Men

Club de Nuit Bling

Marca
Armaf
3.67 de 5
255 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Armaf Club de Nuit Bling is an aromatic woody fragrance for men and women. This new creation was launched in 2025. The top notes are citrus; the heart notes are floral prism and stardust; the base notes are velvety woods and vanilla.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 14%
  • Primavera 31%
  • Verano 33%
  • Otoño 21%
  • Día 60%
  • Noche 40%

Notas clave

Comunidad

255 votos

  • Positivo 65%
  • Negativo 23%
  • Neutral 12%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Salida 1 nota
Corazón 2 notas
Fondo 2 notas

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Club de Nuit Bling y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

20 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • SYNYSTERGATESYN

    I find it a delicious aroma; I have no objections, but the longevity is very short. I wore it on my skin and it lasted just over 3 or 4 hours. I assume the trail is good, though I didn’t ask people around me. To be honest, I expected more.

  • Give it a try first so you don’t end up disappointed. For me, it doesn’t justify the hype. At first, it sounds like a blend of Montblanc Legend EDP and Fakhar Platinum, and as it dries down, it has an air of Erba Pura. The performance is just about right, lasting around 5 hours.

  • Jaasielrmrz

    I tried it and, truth be told, it smells nice but doesn’t take my breath away. It opens with powerful citrus notes, like bergamot and grapefruit, but as it dries down, the vanilla fades and the woody notes become more prominent, resembling Bleu de Chanel but less potent and more woody. It lasted around 6-7 hours, nothing compared to other CDN fragrances. The trail is strong; I noticed it from a metre away, and the projection was decent for about 3 hours. I don’t think this will be a boom and its hype makes no sense; it smells like something we already know, and if you’re sold it for over $30 just because it’s ‘new’, it’s not worth it. Wait for the price to drop. Scent: 6/10 Longevity: 8/10 Sillage: 10/10

  • MisterPerfume

    Contrary to previous reviews, I quite like it, and let’s not even mention its appeal to the fair sex. I specialise in asking women about new launches, and this was a bomb of female reactions.

  • Jaasielrmrz

    I tried it and it smells nice, but it doesn’t take my breath away. It opens with powerful citrus notes, like bergamot and grapefruit, but as it dries down, the vanilla fades and the woody notes become more prominent, resembling Bleu de Chanel but less potent and more woody. It lasted around 6-7 hours, nothing compared to other CDN fragrances. The trail is strong; I noticed it from a metre away, and the projection was decent for about 3 hours. I don’t think this will be a boom and its hype makes no sense; it smells like something we already know, and if you’re sold it for over $30 just because it’s ‘new’, it’s not worth it. Wait for the price to drop. Scent: 6/10 Longevity: 8/10 Sillage: 10/10

  • I bought it yesterday and liked the scent, although the listed notes are just decoration; it’s a woody citrus. I consider it a blind buy, easy to enjoy and quite unisex; I wouldn’t say definitively it’s for ladies or gentlemen. The downside is that it’s new and expensive for a perfume that isn’t even 105 ml like the rest of the CDN line, I think it’s 75 ml. Longevity and trail are lacking; I’d look for other options because it’s not novel, but it is good.

  • Hocicosensible

    Total disappointment! An overwhelming synthetic grapefruit opening that turns vanilla and almost becomes a feminine perfume. Terrible longevity. I have a decant I use to spray on a cotton ball and put in the vacuum cleaner to perfume the house, and my wife told me today she didn’t know what I’d sprayed and that she hated it, haha. Luckily, I only bought a 3 ml decant.

  • Leonardo-Ramirez

    Very citrusy, fruity, and fresh opening, but dries down to aquatic vanilla. In the dry-down, it reminds me of Nautica Pure Blue, which came out a year prior. Also reminiscent of Odyssey Aqua, though I prefer this Armaf one. Pleasant scent, easy to like but not surprising.

  • Leonardo-Ramirez

    Very citrusy, fruity, and fresh opening, but as it dries down it becomes aquatic vanilla. It reminds me quite a bit of Nautica Pure Blue, which came out a year earlier, and also Odyssey Aqua, although I like this Armaf one more. It’s a pleasant scent, easy to like but not surprising.

