Men

Goddess Intense

Marca
Burberry
3.54 de 5
1,991 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Burberry Goddess Intense is an aromatic woody fragrance for women. This creation, launched in 2024, is a new addition to the collection. The nose behind this composition is Amandine Clerc-Marie. The top notes reveal the freshness of lavender; the heart unfolds a warm and enveloping combination of vanilla, vanilla absolute, bourbon vanilla, and vanilla caviar; while the base settles on the depth of patchouli.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 38%
  • Primavera 15%
  • Verano 7.6%
  • Otoño 39%
  • Día 41%
  • Noche 59%

Notas clave

Comunidad

1,991 votos

  • Positivo 56%
  • Negativo 27%
  • Neutral 16%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Salida 1 nota
Fondo 1 nota

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Goddess Intense y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Colecciones Goddess Intense

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

40 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • I owned the Goddess and finished it; it was a bit of a let-down, nice but not amazing. Today I tried the Intense and was pleasantly surprised; I like it much better than the original. It clearly has the lavender + vanilla DNA, but the patchouli (which I adore) gives it a darker, warmer twist. For some reason, on my skin it smells like caramelised vanilla; I can’t quite explain it, but I loved it. It lasted about five hours (from the shop until I showered at home), which was quite noticeable, though time will tell how it develops. It will surely be my next purchase.

  • What a pity they added patchouli. This perfume is lavender with very sharp patchouli; it’s not a bad scent, but too much patchouli and lavender, and I barely smell the vanilla due to the heavy load of those two notes. It would have been lovely to increase the vanilla instead of the patchouli and lavender.

  • anamaestracorreo

    I prefer the first one much more. The patchouli has lowered the tone and the lavender becomes a bit masculine. The first is far more refined and better made.

  • Boticario13

    What does a goddess smell like? Why does every brand offer such a different version of divinity? It’s marketing, I know, but it tickles our curiosity. This reminds me of the quest for the perfect sea scent with the ‘Marine’ or ‘Acqua’ lines; no one has quite nailed it yet, and the same goes for this ‘Intense Goddess’ by Burberry, which echoes other successes. It smells good but lacks originality. It’s interesting, ultra-gourmand and very sweet, unisex thanks to the lavender and patchouli (that touch of novelty), yet it falls short of marketing expectations. Similar to Mugler’s Alien Goddess: expectations weren’t met; it wasn’t a majestic Alien taken to the heavens, but a decaffeinated version. One expects something original, divine and feminine, and instead you get a vanilla unisex with patchouli that, on my masculine skin, works brilliantly, lasts a long time but I doubt it will charm anyone. It sounds like proposals such as YSL’s Libre Intense, but unbalanced and linear. Very sweet, suitable only for mild or cold seasons. It lacks depth and the linearity becomes tiresome; it’s an overblown vanilla, and as a colleague remarked, ‘caramelised’. There was a time when collecting such perfumes was acceptable, but with these outrageous price hikes, no longer, unless it’s your first vanilla fragrance. In that case, it will work well and its performance on skin will be excellent. This house has genuine gems for men and women. You could do much more. Rating: 7/10, mainly for its longevity. Cheers!

  • I’ve only tried the original Goddess a couple of times: pleasant, sweet but not heavy, cheerful and centred on vanilla, though it didn’t make me want to buy the bottle. I’ve liked this new version more, but I won’t buy it until I’ve finished my deep vanilla perfumes. The Intense seems more mature, dense and woody, with caramelised and chocolatey vanilla, more unisex and with lavender. For me, a patchouli lover, its addition is a success, though it will horrify detractors. It’s practically linear (and I like it that way), with notable sillage and about 9 hours of longevity. I think it’s a proposal that improves the original, turning that innocent vanilla into something deeper. Scent 7/10, Longevity 9/10, Sillage 8/10, Value for money 6.5/10, Versatility 6.5/10, Packaging 7.5/10. Would I buy it again? No, I haven’t done so.

  • Total disappointment. For what it costs (almost £50 for 30ml), it barely smells. It’s almost imperceptible, which is a pity because up close it’s nice, but it neither lasts nor has any sillage. I’d prefer a thousand times the inspirations by Madame B.

  • One day at home, it smelled like burnt plastic; a plug melted like marshmallow. This fragrance smells exactly the same. Who at Burberry authorised this abomination? I want them arrested. The original Goddess was good, rich but nothing revolutionary. This is an abomination and an insult to perfumery. I tested it on blotter and it still smelled of burnt plastic with vanilla on top. I’d rather roll in the mud than let a drop of this touch my skin.

  • Although I didn’t like the first one, this one seems even worse. It smells very woody and patchouli-heavy, and those vanillas don’t suit my skin at all.

