Men
CH (2015)
Acordes principales
Descripción
CH (2015) by Carolina Herrera is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2015, this composition features top notes of grapefruit, bergamot and lemon; heart notes of orange blossom, rose and jasmine; and base notes of leather, patchouli, praline, musk, sandalwood and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
grapefruit
-
Corazón
orange blossom
-
Base
leather
Comunidad
1,117 votos
- Positivo 74%
- Negativo 13%
- Neutral 13%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para CH (2015) y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Weak reformulation, what a pity. I adore the original and it lasts all day, whereas this version barely reaches two hours. It’s too volatile and you can clearly tell the suede is missing. I’ll stick with my classic rather than spending money on this cheap jewel.
A weak reformulation. It is a shame because I love the original CH; it lasts all day on my skin, whereas this fragrance lasts two hours at best. It is too volatile. Furthermore, the absence of suede is very noticeable. I am hoarding my classic perfume to avoid buying this poor fragrance.
The reformulation has ruined the fragrance. I remember when it launched that it smelled strongly, was potent, and lasted quite a while on the skin. It was a powerful aroma of praline, patchouli with a citrus touch. I tried the reformulation today, and the blotter I used to smell it didn’t smell anything at all; it was barely perceptible with no trace of the characteristic and characterful scent of the previous version. A total blunder; I would not buy it.
It is so sad that every time a good, long-lasting perfume is released, it is reformulated and ruined. Houses don’t want it to last so people finish it quickly and buy again; it’s all commerce, brands, and floral and fruity waters. Nothing compares to the perfumes of the 70s and 80s, which were of high quality. Nowadays everything is reformulated and lasts nothing; it disappears with the wind and polluted air.
It has the typical orange blossom scent, but I love it and it is one of my favourite perfumes. It’s a pity it doesn’t last long, although I am fascinated by it and find it elegant.
I struggle to rate this perfume. At first, it jars due to its acidity and lack of originality, seeming lost among irreverent and aggressive new launches. However, as the hours pass and you’ve forgotten it, the scent becomes intriguing: a vibrant blend of citrus, leather, and fresh florals. It’s elegant and daytime-appropriate, perfect for the office or semi-formal events for a classic woman who likes to stand out. It isn’t sensual, but it is original when dry; the leather adds a subtle masculine touch that is disarming yet effective. I believe it is more intelligent than it appears. The longevity is excellent, though I recommend applying it moderately and avoiding it in hot months.
I’ve known it for about two years now and understand it had already been reformulated. I don’t know what the original was like, but I imagine it was excellent, as the one I know I like immensely. It’s not about its longevity or projection, which don’t seem bad to me, but because it’s a well-blended, balanced, and harmonious fragrance. It has become my go-to perfume. Simple yet distinctive. Youthful and fresh. Suitable for a woman in any country or place in the world. With a suit and shirt or dressed simply. A real charm that I don’t plan to let go of.
It has a lot of personality. It’s strong yet gentle on the nose, smelling elegant to me, for evening wear. For seduction.
What a formal perfume! I imagine a clerk wearing it or someone giving a presentation to a large audience. I think it’s ideal for job interviews or where formality and responsibility are required. It has a feminine touch but with a masculine undertone.
What a serious perfume! It makes me look like an office worker or someone giving an important presentation. Ideal for interviews or whenever you need to project formality and responsibility. It has that feminine touch with a very marked masculine base.
To me, it’s a beautiful oriental floral. Since the first version came out, it’s been on my wishlist; I don’t know the previous one, so I can’t compare, but I hope the reformulation and bottle change haven’t altered it much. Initially it’s citrusy, with grapefruit, bergamot, and lemon standing out; at first glance it seems acidic, but it’s more complex as it evolves. It transforms into a sweet scent thanks to the praline with a velvet accent, I imagine due to the leather. It plays extraordinarily well with this accord. Magnificent. I’ve read that many see it as masculine and formal, but for me, it’s quite the opposite: feminine, sensual, and distinguished. It’s perfect for autumn and winter. The longevity is moderate and the projection minimal. To me, it’s undervalued.
