Skip to content

Bad by Diesel

Men 2016

Brand
Diesel
Perfumer
Anne Flipo
Perfumer
Carlos Benaïm

Description

Bad by Diesel is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2016, this composition was created by Anne Flipo and Carlos Benaïm. The top notes unfold lavender, bergamot, cardamom and violet leaves; the heart reveals caviar, iris root and sage; while the base notes settle on a woody accord of tobacco, ambroxan, tonka bean and patchouli.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 30%
  • Spring 23%
  • Summer 14%
  • Autumn 33%
  • Day 49%
  • Night 51%

Key notes

Community

789 votes

  • Positive 65%
  • Negative 25%
  • Neutral 10%
positive reviews 789 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentAutumn CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

1,778 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

1,000 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

546 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Bad

Main accord aromatic Year 2016 Gender Men Perfumer Anne Flipo · Carlos Benaïm

Bad by Diesel is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2016, this composition was created by Anne Flipo and Carlos Benaïm. The top notes unfold lavender, bergamot, cardamom and violet leaves; the heart reveals caviar, iris root and sage; while the base notes settle on a woody accord of tobacco, ambroxan, tonka bean and patchouli.

Flowers Spices Green, herbal and fougère Musk, amber and animalic Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

475 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

534 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

358 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

325 votes

Community reviews

38 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Kepa_Jametxo_Masrica

    To me, the caviar note smells like canned mussels. I was the only one who noticed, but it seemed curious.

    Reply
  2. AntonioLeón

    I’m new to perfumes and as soon as I smelled the decant, it clicked instantly. It’s like a mix between Invictus and Bad Boy: intense, but what a surprise. It’s not innovative; it’s a warm, versatile classic. I’d recommend it, but only as a decant—I don’t want to spend that much; I can’t see myself buying the original for under $10 in knock-off shops.

    Reply
  3. Wasonhound0525

    Probably a hidden gem that few know, similar to Diesel Plus Plus in some notes but much more interesting and deep. I’ve worn it in all seasons and it has good performance that doesn’t overpower but invites people to get a whiff; compliments are plentiful. You could be in the shower and, amidst the vapours, you’d still smell like this fragrance remains. 🐿️🇦🇷

    Reply
  4. Wasonhound0525

    Probably a hidden gem, similar to Diesel Plus Plus in some notes but much more interesting and deep. I wear it all year round; it has good performance without being overwhelming and begs to be smelled, earning plenty of compliments. You can shower and, amidst the vapours, you still smell great.

    Reply
  5. DanielOyarzún

    It’s good for being close to you, like Invictus, Sauvage, or One Million: a familiar scent, nothing new. Diesel Bad is cheap and, compared to those overused perfumes, I’d switch a thousand times for this. Anyone who smells it will surely like it. There are hundreds of rare scents, but this is the one you should have to wear without worry. I’ve had the first bottle for a year and bought another yesterday for Christmas because I missed that generic but rich smell that doesn’t go unnoticed by women, watch out for that date haha.

    Reply
  6. Second day with BAD: it’s spring and you can tell more in the park. Today something curious: during my morning walk with the dog, everyone turned their heads with a look of surprise. The most curious part was later, after breakfast on the terrace (cloudy, fresh, and humid day): I think I broke the record for the number of strangers who greeted me. Even from behind, I could tell they had seen me before. I wasn’t going to greet anyone, but today all the girls, known and unknown, greeted me. Walking the dog normally means everyone goes their own way, but today I couldn’t believe it; five in a row. Everyone said something to me. I don’t know what happened, but it’s my second day and I admit it has extraordinary performance on my skin, filling rooms. It projects more than I thought and the longevity is above average. I don’t dislike the aroma; I like it enough to finish it and leave a good memory. I don’t usually repeat unless it’s in my top five. Time will tell……

    Reply
  7. Hello everyone… I’ve seen many comments, all correct. I think it comes down to the notes: they are familiar and commercial, a generic set, timeless and easy to use like eau de toilette. Top, heart, and base are very balanced, leaning neither way. If it were a Chypre scent, it would be a quiet walk through a peaceful city. What I like about BAD is when I don’t know where to turn and want something casual that doesn’t stand out, but with strength and medium longevity: it’s one of my favourites. It reminds me of Carolina Herrera and brands that use cardamom, also youthful scents and the lavender in Sauvage. The only downside is that it’s totally masculine due to a lack of floral notes; if it had them, it would be well-rounded, but I don’t think that’s the intention. Regarding the caviar, I think it’s a way for the perfumer to cover up with discordant blends that don’t come out as intended. It’s an unpleasant fish note, synthetic, gummy, tarred, salty, and plasticky; it’s not noticeable on the skin but appears in the projection. If you accept it as caviar or a touch of bad boy, no matter. The problem is when you think it’s a flaw rather than a virtue, and you spoil the pleasant notes. I’ll use it until it runs out, but since I found that caviar part unpleasant, I know I’ll set it aside like others that excited me with a WOW and then I found the ‘wow but…’. The search for the perfect scent continues… There are thousands of options…..

