Men
Fahrenheit 32
Acordes principales
Descripción
Fahrenheit 32 by Dior is a woody oriental fragrance for men. Launched in 2007, this composition was created by François Demachy and Louise Turner. Its olfactive structure unfolds with an opening of bitter orange blossom, giving way to a heart of vetiver and settling on a base of vanilla.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
orange blossom
-
Corazón
vetiver
-
Base
vanilla
Comunidad
2,486 votos
- Positivo 81%
- Negativo 16%
- Neutral 2.9%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Fahrenheit 32 y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Excellent perfume!!!!! Refined, sensual, seductive… with incomparable subjectivity!!!
It’s a fragrance I bought right at its summer launch in 2007. I must confess I liked it a lot at first, as it was a Fahrenheit that only shared the vetiver note with the original (which never suited me or my skin since its launch), but in this case, the fragrance felt much more modern, which didn’t prevent certain people from commenting that this was Fahrenheit. Its soft development, centred on the white flower of orange blossom playing very well in the heart notes, made it distinct for me. The following year it didn’t seem the same to me; the feeling was that the longevity became short and somewhat fainter (something that always happened with the original Fahrenheit), I suppose climate and mood play their part almost always. I would recommend it in warm seasons as it has a soft, fresh opening that transitions to pleasant and enjoyable white flowers with vetiver, with a fairly synthetic base that I wouldn’t call the coconut note. A comparison with Virgin Island Water by Creed would be to pale in comparison to this fragrance in every olfactive sense. But if it’s a different Fahrenheit, and we focus it towards a younger audience, then it works.
Fahrenheit 32 is a rare fragrance, but in the best sense: exotic. In my opinion, it bears no resemblance to Fahrenheit. I don’t find it fresh, cheerful, or party-like; it evokes a certain winter melancholy, suitable for going with a girl to a quiet, romantic setting. Very floral and dense, with a less prominent but always present vanilla. The orange blossom gives the impression of smelling like an artificial sweet made with coconut, pineapple, and strawberry; it reminds me of hard lollipops with gum in the centre. Note: artificial doesn’t mean unpleasant. Fahrenheit 32 exudes great class and refinement. Its fixation is excellent, lasting from when you leave the house until you return from work; it’s far from those bottled lies that flee the skin after two hours. The trail is heavy and enveloping, but nothing suffocating. Some categorise it as gourmand, but it lacks that almost edible vibe of other fragrances. It also has certain unisex aspects. Overall, a great fragrance by Christian Dior. Fragrance: 8.5/10 Longevity: 9/10 Projection: 8/10 Price: 9.5/10.
Fahrenheit 32 turned out to be an EXCESSIVELY floral perfume (which is why some interpret it as unisex or directly feminine), unbalanced (the vetiver and vanilla feel too distant), suffocating, flat, and boring. It doesn’t seem sensual or delicate as some reviews claim. I agree with those who say it awakens a hint of pineapple and with those who indicate it has practically nothing in common with Fahrenheit. Not even the vetiver evokes memories of the other Fahrenheit scents. Fahrenheit 32 is one of the few Dior perfumes, if not the only one I know, that caused me strong disappointment. Trail and longevity: moderate.
Fahrenheit 32 seems to me to be a fairly linear fragrance where the floral notes dominate overwhelmingly; the sweet vanilla and vetiver notes add timidly in the background. It’s simple but effective and sits right on the edge of being unisex, although it has ultimately convinced me more. I don’t think I’ll repurchase it when my bottle runs out. On my skin, it lasts a very long time and has excellent projection, although in very warm weather it can become a bit heavy, especially due to its excessive florality.
I agree with everything Tami Franco said; I don’t think her comment could be improved by adding a comma. It’s very heavy, too cloying, linear from start to finish, and on top of that, it has a potent performance that makes me unable to tolerate it for more than 5 minutes. I was gifted a Dior case with a 15ml miniature splash bottle, which I ended up giving to my father with the condition that he doesn’t wear it when I’m around, haha. I apologise to those who like it; my opinion is not intended to offend. 2/10 regards.
