Cacharel pour L’Homme by Cacharel
Men 1981
Main accords
Description
Cacharel pour L'Homme by Cacharel is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 1981, the nose behind this composition is Gérard Goupy. The top notes are nutmeg, bergamot, lavender and chamomile; the heart includes carnation, geranium, ylang-ylang, valley lily, cyclamen and jasmine; while the base notes consist of fir, vetiver, cedar, oakmoss, sandalwood, amber and musk.
Show more ↓Quick summary
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
4,837 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Love it
1,869 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Autumn
1,853 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Day
989 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About Cacharel pour L’Homme
Cacharel pour L’Homme by Cacharel is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 1981, the nose behind this composition is Gérard Goupy. The top notes are nutmeg, bergamot, lavender and chamomile; the heart includes carnation, geranium, ylang-ylang, valley lily, cyclamen and jasmine; while the base notes consist of fir, vetiver, cedar, oakmoss, sandalwood, amber and musk.
Spices Flowers Green, herbal and fougère White flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Cacharel
More from Gerard Goupy
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Moderate
813 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Moderate
904 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally masculine
448 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Fair price
386 votes
Most talked about
Notes and topics that come up most in 40 reviews.
Featured review The most detailed of the latest reviews.
Have you worn Cacharel pour L’Homme?
Tell us how it opens, how it settles on your skin, how long it lasts and when you wear it.
Sort by
Perfumoon
A vintage gem that doesn’t follow fleeting trends; it will sound just as good today as it will in 20 years. It opens fresh and herbal, reminiscent of freshly cut parsley with a hint of anise. It then evolves into something mossy, with tobacco and floral notes, very old-school and masculine, like the dads of the 80s in suits with full beards. Nutmeg and flowers blend together; I can’t distinguish much beyond geranium and clean lavender. They achieve a harmony without the harshness of modern perfumery. In Spain in the 80s, this was the status symbol in an emerging men’s perfumery, leaving behind the ubiquitous Agua Brava or Varón Dandy. My mother gave it to my father on an anniversary, which prompted me to try it in-store; I loved it so much I bought it. The bottle and box retain the original design, perhaps with minimal changes. It deserves a place on every serious collector’s shelf. In fresh springs or mild autumns, it fits like a glove, perfect for daytime wear because it doesn’t overpower; it’s subtle, like a second skin. In current batches, the trail and longevity are moderate (6 sprays/6 hours). A reasonable price between £35 and £45 for 100ml given what it offers.
Aaperti
An excellent nutmeg scent, very different from what is done nowadays. A pity that the longevity is so short.
Gatusso79
What a crime they have done with this perfume! It was my signature from 1998 to 2002 and I hadn’t smelled it in ages. I sprayed it yesterday and it smells like a completely different perfume, plus the performance is non-existent. What a shame to ruin a classic like this.
Javier636
It is a cologne that disappears as soon as you put it on the shelf. To be noticed as perfumed in the afternoon, you have to reapply about 8ml. The performance is desperate, including projection. I am practically bathing in it to finish the bottle and goodbye Cacharel. Better an Alvarez Gómez based on bergamot, in terms of price. I don’t know how the original smelled; here it is a water for children. Save your money and for a little more you can buy an Aqua di Giò; an Obsession for Man by Calvin Klein beats it many times over for much less. Nothing like Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme which reminds it somewhat. That one is truly a great perfume.
incognito
It is my signature. It fills my senses, I feel comfortable and secure wearing it on any occasion, climate, or season. Regardless of the declared notes, for me it evokes three indisputable ones: pepper, nutmeg, and cardamom. Perhaps I am wrong, I am just a humble enthusiast. I received my first bottle as a gift in 1996 at 19 years old and I loved it immediately. I have used it in different periods and when it runs out, I leave it to smell different and miss it. It disappeared for two years and when I found it in 2015, I bought two of 100ml; the second one finished in the middle of last year. It must be reformulated, because sometimes my olfactory memory misses something. However, it seems fairly faithful to the first time I smelled it. It is less persistent and lasts much less, but what can we do? At least it is still available and I hope to enjoy it until I die, hopefully to be buried with it.
L'UOMO_
I didn’t try it until last year. Several tests on skin confirm that it is repellent to my sense of smell. What does it smell like? A puddle of urine cleaned with Zotal.
