Men
Narciso Rodriguez for Him
Acordes principales
Descripción
Narciso Rodriguez for Him by Narciso Rodriguez is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 2007, this composition is signed by perfumer Francis Kurkdjian.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
4,504 votos
- Positivo 81%
- Negativo 16%
- Neutral 3.7%
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Narciso Rodriguez for Him y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I don’t like it, what can we do? Narciso loves musks, but here it smells like barbershop shaving foam, which bothers me. It is very adult, lacks sensuality, and its performance is scarce for the price. It is minimalist and people around me don’t like it, nor do I. Perhaps it’s because it’s classic and not my style. Don’t buy blindly; it ages the wearer.
I just bought the EDP version: it’s a captivating and addictive scent, deep, like crossing into a gloomy underworld where melancholy bewitches you. It is seductive in its own way, an invitation to a forbidden place full of nostalgia. A masterpiece, a dark and charming work of art. I give it 9/10 for style, originality, and quality; not 10 because it’s not versatile, but it is a jewel.
Looking for a Christmas gift, I saw testers of this For Him at Narciso Rodriguez. It gives me the impression they are discontinuing it, as it’s hard to find a tester here in Chile. I couldn’t resist trying it, hoping for a marvel. Mistake! I haven’t felt such rejection in a long time; it smells like an old-fashioned perfume, only for a granddad. I’m sorry, but that’s what I think when I smell it. It smells like the murky water left after leaving flowers out for days without changing them.
A perfume unlike any other. If scents had moods, this would be sad, melancholic, and funereal. It transports me to a solitary walk in a damp forest in the afternoon; it smells of fallen leaves in autumn under the rain. It has very good performance and projection.
It consists of violet, patchouli, amber, and musk. The violet and musk stand out, giving it darkness, while the patchouli adds earthy moisture and a touch of sweet amber after three hours. It evokes concrete and wet earth, like walking on a cold day with autumn leaves. It is elegant, formal, and of extremely high quality, even above niche brands. I don’t recommend blind buying as it is risky; test first due to the floral violet and earthy patchouli.
A very good fragrance, but it needs specific conditions to shine. First, it thrives in a rainy climate; the humidity of the rain boosts Narciso Rodriguez Him. Second, it conveys melancholy and a deep sadness. It’s a modern vintage, elegant and mysterious. But with sunshine, sea breeze, or at night, everything dissolves. It needs rain and a specific state of mind; the Mediterranean climate doesn’t suit it in my case.
Finally, I found the year of my Narciso for Him EDT: it’s from 2017 and it’s not the same one that lasts hours as they say. It was criminally reformulated. The scent is good; I note the violet leaves, wet patchouli, and amber, a beautiful accord created by Francis Kurdjian. But the truth is that now it lasts very little and projects nothing.
Mysterious, gothic, and nostalgic, this perfume is wonderful precisely for its lugubrious side. It amplifies its magic on rainy days. It is difficult, rough, and dry, although the violet and patchouli add moisture, while the amber and animalic musk give it depth. The EDP is more aggressive and ritualistic, whereas this EDT is introspective and melancholic. It’s not cheerful or friendly; at first, it smells good, but the musk and violet can become overwhelming over time. It smells like a mausoleum, not sadness, but dark elegance. Only for cold weather, pure art.
The EDT is a vintage aromatic fougere that smells like a damp atmosphere after rain, like a cobblestone path wet with dew. The violet here is bright, floral, and bold, distinct from the usual, combined with patchouli and amber for a grey and deep profile. Recommended only for cold, rainy days; in the heat, it can be overwhelming. Not for parties, but my wife adored it. Lasts about five hours with potent initial projection. An original proposal that was missing.
I didn’t enjoy it, but I respect its quality: it’s a complex assembly where animalic musk dominates, softened by powdery violet and a timid base of patchouli and amber. It evokes vintage melancholy, sober and elegant, ideal for solitary walks on winter afternoons while reading a book. It’s not for quick conquests, but for that lifelong love. Perfect for formal wear, with impeccable performance and price.
