinas, which isn’t a compliment. The longevity is scarce; after three hours, only a fruity trace remains. The INCI is clean but contains unnecessary synthetic colourants. It seems like a commercial attempt for young women, although I’m not sure who can afford it. An oversight coming from Chanel.
I believe the aim of this fragrance was to cause the same stir among girls that Eau Tendre did fifteen years ago. It’s charming, sweet, and easy to wear. Although fragrances shouldn’t have an age (I’d hate for them to smell ‘mummy’), it will fascinate many young women starting their perfume journey. For collectors, it’s disappointing, as others say. It reminded me of Moschino Toy 2 Bubble Gum, Marc Jacobs Daisy Dream, and YSL Mon Paris, all of which are more interesting. For the price, there are better or cheaper options; Chanel has more sophisticated things. It lasted about seven hours on my skin, acceptable for an eau de parfum, though not as much as Chance eau de toilette, which lasts twelve. A pretty perfume I hope will serve as an entry point to the fascinating world of Chance, which has more interesting options within its great tradition.
What a pleasant surprise! The girl at Sephora suggested I try it, and I wasn’t even interested… but when I tried it, I fell in love instantly and bought it! It’s a super lovely scent, perhaps nothing new, but quite pleasant, feminine, and very flattering. It’s a mix of lovely flowers, none standing out more, but those red berries give it a juicy, refreshing, and sparkling touch. It could easily be my signature scent; I’m totally smitten. It lasts about eight hours on me, and people always ask what I’m wearing.
Chanel perfumes usually have a particular DNA, but this new flanker has lost everything, neither from the Chance line nor the house. If they had let me smell it blind, I wouldn’t have guessed it was Chanel. It’s a standard floral with an acidic red berry opening that, on my skin, doesn’t let the rest of the notes show (the iris I love so much isn’t felt). After a while, it softens, but it remains linear. I’ve compared it to Baby Doll and disagree: the YSL one remains a beautiful, balanced floral. This Eau Splendide reminds me more of the Delinas from Parfums de Marly, which isn’t a compliment. The longevity is minimal; by three hours, only a fruity trace remains on the skin. The INCI is clean, but it has four unnecessary synthetic colourants. It seems like an attempt by Chanel to do something 100% commercial for a young woman (though I don’t know who would allow it). It has seemed like a blunder, especially coming from Chanel.
I tried it a few days ago. I liked it but it’s not groundbreaking. Typical red fruit aroma with a floral and musky base. Pretty? Yes. Innovative? No. Would I buy it? No. If it were a gift? Absolutely.
This perfume comes out fresh and sweet from the red berries, but as it dries down, it becomes clean, musky, and powdery, with no trace of sweetness. It smells good, although personally I haven’t liked it. It smells to me like a Yves Rocher perfume my mum used to wear a long time ago, of lilacs; here there is violet, but it reminds me of that softer scent. After an hour, the dry-down reminds me of baby wipes. I think Chanel jumped on the musky and powdery perfume train and didn’t come out badly; it smells good, but there’s no Chance DNA. It could have been a perfectly new perfume.
I had high hopes for this perfume… it’s not bad, it’s sweet and fruity, but it lacks the Chance signature. It reminded me of Versace Bright Crystal when it dried down, and that smells much better. I don’t think it’s a suitable launch for 2025, but it’s not terrible.
I wait for every Chanel launch like Christmas Day… so as soon as it arrived in my city, I ran to my trusted store to try it. What a surprise! It smells of raspberry and roses so generically that it reminded me of dozens of more or less cheap perfumes with the same combination. The Chance line used to share citrus bases: lemons, grapefruits, oranges, or quinces. This bottle only holds a sweet, fruity-red floral scent. It’s okay and 100% wearable, but not elegant. It reminded me of Lanvin Couture or a flanker of Lancome Tresor before LVEB, even a light pharmacy cologne. It could have rescued Chanel’s identity in that soft, enveloping sensation of notes dancing around the raspberry, but it still doesn’t smell like what it costs.
