Men
Dior Homme Parfum 2025
Acordes principales
Descripción
Dior Homme Parfum 2025 by Dior is an oriental fragrance for men. This new creation was launched in 2025. The nose behind this fragrance is Francis Kurkdjian. The top note is iris; the heart note is amber; the base notes are patchouli and vetiver.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Dior Homme Parfum 2025 y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Versatile, warm, aromatic, mostly daytime. Merely oriental. With a fresh, sharp, floral iris opening, in the dry-down it becomes a bit cloying, as it dims its brightness to become creamy, with the vanilla touch of amber, and appears strongly alongside the iris this note of intense patchouli, very classic, and completely skin-close with some earthy notes, and vetiver making a presence. With moderate trails during its life. Constant bursts, and an acceptable to intense longevity. In summer heat it seems to show all its performance. Pity about Andrés Croxatto’s review, without giving him the opportunity to unfold all its notes, of this fragrance by the great Francis K.
I can’t believe what Dior has done with this perfume. Radical change, it went from being something extraordinary to being something ordinary. It’s no longer a distinct perfume, with its own soul. Now it’s just one more, no more. It smells good, of course. But this can’t be called Dior Homme Parfum.
It smells good. The opening is the best, it has the DNA the line used to have, that iris-derived makeup scent and little more. My test was dry and after 45 minutes it starts turning into an ultra-generic scent. Although it smells very good and striking, it results in being unrecognisable, clearly it could be any of the ‘REMINISCES OF’ lists. Too expensive and too generic, this industry is already overexploited, especially the tradition and fame that brands like DIOR boast, and the good image of the little bottles. Without a doubt, if you want to smell striking you could wear any Hugo Boss from a third of the price and it would result in the same, because the performance and quality are not minimally remarkable. From far away… from very far away, the DIOR HOMME EDT 2011 (the toilette) was much better, with much higher quality in raw materials and conceptually, a super original, elegant and distinguished scent without being old-fashioned like the discontinued PARFUM. The EDT 2011 was more of a parfum than this one, because it had much more projection, longevity and originality. I suppose that formula would be expensive now, they had to look for cheaper raw materials and a more typical composition. _____ Update: More than 12 hours have passed and the dry-down scent has practically disappeared. There is no logical way this could happen with a composition of this nature. LVMH wants you to apply 20 sprays and reapply every 30 minutes until you finish the bottle in three weeks. PREMATURE FORMULA. DISPOSABLE.
It’s respectable to Francis, but trashing everything Demachy did seems done with spite. It’s inhumane.
A fragrance for all year round, similar to JPG’s Ultramale, in my opinion less sweet and a bit more mature. Excellent longevity and quality. We must understand it’s a new perfume; filling it with hate just because some don’t like it isn’t good, we all have different opinions and it’s not allowed. My recommendation will always be ‘go, smell it, try it and decide YOURSELF’. The price is high for the quantity (ml), but the quality is worth every penny.
I’ll start with an absolute truth (at least in perfumes): TRY THE PERFUMES BEFORE JUDGING THEM AND DON’T LET YOURSELF BE GUIDED BECAUSE ‘PEPITO/MENGA SAID THIS OR THAT’. Although many reviewers raise the flag of ‘Dior conservatives’, it is by no means a bad perfume. One must admit that the previous DHP, as many say, was ‘a niche encapsulated in a designer bottle’, which to me (I have the 2020 Parfum) seemed more difficult to wear, for rare occasions and not pleasant to the general public (I checked). This version, while maintaining that iris opening, soon turns sweet and more pleasant, seductive. Although, as many say, it keeps that ‘generic’ DNA (some assimilate it to JPG, others to Armani, even Prada L’Homme Intense), it is MUCH more pleasant to the general public. Unless you have a refined nose and want to kill it because it’s no longer ‘niche’, your psyche will make you not like it. I think they aimed for that from a commercial brand; if not, that’s what niches with camel smell and strange things are for. Now, the same happened with the EDT version and the 2020 EDT, a radical turn. They took away that characteristic iris to become a great woody citrus. Does it follow the vibe of its predecessor? No. Is it a bad perfume? BY NO MEANS, IT’S DELICIOUS. And as the conservative flag-bearers messed up so much, they released the ‘Dior Homme EDT Original’ version 🤡. Experience: I used it for the first time yesterday for an exam; it projects quite well that dense sweet iris. A classmate three metres away came up to ask what perfume it was. Four hours later I went to a café, my aunt came and said ‘what a nice perfume, which one is it’, even though at that moment I didn’t feel it, it seems it kept projecting. ANYWAY: stop judging with your conservative little nose, leave people to smell good with what they like. For changing the formula, coming out to say ‘such a perfume is shit’… do them a favour and call yourself silent and let people try before being guided by the stupidities of the internet. I reiterate: GO AND TRY THE PERFUMES.