Alberto_73
It has been my favourite for many years. I find it balanced, rounded, masculine, timeless, and elegant, valid for daily wear and all year round. But the latest reformulations have turned it into an ephemeral cologne with almost no fixation. I have a bottle from 17 years ago with barely 5ml saved to remember; that one lasts hours. It happened to it the same as the original Kenzo EDT: what is sold now is just a shadow of what it was.
Ente
They have ruined this perfume in their reformulation. It still smells just as good but after 10 minutes it’s as if you haven’t worn it. It literally disappears from the skin. And they keep it above £50. I don’t know how they have the audacity to put a formula on the market with less longevity and trail than Aldi colognes.
Palladio
Fortunately, I enjoyed this fragrance in the 80s. It seemed to me the most spectacular aroma I had ever tried: the most elegant touch of nutmeg I have ever experienced. Unfortunately, the reformulations (I know the topic is old hat, but it is true) have ruined the perfume. It still smells just as good but nothing like the power and projection of old. If it lasts more than 4 hours you will be lucky. Despite everything, I recommend it for its pleasant and elegant smell, perhaps even with a touch of sexiness.
LEOLUCAS
It is true, I enjoyed it too many years ago, in the past. Now it is a pain, a huge frustration. The aroma, although no longer so harsh or penetrating, still retains its extreme elegance, but the performance is not even a shadow of what it was. A huge pity.
Fede
This was my signature scent alongside Massimo Dutti when I was 16. Its spiced DNA with nutmeg and that green helichrysum note is still there, but IFRA restrictions have castrated it bit by bit. It’s not the same anymore: back then you could fill an entire nightclub and it lasted forever; now, if you’re lucky, three hours but with better health 😂. The important thing is the soul remains intact, loaded with memories of when you were happy and didn’t even know it.
José Antonio Ayuste
Joaquín Sabina says you shouldn’t return to the place where you were happy, and that is exactly what happened with this new Cacharel Pour Homme. I had it fifteen years ago, enjoyed it, but didn’t buy it again when I finished. A few days ago I found a ‘Limited Edition’ at a well-known chain, assuming it would be better. Fed up with trying it and finding not a hint of what it used to be, I bought the February 2021 batch (the regular ones are from 2023). Huge mistake. It’s identical to the current version: a watery mess without any power that doesn’t even last. I agree with everyone else: save your money and grab any Massimo Dutti dupe that’s still in production. Honestly, it’s not worth it unless you find an old gem from seven or eight years ago. I’m indignant at what they’ve done; it’s a desecration and a crime.
Real Betis
It was my first perfume. The first time a friend smelled it, I was stunned. It’s obvious that perfumery has changed a lot, but even though I use it little, it’s not missing from my collection.
MaximoRV
Very masculine aroma, result of the union of woods, lavender and nutmeg. It’s already a classic. I don’t usually pigeonhole by age, but this isn’t for teenagers. Highly recommended 100% for medium seasons. A fragrance to the female taste, 6-7 hours of duration and projects well for the first hour and a half. Rating: 8/10.
MrElegance
After postponing this perfume for several years, it finally arrived today and blind. At first it seemed a unique and masculine departure. After 10 minutes it starts to remind me of Loewe 7, but softer and more wearable. I liked it a lot. I’ll keep testing it.
eden_at_hand
Connect and keep connecting, rendez-vous with life in many of its airs: sensuality, ego, generosity, passion, nature. It sounds pedantic, yes, but it is huge huge.
nneestorr
I had it in my youth years, today I only vaguely remember its scent. I used it only for special occasions. Once a girl from my gang gave me a compliment: ‘you smell like a man’. She meant you smelled like a mature man… And I really felt that way wearing this fragrance.
Mayoral
I agree in valuing Cacharel Pour Homme as a timeless gem, earthy and woody. The nutmeg note is the most beautiful I’ve known, superbly harmonised with the woods and the top notes that drive it to a spicy and sensual opening. I share that this masterpiece must be a must-have piece in any collection of perfume lovers.
Bryello
I fell in love with this so authentic bottle, one of my favourite designs, both the old and the modern one, and logically I had to get its contents, blind. A fragrance from 81 with that story couldn’t disappoint me. But one day I couldn’t resist and tried it; I loved the aroma but not the duration, which I found very scarce. What a letdown, pressing my nose to my arm trying to convince myself it had quality, but what about it! The scent vanished in little time and I relegated the purchase. Would I buy it some day? It could be, although only for the bottle, ains what a pity. But what joy I took today!! I tried it again, the limited edition they say is better, and wow it is. Three sprays on the wrist and all day perceiving it, after 12 hours I notice it at skin level, how good. It’s an aroma I love, very evocative, as if I had smelled it already in someone in my childhood. This fragrance transports me to another time, to other situations, it’s easier for me to imagine stories, for example, in 80s Madrid, of those people who one day perfumed themselves with the authentic Cacharel Pour L’Homme. Stories of low and high neighbourhoods, robberies, infidelities, elevators, nightclubs, Christmases… Like a film director or writer, a small detail serves them as inspiration to start their story. Something like that happens to me with this smell. In a review I read it was associated with Christmas, it has clearly taken over the #1 again and next month it will be my mandatory purchase. Cacharel will be my Christmas perfume of this year, ho ho hou!!!
