Skip to content

Leonara by Leonard

Women 2001

Brand
Leonard

Description

Leonara by Leonard is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2001, the nose behind this composition is Bertrand Duchaufour. The top notes are violet leaf, freesia and blackcurrant; the heart features orchid, bourbon vanilla, tiare flower, neroli, jasmine and Bulgarian rose; and the base is composed of benzoin, sandalwood and musk.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 30%
  • Spring 27%
  • Summer 17%
  • Autumn 27%
  • Day 43%
  • Night 57%

Key notes

Community

133 votes

  • Positive 87%
  • Negative 9.8%
  • Neutral 3.0%
positive reviews 133 community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentNight CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Tied for the lead I own it / I want it

395 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Winter

108 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

63 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Leonara

Main accord white-floral Year 2001 Gender Women Perfumer Bertrand Duchaufour

Leonara by Leonard is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2001, the nose behind this composition is Bertrand Duchaufour. The top notes are violet leaf, freesia and blackcurrant; the heart features orchid, bourbon vanilla, tiare flower, neroli, jasmine and Bulgarian rose; and the base is composed of benzoin, sandalwood and musk.

Green, herbal and fougère Flowers White flowers Resins and balsams Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

37 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

55 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

22 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Excellent value

15 votes

Community reviews

3 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Cherchezlafemme

    This doesn’t smell strange at all, unlike the previous review. It’s all clear: potent resins and white flowers with a tropical touch of tiaré. Barely sweet, it’s floral and resinous. Very much of its time, with the style of the original Dior Addict and similar scents that are now seen as cloying, plus a few hints of the nineties. It’s like adding a heap of white flowers to Yves Rocher’s Accord Chic. Elegant and exuberant, nocturnal. I believe it’s unisex; a man could certainly use it. A very good blind buy in terms of quality and price if you like this type of perfume.

    Reply
  2. Cherchezlafemme

    Nothing as strange as some people say. In fact, it smells of potent white resins and flowers, with a tropical touch of tiaré. It’s hardly sweet, more floral and resinous. Very much of its time, evoking the vibe of the original Dior Addict and similar scents that are now seen as cloying, with a few hints of the nineties. It’s like adding a heap of white flowers to Yves Rocher’s Accord Chic. Elegant, exuberant and nocturnal. I’d say it’s unisex; a man could certainly wear it. A very good blind buy for the quality and price if you enjoy this style.

    Reply
  3. This smells incredibly strange. I bought it blind because I fancy trying unusual things. I picked it up at a good price at my usual shop and the notes on Fragrantica look promising. The opening is brutal for me: very strong and medicinal. After twenty minutes it softens and the white florals emerge; it dries down beautifully, but I see it more for women over 45. Although perfumes don’t have an age, this is so clogged and balsamic that I think it suits someone older; nothing youthful, it feels complex and intense. I’m not sure if it’s for day or night, or quite what it’s really for.

    Reply