  • Huge hype since its launch in October 2025 in the Emirates. I bought a decant because I know the history of YouTubers saying it’s spectacular. Honest review: 1. Clean citrus opening. 2. Then a synthetic fruity trail, like passion fruit. 3. ‘Stardust notes’? WTF, is this from Armaf or NASA? 4. Reminds me of BEIJÓN DE HUMOR by NATURA. 5. Sweet, fruity, youthful, informal. 6. Nothing innovative; a scent seen a thousand times, especially in Paco Rabbane’s ADN. 7. I don’t recommend it. If you’re over 30, it’s not for you.

  • Hocicosensible

    Total disappointment. An overwhelming synthetic grapefruit opening that fades into vanilla and almost becomes feminine. Terrible longevity. I have a decant I use on cotton to put in the vacuum cleaner to scent the house; my wife says she doesn’t know what I put in it and hates it. Luckily, I only bought 3 ml.

  • I tried it at a tasting and was surprised; I bought a bottle. It will break out this spring-summer 2026. Clean, bright, juicy citrus opening, yet synthetic, with hints of passion fruit without copying others. It has ‘solar’ scents and a well-executed floral vanilla. As others say, it doesn’t pull the wool over your eyes or propose new recipes, but it stands out as a tasty, easy creation, ideal for young people aged 15 to 30, although I’m 43 and a friend over 50 also wears it. I liked it; it’s easy, wearable, and tasty. This is a bomb among women. Forcing it to be a dupe of one, two, or three perfumes seems unjustified.

  • diegomtz2003

    I was sceptical due to the hype, so I bought a decant and have tried it for two weeks. It’s fresh, rich, and has a slight sweetness that gives it a ‘sexy’ touch without losing freshness. Don’t let the opening lead you astray; at first, it’s sharp and chaotic, but as it settles in 15-20 minutes, it becomes better and that sweetness emerges, which is what I like most. My problem is the price because it’s new: between 1200-1500 mxn. Is that a lot? No, but it’s nothing spectacular or new; it’s a familiar scent, so I don’t feel it’s worth that expense unless you absolutely love it. At that price, we might be entering designer territory. In conclusion, although it brings nothing new, it’s rich, fresh, and attractive. It’s a safe purchase, unlikely to disappoint, but you could be let down by the price. I’ll wait for it to drop.

  • Citrusy, fresh, and very good. Don’t let yourself be led astray by the super-experts who put the magic word ‘synthetic’ on everything, haha, they don’t know how to say anything else.

  • Citrusy and fresh, very good. Don’t let the super-experts fool you with their magic word ‘synthetic’—haha, they can’t say anything more.

  • valentinophantom

    I liked it, mate. At first, it smells of synthetic passion fruit with shiso, then it shifts to lemon grass, a green citrus note leaning towards plant-like, dry like cannabis and grapefruit in Bad Boy but wet. Super pleasant. Longevity is good, 7 hours on the skin and decent projection. It works brilliantly on clothes; it’s not heavy. It smells like 2People (2011 Rework) – Louis La Roche Remix.

  • I got to smell it at a tasting with friends and was surprised, so I bought a bottle. It’s a fragrance that’s going to break this spring-summer 2026. The opening is clean, bright citrus, juicy but slightly synthetic, with hints of passionfruit without trying to imitate others. It has ‘solar’ aromas and a well-executed floral vanilla. It’s true that it doesn’t uncover the black thread nor propose new recipes, but here it stands out a bit; it’s a tasty, easy-to-wear creation, ideal for young people aged 15 to 30, although I’m 43 and a friend over 50 uses it too. I liked it; it’s easy, wearable, and tasty, a bomb among women. Trying to force similarities to call it a dupe seems unjustified.

  • If you love citrus, this one is for you. Top quality. Ignore the so-called experts who scream ‘synthetic’ about everything; they simply don’t know how to describe anything else.

  • diegomtz2003

    I was sceptical due to the hype, so I tried a decant for two weeks. It’s fresh, rich, and has a slight sweetness that gives it a sexy touch without losing freshness. The opening is sharp and chaotic, but within 15-20 minutes it settles, and the sweetness becomes noticeable, which is the best part. My only gripe is the price: between 1200-1500 MXN. It’s nothing spectacular or new; it’s a familiar scent, so it’s not worth it unless you absolutely adore it. At that price, we’re entering designer territory. In short, it’s rich, fresh, and attractive—a safe purchase but perhaps disappointing regarding the cost. I’ll wait for a sale.

  • If you like citrus, this is for you; very good quality. Don’t pay attention to the so-called experts who call everything ‘synthetic’; they don’t know how to say anything else.