I wanted to try it because the advertising was everywhere; the video is lovely and the song very addictive. It caught my attention, so I went and tried it on skin and blotter. The opening is sparkling; I liked it more than the dry-down; it transformed into a violet scent, very intense. Yes, it smells quite of roses and violets. It’s not invasive, smells clean, and has a subtle talc-like quality; although I don’t usually like florals, it didn’t bother me to wear it. Its longevity is 6 to 9 hours.
Chanel returns with a signature that replicates a Lancôme O’Zur EDT, which was discontinued three years ago. They told me they dropped it because they wanted to bet on more expansive scents, but it was my favourite clean scent: rose with violets and a slightly plum-like note that I adored. Now this scent is back, but yes, for four times the price. Roses, violets… Well done to Chanel for rescuing this subtle marvel, but at that price, it really needs to be loved.
It reminds me of one my mum used to have, perhaps Dior Addict 2. Rich and fresh, but it doesn’t last long. I’m not sure if it’s worth the investment.
Reminds me of an Iguak my mum used to wear, perhaps it’s Dior Addict 2. Smells lovely and fresh, but it fades quickly; I’m not sure if it’s worth the expense.
I wanted to try it due to the advertising; the video and song are addictive. I tried it on skin and paper: a sparkling opening I liked more than the dry down, where it transforms into intense violets and roses. It’s not intrusive, smells clean and of subtle talc; although I don’t like florals, it didn’t bother me to wear it. It lasts 6 to 9 hours.
I went to a shop in Chile, took a tester, and applied a little; I was amazed. But based on experience, I wanted to wait and see how it felt after hours. The next day, I bought it online from Chanel, because they send extra details and samples (something physical stores no longer do, as they don’t give testers out anymore). I adored it; you can feel that purple aroma, very similar to sweetened lavender. It’s the violets and roses that define the fragrance, with cheerful notes that in an autumn chill cling to the skin and clothes. It’s one of my favourite fragrances.
It seems Chanel and Dior are leaning more towards the Asian market than the Western one; here we are flooded with Arabic inspirations and a few originals. To me, Splendide smells like those typical Asian girls from k-dramas or j-dramas: pretty, refined, and neat, tender but with a sparkling and bold side. It’s totally for spring and summer; it opens with very refreshing, almost bubbly red berries, neither sweet nor acidic, perfectly balanced. Then come the flowers, highlighting rose and geranium with a slightly bitter citrus touch that helps balance so the fruits don’t become too sweet. It closes with an acidic, fresh, clean, and slightly powdery floral, very neat thanks to Chanel’s musk. While it’s not the eighth wonder, it’s a very good option if you like clean scents that don’t overwhelm the senses. It doesn’t seem like Bright Crystal; don’t trust other people’s noses, try it on skin. There’s nothing alike on blotter and skin; the musk works magic on skin, just like in Chance Tendre. I agree it fits the Dior Addict 2 line, only Splendide is denser, with a stronger opening and better longevity. Despite its lack of maturity, it lasts 6 hours on skin. If you like this line, it’s totally worth it: there is scent and quality.
I liked it very much. I’m not sure if the tester in the shop had matured, because the longevity was more than acceptable. Very enjoyable. Definitely, you must try it and not be swayed by reviews; you have to try it yourself.
Fresh and bubbly. I’m the only one who notices the resemblance to Guerlain’s Granate de Pera.
I went to a store in Chile, tried a tester and was amazed, but waited to see how it felt after hours. The next day I bought it online because they send details and samples, something they don’t do in-store. I loved it: it smells of violets and roses, like sweetened lavender, with cheerful notes that linger on the skin and clothes even in cold weather. It’s one of my favourites.
In its dry-down, it reminds me of Givenchy’s Hot Couture Collection No.1 from 2000, which is no longer available.
I’ve just finished my bottle of Chanel Chance Eau Tendre EDP and tried this new one to see if I’d switch. I had few expectations, and indeed, that’s exactly what happened. My first thought was: ‘nothing new under the sun’. It smells nice, yes, but I need a bit more to justify the price, especially just for being Chanel. I tried it on my sister, who is more casual about perfumes, and she loved it; she said she’d never smelled anything like it. For those less ‘in the know’, it could be a great find. I see it as a sparkling, cheerful, and feminine fruity scent, ideal for summer. I’m staying with Eau Tendre.