To me, it’s a beautiful oriental floral perfume. Since the first version came out, it was on my wishlist; I don’t know the previous one, so I can’t compare, but I hope that with the reformulation and change of packaging, they haven’t modified it notably. Initially it’s citrusy, with grapefruit, bergamot, and lemon standing out; at first impression it seems acidic, but it’s more complex because it evolves: it transforms into a sweet scent, thanks to the praline note with a velvety accent, which I imagine comes from the leather. It plays extraordinarily well with this accord. Magnificent. I’ve read that many find it masculine and formal, but for me, it’s the exact opposite: feminine, sensual, and distinguished. Perfect for autumn and winter. The longevity is moderate and the projection minimal. To me, it’s undervalued.
I’ve always wanted to try it; I bought it a month ago because I read it was for autumn, and it was a total success. It has a great reaction with my skin and, being an EDT, lasts quite a while, around 8 hours. Its trail is moderate, ideal for enclosed spaces like the office, a good option for daily wear. It smells sweet due to the praline, and the leather gives it a warm presence; these are its predominant notes. The opening is fabulous, fresh yet sweet; the citrus notes are noticeable but last an hour. I wear it during the day and will use it in autumn, winter, and perhaps spring on cold days. Scent 9/10, Longevity 8/10, Price 9/10, Projection 7/10.
What a pity the reformulation; not a trace of that great 2007 scent. They took away the suede and everything went to pot. I miss that morning scent; with it, its elegance went too. I won’t buy it again.
I don’t know what the previous version was like, but this isn’t worth a euro of what it costs. It barely lasts 30 minutes even when I apply it excessively. Fatal…
A special fragrance with an interesting evolution: it starts very citrusy and fresh, becomes very woody by the hour, and ends sweet, woody, and anchored to my skin, behaving differently depending on the day. Sometimes I get four or five hours, other times more than seven or nine. It depends on many factors like skin type or weather. It’s super versatile, excellent for any climate except very cold ones, and works both day and night. Because it’s a bit warmer when dried, I don’t recommend it for exercise or very sporty outfits, though everyone should wear what they want. A curious fact: it’s one of the few where my boyfriend can’t help but tell me I smell good. Yes, only if he smells me close on the neck, as it’s not potent nor does it have much projection, but he’s given compliments even after more than seven hours. Of all I own, it’s not the one I’d recommend most for the price. I think a fair price would be a maximum of $40 to $45. For what it costs, there are better options.
It’s a special fragrance with an interesting evolution: it starts citrusy and fresh, becomes very woody by the hour, and finishes sweet, woody, and tenacious on my skin, behaving differently depending on the day. Sometimes it lasts 4-5 hours, other times more than 7 or 9. It depends on many factors (skin, weather, etc.). It’s extremely versatile, excellent for any climate except very cold ones, and suitable for day or night. Ideal for the office or formal dates. Due to its warm dry-down qualities, I wouldn’t recommend it for sport or very casual wear, although everyone uses their perfume as they wish. An interesting fact: it’s one of the few where my boyfriend can’t help but tell me I smell delicious (when he smells my neck, as it’s not potent in projection), and he’s given compliments even after more than 7 hours. In my collection, it’s not the one I’d recommend most due to its price. I think a fair price would be a maximum of $40-45; at its current cost, there are better options.
What a pity they reformulated it; the previous version was unique. I saw they removed and changed some notes; the old one lasted all day. A real shame.
My favourite dry-down is that suede or skin note; it makes it incredible, but the trail is very faint and it only lasts a couple of hours on my skin, so it won’t stay in my collection.
CH is a floral and musky accord derived from woods and leather; its opening is slightly citrusy and its heart is sweet due to rose extract and praline. It was my favourite for 10 years, however, in my opinion, the reformulation (particularly the substitution of suede for leather) gave it a masculine tone with a slightly ‘bitter’ transition on me, so I stopped enjoying it as before, when it was deep but absolutely feminine. Nevertheless, it’s an elegant and formal fragrance suitable for all seasons. Moderate to high sillage, lasting eight hours on skin and days on clothes. Good value for money. Who will like it: Everyone; it’s a totally balanced fragrance.