Excellent, intense, fresh, woody, and spiced, with great longevity. For me, it’s the best Dior perfume. (Pity that I was told it would be discontinued).
Hello everyone, for me this is a perfumon. Despite being very sweet and simple, it has a savoury scent, at least for me. It lasts about 8 hours on my skin and works well in cool climates; it delivers its notes quite professionally. It’s a very well-crafted fragrance of good quality, a pity it doesn’t receive the praise and credit it deserves. It’s unique: initially a different oriental vanilla, after an hour I start to notice it smells more like orange blossom, and halfway through I perceive more vetiver. It’s for casual use, perhaps with acquaintances, as it’s a scent that can polarise opinions. 9/10.
A very good perfume, now discontinued. It’s quite linear, with vanilla as the star, yet it’s an exquisite fragrance: sweet without being cloying, caramelised, with a sweet leather note. At times it has a metallic touch, and the notes are very well blended. If you overapply it, it can become heavy as its aroma is potent. It bears no resemblance to the original Fahrenheit, and I would buy it again without hesitation. The trail is very high and longevity is moderate to high; just don’t overapply it. Oh! There are still some bottles online; I just bought a 100ml one. My rating is 9.
A simple yet well-made perfume featuring vetiver, vanilla, and orange blossom. It’s linear with few evolutions: initially, you detect the woody vetiver contrasting with the floral orange blossom, while the vanilla adds a sweet, creamy touch. This blend creates a pleasant bitterness, nothing unpleasant. Towards the end, the vanilla sweetens it slightly more, but the scent barely changes from start to finish. Performance is poor: it projects easily at first but fades quickly, staying close to the skin, and disappears within a few hours. It could be considered unisex due to the orange blossom and vanilla, but I find it leans more masculine because of the vetiver and woody contrast. I liked the scent. I’ve heard of successful clones, but the original has higher-quality ingredients and a more satisfying result. The downside is its poor performance on my skin and how difficult it is to find. I’d have to think very hard before buying it, but for now, I’ll have to wait.
It’s a hidden gem! A pity it didn’t get the place it deserved; in my opinion it’s worth it. I bought it near Christmas at launch; the opening was unusual for me, very vanilla, silky and floral in a men’s perfume, I thought no, but once it touched the skin it acquired all the power of Fahrenheit: deep, strong, almost body gasoline. The projection and trail are titanic. I widely recommend it for winter, with a knitted sweater and near a fireplace. Simply brilliant! PD: it sins by being unisex, which is the cherry on the cake.
“The Frozen Flower” Fahrenheit 32 is inspired by the freezing point of water (32°F / 0°C). In addition to the Fragrantica notes, it has solar aldehydes and vanilla. According to my eight-year-old daughter, it smells like “coconut and vanilla ice cream”. For a colleague: “At first it’s intense and unpleasant, then it smells nice and I feel a lot of vetiver”. If it’s a Dior Fahrenheit flanker, it’s the least like its mother; this one smells like tar (I’m fascinated by it) and 32 is floral, diametrically opposite. They only share the bottle, not the colour. It’s a floral explosion in superlative degree at the “32nd” power. It gives a feminine vibe without losing the masculine touch. Linear, heavy to moderate trail and good longevity. I use it in winter, at the office or on romantic dates, and supposedly women find it sexy. Repugnant for some, a jewel for others; in my case I’m neutral and only recommend it if you’re ready to carry a “Liquid Garden”.
It’s like a spectacular coconut ice cream, something different from usual men’s scents. A pity it didn’t continue evolving.
It didn’t hook me. As others say, it’s decaffeinated vanilla: the comparison by @Espartaco is brutal, it seems they added artificial sweetener and leave you with expired liquorice. Apart from that chemical vanilla, the orange blossom is the problem: overwhelming and stifling. I understand the ‘icy note’ some noticed (my only positive point) and the milky accord reminiscent of coconut, but ultimately it’s unbearable. Longevity and trail are moderate. I gave it several chances, it was a gift, but I ended up gifting it again to someone who saw something good in it.