A tender and lovely scent, very similar to Dior’s Addict To Life.
An incredibly citrus opening; those berry notes are citrusy, not sweet. It dries down to violet, musk, and cedar; the dry-down feels odd to me—could it be the DNA Chanel uses, or something else? It reminded me a bit of Gabrielle from the same brand. Personally, I’m sticking with Chance Eau Tendre EDT; I prefer it.
It smells fruity and mainly of roses, with nuances of sweet red fruits, the typical peach, and roses. It smells good, yes, but honestly, I expected something more. It smells quite generic, to be honest. I think it’s a perfume you could easily give to a teenager who would like it. I agree with a review stating this perfume might be targeting the Asian market, which is a lucrative one. This perfume could have a wide audience; it’s easy to like, but it’s not original. Another one for the Chance list to sell.
I bought Zara Majestic Lilas some time ago; this new Chanel version is the refined older sibling I was looking for in that fragrance. It’s a delicate, talc-like, feminine scent that evokes the classic melancholic colour of violet, with that softness of lilacs and a well-selected iris. It’s very agreeable for any lady, so if you’re looking for a unique aroma, it’s not for you. Long-lasting duration, especially on clothes, or medium on skin, medium trail, and it maintains the price of the other high-selling versions.
Truly beautiful 💜 I just bought it and loved it; it’s so fresh and super youthful without being disgustingly sweet. Moreover, its trail, projection, and longevity are very wide. I completely disagree with those who say it smells like nothing, lasts nothing, or adds nothing new; it’s true, it didn’t invent the wheel, but it’s a fairly well-made formulation. I’d recommend it to people between 20 and 28 years old; I think it’s more than perfect for work, it smells clean. I hope Chanel makes more of these perfumes targeting the Asian market; I’m tired of Arabic perfumes that even the dog brings home.
A beautiful, calming scent. It’s sweet, citrusy, and fresh, unlike anything I’ve smelled before. Very feminine and clean.
A floral perfume with lots of rose. It reminds me of Boss Ma Vie L’Eau by Hugo Boss due to the rose, and Miss Dior Blooming Bouquet by Dior because of the peony. Chanel Chance Eau Splendide is a timeless classic.
They sent me a sample when I bought another Chanel. It seemed like a fresh, youthful scent with a pleasant, feminine fruity sweetness reminiscent of shampoo or just out of the shower. Undoubtedly, the protagonists are the red fruits and violet, which blend with the musk and cedar of the Chance line. In this sense, Eau Splendide is juicier and sparklier than the Eau Tendre, though I agree it smells very generic and is an uninteresting launch. What both share is their terrible fixation, longevity, and projection, relative to the high cost. I think it smells nice and could be a good everyday perfume, but I feel its notes are too basic and it lacked the elegance to be Chanel. I sincerely believe it’s not worth the price, just like the Tendre, and of course, there are better options with musk, cedar, and red fruits. Finally, between Tendre and Splendide, I stick with the original Chance xD.
They gave it to me for my birthday with all the love in the world, but at first, I thought it was a total bore. Now I’m giving it another chance, and honestly, I enjoy it immensely, even as an everyday or all-rounder scent. It’s youthful, fresh, and super luminous. The opening is an acidic, effervescent raspberry, accompanied by a musky cloud of light, almost aquatic flowers. In summer and spring, it has to be its prime. I’m surprised it lasts longer than a full workday; at least on my skin, it’s very long-lasting.
It looks good; that opening is super fresh, sweet yet citrusy. The iris and violet are noticeable, and I feel freshly showered. However, the longevity is poor; the trail lasts nothing, and by an hour it became too woody, to the point where I didn’t like that dry-down. The violet is detectable, but for a Chanel costing up to 4,000 pesos that lasts only 2 to 4 hours on my skin, it’s an outrage. I wouldn’t buy the full bottle.
Luckily I bought a decant. It’s not a bad perfume, but I can tell it’s very similar to the Idols, perhaps due to the rose and iris notes; I never detected the fruit notes (a great disappointment). I wouldn’t buy it.
Not bad, but it doesn’t really stand out. I think it’s throwing money away. It’s floral and clean, but that’s all it has to offer.