As an owner of four bottles of the 2020 Parfum, I say it’s a jewel, though I must admit no one has ever asked me what I was wearing, which they have done with this new formula. They’ve asked me several times what perfume I’m using; it smells great. In my opinion, it’s quite more wearable than the old one, even if this hurts the heads…
It’s identical to Ultramale but with Iris; it has nothing to do with the original. They made it more sellable and chic, purely for commercial reasons. What a pity they replaced the DHP with this.
There are perfumes that define an era, like the original Dior Homme Parfum which created a religion. But of course, the valuable doesn’t last. In a move that feels like an aromatic outrage, Dior decided to ‘update’ that jewel, and what emerged was basically an involuntary homage to a supermarket generic, only with a magnetic cap and a luxury price tag. When I heard it, I expected to rediscover that luxurious density: dark iris, cured leather, velvety cacao. But no. We received a slap of disappointment. A timid, ambiguous fragrance, with an iris so brief it seems only there to meet the legal quota for the name. Where is that dark leather, that dense and sensual base? Replaced by a flat, versatile, repetitive nectar sold in any chain. Defenders say it’s more wearable, more usable. Oh, right, because we all dream our favourite perfume will suit going to the gym in tracksuit. Apparently, the original could only be worn ‘three or four times a year’, as if that were a flaw and not its exclusive charm. I didn’t know art had to be justified by its frequency of use. Then there’s the economics: for Dior, it’s more profitable to sell litres of something forgettable than millilitres of the sublime. Reformulating a masterpiece until it’s unrecognisable is the new model: less concentration, more rotation, and a public that forgets how the original smelled because it’s already discontinued. And the cherry on top: Francis Kurkdjian, poached by Dior, signs off on this formula with his blessing. Kurkdjian? The same man who gave us Absolue, Grand Soir… now flirting with low-profile fragrances that could be confused with the male section at Mercadona. I don’t know if it’s strategy, art, or the consequence of running a house that considers olfactory identity negotiable whenever the box sounds good. Calling this ‘Dior Homme Parfum’ is selling an empty box as a minimalist edition. The resemblance is anecdotal; the result is frustrating. And yet, the label tries to convince us it’s ‘the same essence, modernised’. No: it’s another fragrance, another audience, another concept. Just with the same name to cash in on the emotional value of those who knew what the original was.
Horrible… I regret not having bought the previous formula. 🙁
I fell in love the moment I smelled it 🙂
It smells very similar to Le Male by JPG, at least on my skin. Although I’m fascinated by Gaultier’s, I expected something more glorious and not a clone. They definitely chopped the mother out of a work of art with its own light and soul. I stick with the 2014 Dior Homme Parfum. I’ve just bought this and will wear it gladly, but it wasn’t what I expected.
To my previous review, I’d add this: 1° Dior has the right to withdraw products that don’t pay off. 2° To release lower-quality products that sell more. 3° To mislead using a prestigious name to sell mediocrity. 4° To hire a famous perfumer as a lure. 5° To choose fame over prestige and devalue their brand. 6° They could learn from Guerlain, who renews their icons without envying anyone. 7° Like Opel or Citroën, they’ve sold their soul while keeping only the shell. They have the right, but I won’t play, because we love perfumery as art and experience, not just to receive compliments.