It is a good fragrance. After reading such excellent reviews, perhaps I went to try it with high expectations and did not find everything I had read, but it is still a great product. It opens strongly with aromatic green notes; I imagine violet leaves. It has been pleasant, though one must not bring the nose too close to the application point. The development is the best part; musk predominates with a delicious base. One can tell there is good taste and it is high quality. Here I do not agree with other reviewers: I do not find it melancholy, sombre, dark, earthy, gothic, damp, sensual or extremely animalistic. My opinion: (1) It is clearly masculine, wearable by a woman but not a young one or without elegance, nor for daily use. (2) It is not complicated, but it is a serious scent for a serious person. (3) It is to a certain extent minimalist, but with so much good taste that it is pleasant. (4) It is elegant but not opulent. (5) Longevity and projection are good. (6) Very attractive. (7) Better in fresh and cold climates. (8) Very good value for money. I have liked it very much and discovered that Narciso Rodriguez makes products with care and class. I recommend trying it.
I am continuing to explore men’s fragrances… There are many that seem similar to me and overlap; over time, one forgets what each conveys. That is why I usually write private notes. Top, heart, base, trail… whether I like it or not, whether I buy it. Well, I think this Narciso Rodriguez For Him does not need a note; I will hardly forget what it provoked in me. Only to me (a senseless kamikaze) does it occur to me to spray it five times in Zaragoza in August. That is enough, no matter how late it is. I am a woman and I like officially masculine scents. I like earthy ones like Terre de Hermès, intense ones like Esencia de Loewe, marine ones like Aqua. I like herbs, woods, sandalwood, ginger, cardamom, musks and aldehydes. And yet, this Narciso For Him has knocked me down. It has upset me, I have a headache, I feel stifled, and although I showered, I can still smell it here. More bearable, but my goodness… It is a direct hit to the jaw. Not suitable for everyone. A sour slap, super sour, earthy, a blow of violets and musk. It brings to mind mould, tar, damp northern earth, almost bogged down with rotting leaves, dark, wintry and buzzing without stopping. In the style of an old village surrounded by divine forests, waiting for a mythical Basque creature to appear and take you to the underworld. I am not surprised that it is classified as gothic, and it shocks me that someone labels it subtle, sweet or androgynous. This is terrifyingly good; long live Narciso. But one needs guts to wear it without dying in the attempt. Of subtle, nothing; it is sober, solitary and damp. Throw stones at me if you wish, but in my opinion this is for a very proper man, from the North and in winter. And there this perfume is in its element. Those of you from below León and without rain are warned. I am going for a large paracetamol. Tomorrow at best I will be ‘nenuco’, as I remain dizzy.
Fantastic scent. I have used it on different occasions, experiencing pleasant sensations and others that are stifling. Finally, in 2017/18, I think I got rid of it because I found it aggressive and strident. It also generated a kind of itch in my throat (I do not know if because of the BHT it contains). But the usual: later, in a bar, there was a couple next to me and in the air I sensed an exuberant, striking, intoxicating and above all, quite unique aroma. When I asked the young man what he was wearing, he told me it was this perfume. It felt MUCH better than when I used it myself. ‘The neighbour’s grass is always greener’. *Butylated Hydroxytoluene*
Good morning. Thank you for the explanation. On re-reading my review, I realised I said I considered it absurd to use sarcastic phrases to define notes. That was a misunderstanding; it wasn’t about identifying the notes. I understand there are fougère, gourmand, floral, and other classifications. What I struggle with is the generalisation of sensations: what is opulent for some is formal for others. In my case, For Him by Narciso Rodríguez doesn’t feel melancholic, sombre, dark, earthy, or damp, nor is it suitable for a nightclub. I’ve read other reviews and they agree that for many it is gothic and melancholic. In any case, I highly recommend trying it. Thank you.