Mr. Baskerville
I think I tested a bottle that had been sitting on the shelf too long, which dulled its brilliance. The opening is citrus with lavender, but the development is a bed of wood and jasmine that smells nice, nothing more. The longevity is extremely short, so it feels like the potential was left unrealised. If I try it again with a fresh bottle, I’ll let you know.
jerry drake
Cacharel Pour Homme from the 80s is a vanguard jewel in an era of excess. It smells like winter holidays thanks to that addictive fir and spice note. The dry nutmeg adds a powdery, fresh touch that is delightful. The current version has reduced the nutmeg and isn’t as deep, but if you can find the limited edition with the bird logo, it remains a timeless, earthy masculine gem.
Fragancefran
The quintessential jewel of the 90s. While everyone else smelled of Cool Water, I smelled of Cacharel. I part the crowd, so to speak; I needn’t say more. It is essential in any collection of fragrance lovers.
Adry_slim
They gave it to me for my birthday, 25 years after I first owned it. The bottle and box are identical, and luckily, the scent is too. I don’t care about longevity or projection; this fragrance doesn’t matter to me in those terms. It has that characteristic nutmeg that sets it apart from Loewe. It transports me back to when I was 14; it’s incredible how perfumes take us back in time.
xafbcn
I don’t understand the comments about it being fresh or sweet; to my nose, it feels rough and dry. The opening lasts only a breath, then comes an odd middle, and at the end it smells like croquette dough due to the nutmeg. Perhaps it’s like tonic water, where you get used to it, but with other scents there is no second chance. It is a classic men’s cologne, though for that I would stick with Loewe. EDIT: After using it for a couple of weeks, it has become one of my regulars. I reaffirm that it is neither fresh nor sweet, but yesterday I saw a limited edition box and I’ll be keeping it.
LazaroFragances
My brother had a dead bottle, so I managed to get it. At first, it didn’t convince me, but over time I have come to appreciate it. It is very herbal and aromatic, with a touch of incense at the end. I don’t see it as unisex and wouldn’t recommend it blindly. The trail and longevity are decent. It resembles the classic Massimo Dutti one, but this is more intense. It’s good for shy people who need to stand out. My final rating is 7.5.
Adry_slim
My first fragrance away from Crossman or Sportman. I was 14 and went with my grandmother to the neighbourhood perfumer. She said, ‘Choose one, I’ll give it to you.’ Imagine what a nose I had at 14 choosing Cacharel Pour Homme. It might be the nutmeg or because my mother used Lou Lou, but in any case, it blew my mind and I fell in love. Today, 25 years later, I keep the empty bottle as one of my best memories of my grandmother, whom I recently lost. I started loving perfumes that day. I don’t recall the trail or longevity from back then, but today I know it doesn’t last long, although the scent still reminds me of that 14-year-old boy.
Real Betis
It has been my signature fragrance until three years ago when I started trying other options. It is marvellous, it smells fantastic, it is sweet, it has longevity and a good trail. As one forum member says, it is very similar to Loewe 7 but without the incense. Highly recommended.
Egresiv
I have read that it has moderate longevity, but I have worn it for over 12 hours and still feel its presence; I suppose it depends on skin pH. I know it from the 90s, from my first job in a perfumery thanks to a very posh and fragrance-fanatic manager. Thanks to him, I entered this world from which I cannot leave. The aroma is unique and it is one of my favourites. It is quite persistent with good fixation and trail. Every true fan should have it on their list.
monsieurleather
An unforgettable classic, but we don’t get along because it overwhelms me with that marked nutmeg note, which becomes astringent and even gives me a headache. Nevertheless, if you have never heard of it, it is a fragrance worth trying. PS: A friend’s wife often wears that scent, but I imagine it is a women’s perfume as it is not her style to wear men’s fragrances. Does anyone know which women’s fragrance it could be? Thanks, au revoir.
30 of 40