It smells like vanilla ice cream tub for diabetics, faint vanilla with a bit of saccharin. On skin it’s vanilla with artificial afternotes, like cosmetics. I don’t feel coconut; it’s light vanilla without body and white flowers. It’s also not icy as claimed, but warm and woody. I don’t like it. Absolutely unisex.
Baffling and totally unisex. I expected a cold aura given the name Fahrenheit 32 (0°C), but it smells warmer and more oriental-floral than woody. It reminds me of summer promo body wash lines. It has vanilla, orange blossom and a subtle vetiver, yet gives an aldehyde impression. There’s no coconut; it’s the blend of vanilla and flower that creates that sensation. The trail is heavy at first, then moderate, lasting over five hours; afterwards it drops to skin level and lingers for another eight hours. Totally unisex, I’d recommend it to women as it highlights neither masculine nor feminine traits. I neither adore nor detest it; it’s just another fragrance. If it weren’t called Fahrenheit, perhaps it would have a wider audience, but houses release more flankers. Personally, I wouldn’t pay the price asked on websites as it isn’t worth it, but everyone decides for themselves.
Delicate little vanilla, but to be honest, it doesn’t convince me for a man.
Finally, a flanker that breaks the mould of the Fahrenheit line. Although the original doesn’t work for me, this is a triumph for Dior: delicious and intoxicating all at once, with vanilla and bitter orange blossom that combine perfectly. It’s novel and authentic, ideal if you’re looking for something elegant, sensual and youthful.
One of my favourite perfumes, a very peculiar and distinct scent. It’s sweet, fresh, and has longevity that has truly impressed me; it easily lasts eight hours. It’s a perfect fragrance for the evening.
Personal opinion, no wish to stir controversy. I arrived with sky-high expectations after searching for years, yet it bears no resemblance to the original; it’s a different class entirely in terms of scent, longevity, and trail. It seemed tempting, but ultimately it’s a partial failure for me. I’m not saying it’s bad, just that it lacks standout qualities for such a prestigious house. It smells like vanilla and orange with a strange green note, and worst of all, it has absolutely no character. I recommend trying it before buying.
I had enormous expectations with this perfume and today I have finally been able to try it on skin. I am not usually delicate with perfumes, but this was the first time I had to go home to shower and remove the scent. It is probably because it was very hot, but it has resulted in being cloying to the point of no return, shrill, metallic and very very strange. I do not say it smells bad, but it is quite annoying to my nose. It had a very peculiar scent that, although familiar, I have not been able to identify very well. I suppose it would be the artificial vanilla that many highlight in the comments. Fixation must be good, because even hours after the shower if I bring my nose close to my skin I still feel it. Apologies to the fans of this fragrance, it is just my opinion! Final note: 3/10.
For 2007, Fahrenheit 32 would propose an aromatic shift within the series of flankers that make up Fahrenheit, one of the great icons of Dior. A year ago I got Aqua (2011) and a couple of days ago I received “Le parfum” (2014). I mention this because the importance of Fahrenheit 32 lies in the fact that its DNA served to bring life to the aforementioned versions, where I can see that Fahrenheit 32 proposes the aromatic base with the following variations: Opening, neroli flower; Heart, vetiver; Base, vanilla. Here the neroli flower-vanilla accord proposes an intense and sharp scent, almost insidious; it is a fragrance requiring care when spraying. Of the three, the most “white and sharp” is Fahrenheit Aqua, to which it adds leather (subtle) and Mediterranean accords, as well as notably lowering the intensity of the vanilla and adding grapefruit (pomelo), mandarin and vetiver; here the violet becomes acidic, likewise lowering its intensity and projection with the understood “Aqua”. Le parfum brings back the vanilla and adds suede, violet leaves, rum, coriander and cumin, giving it a more robust and warm character, and where the vanilla becomes velvety by the suede; at times the vanilla is almost edible. Undoubtedly, Le parfum is the refined path that began with Fahrenheit 32 over 11 years ago. All highly recommended; if perhaps what Fahrenheit 32 lacks is a very cold climate that could compensate its stifling heat or simply go light with the spray to achieve the personal adequate point. Excellent both in fixation and projection. It is seen less and less; if you collect and love the Fahrenheit line it is almost a must!