@Mr Baskerville: Good evening. I only review based on my olfactory experience. The notes I mention correspond to the gothic style because gothic fashion, architecture, and scents share something: they are an artistic style. This fragrance is inspired by a melancholic romanticism, ideal for rainy days, cold weather, or grey afternoons, like a pleasant sadness, nothing for sunny days. Unlike other designer scents, its interpretation is cold, pale, nostalgic, and a harmonious grey romanticism. To capture that facet, it is an artistically constructed work. Each scent awakens sensations: an aquatic note gives freshness, a sweet note gives warmth, and an incense note gives spirituality. I don’t see why identifying notes is absurd; the olfactory experience is decisive. Terms like fougère, gourmand, and spiced have existed for years. That is why, and given what it expresses in its notes, For Him is of the gothic style. I hope I have explained myself. Thank you.
Good evening. To be perfectly honest, I’m not entirely sure what ‘gothic’ means in the world of fragrances, so I’ll ask formally: what is the objective, generalisable definition of gothic in this context? I know the term from architecture, art, fashion and literature, but I struggle to accept that a complex olfactory sensation can be generalised in the same way as a visual, auditory or tactile one. I don’t deny that it might evoke a sombre or grey romanticism in some people, but I don’t understand why it should do so for everyone within the olfactory world. I agree that both fragrances are wonderful and I recommend them, but I still can’t quite see why old wood, patchouli, moss, damp earth, leather, musk and soft florals are synonymous with gothic depending on who is defining it and why. Is it generalisable across all cultures and experiences? My opinion is that it is subjective, complex and individual. Perhaps we need greater knowledge to define which notes make an aroma gothic or funereal (I say this without sarcasm, as I consider that intention absurd). Thank you in advance.
Narciso Rodriguez For Him EDT: I own both versions, the EDP and the EDT, and they are nothing alike. Not only in longevity and projection, but in essence. I find the EDT more herbal and earthy, in the line of Lalique’s Encre Noire without being similar, whereas the EDP is much more floral; the violet is spectacular and rounded. Both are very good; if you like one, you will surely like the other. The EDT is 100% melancholy, while the EDP is romance. I recommend both if you enjoy eccentric fragrances. I would place the EDT in the gothic genre: it is not bizarre, but understanding it requires a certain olfactory world. The gothic notes are diverse: old wood, patchouli, moss, grass, damp earth, leather, musk, soft florals, heavy and thick notes, which is exactly what this EDT has. It complements the aromatic art with a sombre, grey melancholy, just like its bottle. To me, even up close, it does not seem unisex; I do not see this scent on a woman. Nor is it minimalist; it is a complex work with many notes well conjugated towards a versatile direction. I am not saying whether it is good or not, only that I love both. Scent: 10+1, Projection: moderate, Longevity: 6-7 hours. Recommended.
Love at first sniff. For me, it’s neither strange nor difficult, just distinct. It smells to me of damp concrete and delicate florals. Ideal for spring and autumn when it’s raining.
I don’t know why it sounds a bit like Xeryus Rouge mixed with 212 by Carolina Herrera to me; if anyone else experiences this, please let me know, or maybe it’s just my head… I’ve given it more than ten chances and today I can say it has completely fascinated me. It’s synthetic, musky, and overwhelmingly floral, with a touch of patchouli that gives character to a simple fragrance. The dry-down is sweet and ambered, acrid, dry, earthy, and baroque. For the price, it offers a lot. It still seems to me a lugubrious, strange, and dark work, not because of the black bottle, but because of that dry smell of cemetery flowers and bad memories. The longevity is BRUTAL and the trail reaches two metres. I like it more and more each day.
Wauuu, what an incredible perfume. Totally niche; it’s clear Kurkdjian let his creative side run wild. I’m absolutely blown away, though I admit it’s polarising: you either love it or it kills you. It smells to me like a vase with stagnant water, withered roses, and decomposing flowers. A super ceremonial scent, more gothic than anything, pure melancholy. I completely agree with those who detect a bouquet of flowers in a cemetery. Bravo, Mr Kurkdjian.
