Men
Salvatore Ferragamo Pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Salvatore Ferragamo Pour Homme by Salvatore Ferragamo is a woody musky floral fragrance for men. Launched in 1999, the nose behind this composition is Jean-Pierre Mary. The top notes are fig leaf, grapefruit, caraway, Brazilian rosewood, African geranium, cyclamen and neroli; the heart notes include carnation, cardamom, rose, jasmine and lily root; while the base notes consist of cedar, vetiver, sandalwood, leather, musk and oakmoss.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Fig Leaves
-
Corazón
carnation
-
Base
cedar
Comunidad
1,176 votos
- Positivo 84%
- Negativo 10%
- Neutral 5.1%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Salvatore Ferragamo Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
28 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
No longer available so easily. Another essential for summer evenings.
Exquisite and super Mediterranean, it smells of fig leaf. One of my favourites: it lasts well, leaves a lovely trail, and is no longer easy to find. If you get your hands on it, don’t let go.
Exquisite and super Mediterranean, the fig leaf scent predominates. One of my favourites: good fixative, very good trail, and it is no longer easy to get. If you find it, don’t let go.
Today they gifted me this fragrance, and the truth is, it’s very elegant. It’s the first from this house, and I think I’m too young to wear it, but despite that, it’s very pleasant to my nose and would suit me well. It’s fresh, somewhat subtle, and I agree that it’s suitable for summer nights. In my concept, it’s a good fragrance, but it didn’t impress me. Age range 20 and above.
This must be the most misunderstood in my collection. I love it: the opening is super fresh, sweet, but with character marked by the fig. For me, it’s subtle and refined, with a lot of presence in the first hour, but then it evaporates. The trail is good for the first 30 minutes, then it fades quickly. After an hour and a half, it feels very close to the skin. On my skin, it lasts no more than 4 or 5 hours, being generous. I wouldn’t repeat it for the performance. Misunderstood? If I take an average, out of every 10 people who smell it, 8 or 9 say it stinks, that it’s repulsive… heehee, I don’t understand why it’s not accepted. For me, it’s a delight, and I don’t care what they say; I keep using it. My girlfriend hates it, and yet I use it when she’s around, heehee. The ideal situation is summer afternoons/nights, walking near the waterfront or beach, with a lot of breeze to disperse the aroma… mmm, it’s a delight! 7/10.
This must be the most misunderstood fragrance in my collection. I love it: the opening is super fresh, sweet but with character thanks to the fig. It is subtle and refined, with a strong presence in the first hour, but then it evaporates. The trail is good for the first 30 minutes, then fades quickly. After half an hour, it feels very close to the skin. On my skin, it lasts no more than 4 or 5 hours, being generous. I would not repeat it for the performance. Did I say it was misunderstood? Well, if I take an average, out of every 10 people who smell it, 8 or 9 say it stinks, that it’s repulsive… haha, I don’t understand why they won’t accept it. For me, it is a delight and I don’t mind what they say, I keep using it. (My girlfriend detests it and yet I use it when she is around, haha). The ideal situation is summer evenings/nights, walking near the coast or beach, with a breeze to disperse the scent… mmm, it is a delight! 7/10.
What can I say? They knew how to mix it very well; it’s so harmonious. It ran out on my husband, and I definitely want him to have it again. It’s so elegant and fresh; I love it when he wears it; it certainly captivates me. A perfume says a lot about your person; when my husband wears it, it highlights that he is a productive, sexy, confident, and firm man. It conveys so many things, it’s incredible. It lasts about six hours on him, and it’s generous to apply (it always has been). I don’t know if that’s why it lasts so long or because of its pH. I associate it with meetings, dinners, and special occasions. It’s super versatile, but if I were a man, I’d use it only for special moments. Trail 9/10, longevity 9/10, perfume 10/10.
Do you know when they stopped making it? I want to buy some vintage and ensure with the batch code that they’re not selling me a counterfeit… I miss it so much…
I discovered it in 2006 and have used it non-stop as a reference since then. It’s a pity that its production seemed to be discontinued (incomprehensibly), as it is now becoming difficult to find. Upon spraying, the fig notes dominate (refined, spectacular) over a citrus and spiced background. After drying down and hours later, it adds delicious floral and woody nuances. It evokes spring and summer (although I wear it all year round). Perfect for day and night. Lasts about six hours with a moderate trail for up to two hours. Elegant, urban, sophisticated, balanced and versatile. For me, simply perfect. A true masterpiece, 10/10.
I discovered this fragrance in 2006 and used it uninterruptedly as a reference since then. Unfortunately, it seems production has been discontinued (incomprehensibly), so it’s getting harder to find. Upon release, the fig notes dominate (refined, spectacular) over a citrus and spicy base. After the dry-down, it adds delicious floral and woody nuances. It evokes spring and summer (although I wear it all year round). Perfect for day and night. Lasts about six hours, and the trail is moderate for up to two hours. Elegant, urban, sophisticated, balanced, and versatile. For me, simply perfect. A true masterpiece, 10/10.
