Men
Prada La Femme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Prada La Femme by Prada is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2016, this composition was created by perfumer Daniela Andrier. At the top, the fragrance unfolds magnolia, bergamot and carrot seeds; in the heart, frangipani, neroli, ylang-ylang, iris and spices; and on the base, beeswax, vanilla and vetiver.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
magnolia
-
Corazón
Frangipani (Plumeria)
-
Base
beeswax
Comunidad
3,188 votos
- Positivo 76%
- Negativo 14%
- Neutral 11%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Prada La Femme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
This fragrance is pleasant, completely floral and moderately light. It reminds me a lot of Idylle by Guerlain and Jeu d’amour by Kenzo; I think a little more towards the latter. However, I consider that the price is a major issue when compared to the previous ones.
Viewed from a masculine perspective, this is a strong fragrance in terms of sillage and longevity, arriving from a classic olfactive point but adapting to the times. It is true that it can be elegant from the original concept of classicism, but ultimately it proves very sophisticated and striking, giving off the air of a true vampire. It makes itself felt, and discretion would not be its characteristic.
This perfume left me cold: a scent that neither grabs your attention nor disgusts you. Simply another perfume. I don’t see much personality in it and can’t quite grasp what it’s trying to convey. In short, it smells like a generic ‘women’s fragrance’ without any fuss. It feels slightly out of tune within the Prada range.
Too strange for everyday wear, yet too innocuous to stand out opulently. Ultimately, it ends up in no man’s land. I’d say La Femme Prada is a fragrance that doesn’t even know what it wants to tell us. It’s a strange floral, sometimes bitter and very untamed, with cardboard-like notes. At times, I smell freshly laundered bedlinen mixed with an elaborate fabric softener. Beneath all this lies a very soft, untamed floral. If Duchamp had created a perfume, it would probably be something like this. An innocuous, lazy affair. The worst part is that its intention remains unclear, given that from the bottle to the name, everything seems designed to convey something interesting. La Femme… heavens above. It looks like a Hugo Boss fragrance, though coming from Prada, which hasn’t been what it used to be in fashion for years, no one is surprised. The sillage is almost non-existent and the longevity is laughable. By the way, I know we shouldn’t judge a fragrance by its target demographic, the eternal debate between niche and designer houses, as both extremes have joys and disappointments. But alas, if Prada ever positioned itself in the Designer-Niche space in perfumery, it was at the start, when its clothing had prestige. Now, everything is on par with its perfumery. Something that lives off better times.
What awaits Prada is the same fate as Jean Paul Gaultier… One from autonomy and the other from BPI were adhered to the Puig contract, prioritising the commercial over quality. The truth is that in that aspect, Prada used to care more about prestige over marketing, which we now see has diminished its concept; it is a real pity and disappointment since its masterpieces Amber Homme and Femme may perhaps be in discontinuation projects to make way for La Femme and LHomme as their symbolic successors. They have not yet reached the national market in Chile, and I am waiting for them to be in the window to give my opinion.
In my opinion, it only smells of very decaffeinated neroli. If we compare it with others where neroli is present, such as the famous Carolina Herrera, for example. Otherwise, the sillage is low, the longevity is extremely scarce as it goes directly from top notes to base notes, there are no phases, no evolution, no development, and no spark; it is boring. There is not even a proper marketing campaign; they base their strategy on the bottle and the brand. The average age, that is, a woman over 35 who has spare cash or collects bottles. I will continue looking for vintage second-hand because if this is high-end, I will go back to Nenuco. Perhaps the niche concept is to offer 90s quality at less democratic prices; I leave that as a reflection.