This has been, is, and will be a gentleman’s perfume, another genius by Mr Kurkdjian who never stitches without a thread. It is said to have enough quality to be considered niche, and it is no less so; it has quality in its notes, and although I do not think it is a perfume that turns people away, it is not a scent for everyone, it has a very particular smell that can be slow digestion, being one of those perfumes that do not win you over at first sniff but with which familiarity breeds love. It is a clean, neat perfume, a cold and damp winter morning, a pre-dawn in which the dew has already bathed the asphalt, a wall with fresh cement in the middle of a construction site, a cold marble acting as a support for withered flowers. All that is this Narciso For Him, a discontinued perfume with which justice has not been done, and it is that versatile and simple scents are sought and this is not one of them. Its cousins the Bleu Noirs are good perfumes but lack the personality of this flagship of Narciso Rodríguez, a perfume whose disappearance has left a void in the American brand’s men’s line, as I say the Bleu Noire line does not reach its height. If anything characterises Narciso Rodríguez is the wonderful treatment and handling of musk, and here it would not be any less. It is the dominant note along with the violet, nothing tarred in my opinion, but colder and deeper than ever, and the patchouli. It is a very linear scent where only at the end, in the residues that resist the passing of hours, it acquires a soapy character that closes an olfactory experience far and away from designer scents. It seems like boiled violet juice, whose cold vapours form the scent of this perfume. One must not forget the fact that although it is a scent that, like all, may or may not please, if you have the fortune to like it, it is easy to wear, it is clean and neat, ideal for daily life taking the climate into consideration; I do not think one should be a Dracula or a grave-digger to use it, nor should one be a grumpy or melancholic person, although it is true that it evokes many of those circumstances and characteristics; really everything boils down to the fact that its characteristics suit a simple use but it is not a casual scent. As I have pointed out about the climate, high temperatures do not do it well as it can become heavy due to its lack of evolution and the characteristics of its notes. Despite having a soft and clean scent, it is very persistent and its longevity is very good, having a moderate but enveloping trail that we will perceive for hours in a light way, in the line of Narciso Rodríguez’s female perfumes. Its solid bottle cannot have a more appropriate colour for what its contents evoke, grey-blue, cold and marbled. I strongly advise against buying it blindly; do not let yourself be carried away by the fact of seeing it on sale if you cannot try it before despite its scarcity or discontinuation, it deserves to be tested beforehand without doubt or you may take an unpleasant surprise, like the one we took when they removed from the market works of such quality and personality as the perfume we are discussing. Great perfume wherever you are.
I had wanted this perfume for a long time, but for one reason or another I postponed it. Perhaps after reading some reviews that said it was worthy of Dracula and smelled like a cemetery or stagnant water, etc. When I smelled it for the first time, I felt a different scent, as if I were smelling a bouquet of roses accompanied by smoke while burning their stems. The smoke fades and the floral scent settles. Definitely a masculine and very clean scent. And more than Dracula, this would be perfect in Batman.
I bought it about a year ago and have only used it once. That day of purchase really captivated me; it has a strange but very pleasant opening. The problem, in my opinion, is the dry-down, and it is a problem for me because these are notes that you should like before buying it. In the dry-down, a note of patchouli and amber predominates, and together they seem like a grandma’s talcum powder scent. It is a vintage patchouli smell from the old school, not very masculine. Its opening is very pleasant but I do not like the dry-down.
It has been trying this perfume and travelling, travelling through time, through memories, in my memory, and sincerely, of all the notes declared, I cannot perceive any. To me, it is a fresh and very vintage perfume, a wonder, certainly, but it is something I have heard about for a long time. The note I feel most is the moss, also the patchouli, something earthy, but for me the moss is the protagonist, everything from my unexpert nose… And at times it reminds me of the classic Paco Rabanne, that green part is very characteristic, but after recalling and giving it much to my memory, it has come to my mind the perfume Pitiusa, a perfume I used in my adolescence and adored, at that time feminine, but which currently would be totally unisex, even many young girls would say it smells masculine, due to current fruity-patchouli trends… The problem is the trends, the current trends, which leave these masterpieces in the background and leave us to appreciate these beauties, and then you go down the street and everyone smells One Million or The One, all very generic… And suddenly you come across this, and they discontinue it… Slobbery great perfume…
Narciso Rodríguez for Him Eau de Toilette, a floral-aldehydic perfume with an earthy-warm facet. Smells like high-quality artisanal soap that generates an aura of cleanliness, mysticism, and sobriety. Semi-formal to formal fragrance. I see it better for evening use. Its longevity is decent, with a projection for the first hour and then it stays close to the skin. It is a scent that completely breaks away from the current trend of conventional men’s perfumes. If you like it and can find it, buy it without hesitation as it is discontinued. Excellent work, Mr Francis Kurkdjian! Unique and original niche-quality perfume. My opinion. Age: 25+. 50% Male-50% Female. Seasons: Autumn and Winter. Occasions: Night outings, leisure moments. Scent: 8.3/10. Number of sprays: 8. Longevity: 7.5/10. Duration: approx. 5-6h. Trail: 7.0/10. Projection: 7.0/10. Versatility: 8.0/10. Value for money: 9.0/10. Final score: 7.80/10. Thanks and see you next time.