It reminded me very much of Le Male Elixir by Jean Paul Gaultier.
Very unfortunately, it’s a good perfume, wearable, and will please anyone who smells it, but the price is excessive: 75 ml for nearly 200 dollars. You can buy it blind; everyone will like it. If you’re looking for something elegant and captivating, go for Dior Homme Intense. This one keeps the iris but with marked vanilla and less leather than the previous version. If you want something for everyone, it’s your option; if you want to stand out, go for the Intense.
It’s a scam; it’s an Ultra Male at Dior prices.
Its only problem is being called Dior Homme. The old one was a niche jewel, not for everyone, and I loved it. Here, you can definitely feel the original DNA in the opening; the iris is pleasant, less powdery, fresher and more aromatic than the dark original. There’s no leather or rose. In the dry-down, the iris disappears and it becomes generic. It’s good and effective, but a pity it didn’t maintain the initial iris. It’s masculine, versatile, and has good performance. The price is high, but not exclusive to Dior. As an independent creation, it’s a good perfume, though inferior in originality.
Honestly, it smells like Dior Homme Intense before its renewal, but sweeter. It’s no longer the true Parfum. A pity; they killed the previous version and replaced it with this ‘Parfum’. It’s not bad, but the price is outrageous.
Quick review without knowing the previous one (a pity). I tried it in-store and the saleswoman didn’t understand why I was laughing: YES, it reminds me of Ultra Male haha. I never expected Dior to take that direction in the Homme line; it’s like a more refined Ultra Male with a touch of iris. I liked it, but the performance disappointed me, just like with Dior Homme Intense 2025, both too weak. I understand the discontent, but companies seek to make more money. I usually see it on discount for $90; I think at that price it’s worth it, more than that not even joking as they are only 75ml.
It no longer smells niche, nor like the Homme family. Perhaps the first three minutes remind you, but quickly you note it’s more popular, it smells like designer. Is it bad? No, now it’s easy to wear and versatile. Under my nose, it reminds me of JPG Ultra Male. It has excellent quality and good performance. The great drawback, beyond the name, is the price/ml ratio. There are similar options much cheaper. If you want to smell like Ultra Male but it’s Dior Homme, there’s no other choice but to pay the price. The company knows because they sold thousands.
No, no, and no… I couldn’t take it and gave it away. It seems like they mixed Le Male, Ultra Male, Phantom, Bad Boy, Scandal, Born in Rome, and a touch of Axe chocolate in a bowl. It smells like everything but original; it’s the quintessential copy of a copy. On the plus side: radioactive sillage, bestial longevity, and it lingers on clothes. But it’s artificial and generic. For the price and because it’s Dior, it’s not worth it. Total disappointment.
I believe the name and bottle are a trap. They’re selling churrasco for merino wool. Everything points to cutting costs, reducing sizes, and raising prices by copying what is already a copy. It’s the shift from genuine luxury to cheap mainstream: from the exclusive to the generic. This scent is oblivion and branding, where value lies in the logo, not the essence. Once the pinnacle of good taste, now it’s any recognisable thing that doesn’t justify its price.
The opening is pleasant, but it doesn’t justify the price; that’s why there are superior options. What disappointed me most is that when it dries, it smells like insect repellent. Also, it doesn’t seek the classic Dior Homme style; it doesn’t resemble the others. Still, I should try it more; perhaps in the future I’ll like it. For now, I do not recommend it.
I bought the 2025 and it won me over instantly. The opening features a more restrained iris than the Intense, elegant and serene. Then amber emerges, enveloping and warm, like a comforting hug that lasts for hours. The base is clean, polished vetiver, without earthiness, mixed with a well-made patchouli, giving depth. I didn’t know the previous version, but this is elegant, pleasant for her, and lasts all day.
