Skip to content

CK be by Calvin Klein

Men Women 1996

Description

CK be by Calvin Klein is a fragrance from the woody floral musk family for men and women. Launched in 1996, the nose behind this composition is René Morgenthaler. The top notes reveal lavender, green notes, bergamot, mint, juniper and mandarin; the heart unfolds green grass, jasmine, peach, freesia, magnolia and orchid; while the base notes settle on musk, sandalwood,…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 11%
  • Spring 35%
  • Summer 36%
  • Autumn 19%
  • Day 74%
  • Night 26%

Key notes

Community

6,717 votes

  • Positive 74%
  • Negative 13%
  • Neutral 13%
positive reviews 6.7 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageIntimate Best momentDay CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

19,248 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Summer

7,985 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

4,338 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About CK be

Main accord green Year 1996 Gender Men · Women Perfumer René Morgenthaler

CK be by Calvin Klein is a fragrance from the woody floral musk family for men and women. Launched in 1996, the nose behind this composition is René Morgenthaler. The top notes reveal lavender, green notes, bergamot, mint, juniper and mandarin; the heart unfolds green grass, jasmine, peach, freesia, magnolia and orchid; while the base notes settle on musk, sandalwood, cedar, vanilla, amber and opoponax.

Flowers Green, herbal and fougère White flowers Fruits, vegetables and nuts Woods and mosses Spices Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

3,761 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Intimate

3,815 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

2,876 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

2,613 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. I absolutely love it; it smells masculine and is distinct from CK One, but the longevity is a disaster: barely lasts four hours on skin even when well-macerated. A wonderful scent that I don’t understand why it fades so quickly 🤔

    Reply
  2. I got everything wrong: it doesn’t smell like CK One, it’s not just for men, it’s not for winter, and above all, I actually liked it. Totally surprising.

    Reply
  3. Sofisticado

    Ideal for mid-seasons or quick outings like grabbing bread. Fresh, herbal and citrusy, yet not bright; that ‘grey’ touch makes it perfect for less warm climates. Note: it’s a mature and classic scent, so abstain if you’re fans of Valentino Born in Roma. Yes, I like it.

    Reply
  4. Jorgelopezelizalde

    Neither here nor there, more bother. Perhaps it had its moment, but everything changes. I don’t know what it smells like; it’s a mess. I gifted it and hope they don’t hate me, but I won’t be buying it again.

    Reply
  5. metroidsoldier

    I tried it in-store and it’s soft, herbal and aromatic. I understand the bottle is black, but it smells much less intense than CK One.

    Reply
  6. My mother gave it to me for Christmas and it was a pleasant surprise. Despite the negative reviews, it’s fresh, herbal and citrusy, very easy to wear. It reminds me of a high-quality hotel air freshener. It suits any age and gender, timeless with nearly 30 years on the market. Its only flaw is the performance: four hours on skin and one hour projecting, but given the price ($23 for 200ml), it doesn’t hurt to reapply. Ideal for the gym or daily wear.

    Reply
  7. A discreet surprise. Soft herbal and floral notes with a touch of peach that adds freshness. Everything is balanced to be unisex: carefree and perfect for everyday wear. It’s not a beast; it accompanies discreetly. When dried, clean woody accords, a slight sweetness and a earthy touch that adds sensuality without being cloying. Simple but very pleasant on skin. My rating: 9/10. Easy, versatile and with minimalist charm.

    Reply
  8. It delivers what it costs: longevity of 3-4 hours. It’s very green and I get dizzy from it; the more I smell it, the worse it gets. I’d only use it outdoors, not in enclosed spaces.

    Reply
  9. Villefragance

    Exquisite, but it disappears in two hours; if they made a ‘beast’ version, it would be a fragrance.

    Reply
  10. It has a special memory; it was a gift from my mother and that makes it unique. For me, it combines two concepts: musky/clean and green/herbal. The opening has a sparkling touch of citrus and juniper; it doesn’t smell as much of lavender as people say, that herb is barely noticeable against the dominant green notes. The heart is a soft floral where no single note stands out. The base is pure musk with cedar, the other notes just add depth. The scent is rich if you like green perfumes, but there’s nothing to defend regarding performance. Longevity: 1-2 hours on skin, 3-4 on clothes. Sillage: 15 minutes projecting, then it disappears after an hour leaving only a trail. Scent: 5.5/10, it smells good but it’s not my type. Usage: day wear exclusively in spring and summer. Gender: masculine unisex. It will always remind me of my mother, so overall it’s 10/10.

    Reply
  11. Smells incredible, fresh and elegant. Ideal for a late twenties guy, active, clean and sporty. I gifted it to my boyfriend at 28 and was fascinated; people were constantly asking for it, so beware if you’re jealous. It smells of citrus, clean laundry and that woody touch gives it elegance, but not so much for a gentleman smoking a pipe in his library.

    Reply
  12. Nothing like the CK One; it seems they mixed anything and ended up with a terrible, unclassifiable disaster. It’s not just bad, it’s horrible.