    Reply
  8. Diesel Bad is aromatic, spicy, and woody. Citrus, spicy, and semi-sweet opening, with amber and violet tones. After a few minutes, it becomes very aromatic, with lavender and a hint of tonka bean, like some Fougères. In the dry-down phase, woody notes appear, but the lavender stays fresh and aromatic. It could be used almost all year round, except winter, due to a lack of warmth in the spices; temperate climates are its perfect stage. It’s not elegant; I don’t recommend it for special occasions, but yes for daily use or the office. Longevity is good, close to 9 hours, with regular projection. In summary, it doesn’t stand out in anything and isn’t original, but it’s pleasant and a good option for someone who doesn’t want to collect but just smell good.

    Reply
  9. beto_ruiz

    Bad Diesel is aromatic, spicy and woody. It opens with a citrus and semi-sweet top with amber and violet hints. Then lavender and tonka bean give it a fougère nod. In the dry-down, the woods emerge but the lavender keeps the freshness. It suits temperate climates, not winter due to lack of warmth. Not elegant, better for daily wear or the office. Lasted about 9 hours with average projection. In short, it doesn’t stand out or feel original, but it smells good and serves anyone who just wants to smell nice without complications.

    Reply
  10. I bought it on offer, blindly searching for notes I know I like, and it was a hit; I loved it. Good longevity, 6 to 8 hours on skin, on clothes it lasts a week on my jacket. Good projection. The best compliment came from my two-year-old daughter, who gave me a sigh after breathing deeply… Recommended, yes. I’ll buy it again; I’ve already bought an extra bottle to keep. I learned to buy more than one whenever I like a perfume. Fragrances I use or have used: 212 Men x2, 212 On Ice 2005, Invictus (which it doesn’t resemble at all) x2, Quasar JDP x4 (I have 1 left of 125ml), Black XS 2005 x2, Quorum Silver, Agua Brava Sea Power x2, Miami Seduction Black.

    Reply
  11. alvarodelgadob

    It’s a super synthetic Invictus, so much so that it gives me a headache. At this price, I’d recommend the original instead, but if you’re looking for something more classy and enjoy the scent, Acqua Di Gio Absolu is your best option.

    Reply
  12. One of my top favourites. Smells like you just climbed onto a Harley with brand-new leather – rich and warm. Totally Son of Anarchy.

    Reply
  13. It’s one of my favourites. You feel like an Anarchy son on your Harley: leather scent, super rich and warm.

    Reply
  14. A pleasant synthetic scent… though to be honest, I always prefer Sculpture when it comes to synthetics.

    Reply
  15. Superior fragrance to Invictus: the opening is less sweet but after five minutes it evolves, becoming more mature, persistent and heavy, similar to Paco Rabanne. I recommend it over Invictus, although it’s less striking than Acqua Di Gio Absolu, which follows a similar path. I’d say Diesel Bad is the Invictus for men over 35. I recommend it.

    Reply
  16. misteroliver

    I love it. The blend of leather and caviar with sweet notes creates a very original salty touch. It’s cheeky but clean, nothing cloying. Ideal for evening wear; I use it in winter.

    Reply
  17. misteroliver

    I absolutely love this fragrance. The blend of leather and caviar with sweet notes gives it a very original salty touch. It might be a bit cheeky, but it’s clean and not cloying. Better for evening wear and I wear it in winter.

    Reply
  18. The comment was ironic, not malicious, juancar677. Obviously, everyone smells and rationalises differently. I also say that many perfumes change hugely between paper and skin. I’ve been surprised. CH Men Privé, I started hating it (blind buy because I live on an island with limited choice). It’s been an acquired taste, especially due to the good results. Another point in its favour: the first bottle had terrible performance, the last two last 7-8 hours solidly with movement and sweat. At 30-40cm from the neck they’re always detectable, even closer a couple of hours later. I applied one on my arm to compare them 1:1; I suspect many only smell the spray or are mediocre proposals on paper strips, because I can’t find any similarity save perhaps the initial alcohol, but even then imagining more than feeling. Best regards.