I see that in this fragrance there’s a day I love and another I hate. The fig leaves dominate, just like the cedar. The magic lies in the dry-down: it’s very different from the original Diptyque or the Marc Jacobs. It has a complex blend that makes it creamy at the end. It’s ideal for sophisticated nights and cold climates. Sexy, romantic, and seductive after the dry-down on a cold or windy autumn night.
Salvatore Ferragamo pH is one of the most forgotten fragrances in the community. It’s almost identical to the Marc Jacobs from 2002 but with more body, considering it came out in 1999, although Phylosykos by Diptyque was first. It’s a curious mix of wood, coconut, and fig. I bought it blind because of its resemblance to the MJ I’ve always wanted, but it’s more expensive and harder to find. Longevity and trail are moderate (maybe 7 hours with 7 sprays) and the price is good. Why spend a fortune on Diptyque if I don’t know if it lasts the same or worse for nearly four times the cost? Niche lovers love to charge high prices. Ingredient quality counts, but so does the price-to-longevity ratio. I’ve seen reviewers saying longevity doesn’t matter, of course, when they’re paid, they’ll hardly mention the downsides. The only thing that didn’t convince me is the atomiser, which is quite stingy.
Salvatore Ferragamo PH is one of the most forgotten fragrances in the community. It is almost identical to the Marc Jacobs 2002 but with more body, considering it came out in 1999, although Phylosykos by Diptyque was first. It is a curious mix of wood, coconut and fig. I bought it blindly, guided by its resemblance to the MJ for Men that I always wanted, but it is more expensive and harder to find. Duration and trail are moderate/soft (if at all 7 hours with 7 sprays) and very good value. Why spend fortunes on Diptyque Phylosykos when you wouldn’t be surprised if it had similar or worse longevity for a price almost four times higher, as niche lovers love when you have the option of buying this Ferragamo instead? To avoid snobbery, ingredient quality also counts for a lot in the price-to-duration ratio. I have seen reviewers say that duration is not important, yes of course. When they are paid, they will hardly mention the downsides of a specific fragrance. The only thing that hasn’t convinced me is its atomiser, whose distribution is quite just.
By the late 90s, Ferragamo was already making waves. In 1999, Pour Homme arrived with its signature pH scent. This fragrance showcases the trends of its era. Its forgotten success proves that the perfume world leaves beautiful proposals in the shadows… although I am glad to escape from trends that repeat themselves at every corner. Ferragamo Pour Homme contributed so much that it prompted Nina Ricci to launch Memoir d’Homme (2002) and Givenchy its forgotten Givenchy Pour Homme the same year. All similar and with the same approach. Unlike the others, Ferragamo pH takes the palm for its balance. It escapes the nervous licorice note of Memoir and is less adult than Givenchy. It bears great resemblance, but in pH, the fig note mixed with sweet rose and sandalwood gives it a unique, masculine charm, where the medium-grade leather shines with woody touches. Forgotten? Yes. Out of date? Not at all. Beauty is timeless. Although it is not a must for everyone, it is obligatory to know it before its disappearance. Welcome to the collection.
Towards the end of the 90s, Ferragamo was already making waves in fashion; in 1999, Pour Homme arrived with the prized pH tag. Aromatic archaeology shows us the trends of its time. This forgotten success reminds us that the world of fragrances leaves beautiful proposals in obscurity… although I appreciate exiling myself from trends where you smell the same thing for the fifth time in every corner. Ferragamo pH contributed so much that Nina Ricci launched Memoir d’Homme in 2002 and Givenchy its famous Pour Homme the same year. All similar, but Ferragamo pH takes the crown for its balance. It escapes the nervous licorice of Memoir and is less adult than Givenchy. It bears great resemblance, but here the pink fig and sweet sandalwood note give it a unique, masculine charm, with a medium leather that shines with woody touches. Forgotten? Yes. Out of date? No. Beauty is timeless. It’s not a must for everyone, but it’s essential to know it before its disappearance. Welcome to the collection.
Excellent review, the one preceding mine. My first love at first sniff was back in 2002-2003, when I was 21-22. It was almost my signature scent alongside the classic Givenchy Pi, after buying the iconic D&G in 2001. They were my first three purchases with my salary, heehee. It was unique; nearly 20 years later, two came out (Ferrari Noble Fig and Zegna Milan) with a certain similarity but not the same, thanks to that fig leaf note I didn’t know until I immersed myself in this during the pandemic. Basically, it smells of cedar with a lemony twist (though I see it doesn’t carry lemon, but grapefruit instead). I’m sure cardamomo adds depth and sandalwood provides creaminess.