    Reply
  13. AxelELQHueleRico

    Smells rich, though honestly I think it’s for people over 30. That said, it lasts quite a while and is good for casual outings.

    Reply
  14. Pauloant21

    It’s for the gym and nothing else; it doesn’t last long and smells very ‘X’. Don’t buy it unless you’re looking for something to train in. I bought the 200ml version for about $18, I wouldn’t buy it again, but of course I spray myself like a fire hose because it’s large. I’m looking for its replacement for the gym: something fresh and cheap, that smells rich even if it doesn’t last.

    Reply
  15. Leonardo-Ramirez

    They gifted it to me and the first time I didn’t like it at all. I tried it several times and it became the fragrance with ‘no reason to exist’ in history. I didn’t understand why anyone would want it. I kept trying it only because it was in the bathroom cabinet. Over time it became addictive and I started enjoying it immensely. I love its clean scent. Whenever I heard about fragrances with a ‘clean scent’ in my head, it was this one. It smells CLEAN, without strong notes of citrus, fruit or woods, just a powdery touch. It doesn’t last and doesn’t project much. I don’t find it useful for going out, but for using it one night after a hot bath it’s perfect. As a versatile fragrance it’s a 1/10, but for staying in after a shower it’s a 10/10. I think it’ll never be needed in my wardrobe.

    Reply
  16. It’s very different from CK One, more complex to understand but no less difficult to like. When I used it I thought it leaned feminine, but it’s totally masculine unisex. My girlfriend used it and I didn’t feel it was for her. As for the scent, it’s a soapy and green blend. Very addictive once you understand it.

    Reply
  17. Botechutado24

    All said and done: very good scent, but with very poor longevity and projection.

    Reply
  18. RoswellSS

    Forget about longevity; it’s short, lasting around three hours, but perfect for post-shower. It smells of green talc and freshness, like diving into cold water straight from the atomiser, which is super generous. The opening is purely alcoholic; wait a few minutes and the delightful scent emerges. I wouldn’t wear it outside the house, nor even for the gym as there are better options, but at $19 for 200ml, it’s a total bargain.

    Reply
  19. Bernardo88

    It smells absolutely delicious and I love it, but the longevity is terrible. It’s typical of free shop perfumes: excellent price-to-quality ratio for occasions where you hardly want to be heavily scented. It smells of pure cleanliness with almost no sillage.

    Reply
  20. The previous reviews say it all: lovely scent, poor performance. I’ll just share my take: I adore the opening, a mentholated lavender with citrus, nothing like that eighties barbershop style; it has a very wearable nineties touch. I don’t like the dry down as much, not because it smells bad, but because it’s that clean, musky, simplistic, almost generic dry down that makes it feel unisex.

    Reply
  21. Instant citrus and sweet opening, followed by just alcohol for a few minutes. Then comes a slightly sweet and citrusy floral aroma. At 20 minutes, bursts of tangerine appear that I didn’t notice initially, and it starts to talc over. Ideal for feeling fresh post-shower or clean for working in the sun or heading to the gym.

    Reply
  22. Slightly green, talc-y, clean and floral. It feels like a very good vintage nineties fragrance. Although it’s unisex, it leans masculine; it’s easy to wear and puts you in a good mood. Perfect for chilling at home or in very enclosed spaces. The issue is longevity and sillage: you need eight to 15 sprays to match three sprays of Nautica Voyage. It competes with cubes, and even supermarket body mists outperform it. A 100ml bottle equates to 25ml of traditional perfume, so it’s not as cheap as it seems.

    Reply
  23. marcosluparia

    CK Be by Calvin Klein. It passed without much fuss in my collection. It wasn’t as disliked as the One; it had a woody touch with lavender and mint, notes I usually enjoy. But it wasn’t a beast either. A simple perfume that repeats the CK line’s mistake: they aren’t potent. Ideal for every day, especially hot days, post-shower or post-gym, to be lightly scented. Low longevity, almost zero projection. Scent of clean and talc. Rating: 5/10.

    Reply
  24. I love this fragrance; in fact, I’m a fan of CK perfumes. The pity is how little they last on the skin. The EDT smells clean; initially woody notes, some lavender, sandalwood and a citrus. Then it opens up and the florals arrive. It seems incredibly complex to the nose, with different notes appearing all the time. Although it’s unisex, I detect it’s almost masculine, but I love wearing it on my skin.

    Reply
  25. For me, it’s totally for the gym. It smells extremely clean, with moderate longevity and soft sillage and projection. It doesn’t turn nasty with sweat. Four sprays are enough to camouflage the gym smell without going overboard. Personal note: 7/10. It works wonderfully for its purpose, although other fragrances of mine completely overshadow it.

    Reply
  26. It’s in my top three forever. It’s a spectacular clean scent, not citrusy. It’s neutral, talc-y lavender with green bergamot touches that make it elegant. Very poor longevity to be honest, but given the price, imagine it’s a more expensive toilet splash on the market. 200ml for $25, easily available. If applied to clothes, it smells like fine detergent and lasts longer than on skin. It can be reapplied without issues.

    Reply