Heritage Oud by Beverly Hills Polo Club

At first, it gave me a bit of a scare, but then I saw it has character. I always look for longevity and trail, and for this price, it’s a gem. It’s not for everyone as it’s strong on oud, but it pleasantly surprised me. The brand offers real quality compared to its cost.

If you’re looking for synthetic leather and oud (even if they don’t say so) for 15-25€, this sells without a prescription and I quite like it. Tuscan Leather is far behind; here there is something leathery, spiced, and smoky with a surprising development for the price. It opens citrusy-spicy and then leaves a sweet, smoky, almost petroly oud. It’s super synthetic but warm and pleasant, much better than Penthouse Windsor Rue Broca. It gives comfort, ideal for the cold. Try it before buying.

I liked it. Perhaps I’ll be criticised, but this Heritage Oud doesn’t smell much like Tuscan Leather to me. To me, the original smells of leather with clear raspberry, whereas this Beverly Hills Polo Club doesn’t seem like leather, although the cade petroleum note is very well worked and confusingly blends in. The opening is pleasant with cardamom and citrus. The development has thyme and synthetic smoky wood, kind and understandable. The base softens the tar with vetiver. It’s not groundbreaking, but it’s modern, sensual, and elegant. Projection and longevity are good. Modest but well-made, very good value for money.

I still have it in my stash. It reminds me a lot of Tuscan Leather and La Yuqawam in the leather phase, but it’s more modern and wearable. I don’t detect fruit or raspberry, nor isolated notes; the air of resemblance to Tom Ford or Rasasi comes from the cade petroleum. The results fit better with today’s young perfumery, without such a classic base. If you find it, it’s a good buy and works as a gift. The price was a laugh.

I tried it out of curiosity after hearing it was similar to Tuscan Leather. A blunder! It gave me a headache and the urge to take it off my wrist. The scent itself might be a half-decent likeness to the dry-down phase of the original (which is the one I like least), but it’s like comparing a draftsman to a classical painter. In perfumes, that’s the difference between a headache and enjoyment. Tuscan Leather isn’t the 8th wonder (it’s overpriced), but it’s pleasant and well-made; this Heritage Oud has nothing but the price. At 20€ there are superior fragrances. Goodbye.

Great perfume for performance and price. It doesn’t have the quality of the niche scents it reminds one of, but for those who want to try leather and oud (undeclared notes) with smoky wood and amber, it can satisfy many beginners and veterans who aren’t too demanding. The projection for the first two hours is spectacular, then it fades into a monotonous but pleasant trail. Ideal for autumn-winter and evenings-nights, without clashing, for guys who have passed thirty. Cheers.

I’ve had it for a few months and I love it, especially for the scent and price. What can you ask of a 15€ fragrance that lasts 5/6 hours on skin? I’ve read comparisons with TF, forgetting they cost 50ml at 200€!!! Comparing this to a Ferrari is exaggerated. Many 60€ brands would envy this longevity. It’s good for getting into leather, with no further pretensions. Recommended purchase rather than imitations like Divain or Refan.

We must acknowledge that Tuscan Leather created a trend in leather. In this Heritage oud, we have isobutyl quinoline as the axis again, but at contained intensity and sweetened. It creates a small personal bubble, with acceptable longevity of 7-8 hours. It’s completely linear. I loved the care of the box and bottle. At 14.95€ it’s highly recommended if you like these scents.