Skip to content

Sander for Men by Jil Sander

Men 2000

Description

Jil Sander Sander for Men is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 2000, this composition was created by perfumer Jacques Cavallier Belletrud. The olfactory pyramid unfolds with top notes of ivy, mint, and cinnamon; a heart of pepper, cloves, cardamom, coriander, and nutmeg; and a base evoking cypress, cedar, sandalwood, labdanum, and tobacco.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 10%
  • Spring 36%
  • Summer 31%
  • Autumn 22%
  • Day 75%
  • Night 25%

Key notes

Community

1,143 votes

  • Positive 89%
  • Negative 7.0%
  • Neutral 3.8%
positive reviews 1.1 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

2,590 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

1,152 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

606 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Sander for Men

Main accord fresh-spicy Year 2000 Gender Men Perfumer Jacques Cavallier Belletrud

Jil Sander Sander for Men is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 2000, this composition was created by perfumer Jacques Cavallier Belletrud. The olfactory pyramid unfolds with top notes of ivy, mint, and cinnamon; a heart of pepper, cloves, cardamom, coriander, and nutmeg; and a base evoking cypress, cedar, sandalwood, labdanum, and tobacco.

Green, herbal and fougère Spices Woods and mosses Resins and balsams

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

491 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

560 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

183 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

157 votes

Community reviews

6 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Spraying Sander for Men brings me a melancholy that might just be sadness. I first encountered it during a turbulent period in my life full of hard changes, when I realised I would never be the same. At first, I remained doubtful. A friend gifted me a bottle she loved, and with my mind in a fog during those times, I barely noticed it, not even on a Milanese December morning. I merely sniffed a spritz on my hand to thank the blonde standing before me, unsure at once if I would fall in love with it. One Friday night, after showering, I tried it before heading out partying with friends where I used to lose myself to stop thinking; I recall receiving several compliments on my scent. Since then, Jil has been a constant, discreet companion, probably one of the few fragrances that has always stayed close without causing jealousy dramas, but rather bringing comfort to others. Over time, I immersed myself deeper into the world of Jil, completing the EDT with gel, deodorant and aftershave lotion, a pleasant set to convey relaxation. Freshness and cleanliness were key, with a woody base that added the necessary masculine vibe after a fresh, spicy opening with lots of mint, cinnamon and that note of bitter green ivy. Although the spices provide warmth, the cool tone has always been present, floating with a slight sweetness. Trying the current version, I subjectively feel it has dramatically lost its identity and longevity; the quality is no longer what it was, but perhaps one day someone will restore this fragrance in its original quality and realise how beautiful it was. I’m left with a comment from a friend at a fashion shop: ‘dear, you smell very well today. I need to know what it is.’

    Reply
  2. Young, spicy wood, nothing crazy. Like Burberry Touch without the violets, like Angel Schlesser spicier and green with a hint of 212’s anaemia, a bit like Rochas Aquaman sans bergamot, very similar to Calvin Klein’s Truth, that 1999 office cologne: crystalline, spicy, peppery and woody. Sander for Men is a super watery formula; if you catch it right, it smells of banana leaf (perhaps ivy), a mint/pepper blend à la Cristal, followed by a green-spongy note with ivy and a transparent sweetness from cardamom, cedar and cypress. In its day, it would have been modern, cosmopolitan and minimalist. Today, any young lad will find it old-fashioned. For me, raised on advertising for poreless, odour-free men after ten hours in the office, it smells like generic men’s hygiene lotions from twenty years ago. I wouldn’t recommend it unless you’re a fan of that 1999 watery minimalist vibe. If it turns you on, it’s a perfect blind buy. PS: Longevity and sillage are abysmal.

    Reply
  3. Young, spicy wood, nothing crazy about it. It’s like Burberry Touch without the violets, like Angel Schlesser pour homme but spicier, like a green, anaemic second cousin of 212, like Rochas Aquaman without the grapefruit, very similar to the Truth Calvin Klein vibe: the quintessential 1999 office cologne: crisp, spicy, peppery and woody. Sander for Men is a super watery formula; if you’re lucky, at first you’ll smell something like a banana leaf (I suppose it’s the ivy combined with something), a mint/pepper blend à la Cristasol, and in the mid-phase a green, spongy touch, with more prominent ivy and transparent accords of a nice sweetness that I imagine comes from cardamom, cedar and cypress. At the time it was a modern, cosmopolitan and minimalist fragrance. Today any young lad will find it old hat, as the lads say. For me, who grew up bombarded by advertising for these waters touted by heartthrobs with not a single pore in sight and who, after ten hours in the office, have not a single smudge of armpit sweat, it’s something I could use perfectly when I don’t want to complicate my life, because it smells generic, like the mass-market men’s hygiene lotions from twenty years ago. I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone unless you’re a follower of this 1999 watery minimalist trend. If that style turns you on, it’s a perfect blind buy. PS: Longevity and sillage are abysmal.

    Reply
  4. william aguirre

    I bought it on the strength of good reviews on the English Fragrantica site and it wasn’t what I expected. It’s not bad, but it reminded me of Burberry Touch, with that nappy or wet wipe smell I don’t like. It has a touch of cedar and perhaps ivy, but the spices, mint, tobacco and cypress left me wanting. If you like fragrances that aren’t fresh, oriental, citrus, fougère or aromatic, but have a subtle woody base, go ahead. Scent 6, Longevity 7, Projection 6, Price 10.

    Reply
  5. william aguirre

    I bought it because of its good reviews on the English Fragrantica site and I must say it wasn’t what I expected. To be honest, the fragrance isn’t bad; it’s simply that it reminded me of Burberry Touch, with its baby nappy or wet wipe scent, which isn’t to my taste. It has a small touch of cedar wood and perhaps a bit of the ivy it claims to have, but the spices, mint, tobacco and cypress left me wanting. If you like that type of fragrance that isn’t fresh, oriental, citrusy, fougère or aromatic… ‘nothing’. But rather has a subtle wood base; then go ahead. Scent 6, Longevity 7, Projection 6, Price 10.

    Reply
  6. DavidLalique

    Very fresh and rich, perfect for an afternoon coffee or tea break. Not for evening wear.

    Reply