Prada La Femme has all the signs to become one of the most insignificant, harmless, and forgettable fragrances of the last decade; in fact, it is potentially the worst launch of 2016. Initially, its presentation could suggest a scent far from current classicism (far from Fruitchouly gourmands, Oud oils, or the unbearable ‘Fresh & light’ watery scents), and it is true that its aroma is ‘relatively’ particular, however, it establishes this quality as something untimely. It is neroli with beeswax and spices, but they must be the most unmotivated and contracted tuberose notes ever used, since the floral nuance of the white flower is in its most insipid facet (attempting to find an ozonic and animal profile, a desired mix today). All accompanied by questionable beeswax and spices that smell like the most crude and common moisturising cream one could ask for (Nivea, Avon, any brand), to this is added a cardboard edge that vaguely recalls packaging cardboard and a brief sweet-clean development of frangipani (Again, nothing notable). All other ingredients in their most cacophonous and timid displays. La Femme is a fragrance that surpasses the limits of incoherence with Prada’s postulates; it does not even classify as simply pleasant fragrances, nor is it unpleasant, it is simply: Nothing, an aroma that leaves anyone indifferent, although that only happens until one finds the unforgivable price tag alongside the presumed ‘exclusivity’. It is a dispensable fragrance; it is reason to seek others that explore neroli better, such as Fragile by Carolina Herrera, Cabotine by Gres, Michael Kors, Truth or Dare by Madonna, or Radiance by Britney Spears; all are (or were) better made, with better handling of raw materials, trail, and longevity (as mediocre in La Femme as the rest) and are netty more affordable. If you want to try it but it is not in your perfumerie, go to the pharmacy and buy a moisturising cream; I guarantee it smells identical. For all this, Prada La Femme is a lamentable waste of energy, raw materials, and money.
I don’t understand why it’s so casually said nowadays that a perfume has no ‘personality’. Personality is individual, and just because a fragrance is stronger and more extreme doesn’t mean it’s better. It seems brands like Prada or YSL can’t produce perfumes for all women, as WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. Perhaps there are women (among whom I include myself) who get nauseous from a very strong perfume, those you call with ‘personality’, which is why they release these subtler ones. Let me tell you that for me, this perfume is one of the strongest I own, and I like it because it doesn’t make me nauseous and DOESN’T leave me indifferent. It is true that neroli is underexplored and the scents blend, but that doesn’t make this perfume bad and we should seek others with greater intensity. Perhaps these subtle blends are what give elegance to some women. LET’S RESPECT ALL TASTES. A perfume isn’t good just because it’s strong, because consider that for another person it will be the opposite. I give Prada La Femme an 8.5.
Juditcm13, forgive my boldness, but I believe you are mistaken. When most people criticise this Prada La Femme for lacking ‘personality’, they are not comparing it with opulent and extravagant fragrances. The truth is that it is an artificial, cheap imitation, using poor-quality ingredients at a gold price, and it lasts for a mere breath compared to what its luxurious bottle promises. In short, it is a scam. I adore ostentatious and narcotic perfumes, but I also like soft and discreet ones. Simply put, I expect soft perfumes not to deceive me and to be honest about what they are. This Prada La Femme is a hypocritical fragrance because it longs to be something else, yet ultimately it is an intimate, skin-scent fragrance, but it is sold as something else. You yourself, as a client of soft fragrances, should demand more quality and honesty, which this Prada lacks. Best regards.
I do not understand why it is so casually said nowadays that a perfume lacks ‘personality’. Personality is individual, and just because a fragrance is stronger and more extreme does not mean it is better. It seems as though brands like Prada or YSL cannot produce perfumes for all women, because WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT. Perhaps there are women (including myself) who feel nauseous from very strong perfumes, those that you call having ‘personality’, which is why they create these more subtle ones. Let me tell you that for me, this perfume is one of the strongest I own, and I like it because it does not make me feel sick and it DOES leave an impression. It is true that the neroli is underutilised and the scents blend together, but that does not make this perfume bad; we should not seek others with greater intensity. Perhaps these subtle blends are what give elegance to some women. LET US RESPECT ALL TASTES. A perfume is not good simply because it is strong, because consider that for another person it will be the opposite. I give Prada La Femme an 8.5.