Possibly the only leather-note fragrance I enjoy. CH is a really lovely scent: citrusy, sweet, with a perfectly blended, inoffensive patchouli mixed with florals and woody notes. It’s one of those perfumes that makes me think of successful, confident women. My sister and mother adore it; it feels very familiar to me. CH opens with a full citrus burst of lemon and bergamot, giving it a sparkling, alert character. Then, through a light floral veil, the star leather note emerges alongside sweet patchouli and cedar, which I simply love. These are not harsh or annoying notes. It’s a rather tranquil fragrance, perfect for the office or daily wear. It doesn’t have a beastly trail, but it’s the kind of perfume where, if you hug someone, you definitely smell it and stay imbued with the essence. Plus, it’s very affordable, which I like. Smelling good without spending much. A great option for gifting or adding to your collection if you’re a fan of this type of fragrance.
Perhaps the only one with the leather note I like. The CH original is lovely: citrusy, sweet, with a perfectly blended innocent patchouli mixed with flowers and woods. This perfume makes me think of successful, confident women. My sister and my mum love it; it smells familiar to me. The CH opens super citrusy with lemon and bergamot, giving a sparkling character. Then, with a floral veil, comes the leather, sweet patchouli, and cedar, which I adore; they’re not loud or annoying notes. It’s a quiet perfume, perfect for the office or daily wear. It doesn’t have a beastly trail, but if you hug someone, you definitely feel it and get soaked in the scent. Plus, it’s very cheap, which I like. Smelling good without spending much is a great option to gift or collect if you’re a fan.
Super elegant; my mother wears it. On me, it’s quite strong, but I love how it smells on others. I hope to enjoy it myself one day. Perfect for cloudy winter days. Very lovely.
EDIT: Indeed, I found the previous silver cap version in a tester from seven years ago. It starts with a watery note, barely hinting at a pineapple fruitiness that gives it its ‘twist’, and as it dries, the sweet woody notes intensify, blending harmoniously with the florals. In the gold cap reformulation, that opening became purely citrus-floral, and as it dries, I feel the floral notes linger longer. I perceive it as more feminine, if that can be said, and less alluring… they removed the fresh watery opening and added more flowers, while retaining the woody base… it lasts much shorter. It was my signature fragrance before the reformulation; it ran out so quickly I threw the bottle away, so I have no memory of what it was… They gifted me this reformulated version. I can say they share the same DNA in terms of scent, but this does not captivate me from start to finish; it lacks something… The trail and longevity are vastly inferior; before, I was showered with compliments from strangers at a distance and friends alike, now only from close range… what a pity, I would not buy it again. In summary, it is floral with a subtle woody touch… I do not see it as unisex; it is very versatile.
This fragrance became so mass-produced that it ultimately annoyed me, even before I had a chance to purchase it. It is a total blend of grapefruit and leather, a perfect mix of citrus and leather that somehow feels feminine, sexy, and well-executed. The problem is that it is so overwhelming, with a penetrating and long-lasting scent—at least in the original formula—that when it was trendy and fifty out of fifty-five women in a room wore it, it became unbearable. A brilliant invention and very popular, but unfortunately, I feel it is not an aroma that will stand the test of time.
Well, I must say its launch did not catch my attention; a ‘slob’ scent made me think twice, but a colleague bought it first and her rejection was without me saying a word. I tried it, let it dry on my skin, and in dry form it was so formal, sexy and different that it changed completely: more wood, slight sweetness and citrus with roses… She offered it on instalments and that is where I met its dry-down. That is why I put it on half an hour before going out, but I would not repeat it.
I truly loved the silver cap of the 2007 version; with the reformulation, that delightful suede was gone. I will not buy it again; it is not worth it.
A classic jewel. An elegant and refined perfume, though not serious, rather jovial, ideal for someone looking for their first fragrance. It never fails. It is a citrus-floral blend with a patchouli that gives it sweetness and woods that provide a fabulous dry-down. It’s a pity I couldn’t smell its predecessor with the silver cap and suede notes, which were changed to leather. It is one of the few I feel is ideal for the shoulder seasons, spring or autumn, especially on fresh days. I would love an EDP version because the EDTs don’t last long on my skin, although this one lasts well for three hours. After that, it is only detectable up close.