A great fragrance by master Francis Kurkdjian, who here gave a twist to the concept of the classic fougère; today unfortunately discontinued, hard to find and at a high price. The current NR Blue Noir for Hims do not match this jewel in scent, charm, or charisma. All the same, the Narciso Rodríguez house should bet as soon as possible on releasing a new fragrance (and with the brand’s quality, i.e., high) for the men’s market. They already have plenty for women and have largely abandoned men. The NR for Him has a fairly unique, personal, violet-tinted scent that, in my opinion, is a dark niche-quality fragrance in the designer market. If houses like By Kilian, Initio, or Amouage had released it, no one would be surprised to pay 250 euros for a 50ml bottle for mature men with strong personality. Nocturnal, winter, rainy day, with more than acceptable longevity and trail (8 hours without issues and projecting for two hours). To give you an idea, it is like a mix of Dior Fahrenheit EDT (without the strong gasoline note), i.e., a smell of violets mixed with Encre Noir by Lalique, but instead of the strong vetiver and cypress smell of that, it has more of a patchouli, leaf, and trunk smell, which is pure grass, masculine, and also slightly bitter and domesticated with amber and the right dose of musk to give it longevity and presence. Satisfied? Why not? If you are a fragrance collector or you prefer non-commercial perfumery, different from the trend, certainly a bit of a dandy, with strong, difficult, and dark scents, and you see it out there, do not hesitate. Go for it.
Test before you buy! Everyone says it smells like petrichor. It is true, but poorly executed in my opinion. To me, it smells like a badly scrubbed bathroom floor in a supermarket. I tried it once and said: it’s not for me! That said, it is definitely niche quality.
It closes a rainy autumn morning in which the violet dies in the arms of the musk to hide together in the earth, while the damsel’s moan is the last thing to fade. It is bottled poetry. An elegy dedicated by Narciso to his male audience, who do not break into applause upon trying its scent but into verses of melancholy. This is how I would recount it.
I owned it, and honestly, the performance and longevity are beastly. However, to be honest, it reminds me a lot of Dior’s Fahrenheit with a smokier touch. Nevertheless, I had to gift it away because it was overwhelming; it was intrusive. The curious thing is that it is one of the three scents that make me cough when I apply them; the other two are CH MAN and Declaration by Cartier. I don’t know why, but I keep using them despite that strange reaction :v.
The genius lies in its undeniable originality. The opening is an intense, rough, earthy, and slightly dark green floral note. Then it slowly fades until acquiring a warm, dusty, subtly woody, and musky accord that lasts until the end. It denotes distinction, elegance, and an introspective and melancholic air. Although at some point it may vaguely remind one of another fragrance, Narciso Rodriguez for Him is unique. I agree with @Bofifa: moderate, even low, longevity and projection. Nevertheless, it has worked perfectly on every occasion. It doesn’t need to last eight hours, it is enough to know when to wear it. Another jewel that joins the greats in the beyond, such as Gucci Envy, Gucci pour Homme, Gucci pour Homme II, Guilty Absolute, Sensual Vetiver by Carolina Herrera, Dior Homme Parfum (75ml), and Fahrenheit Absolute.
