Skip to content

Concrete by Comme des Garcons

Men Women 2017

Description

Concrete by Comme des Garçons is a woody fragrance from the olfactive family, created by perfumer Olivier Cresp and launched in 2017. This composition, designed for both men and women, unfolds a sensory narrative evoking the essence of the modern city. The top notes feature fresh, metallic tones of oakmoss and bergamot, establishing an urban and structured character. The heart…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 26%
  • Spring 27%
  • Summer 15%
  • Autumn 31%
  • Day 63%
  • Night 37%

Key notes

Community

1,510 votes

  • Positive 66%
  • Negative 23%
  • Neutral 10%
positive reviews 1.5 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

4,267 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

1,246 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

653 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Concrete

Main accord woody Year 2017 Gender Men · Women

Concrete by Comme des Garçons is a woody fragrance from the olfactive family, created by perfumer Olivier Cresp and launched in 2017. This composition, designed for both men and women, unfolds a sensory narrative evoking the essence of the modern city. The top notes feature fresh, metallic tones of oakmoss and bergamot, establishing an urban and structured character. The heart reveals a complex woody core with streaks of cedar and pine, while the base settles on a warm, persistent foundation of vetiver and musk, closing the olfactive pyramid with timeless elegance.

Woods and mosses Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

606 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

675 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

564 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

444 votes

Community reviews

10 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Belerofonte

    Rather inconcrete. It doesn’t leave anyone indifferent. Fresh opening, loaded with cardamomo, which reminds of industrial soap (not unpleasant, surprising because it’s synthetic from start to finish). It has an interesting cold-warm sensation. It’s explosive and addictive, but evolves little into promising talc-like nuances that disappear quickly with poor longevity. The wood is not noticeable and turns bitter. It has something addictive that makes you spray until the bottle flies. It’s surprising, you like it, but you hesitate to buy again.

    Reply
  2. Belerofonte

    Rather undefined, but certainly not leaving anyone indifferent. It opens fresh, and in my opinion, with too much cardamomo that initially reminds of industrial soap (mind you, it’s not unpleasant), which is surprising given it’s synthetic from start to finish with that strange cold-warm sensation that makes it interesting. It’s explosive and addictive, yet it stays there; it evolves very little into promising talc-like nuances that disappear quickly with poor longevity. The wood is barely noticeable and turns slightly bitter. It has something that makes it sticky to the point of spraying non-stop until the bottle flies. It’s that surprising fragrance you like but always hesitate to buy again.

    Reply
  3. Top Notes: Cardamom, Clove, Caraway, Ginger. Heart Notes: Sambac Jasmine, Rose Oxide. Base Notes: Cedar, Incense, Musk, Sandalwood.

    Reply
  4. Very spicy scent (the cardamom and cloves are very noticeable), talc-like and sweet. The sandalwood does come through, but personally I find it odd to mix it with spicy notes.

    Reply
  5. Smells very spiced, with lots of cardamom and cloves, plus it’s powdery and slightly sweet. I can detect the sandalwood, but personally, I find the blend with those spices a bit odd.

    Reply
  6. This perfume really goes ‘its own way’. It’s true it smells like freshly mixed wet cement. I don’t know what they did to the sandalwood to end up like this. It’s a pleasant scent that gives a fresh, even cold, sensation, a curious effect starting from a wood note. On the other hand, there’s something citrusy, something ‘soapy’, but soft, which also adds freshness. The result is a totally unisex, very neutral and flat smell. Versatile in its own way, of course. Nothing remarkable in performance. I think the best thing is that it’s quite original.

    Reply
  7. I judged it quickly at launch due to my expectations with the name and bottle. It’s not bad, but incoherent. Today, after trying it with a friend, I’m surprised. It’s dry, musky sandalwood, sweetened with something ‘chemical’ that is pleasant and genderless. It has more bite: the first two hours are medicinal and herbal cardamom-mint, with rosemary that has left me crazy. Then the laboratory sandalwood, cold and warm, and appears what is criticised: a smell between cardboard and cement dust when opening a heavy bag, which hurts the eyes. It contradicts with a mineral-wet smell like preticor that throws me off. In the end, the protagonist sandalwood with honeyed patchouli. I’ve felt many things, but it’s a wood-sweet perfume with little evolution. The bottle is a treat.

    Reply
  8. I judged it very quickly upon launch and tried it, because I had some preconceived notions about the bottle-concept-name. It wasn’t bad, but it was indeed incoherent. And sometimes I get annoyed easily. I’ve been wearing it for a few hours now, a friend showed it to me, and since I wasn’t expecting much, it surprises me a lot. It boils down to a dry, musky sandalwood, sweetened with something ‘chemical’ (shick) that is pleasant and quite genderless. But it has more bite. It seems linear, but the first two hours have a chilled, decongesting accord of medicinal and herbal cardamom-mint, with some strokes of rosemary that have left me crazy. It focuses on laboratory sandalwood, very strange but pleasant, moving between cold and warm (not hot). Suddenly appears what is so much criticised: a smell between cardboard and cement dust, just like when you open a huge bag of this material and breathe the dust that gets in your eyes; but it contradicts with a mineral-wet smell reminiscent of preticor that has completely thrown me off. In the end, the protagonist sandalwood follows, with a slightly honeyed patchouli at the base. I’ve noticed and felt many things, but the general sensation is of a wood-sweet perfume with little evolution. The feel of the bottle is a treat.

    Reply
  9. It’s wood, with lots of sandalwood, iris and sweet spices that make it feminine. I didn’t buy it because it seemed ambiguous, low quality and poor performance. It lasts little and is very linear.

    Reply
  10. What will surprise us? Smell of wet cement? Builder’s perfume? The photos are priceless xD

    Reply