I’m surprised by the negative reviews for Prada La Femme. I work in perfumery with luxury brands, and unlike a public opinion study, we know this fragrance has nothing to envy from Chanel, Hermès, or Dior. We have many clients who, after trying it, return satisfied and praising it, with no complaints. Perhaps someone who tries it once cannot judge, but comparing it to Avon or Oriflame is a waste. With respect, I recommend giving it another chance; although it’s not a best-seller, it has pleased those who know fragrances.
A total failure from Prada; I regret adding it to my collection. It feels unfinished and says nothing. I’ve only worn it once since buying it: it lasts nothing and doesn’t turn heads. The notes don’t quite come together; surely this bottle will end up at the bottom of some drawer. I don’t recommend it; a total disappointment.
What terrible and ridiculous comparisons are read below 👇🏻, claiming it smells like Avon cream or a pharmacy 😒. If they wrote sensible reviews, they’d have followers. The fragrance is soft, clean floral, and different from today’s Frachulis. It lasted six hours on my skin, perfect for spring and summer.
They gifted me this for Christmas because I’m a Prada fan, but they missed the mark. The longevity is minimal; my EDTs last longer. The scent is impersonal, a muddle that doesn’t work. If they hadn’t given it to me, I’d be pulling my hair out; I wouldn’t pay even €10. Some speak of ‘impersonality’ as a good thing; I say it’s the result of a poor blend. Verdict: I didn’t like it at all.
At first, it smells like Mugler’s Alien but softer; then it evolves like a younger, fresher version of Lancôme’s Poème, without that dusty touch. It lasts all day on my skin. I saw it was cheap, looked at me, and said: ‘Take me’, and so I did. It’s the cheerful, tender daughter of Poème by L., a more wearable and delicate substitute.
I don’t compare it to anything. Personally, I absolutely love it! I find it soapy, floral and clean. Very pleasant for daytime wear in summer, with medium to high temperatures.
It left me baffled. I expected a creamy, musky nard bomb and absolutely nothing like it. On my skin, the Frangipani and Ylang Ylang really stand out. It’s a sweet floral, perfect for hot summers. I’m fascinated. What surprises me most is that as soon as it dried down, I thought of a perfume from my collection that I couldn’t identify. I searched Fragrantica for frangipani and found it: Elie Saab Resort 2017, the red one. I’m utterly amazed at how similar they are. It’s beautiful, super feminine, summery and sophisticated, with moderate sillage. I don’t know much about the longevity yet, but it seems more than acceptable. I’m delighted!!!
I like it, though I wouldn’t buy it again… my nose got tired of it. It’s elegant and casual at the same time, and the longevity is good. When I bought it it was original, but then I lost interest. The price is high for what it is; I find more interesting and affordable options.
Pure elegance. I find it feminine, clean and soapy, ideal for hot days.
Almost bought it following YouTubers, but thanks to the samples I realised: it smells nice, yes, but for that luxury price tag it makes me blush. The bottle is gorgeous and would look stunning on the dressing table. People compare it to Chanel Beige and it nearly gave me a headache. To each their own, respectable, but for that price it’s not worth it; if you’re looking for something impersonal, there are hundreds of low-cost brands that perform just as well or better, with more sillage and longevity.
After hearing from others, I tried Prada La Femme and it disappointed me. Like with Chanel or Dior, the quality has dropped but the price hasn’t. I tried it in a decant and won’t buy it. It smells clean, fresh, and easy, typical of cleaning products. If it were a gift, I’d use it, but I wouldn’t spend the price when there are better options for less.
I recently acquired a decant. I know the full scent from elsewhere, but I still don’t know where from. Despite that, I like it. It’s warm, tropical, seductive, and a bit gourmand. On my skin: frangipani, ylang-ylang, and beeswax, with vanilla at the end without being sweet. It doesn’t project much; it’s for personal enjoyment in spring-autumn. It reminds me of a field of yellow flowers in Switzerland or Holland. The brand sells it as a relic and it didn’t dazzle me. I wouldn’t buy the bottle. Moderate longevity, scarce trail, nothing novel. A good complement in 10ml.