Ephemeral and redundant, talc-like vanilla. Disappointing given the wave of hype this perfume had and how banal its scent and longevity turned out. I even thought I had been cheated, but I bought it from a trustworthy website. Stop this hype!
Where did these pleasant scents for summer days go? Refined, sweet, powerful yet delicate, sensual… What a beauty and what a pity it was discontinued. A great Dior fragrance.
I acquired it a few days ago; it cost me to get it and quite a bit of money here in Argentina. It is really one of the best fragrances I have smelled: a beauty, elegant and with an incomparable scent. Everyone likes it. It is a perfume difficult to find but worth having in the collection.
Flanker of the legendary Fahrenheit EDT, which has nothing to do with the original perfume in terms of scent. It is a three-note fragrance clearly perceived and correctly balanced. A special brightness in the opening and then it becomes linear. We find a creamy vanilla, slightly cosmetic and subtle, counterpointed by orange blossom in the foreground and backed by vetiver in the background. The vanilla is not entirely sweet; it has a small bitter point and a fruity aftertaste that remotely mimics coconut, adding a thin tropical and cheerful vibe to the elegant and austere base. The master touch comes from the neroli flower and the good balance of the blend. The scent is cosmetic, subtly sweet and warm; unisex leaning towards the feminine. As hours pass, the vanilla ends up predominating, as is usual with all fragrances containing this note (abrasive and overpowering). Sillage and projection are moderate to low, medium longevity; of a discreet and intimate cut, though not completely. Sensual, elegant, nocturnal and somewhat feminine. One of the first vanilla-based fragrances for a male audience that brought creative novelty at the time; today it would be redundant. A fragrance I knew how to enjoy in the past but which, given my current tastes, I would not buy again, without ceasing to value its mastery and simplicity. High cost due to being highly revered by collectors. Greetings to the community.
Finally, I was able to get this discontinued jewel at a relatively good price, as it is difficult to find. I remember that in the early 2010s a friend asked me for it on a trip to the USA because he said it was almost unavailable in Mexico, so I had to pay over 60 dollars. As indicated, it is a creamy fragrance totally vanilla-based with orange blossom notes and a vetiver touch deep down; it is almost addictive for me. Although it is a bit sweet and I am not a fan of sweet scents, this combination is captivating. Before buying the bottle, I bought some decants and they last days, literally, days on clothes.
I have had it for about 10 years. It smells quite floral and is muuuuuch unisex. I have a 50ml bottle half-used and it is very difficult for me to finish it. Do not buy blindly. Summary: Longevity: 9/10, Sillage: 8/10, Versatility: 7/10. Greetings to the community.
“Freshness in the form of white flowers”. I bought 200ml. What an exquisite fragrance, with its white flowers and that subtle woody tint that, within the unisex spectrum, gives it a masculine touch thanks to the vetiver in the heart which blends with a soft vanilla until the final notes. Totally distinct from the DNA of the rest of Fahrenheit, it is the example of clean, soapy fragrances that rely little on citrus. It accompanied me during a lovely period in my life (university), so my olfactory memory has it etched in fire. It does not stand out for the evening nor is it a compliment machine, but anyone who gets close to its full splendour is left awestruck. In that proximity, the women who accompanied me during that time gave compliments because the fragrance captivated them with that special soapy, floral, and clean sensation. Later, stepping out of that situation, it did not impact as much. It is a risky bet for the Argentine wallet: the 200ml bottle costing over 100 dollars did not work for me. Currently, I only know it is discontinued and reserve original versions are available at triple the price. It can be used by men and women; I agree with the votes reflecting unisex predominance, but due to the woody, vetiver, and slightly unsweet vanilla notes, I insist that within its unisex spectrum there is a masculine predominance. Scent: 9 | Quality: 5 | Longevity: 9 | Projection: 7 | Versatility: 9
The best Fahrenheit flanker for me is the original with the coconut bronzer: I love it and it brings me joy. It projects for 4 hours and lasts over 10 on the skin.