    Reply
  19. universal

    One of my best friends gifted me Invictus Aqua for my birthday in 2016. I’m of using designer perfumes for everyday that please the majority, I keep the heavy artillery for special occasions and my niche eccentricities for environments where they’ll be appreciated or when I fancy putting on something just for me, knowing I might offend. No matter how many compliments I receive, I DETEST fragrances with a chewing gum smell + aquatic notes. Still, year after year my girlfriend or some friend decides to gift me one of this type, so I use them occasionally when I meet up with them. Fortunately, my family usually asks beforehand and almost always receive a spare bottle of something they know I like. To the point: Invictus Aqua had a pleasant smell in the air if you like this style, the best reactions always from girls under 25, especially with the heat. The problem was an inescapable smell of boiled egg every time I brought my nose to the application point. I’d never experienced anything similar with a perfume. After ruling out paranoia by asking trusted people (they struggled to catch it at first, but found it if they looked) I decided to leave it. Luckily, several reviewers on YouTube have superhyped it, and today I’ll have about 30ml left of a 100ml bottle after selling two dozen samples online, so I haven’t cried much. This weekend, the same girl who gifted me the Invictus Aqua gifted me Bad out of the blue. Want to know how the discontinued 2016 Invictus Aqua smelled? EXACTLY the same as Bad, with half the trail and fixation, and a very slight woody note in the dry down that the original doesn’t have. I’m writing this review with two sprays on each arm. Literally, a copy and paste. Including the super sexy boiled egg note. The only interesting thing about the 2016 Aqua was that it lasted until pool baths. You came out of the water and still smelled yourself. Others could learn from this fixation and trail… About three hours ago I applied them, the Aqua is still detectable without needing to bring my nose to the arm, Bad has already been on my skin for almost an hour. Recommended for lovers of the discontinued version; the new 2018 version is still abominable, but they’ve rounded off the ultra synthetic smell taking the fixation and (something good) the egg smell with them. Equally I wouldn’t buy either of the 3, for less money Dylan Blue, First Instinct, First Instinct Blue or Legend Spirit will do the job. In the same price range, ADG Profumo or Light Blue Intense have extremely contrasted and bulletproof ADNs regarding female public reactions. PS: editing to say the bottle is nice, it catches the eye inside the “no thanks” shelf. PS2: second edition after reading reviews from colleagues. Those who say it resembles CH Men Privé, please go to the ENT as soon as you can. I’m on my third bottle of this perfume, and literally they have 0 in common… It can be said it’s a “bad boy” version of Nuit De L’Homme (another one I’m on my third bottle), especially in the dry down if you smell them one after the other although they have several well-differentiated notes. Now, with Bad there’s no resemblance at all. But none.

    Reply
  20. juancar677

    @universal. I understood correctly that your review wasn’t ambiguous. Are the fragrances similar? No, because Bad is far inferior to CH Privé. Only at the start does it vaguely remind me of Herrera. Apart from that, they have nothing in common. I used to love CH Privé and received compliments, but its sweet base eventually bored me, so now my nephew has it, just like the original CH, which I stopped wearing once my partner recognised it. They’re lovely fragrances, but their sweetness wore me out. Warm regards to your island.

    Reply
  21. universal

    One of my best friends gave me Invictus Aqua in 2016. I’m one to use designer fragrances for daily wear that please the majority, keeping my heavy artillery for special occasions and my niche eccentricities for environments where they’re appreciated or when I fancy putting something on just for myself, knowing I might offend. Although I receive many compliments, I DETEST fragrances with a chewing gum smell plus aquatic notes. Still, year after year my girlfriend or a friend gifts me one of these, so I use them occasionally when meeting up with them. Fortunately, my family usually asks first and almost always give me a spare bottle of something they know I like. To the point: Invictus Aqua smelled pleasant in the air if you like this style, the best reactions were always from girls in their mid-20s, especially with the heat. The problem was an inescapable smell of boiled egg every time I brought my nose close to the application point. It never happened to me like this before. After ruling out paranoia by asking trusted people (they found it hard to catch at first, but they could find it if they looked), I decided to leave it. Luckily, several reviewers on YouTube have overhyped it, and to this day I have about 30ml left from a 100ml bottle after selling two dozen samples online, so I haven’t cried much. This weekend, the same girl who gifted me the Invictus Aqua gave me Bad out of the blue. Want to know how the discontinued 2016 Invictus Aqua smelled? EXACTLY the same as Bad, with half the trail and fixation, and a very slight woody base note in the dry-down that the original doesn’t have. I’m writing this with two sprays on each arm. Literally, a copy and paste. Including the super sexy boiled egg note. The only interesting thing about the 2016 Aqua was that it lasted until pool baths. You’d come out of the water and still smell yourself. Others could learn from this fixation and trail… I applied them about three hours ago, the Aqua is still detectable without needing to bring my nose close to the arm, while Bad has been on my skin for almost an hour. Recommended for lovers of the discontinued version; the 2018 update remains abominable, but they’ve rounded off the ultra-synthetic smell, taking away the fixation and (something good) the egg smell. Still, I wouldn’t buy any of the three; for the same price, Dylan Blue, First Instinct, First Instinct Blue or Legend Spirit will do the job. For the same price, ADG Profumo or Light Blue Intense have vastly contrasting ADNs that are bulletproof with the female public. PS: editing to say the bottle is indeed pretty, it catches the eye inside the ‘no thanks’ shelf. PS2: second edition after reading reviews from colleagues. Those who say it resembles CH Men Privé, please make an appointment with an ENT as soon as possible. I’m on my third bottle of this perfume, and literally they have 0 in common… It can be said to be a ‘bad boy’ version of Nuit De L’Homme (another one I’m on my third bottle of), especially in the dry-down if you smell them one after the other, although they have several well-differentiated notes. Now, with Bad there is no resemblance at all. None.