I had the bad idea of buying this Prada blind based on YouTube reviews. Upon trying it, it smelled just like Baygon, a cheap insecticide. I thought it was a hallucination, but after applying 10 sprays at home, my sister walked in and asked if there were cockroaches. I felt ridiculous, I suppose you can imagine.
Hello! I’m new and I loved it. It’s soft and subtle, for everyday wear but with class. If I want to attract attention, I use Delina Exclusif. This is my daily, perfect for this summer with over 100 degrees.
I tried it today looking for the L’eau version and couldn’t find it. It smells super clean and elegant, spectacular. Is it worth it? For me, no, I think there are delicious and clean options for less.
I see it as elegant. In my hot and humid city, its ideal use is autumn and winter. The blend of wood, vanilla, and flower projects elegance without being intrusive.
I bought it blind. It’s not overpowering; it has moderate trail and presence, but at work it appears in flashes. On my skin, it smells like beeswax—actually, the notes say wax! It’s honeyed and powdery, perfect for working without suffocating or playing golf. I imagine a classy woman, casual, with a good watch or on a cruise.
At first, it overwhelmed me, probably due to the neroli, but after months of resting, I now enjoy it. It’s a soapy floral, elegant and classy for daytime. People have praised the scent. It has moderate longevity and projection.
Ideal for feeling clean, it does its job even if it’s not very potent. The best part is that it mixes brilliantly with other florals, vanillas, or yellow notes. I like it, but it’s not my eternal love; the EDT smells better, more humid, and of superior quality.
It’s a honeyed, soapy, floral perfume to make you feel clean and fresh with a shampoo-like scent. I really feel the yellow flowers, honey, vetiver, and spices. I don’t feel the iris; I feel as if there’s wine (maybe my pH). It’s not what I expected; I was expecting a well-honeyed, sweet, vanilla-type scent like ‘Scandal’, but nothing like that. It’s a very soapy, clean, yellow floral perfume, ideal for those who like clean, soapy florals. I recommend it for spring and summer, for when you want to feel fresh and clean. Scent: 4/10 Longevity: 7/10 Sillage: 8/10 Packaging: 6/10 Versatility: 10/10 Value for Money: 7/10 Would I Buy It? NO.
Clean and classy, it really shines with that frangipani note. Smells like a wealthy woman; perfect for work or formal events. A great flanker in the range, much more feminine than La Femme l’eau.
Floral, spicy, and peppery opening. Then everything becomes solar, sweet, warm, incredibly enveloping. The animal notes and woods make it intense and ideal for autumn/winter, adding a lot of warmth close to the skin. The iris note adds that sense of cleanliness we all love, but the fragrance’s development has better plans than just ‘making you feel clean’, as Davidoff with its Cool Water and so many others do. The complexity of the heart notes, intertwining the floral and spices to culminate in vanilla, vetiver, and beeswax, demonstrates the balance an excellent design is capable of. Side note: the quality of the raw materials is notably superior, including the bottle and box which are made of excellent materials.
Ylang-ylang, frangipani, iris, and vanilla. This perfume is ideal for dinner with in-laws or for the office. It’s not offensive or overwhelming. You know you smell good. You are a walking bouquet of flowers. It could be a signature perfume. If you like florals, this perfume is for you. If you work alongside people who don’t like strong perfume scents, then this is for you. It’s super feminine, mature (doesn’t smell old), and elegant. It’s a clean but elegant scent. Perfect for spring. Extremely versatile.
