Skip to content

Monaco by Milton Lloyd

Women

Description

Monaco by Milton Lloyd is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. The top notes are violet, rose and carnation; the heart notes are powdery and spicy notes; the base notes are musk, sandalwood, patchouli and vanilla.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 16%
  • Spring 29%
  • Summer 22%
  • Autumn 33%
  • Day 68%
  • Night 32%

Key notes

Community

62 votes

  • Positive 82%
  • Negative 15%
  • Neutral 3.2%
positive reviews 62 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

195 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

55 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

37 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Monaco

Main accord powdery Gender Women

Monaco by Milton Lloyd is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. The top notes are violet, rose and carnation; the heart notes are powdery and spicy notes; the base notes are musk, sandalwood, patchouli and vanilla.

Flowers Woods and mosses Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Tied for the lead Moderate / Long-lasting

33 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

41 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

17 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Excellent value

19 votes

Community reviews

1 review

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Milton Lloyd or UTC (I’m not entirely sure of the latter’s name) have a reputation for producing extremely faithful clones. I own three of their fragrances (Kashmir, Hawaii, and Monaco) and while I can’t comment on the first two, Monaco is worth discussing. The resemblance to the vintage Paris by YSL is remarkably well-executed. It steers clear of the cloying, pretentious character of the current version. This rose is the enticing one I encountered in the 80s and 90s. It possesses the intensity and freshness of a damask rose, just like the original Paris, and conjures an easy visual of deep red petals glistening with dew. Unlike the modern version, the iris does not overwhelm; it remains understated, offering a subtle talc-like powderiness. The violet adds depth and mystery, backed by patchouli. It is a classic, bookish fragrance with genuine quality. And for €6.95? How is it possible that the iris note feels better treated in Monaco than in a perfume costing nearly ten times more? What effort would YSL have needed to maintain the original formula if a humble English house has nearly achieved it? They will know. I am sticking with Monaco, which is neither a cheap, low-quality knock-off nor are the other two UTC fragrances I own. They are exceptionally long-lasting with a great sillage and possess everything required to earn respect. If you are lovers of chypres, try Kashmir, which is another delightful find available for nothing.

    Reply