To present my review, I must first tell you a personal story from when I was 12-15 years old; this was the first perfume in which I genuinely had an interest to try. I remember being at the Liverpool department store in my city when I first tried it; it was total disappointment and disgust. I couldn’t believe how a serious person could use a perfume like that; I remember it was a sour-sweet smell, too out of place for me. The experience was so strong that for a long time I kept thinking about that scent and the confusing sensations it provoked in me, but in equivalent quantities, it left me wanting to try it again, and besides, I liked it, it was just too cheap for me to save enough money to afford the exorbitant price they asked for it. When I grew up, it was already discontinued, and I felt so much pity because it was such a different scent from what I had known. Today I can say that I feel I have closed a cycle and answered a question of over 10 years: what such a charming and unconventional scent? I now see why it was discontinued, but more so, it is a perfume delight, but now that I’ve heard other perfumes with more challenge, this is quite “normal” in comparison. What a thing the mind is powerful, and maturity of tastes, such as the olfactory one, which is so related to memory. The perfume declares three notes, but in reality, it also includes the Violet note so popular in Fahrenheit, Rose and Iris notes. In addition to some traces of Coco. More so, what is most detected is a cold, plastic-type vanilla, very slightly metallic, which turns slightly bitter due to the Neroli Flower and earthy and slightly smoky due to the Vetiver. The note of the original Fahrenheit is distinguished very slightly in the opening. I read Jerry Drake’s review and understand his point, mentioning that it doesn’t feel like a complete fragrance; in fact, it’s quite linear but with that Vetiver/Neroli Flower interval that revolves around the Vanilla. As Oscarsh mentioned. Also, and after having tried it, it leaves me thinking that adding something “more Fahrenheit” might have made this perfume more notable. As I mentioned earlier, I understand why it was discontinued; it’s a type of composition that is rather feminine, being of a rather floral, vanilla-scented and slightly bitter character. In my adolescence, wearing any of these compositions would be implausible; you wouldn’t believe it, this perfume requires some maturity. It reminds me of the cold (effectively Fahrenheit 32° and 0° Celsius) and the earth, effectively like the mountain in that commercial that I see again today with the bottle in hand. A composition I would use rather in spring but with rather cool temperatures; in summer, this is impossible. It’s perfect in autumn and winter, in my opinion, or on nights with some cold wind (taking into account where you live and the type of climate also influences this perfume much). Longevity on skin of approximately 7 hours, not evolving much but maintaining that pleasant and delicate floral-vanilla, bitter and slightly soapy smell. It projects for the first two hours and then goes down constantly but remains present. On clothes, it lasts all day, being louder but not so invasive. Should I recommend it? The truth is, no. I think if you like white floral compositions with vanilla, this smells very well, besides being a classic and quite sought-after piece. Is it worth the price? For collection value, personal taste, and some nostalgia factor, perhaps yes. But for wanting to use it as a more daily and “battle-ready” fragrance, definitely no. I will treasure this forever in my collection, and it will remind me more than ever how much I have grown. I give it an 8/10, in the heart 100/10.