    Reply
  22. juancar677

    @universal. I don’t claim it’s a clone of CH Men Privé by Carolina Herrera, but tested in 2016, its top notes flew in that style. Nevertheless, I’ll make an appointment with Dr Roig, my private ENT and laryngologist, although in the last review he found me very well. But who knows? Health shouldn’t be neglected by even a millilitre. In general, Bad seems bad. PS: I gifted the CH Men Privé.

    Reply
  23. It’s true it adds nothing. It’s Diesel’s alternative to Ch Men Privé or Man in Black, those that shine with a leather jacket. But I like it.

    Reply
  24. It’s true that it adds nothing. Let’s say it’s the Diesel alternative to CH Men Privé or Man in Black. It’s that kind of fragrance that shines with a leather jacket. But I like it.

    Reply
  25. The name fits this gem perfectly. Generic, synthetic and with poor performance for the modest price of 60 euros. In short, very bad.

    Reply
  26. The name fits this little gem perfectly. Generic, synthetic and with scant performance for the modest price of 60 euros. Anyway, very bad.

    Reply
  27. Bought the Bad by Diesel using the samples given in-store. I’ve tried other scents from the brand and none convinced me, except Fuel for Life Homme, which isn’t quite my style but is the most usable they have. Bad starts citrusy and spiced, but those citrus notes are artificial, low-quality and smell dirty, lacking any brightness—the antithesis of what it should be. Fortunately, the spices kick in later; the lavender lingers, but cardamom saves the accord somewhat. Here you can sense that hazy warmth mixing with the dry, dusty touch of iris root and woods. There’s also a sharp, very astringent and acidic note that clashes and throws everything off balance; I suppose that’s what they call tobacco. I’ve tried many tobaccos, but this ‘thing’ resembles nothing and is one of the worst I’ve ever smelled, even becoming irritating after five minutes. Upon drying, I detect a salty edge—nothing of caviar, but rather a cocktail of cheap musks that ultimately dies out into a detergent note identical to Invictus, though at least Invictus is better made. That musk is Tonalid. Longevity is good, sillage moderate. In short, another horrendous designer fragrance, another clone, a lack of imagination and shoddy quality that offends good taste. The consumer who trusts a prestigious brand is the one who loses, while companies charge far more than they deliver. Rating: 1

    Reply
  28. I bought a new fragrance and the sales assistant gave me samples, including this Bad. I’ve tried others from the brand and they never convinced me except Fuel for Life, which isn’t my taste but is the most usable. Bad opens citrus and spicy, but the citrus is artificial, low quality, smells dirty and morbid, without brightness – the antithesis of a citrus note, quite depressing. Soon the spices enter and the lavender lingers, but the cardamomo opens with an acceptable aroma that steers the fragrance towards the only salvageable point: here you notice a nebulous warmth that blends well with the dry, powdery point of the iris root and the woods. I also detect an acute, astringent and sour note that clashes and unbalances, I suppose that’s what they call tobacco. I’ve tried many tobacco notes, but this ‘thing’ resembles nothing, not even a little; it’s been one of the worst to pass through my nose, even irritating after 5 minutes. In the dry-down there is indeed a salty point, but no caviar, rather a cocktail of cheap musks that ends dying in a detergent note identical to Invictus, although the latter is better made. This musk is called Tonalid. Good duration with moderate trail. In short, another horrendous designer fragrance, just another clone, lacking imagination, with shoddy qualities that attack good taste. The buyer is the one who loses out by trusting a prestigious brand; the ones who benefit with huge dividends are these companies because they charge much more than they give. Rating: 1

    Reply
  29. juancar677

    @Ivan 80 I know we weren’t discussing a specific review, but it’s curious to see how every skin smells differently and the same perfume isn’t perceived the same by everyone. I have one that sounds youthful to some but old-fashioned to others. I’m glad this Bad by Diesel suits you, but to me it smells very dark, and the issue isn’t that; it’s that it has poor performance. It is original in its own way; not everyone uses a caviar-and-tobacco blend. I presume it has a touch of leather, though I can’t guarantee it. Anyway, wear it with pleasure, as that’s what counts.

    Reply