One of Ferragamo’s lesser-known gems, where fig takes the lead. If you compare it to Dune, it’s an extreme, intrusive, and potent version, yet it works despite its strangeness. It has a subtle balsamic touch drowned in green. If you get the chance, try it: that fig note is fresh, green, and distinct. It’s an elegant all-rounder in a special bottle, with quality you won’t find in every pub. Acidic, fruity, and spicy notes make it unique. Leather and fig form a duo that elevate each other. Over time, moss and vetiver gain ground, but the fig remains juicy and concentrated. I probably won’t find it again soon, so I’m glad I added it to my collection.
It is a charming aroma with outstanding performance. I am not referring to testing it on paper in a perfumery or using it years ago… I own it, use it, and acquired it recently. It is a 2022 batch, and I can speak with knowledge: it is a marvel, both in fragrance and performance. Those who preceded me made a fabulous description; I only wish to add that for me, it is among my favourites. I reaffirm that it is a recent batch with outstanding performance. I applied it today at 07:30 am, and it is now 06:50 pm, yet it is still very present, projecting and without fading to skin scent. A wonderful creation; I recommend it with eyes closed for those who enjoy perfumery beyond the commercial. Thanks to those who shared their experience, they sparked my interest in this marvel.
When you first smell it, you cannot help but wonder how it is possible that it has been on the market for over 25 years without having the same sillage as many abominations still sold like hot cakes at bargain prices. A DELIGHT.
When you first smell it, you wonder how it has been on the market for over 25 years without having the pull of many abominations that are still sold like hotcakes at bargain prices. A DELIGHT.
Salvatore Ferragamo pour Homme. It smells literally of fig leaves or branches with its milky liquid and the sweetness of so many flowers. Then come its woody notes, but what a crazy fragrance; it feels like niche quality due to how natural it is. Watch out, it is from 1999! It opens very fresh; it is a god on earth for anyone who wears perfume. Its notes are: top of fig leaves, grapefruit, rosewood, caraway, geranium, cyclamen and neroli; heart of carnation, cardamom, rose, jasmine and lily root; base of cedar, vetiver, sandalwood, leather, musk and oakmoss. It has become my favourite perfume, and I hope it remains unnoticed as it has until now 🛸.
In my search for fig/fig tree fragrances, I came across this one. When it arrived, I was with my dad, and his first impression was: ‘smells like a garden’. Naturally, there is a fig tree in his house, so the association was obvious, as the fig scent is quite prominent. However, a garden would not seem complete without the flowers accompanying this main note, adding innocence and a more unisex touch. In the background, the sandalwood takes centre stage and can sometimes become heavy. I do not think it is appropriate for hot weather; it is better suited to intermediate climates. The longevity and projection are decent; it is not a beast. After five hours, it feels lighter, although occasionally there are bursts of floral and woody notes on the clothes. I believe its low popularity stems from evoking something very specific that not everyone would wish to project. As a masculine perfume that recalls a garden, it distances itself from other more synthetic options that do not recall things so clearly. Personally, I expected to use it more, but sometimes the sweet-bitter blend saturates me. Other times, I lean towards synthetic proposals because I do not feel like smelling like a garden. Nevertheless, it feels like a necessary perfume, even if just to smell it occasionally or before bed, as it brings me peace.
A magnificent perfume. I tried it and was surprised that its lovely scent lasted all day and even into the next day right up to the skin. Without a doubt, it is worth adding to the collection.
Excellent perfume. I wore it in the late afternoon and evening of summer, lasting about three hours close to the skin on clothes and six hours on reading. The ultimate test was at the gym; I don’t know if the sweat reacted with it. To me, it’s very citrusy and bitter at first, but as it dries down, the woody notes emerge. I got it for $25, so I think it’s worth trying for the price. I consider it suitable for people over 30 years old.
It arrived today and honestly, it smells very similar to the opening of Amouage Interlude. 🫰🫰
A flamboyant, fresh, elegant and friendly fragrance for everyone. My brother gave it to me, who isn’t usually a fan of woody scents, but it certainly cheered me up. I think anyone would like it: very citrusy, fresh and suitable for daily wear and any occasion. It works perfectly in temperate to warm weather. I wouldn’t wear it out at night, but it’s ideal for a casual daytime outing, the office, and so on.
Fresh geraniums as if just taken out of an old cigar box. The scent is linear, strong yet clean, constant and refined. The wood is very present with freshly cut grass. It’s not for the office, but rather for a mid-afternoon ceremony, not for evening wear. I detect few notes because they are in perfect balance; the cardamomo projects while the cedar is barely perceptible. It’s for an audience over 40 years old. Projection lasts three to four hours and longevity six, with the wood still lingering.
I’ve been wearing this for eight months in all kinds of weather and occasions, and it never fails. It reminds me of fig trees but makes them creamy with sandalwood and musk, both robust and soft at the same time. It’s very wearable, barely noticeable in a crowd, and smells unique. It lasts eight hours with a metre-long trail. I love that it breaks away from current trends; it could easily be a niche fragrance.