Fahrenheit, due to its age, is a perfume that accumulates a good number of stories and experiences from those who wear it. Since 1988, they have that possibility, and it’s no small thing because others don’t have it. This fragrance is not the original Fahrenheit but Fahrenheit 32, the one in the beautiful white, translucent bottle, matching the dark yellowish colour of the contents on its lower part, that one which by name and presentation seems to want to evoke a sensation of low temperature, 0ºC specifically. Unlike many who have already left their impressions, I couldn’t try this perfume when it was still on sale; it was later when my interest arose in it, called by its no few popular acclamations that place it as if it were an unfinished work, one of those perfumes that seems everyone should try at least once, and I wouldn’t have been able to do so without the courtesy of Jerry Drake, thanks to whom I write these lines. What has most attracted my attention is that all those sensations Dior tried to convey don’t exist; we are not facing a fresh perfume, nor is it a heavy or very sweet one. In the scent from the very beginning, we can clearly perceive the vanilla, a plastic-like but tremendously pleasant vanilla that from the very first moment is accompanied by white flowers, neroli according to the declared notes, but to that one would have to add a present but soft violet that, in conjunction with the vanilla, makes it cold, almost gelid, creating a very particular aromatic atmosphere, almost as if smelling of ink or paint, a metallic vanilla that will persist for a long time until finally it subsides, leaving the same initial vanilla, already without any floral tone but with remnants of that violet in a very residual way. That is the sensation of cold that Dior speaks of, the cold vanilla, very well executed and really pleasant, don’t think those metallic airs are unpleasant; on the contrary, they make us, in some way, when appreciating the scent as a whole, slightly and for moments remember the original. Tremendous interpretation by François Demachy, spectacular. Besides, that vanilla could seem heavy; these early days of the century were an era when sweet perfumes were still characterised by their stridency and tackiness, but in no way is that the case; the sweetness is just, not raised in volume, it has very good longevity and a projection that accompanies us for a good handful of hours, quite a few more than we are accustomed to seeing these days. This makes the perfume persistent and noticeable in a constant way with puffs that tickle us and remind us of the great work we have the luck to be using. An interpretation that departs from the original Fahrenheit, more versatile and different, vanilla-scented with white floral nuances and a violet that plays hide-and-seek and isn’t what it seems. A work that today truly has the capacity to leave us chilled when we become aware that a perfume like this will never be commercialised again. Zero degrees.
The most usable and easiest to like of the Fahrenheit line. When I applied it, it quickly reminded me of Allure Homme Sport Eau Extreme, and that’s because they are similar in every sense. Good quality, good longevity but nothing extraordinary. Overrated due to its discontinuation.
Review of Fahrenheit 32, a flanker of the mythical Fahrenheit that I used very little in the nineties—along with Kenzo Homme, they gave me a headache-. This perfume retains the DNA of Fahrenheit but would say it’s a bit more acceptable. It’s not that potent gasoline smell that the original distilled, but this one, and I think it’s because of the vanilla, is more wearable. It adds masculinity, and I’ve received many compliments for using it. Its projection and trail are more than acceptable in the times we live in modern perfumery. The use of this fragrance is, to my taste, formal, but it can also be used informally without sounding out of place. It can be used day or night and in the best seasons that it behaves; in my way of smelling, it can be in all; standing out in autumn, spring and winter. A fragrance that was gifted to me, and the truth is I was amazed by this flanker and used it on special occasions, but unfortunately it ran out, and it’s time to write my review. I would buy it again, of course, it brings incredible masculinity and seriousness, especially in office work. In short, a delicious, masculine, formal fragrance for all uses and terrains that can be used in almost all seasons, retaining the spirit of its mother fragrance. Greetings.
A magnificent perfume for spring, charming and… fresh? Not really. Dior, following its poor policy of naming perfumes and flankers, calls this “Fahrenheit 32,” which fits the thermal scale of 0°C, hinting at a refreshing character the aroma doesn’t really possess. However, since there’s already a Fahrenheit whose scent has nothing to do with this, I think it confuses the consumer, once again. The bottle is similar in shape to the other Fahrenheit bottles, which might make one think of a kind of Fahrenheit Cologne, but it’s absolutely not that. A soft yet substantial scent, where the neroli flower and a vetiver that is not earthy but light and green culminate in a subtle vanilla that doesn’t become heavy. It doesn’t declare violet leaves, but that soapy and clean touch suggests it. Whoever knows “Eight and Bob original” will know what this Fahrenheit 32 smells like, as it’s 90% similar; the difference is that in Dior the sweetness of the vanilla is very mild, and generally the perfume is very wearable in heat, something that doesn’t happen with the same scent in Eight and Bob, which turns out to be heavier in high temperatures. A perfume with no DNA from the Fahrenheit, easy to like and exquisite, with good performance and… discontinued. For the nostalgics, there’s the aforementioned Eight and Bob original, but taking care not to overdo it with sprays in much heat.