Happened to be shown a replica of that discontinued NR for Him by a friend yesterday afternoon, and he sprayed it on me on a café terrace. Having owned the original between 2011 and 2012, I recognised it instantly. Truth be told, I preferred this to the original: it lasts longer (I can still smell it this evening), and its projection was basically spot on, with the added bonus that I wear it with great pleasure because it is far less aggressive than the original version. In this world of perfumery, you are surprised daily, and this was one of them, fortunately for the better.
Designer fragrance with a niche base, very original. Upon spraying, I thought of Fahrenheit, but this one takes a different path: more ozonic, clean, and subtle. It is hard to describe, but it revolves around ozonic/aldehydic, dusty accords, and musk. It has a floral point and a woody point. It conveys cleanliness, purity, and sobriety. Performance is good, it fixes well, and projection is not intrusive. I love it, although it is a pity it is no longer available. It is a good versatile wardrobe staple for formal or semi-formal occasions, almost all year round except heat. Masculine.
I tried this fragrance today and I loved it. It didn’t evoke the wet concrete that is often said, but rather a dry petrichor, that scent of the air just as it starts to rain. It is a very dry aromatic green, where violet leaves predominate. Accompanied slightly by geosmin (that earthy smell from garden bags), it gives it an earthy and melancholic touch. It is beautiful, extremely well-made, and very wearable, a pity it is discontinued. Narciso Rodriguez fails with men: first this one, then Bleu Noir Extreme, while the rest of the line is still in stock and worse. What I was looking for in Narciso, the wet petro scent, I find in Noir Anthracite by Tom Ford. For fresh concrete, nothing better than Concrete by Comme des Garçons.
Smells of rain, melancholy, and nostalgia. It reminded me of the scent of a stingless bee building its hive underground and wood, here we call it ‘apynguarei’. It was almost identical and transported me back to my childhood: wax, wood, earth, and honey. I loved it in the perfumery, but couldn’t buy it. Then it was discontinued, but the tester was still hidden under other fragrances. A total success.
A very good fragrance, but with character and very little understood. It seemed too feminine and mature to me, with a mineral touch that didn’t suit me. In the end, I had to sell it; it smells like something a necromancer would wear.
A very curious scent, I like it. It conveys melancholy, dampness, a humid day. I detect lots of violet leaves (reminds me of Fahrenheit) and vetiver. It is ozonic, fresh, and musky but not powdery. Very good and distinctive. Could be unisex, but leaning masculine.
I was looking for musky perfumes and this one was discontinued; I asked shop after shop and it was out of stock. I nearly missed it, but I searched again and found it in a shop at a good price (around $60). I bought it blind. It’s a masculine fragrance, ideal for men aged 30 to 50, although it lacks incense, leather, or tobacco. It has an ozonic top, a marked violet heart, and a rich musky base. Personally, I didn’t love it due to the violet, but it’s a good musky fragrance. Performance is good for an EDT. I give it an 8/10.
A very elegant scent: Narciso Rodriguez for Him is the definition of bottled elegance. I am captivated by its two facets: at first, it smells like a small garden with freshly watered or rain-soaked herbs, fresh and earthy. Then, the musk and amber take centre stage, giving a sensation of deep cleanliness, as if just stepping out of the shower. It is comforting and sophisticated, perfect for the office or events requiring distinction. An olfactory jewel that always impresses. My rating: 9/10
Review based on how it smells on my boyfriend’s skin, to whom I gifted an exchange decant. It’s an original fragrance that changes with the season: in temperate weather, it starts with a vegetal, mineral scent, like freshly cut endive, with an underlying animalic touch; later, the vegetal notes fade, becoming more earthy with the animalic side standing out. In extreme cold or heat, it becomes very animalic, with a metallic or dirty smell, linear from start to finish. Projection and longevity are good, lasting over 8 hours on skin, with a bubble at a prudent distance without being overpowering. I have mixed feelings: it seems rich and fresh in temperate weather, leaning masculine unisex, elegant and full of personality; in extreme temperatures, it seems horrendous, like a gym bag after a week of sweaty clothes. Not to be bought blind, but works well on the right skin. Pleasant: 5/10 Interesting: 8/10 Versatile: 7/10 Original: 9/10
Masterpiece, true niche. Honour and glory to this Narciso Rodriguez for Him.