Dior is doing the 2020 thing again: selling the same perfume with a different scent. It doesn’t suit them, especially when they ruined the Parfum, a true jewel. One time wasn’t enough; they ruined it twice. This 2025 version is rubbish; it doesn’t smell good, just like Prada Paradigme, Le Male Parfum, or dozens of other designers, at a scam price. If you want quality 20-30 times better, Aaron Terence Hughes Hard Candy Elixir is niche and worth it, even cheaper. When houses fall this low, designer perfumery is dead. Now any brand makes something good and they label it niche. This predatory system ruins everything over time. The peak was in the 80s-90s and the first decade of the 2000s, from then on total decline. I can’t refer to the aroma; I’m indignant at the lack of originality and the fact that it comes from Dior generates more repulsion. Designer perfumery is in decline; I never thought it could hit rock bottom.
Owner of Dior: Francis, good to see you. We need to redo Dior Homme Parfum. Snobs love it, but nobody buys it in real life; we have thousands of dusty bottles. Kurkdjian: Haha, it’s an icon, it can be modernised without losing the DNA. Cleaner iris, soft woods, polished leather. Owner: Yes, but remember Ultra Male. Do that but open with iris, sell luxury. Kurkdjian: A potent gourmand with iris? Owner: Exactly, intense and sweet. And a key point: Robert Pattinson in the campaign. Kurkdjian: Ultra Male with a suit? Owner: Yes, Pattinson in a limousine, black suit, dramatic lighting. Kurkdjian: You want an Ultra Male with a tie. Iris at the start, sweetness afterwards, an elegant name… Dior Homme Parfum 2025. Owner: That’s it, it sells itself, top seller like JPG. Kurkdjian: (whispering) Forgive me, Dior Homme Original… I’m just following orders.
I tried the new DHP and can confirm that since Kurkdjian took the reins at Dior, the creative director broke a unique Demachy line to make it more mass-market. They didn’t innovate; they simply ruined something well-made. I’m terrified they’ll change Fahrenheit into cotton candy next. Greetings to the community.
This one actually gets worn and doesn’t smell like grandma.
They ruined Dior Homme. It no longer smells of elite, talc, and characteristic iris. It’s rubbish, a scam, a mix of Axe de Chocolate, Phantom by Paco Rabanne, and Le Male by JPG. It lost its essence, nothing to do with the original. I do not recommend buying it; it has nothing to do with the past. Total disappointment. To smell this, spray Axe de Chocolate at a much lower price.
Ultra Male 2.0
Clearly Francis Kurkdjian wants to load Dior from within so we buy perfumes from his house. Jokes aside, the fault lies with Dior, not the perfumer. It seems to me like a failed strategy: they raise prices to niche levels but make fragrances that are increasingly commercial and similar to other cheap ones; honestly, it’s not good marketing. Let’s pray they don’t decide to touch Fahrenheit Parfum or Eau Sauvage Parfum and completely ruin Demachy’s legacy.
They’ve ruined my perfume. It is undoubtedly the one I’ve used the most. I don’t know why they changed this work of art completely, turning it into something vulgar and generalist. Well… there must be a reason I don’t understand. A pity. R.I.P Dior Homme Parfum.
A JPG. What a shame that dupes of previous versions smell better than this cheap copy of Ultra Male. And on top of that, at a golden price.
I had my suspicions, and upon trying it, I was confirmed: the old Parfum had costs the house could no longer bear, so they set up an extreme reformulation where the iris is very diluted. Be warned, iris is a brutally expensive raw material. I smell it at the beginning but it loses intensity and fades faster than before. Generally, it smells less powdery, and without leather it loses much density. That said, if you try it on people who don’t understand much about fragrances, they will prefer this; it’s more accessible. And yes, with an accessible scent… niche price. For me, it’s a total NO; I’ll stretch out the bottle I bought at the beginning of 2024 as much as I can.