I could smell it thanks to a decanty.com website; otherwise, it would have been impossible as it’s totally discontinued and very hard to find… This fragrance is perfect for those seeking an elegant yet modern scent that adapts well to both formal and informal occasions. Longevity and projection are notable; one could say it stays present throughout the day without being overwhelming.
Its discontinuation is responsible for my madness trying to find a replacement that makes me as happy and that I like as much as this. I must have tried over 1,000 perfumes since then, and nothing even close to this beauty has come up. Neither Eight & Bob nor anything else can match its magic. Perhaps if you find one sealed and well-kept it might be okay, but what’s left of my bottle barely resembles the scent it once was; it’s completely spoiled given that it was discontinued around 2010. Fifteen years ago, it could have been a more controversial perfume due to its unisex nature. However, the compliments I received with this don’t compare to any other; everyone loved it. Therefore, beyond my own experience where I can’t affirm it was a difficult perfume, perhaps today, almost 2025, and thanks to the barriers that have been somewhat broken, it would be a good idea to relaunch it. Maybe it was ahead of its time and now deserves the recognition it merits. Surely Jean Paul Gaultier thought something similar to relaunch Gaultier2. I hope Dior does the same without touching the formula.
The vanilla that doesn’t cloy. Of course, one can be minimalist and succeed. This fragrance, with just three declared notes, achieves something that seems simple but isn’t: an elegant, clean vanilla that doesn’t fall into the gourmand trap. From the very first instant, there’s a citrus-floral sigh thanks to the neroli flower, which adds luminosity without being strident. Then, as it dries down, an emerging vanilla appears that doesn’t cloy but caresses. A refined, almost ethereal vanilla that moves away from dessert to approach elegance. In a market saturated with sweet and repetitive fragrances, Fahrenheit 32 feels like a breath of fresh air. Delicious and different. The vetiver, though it doesn’t shout, is there: dry, discreet, holding up the entire structure with elegance and sobriety. I’m grateful to have discovered this vintage gem forgotten in a drawer. It’s perfectly unisex, long-lasting and versatile in terms of climate and season. I wish more new houses would dare to rescue this vision of vanilla: serene, luminous, with soul. My note: 9/10. I arrived late to review this beauty, but if you cross paths with it—even as a dupe—try it. You’ll like it.
When I first tried Fahrenheit 32, I was surprised because it moves away from the classic Fahrenheit that we all know. From the very first moment, it smells fresh thanks to the neroli, but what really makes it special is that combination with vanilla, which gives it a sweet, elegant, and even slightly creamy air. It’s not invasive; rather, it conveys cleanliness and sophistication. Over time, the vetiver emerges to balance the sweetness and provide a woody base, making it masculine and versatile. Its longevity is good, around 7 hours on my skin, with moderate projection. In summary, it’s an elegant, luminous and different fragrance, ideal for those who want a unique and rare Dior, with a fresh yet warm touch at the same time. I still have a bottle with a few millilitres left, and I don’t want to use it much because, unfortunately, it’s discontinued and I haven’t found it anywhere.
Bestial, fresh and elegant; it envelops and elevates you in summer. I still have remnants of my bottle from over 12 years ago; it hasn’t lost a single iota of its essence or intensity, lasting an eternity on my skin. Comparing it to what I’ve bought in recent years, delicious though they are, they simply don’t last. With luck, applying it six times, they last 30 minutes. I’ve travelled through airports and perfumeries in many countries with the hope of finding a bottle of Fahrenheit 32… and nothing. Note: 10/10