  • It is a lovely vanilla-scented aroma but it feels very unisex to me; I see it more on my husband than on myself. He liked it very much and says it is for women, but it does not quite convince me because I smell it as masculine. It has acceptable performance, but I do not find it ‘intense’ at all (one expects something more potent). Ideal for winter. It smells of vanilla, lavender, and a woody base that has quite a presence.

  • The first time I tested it on blotter paper in a perfumerie, I thought: Goddess… I should have tested it on my skin there and then. Later, a sample arrived and my perception changed completely. It is sweet and spiced vanilla, like a vanilla cookie with caramel and cinnamon (even though I do not declare it; I do not sense lavender at the start, perhaps I attribute a spicy touch to the lavender after five minutes, like when you move the whole plant). It is not innovative but it is interesting. It is a vanilla icon, ideal for those who want vanilla without coconut (Alien), without fruit (Fame), or without lemon (Devotion). It is another option for collecting. In terms of projection, I find it weak; it does not project much. The longevity is intermediate, around four hours. It delivers what it promises; I would definitely buy it.

  • A vanilla bomb with hints of lavender at the start (subtle on my skin) and a dense, smoky, earthy base of patchouli and woods. It’s sweet, but I wouldn’t call it gourmand. A simple, linear scent, totally unisex. Performance is decent. It hasn’t displeased me, nor has it left a lasting mark. For me, the best designer vanilla-lavender combo remains Mon Guerlain (far more refined) or its Intense version if you’re after something darker.

  • Veroazabache

    What a lovely scent! It is similar to the original but with a darker, smokier, and less cloying vanilla. I do not notice the lavender; perhaps the patchouli gives it that oriental and woody touch. It could be unisex; the original is not. It is more bold than the original, less refined but with more personality. It does not overwhelm and suits all occasions. I personally liked it more, although the other is more generally pleasing. Both embrace you warmly and are very tender.

  • Of all the notes they could have chosen, they picked patchouli!? My beloved Goddess, what happened to you? It feels totally masculinised. It still retains that sweet vanilla touch, but the patchouli is so heavy that it smells very green and earthy.

  • It smells very much like a man’s scent; I detect no vanilla at all, only lavender and patchouli. It is a horror, and the worst part is that it lasts an eternity; the horrible scent gives me a headache.

  • Lagioianena91

    It is indeed masculine. Although I resist unisex scents, I feel it is elegantly masculine, almost feminine. It has so much vanilla that it evokes an elegant woman in London wearing a wool coat. You cannot achieve something like this with high-quality ingredients.

  • irmapaolapj

    I have a decant, and to be honest, it seems very masculine for me. I am looking for something with a darker touch, but this lacks it. It is a great perfume, yes, but it is not for me. The vanilla is noticeable, but it is smoky and mature; I do not detect the lavender, and the patchouli is far too intense for my taste.

  • Andreahidalgo

    I was thrilled to hear it had arrived in Argentina and headed straight to the perfumerie, as I adore the original Goddess but find its longevity lacking. I thought this would be the same but more intense, and I was utterly disappointed. On my skin, I couldn’t stand it; there is a note that repulses me. My mother said it smells like that arnica gel for muscle pain. The longevity is long-lasting; I could still smell it after six hours and had to rub my wrist with a sponge to get rid of it.

  • It smells strange; I didn’t like it. It has too much patchouli, smells like artificial vanilla air freshener, tends to be a bit masculine (which I don’t dislike), but it’s a scent that in no way surpasses the original Goddess. They shouldn’t have released this version 🥲

  • The only thing I detect is patchouli, perhaps a hint of lavender, but zero vanilla. If you dislike patchouli, this is not for you. Fortunately, I bought a decant and not the full bottle; it was a total mistake. I want to try the original version without patchouli.

  • I imagine the intention behind this Intense was to create a more… elegant or sober version? With the absolute protagonism of the four vanillas (no more, no less…) it joins the wave of ‘Super Vanillas’. The lavender and patchouli tone down that edible effect slightly, although some find the blend questionable. As for taste… Excellent longevity, a feat nowadays. It does justice to the Intense, but it must be applied moderately. In my opinion, vanilla as a star note is dangerous; in trying to ‘elevate’ it, you can end up with a small Frankenstein. It usually looks better in supporting roles. Although there are always exceptions, I haven’t been convinced. For now. I’m glad there are those who adore it.

