Skip to content

Melinka by 432 Wild Botanic Perfumes

Men Women 2024

Description

Melinka, by 432 Wild Botanic Perfumes, is an olfactory creation from 2024 belonging to the woody-chypre family, designed for men and women. This new fragrance, framed within the 'Los 7 Mestizos' collection, stands out for its natural botanical character and is built around the wood of the Guaitecas cypress, a native tree of Patagonia. The composition, signed by Chilean distiller…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 27%
  • Spring 28%
  • Summer 10%
  • Autumn 35%
  • Day 46%
  • Night 54%

Key notes

Community

31 votes

  • Positive 84%
  • Negative 13%
  • Neutral 3.2%
positive reviews 31 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentAutumn CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

157 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

60 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

28 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Melinka

Main accord amber Year 2024 Gender Men · Women Perfumer Joel L. Martínez

Melinka, by 432 Wild Botanic Perfumes, is an olfactory creation from 2024 belonging to the woody-chypre family, designed for men and women. This new fragrance, framed within the ‘Los 7 Mestizos’ collection, stands out for its natural botanical character and is built around the wood of the Guaitecas cypress, a native tree of Patagonia. The composition, signed by Chilean distiller and perfumer Joel L. Martínez, unfolds a scent pyramid where the top note is frankincense, the heart labdanum, and the base the Guaitecas cypress diluted in extracts of southern mosses.

Woods and mosses Green, herbal and fougère Musk, amber and animalic Resins and balsams

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

23 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

20 votes

Character

Leading answer Leans masculine

22 votes

Value perception

Tied for the lead A little expensive / Fair price

21 votes

Community reviews

5 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. EdwardsScent

    A truly innovative fragrance, distilled from herbs sourced from various locations across southern Chile. It transports you straight into the forests, rain, and wet earth, with pure wood notes. It delivers exactly what it promises—a complete olfactory experience.

    Reply
  2. A beautiful scent. As a resident of Chiloé, I feel it captures the very essence of my dream homeland.

    Reply
  3. ignacio.gaete

    Stunning, photorealistic, and of brutal quality. It smells incredibly natural: moss, incense, and lots of yerba mate. Wonderful; one of the best I’ve ever smelled.

    Reply
  4. Smells of old wood that has accumulated moss and autumn leaves; very evocative. I wish it lasted longer, but it is a wonderful fragrance…

    Reply
  5. You can feel the freezing south wind biting your face as you step into the deep forest. Nature invades you, traps your feet, and the air wraps around you like a second skin. Melinka is super woody—a punch of woods with moss that blends the wild and green with something clean. A touch of incense with mate opens it, then fades. Afterwards, a warm aura emerges in the background, rounding off the forest with an amber heat. The amber softens the fresh greenery, which can sometimes become too clean. It’s a deceptive scent in intensity: at first it seems to fade because you get used to it, but then it reappears softened because it never truly left. A very unique aroma; if you want to smell the southern forest, this will satisfy you.

    Reply