Well, after using it all day, I confirm that in my opinion, it’s a great stunner. Perhaps the original is more impressive, but this doesn’t disappoint. It’s more commercial and for everyone, and nobody will hate it. The notes are top: a very rich iris in the opening that leaves a base with sweet amber, then patchouli and vetiver that harmonise it. Excellent performance; it lasts all day and suddenly releases a burst. I sprayed it on a cushion and it still smells good. Yes, it’s expensive compared to other good fragrances, but I’m happy. Perhaps they should have launched it with a different name and not carry the weight of its predecessor. I recommend it at the level of Prada L’H Intense and G. Privé Reserve.
The flaw with this perfume is its birth… I mean, for the general public, the DHP was a horror; it didn’t sell, it was expensive, shops received few units, and it was hard to push them, but for fragrance collectors, the DHP could be considered a work of art. Releasing a perfume and calling it DIOR HOMME PARFUM carries a connotation for those who know it that if it stops smelling like DHP, you get angry. I’ve said it several times: the Dior Homme Parfum 2025 by Kurkdjian should have been called DIOR HOMME MAINSTREAM and everyone would be happy; the memory of the scent wouldn’t be ruined. That said, the 2025 version smells very good, but it’s zero original; in fact, it’s mainstream, and therefore, it’s a scent you’ve heard in several commercial perfumes. If something the DHP always had was its distinctive smell compared to the rest, yes, it smelled like makeup like others, but the rose and leather load made it very different from the rest. Just look at the list of Arab clones of Dior Homme Intense compared to the Parfum version; the closest to the Parfum is one of Zara’s from the Joe Malone collection, which lasted on sale as long as Zara perfumes do, and what for me is the improved version of Dior Homme Parfum is Harmonious by Boadicea.
I’ve just tried this version of Dior Homme, and while I don’t dislike it entirely, it has caused me some nausea; I don’t know if others have experienced this, and that’s after applying just two sprays on one arm. I feel less iris and more vetiver; the opening is still strong, and during the dry-down, bursts are released. I wouldn’t buy it.
An exceptional perfume that they should have renamed.
I don’t get the fuss over this launch. I haven’t tried the 2020 Dior Homme Parfum, but if the brand changed it, there must be a reason: either it wasn’t selling or it wasn’t profitable. I trust that Dior knows the business better than most of us here. And speaking only of the 2025 version, it’s a proper stunner. You can feel Francis Kurkdjian’s hand in it: they asked for a modern, elegant Dior Homme that would sell in huge numbers, and that’s exactly what he delivered. The opening is very elegant, with a beautiful iris that sets the tone from the very first second. As it evolves, it calms down and polishes itself, drying with brutal elegance, very much in line with the sophisticated Dior Homme collection. Within its commercial range, honestly, you can’t ask for more. It’s refined, easy to wear, classy, and suited to the times. Anyone looking for something more experimental or niche can always look to the Collection Privée.
I’m not here to say anything new: the perfume is a marvel, but it should have had a different name. My first encounter with Dior Homme Parfum was completely random: I was gifted a decant of the 2025 version and fell in love at first sniff. To me, this scent is the definition of luxurious cleanliness. It has a radiant opening, with amber and iris presented impeccably, projecting a modern elegance that captivated me so much that, a few days later, I already had the full bottle. However, once I joined the community, I found a massive hatred for this version. Driven by curiosity, I managed to get a decant of the 2014 version to compare them side by side, and finally, I understood the reason for the controversy. The reality is that they are two different perfumes sharing the same name. While the 2025 version is luminous and clean, the 2014 is dense, earthy, and much ‘dirtier’. I understand the anger of the long-time user. One of my favourites is the Oud Stallion by Maison Crivelli, and if tomorrow it were reformulated into something totally different (no matter how good the result), I would hate that new version for the loss of identity. In conclusion, from my point of view, the DHP 2025 is a marvel of contemporary perfumery. It’s vibrant, sophisticated, and technically perfect. But if we judge it by its legacy, I understand why for many it feels like a betrayal.