  • Many people didn’t like the Intense version, but I adored it. It smells of very strong vanilla, almost smoky, with lavender and lots of patchouli. It can smell a bit masculine, but on me it smells spectacular. I liked it more than the regular version; on my skin it’s a bomb and it lasted until the other day. I recommend it for fresh weather and night outings. As soon as I can, I’ll add it to my collection. 💯

  • Alegria007

    Reviews are very divided. I’m not a fan of sweet fragrances because on my skin they ‘morph’ and lose their structure (like with D&G’s Devotion). The opposite is true with Goddess; I love how it sits on me; although it’s sweet, it’s a sweet of autumn flowers and herbs. The projection is grand, around 6-8 hours, and at the end it stays closer to the skin. It has that ambiguous masculinity that my boyfriend loves so much; I’m going to try it on him to see how it evolves and will comment again. Definitely not for blind buying; it’s a fragrance with a lot of personality.

  • Ojitosdeuva

    It’s an easy-to-wear fragrance, nothing complicated or unusual. It makes you want to sniff it all the time. It’s pure vanilla with a very light lavender. It doesn’t stand out too much; it’s a scent found in many perfumes. I find it delicious, but I wouldn’t buy it again because it doesn’t last.

  • It’s a sweet vanilla but without being cloying or smelling artificial. There’s clearly an almond note that isn’t listed on the description. The projection is moderate, and it doesn’t overwhelm me at all in spring.

  • It’s a delicious and special elixir, nothing gourmand, though it has a very subtle (lavender-free) air reminiscent of the robust vanilla in Matiere Premiere’s Powder Vanilla 🙌🏼.

  • I tried it a few days ago; initially, the lavender dominated, but then the floral touch faded to reveal a mature, dry vanilla that is very elegant.

  • GiuliFerrari

    At first, you feel the lavender, but when it dries down, it leaves a sweet vanilla. I love it for cold days! Its trail on my skin is moderate and the longevity is quite good.

  • TynNyanko

    I don’t understand the heart notes of this perfume; I tried it by chance and had to get hold of it: an uncommon vanilla, feminine yet adult, dense and sensual. I don’t know if it’s the chemistry with my skin, but it’s by far the fragrance that has flattered me the most. I’ve had to make it my signature.

  • Surprisingly, I liked it almost as much as, if not more than, the original. I didn’t have many expectations, but it has pleasantly surprised me. It’s a darker version, something more masculine (though for me it remains feminine) and perhaps more nocturnal. At first, I noticed a very sharp, almost unpleasant lavender, but a few minutes later, when the vanilla emerges, the story changes (for the better). The patchouli isn’t loud; I even detect some wood, although I’m not an expert. As for longevity and projection, it is greater than the Goddess, though not invasive. I think having both options isn’t redundant. The EDP is ideal for the day and hot months, being fresher, while I see this intense version as more suitable for night and winter. Either one is a total success.

  • Pame.Betsabe

    I bought it some time ago blind. It’s a fragrance I haven’t quite understood. It smells odd, as if it’s missing a note to harmonise with the rest. I don’t get the concept: it’s not sweet, not floral, I don’t know what it is. The patchouli is of that well-earthed kind. The longevity is good, so much so that I had to wash my arm to get rid of it. Well, there it is, waiting to be sold or exchanged because I couldn’t cope with it. I wouldn’t recommend buying it blind, especially as it’s not an accessible fragrance.

  • I had high expectations, but there’s something that doesn’t quite convince me. I adore vanilla perfumes; I tried it on a hot day and I’ll give it another chance on a cold day, because then I found it sumptuously elegant, certainly.

  • I bought it after visiting the counter several times without being convinced, but it always happened the same: I’d take the dry-down home and later it would smell wonderful, so I decided to try it on my skin and I’m very pleased. Even as a niche consumer, it has become one of my favourites. I’d classify it as feminine unisex. At first, it smells of lavender and is quite pulsating, but it doesn’t last long; after a few minutes, a wonderful vanilla emerges that isn’t sweet, it’s delicious and lingers for hours.

  • It’s potent, not for those who wish to go unnoticed. On my skin, I don’t detect vanilla, but rather cocoa with an incense undertone; I know that note isn’t listed, but this is how it dries down: a woody cocoa with incense. It’s not a bad fragrance and lasts a long time, as I like, but this scent didn’t convince me; it smells like a traditional Arabic perfume, somewhat aged and quite masculine.

  • I love it! I’m wearing it now in summer, keeping the sillage low so as not to overwhelm anyone. It’s relaxing, a soft, creamy sweetness that doesn’t tire the senses. I liked it more than the original. I own many perfumes, but since I bought this, I keep coming back to it as my go-to when I’m unsure of what to wear. I really like it and it might become my signature for autumn.

  • A sample arrived and, frankly, it’s not for me. It smells of mint from start to finish; I think I’m hypersensitive to patchouli and it ruins everything. I then notice a bit of lavender. I can’t quite distinguish those four vanilla notes. I’m starting to wonder if the sample was faulty or if it was left in the sun for two weeks.

  • First impression: very spicy and aromatic. I need to test it on my skin to see how it develops.