I’ve just acquired my Prada La Femme; I’d been looking for it for a long time. Finally, I found it at a relatively ‘good price’. I read some reviews on Fragrantica and I have to confess I’m a bit confused: to start with, I don’t understand the hate it generates in some people, and the need to label a perfume so negatively and disrespectfully if it’s not for you; it doesn’t mean it’s a bad perfume, and that’s the truth many people don’t comprehend, simply let it go. For example, the famous Baccarat Rouge simply didn’t work for me; we didn’t click, it doesn’t seem at all pleasant to me, and on the contrary, it repels me, and it’s a perfume that conquers the masses and is very popular; is it a bad perfume because I don’t like it? NO, does it smell bad because I think it smells bad or I didn’t like it? NO, the world of perfumery is subjective. We must remember that to each their own tastes, colours, and scents; there are people who prefer or need soft, discreet, or subtle aromas for various reasons; I don’t know why they think a powerful perfume is synonymous with a good one. Personally, when I sprayed it for the first time, I loved it. I sprayed it and yes, I noticed it’s a soft perfume, nothing powerful that hits you in the face with its strength; it’s floral, soapy, and clean, super feminine and somewhat elegant; that’s what I felt. It lasted about its five hours, with a soft sillage with waves of aroma during that time, and it still feels on my clothes. Five hours seems decent to me for many aromas I know, which even disappear in an hour… what would be desirable for it to last longer? Of course, yes, because it smells great; remember that longevity also depends on many things besides the perfume itself.
Ugh, how different our scents can be. I only smell this perfume for half an hour or a maximum of an hour, then it disappears or my nose gets used to it. I hope others can smell it because I cannot, not even with six sprays. It’s super soft; I’d say it’s for people who don’t like wearing perfume. The scent isn’t bad; it doesn’t smell like expensive cream or fresh out of the shower, but it’s very common. I’d say it smells like skin, but not musky like NR Pure Musc, rather a real skin scent. I find it very expensive for what it is. I’ll keep giving it chances and might review it again. It disappointed me. The heart note isn’t bad; it’s soft, a bit powdery, but truly, very, very soft. We’ll keep trying.
I searched for it for a long time because I was very attracted to its composition, but I didn’t want to pay the department store price, so I was ‘hunting’ for a deal and bought it at a good price. It’s a floral aroma of neroli and yellow flowers (ylang-ylang and frangipani) and honey. There is also iris, spices, and vanilla, but that combo is less perceptible. Here, honeyed flowers reign. It doesn’t have great sillage, but it does its job well for everyday wear and meetings where you don’t want to invade or bother others with your perfume. It’s preferably for daytime use and looks better in spring and summer; I don’t see it for night outings or in autumn and winter. I did like it, especially because I bought it (as a partial second-hand item) and because I enjoy floral scents very much. For me, it has been a success.
After a citrus-floral opening led by a typically tropical ylang, the dominant flower settles into a magnolia that is equally waxy and soapy. Its sillage is always soft and disappears completely from my skin after seven hours. As the name suggests, La Femme is a feminine and mature perfume, but very coquettish, clean, and sparkling (despite the waxy accord). I’ve really liked it and, although I don’t see it on me, it seems ideal for informal or semi-formal occasions on mild days. I see it as perfect for the office and as a more than valid (and affordable) alternative to Chanel Beige. Pleasant: 7/10 Interesting: 7/10 Versatile: 7/10 Original: 4/10.
Soapy magnolia with flashes of yellow flowers (frangipani and ylang-ylang) and honey. It’s rich, soapy, clean, and has a sweet touch. Perfect for spring and summer. Longevity: around six hours.
Prada La Femme is a simple, clean, and slightly formal composition, predominantly floral, greener than vanilla and light; it has moderate sillage and medium longevity, lasting between five and six hours. I added it to my collection and it doesn’t disgust me at all, but honestly, it feels like a simple, everyday perfume with regular performance and a high price tag, so it’s worth considering. It is true that it resembles the L’ Eau version, but that one is more sparkling, coquettish, and has similar longevity. It also reminded me of Burberry Weekend, with that wild flower field style rather than an essential oil. Overall, it’s lovely, good taste, feels quality, and the presentation is beautiful; however, the same thing happens to me with other luxury brands: very luxurious, heavily marketed, but nothing extraordinary.
Smells expensive and is absolutely divine, rich. Reminded me of Elie Saab but with a much better performance.