My classic and number one always!!! Elegant and current in all seasons.
What a handsome scent! What a shame I forgot how well it suits me! I ordered a spray with it from a perfumer after years of not using it, and it did not disappoint. As others have commented, it is elegant without being boring. Personally, I see myself wearing it to shine at events or in the evening, as that leather and wood note is at full strength. You can also detect the creaminess of the praline. For a reason, it brings back memories of Christmas parties and gives me goosebumps. I want to try CH Privée to decide which one to keep, although this one has a clear advantage. I am a fan of leather in perfumes, and Carolina Herrera uses it with a richness I had never heard of before.
Well, I was going to exchange it in a Facebook perfume group… What happened to me? In 2017, while walking with my husband, I was offered a tester in a perfumery and I said ‘that’s nice’. The next day, my husband brought me a special box and my face said ‘aaahhh, I liked it, but I have other more interesting options’. So I used it to spend it on any occasion. Today I saw someone looking to exchange it, I remembered, I searched for it and sprayed it to recall why I didn’t like it. The opening didn’t seem interesting to me, it seemed unisex, but after a few minutes, as it dried, it became sweet without losing the citrus base. In its dry down it remains sweet, floral, and woody; I must admit it’s exquisite. Super elegant and formal, more suitable for over 35 years old. I think because it was evening and I had an appetite for dinner, my senses opened up and I’m appreciating it for the first time. Clearly I’m not going to exchange it and I’ll keep the last 30/40 ml, as I don’t know if I’ll buy it again; there are many perfumes I like and I want to try others before returning to this one.
A proper perfume bomb. Elegant, serious, yet not invasive at all. For me, it’s the ideal perfume for a bank executive who needs to look presentable and inspire respect. If you’re looking for something sexy, I don’t think this is for you. The citrus notes are beautiful and delicious. I clearly detect the classic Carolina Herrera DNA, the same as in 212 Sexy.
Spiced, cinnamon-like, very original: you won’t smell like everyone else even if they use the same ingredients. It adapts to pH. Sillage is short but lasts days on clothes. Whoever buys it won’t understand it at first, but they will feel the most unique and sensual.
Years ago my sister had the first version of CH, back in the 2000s; I thought it was super elegant and always wanted one for special occasions. Now that I have a collection, it seemed indispensable. I managed to get this 2015 version on offer and it still seems elegant to me, though not as unique as before. It’s quite fresh, with a well-marked citrus opening, but not to wear only in summer, because at the same time it’s sweet to my taste, making it versatile: ideal for the evening, but not overwhelming during the day. The sillage is fantastic, lingering in the air for a long time. It lasts days on clothes and quite a while on skin; I apply it in the morning and get through the day peacefully. I particularly use it in the office on cold days and when I need a mood boost.
I had the 2009 version, the previous one. I liked it, but it was too girly and the scent seemed strong and serious. I’ve been wanting to buy it back for years. I saw they reformulated it in 2015 and thought there wouldn’t be much difference. I received it yesterday and it’s a different perfume. It’s not bad, but I feel it’s softer, less affected, more citrusy, and a bit sweet. The previous one was affected, had leather, good sillage, and longevity; I can’t find any of that here. I feel disappointed: it doesn’t smell bad, but it goes unnoticed; it’s just a woman’s citrus scent.
Very rich and elegant. It lasts 4 hours on skin with a soft sillage. You can detect the musk with praline and a dry down of rose and jasmine. Really good and no longer manufactured. I wouldn’t swap it for any Good Girl which smells the same. CH has personality and that makes it unique. The Good Girl scents don’t last and that takes the fun out of it. This is a jewel; it lasts and is noticeable from miles away. Moreover, it doesn’t have as many imitations as the famous Good Girl.
Very different from the CH 2007 (which I gave 9.5/10). It’s less woody, losing the tropical touch. The rose is different, more powdery, as if they used rosewood instead of sandalwood. And what about the cashmere wood? It no longer envelops me and has lost its elegance. 4.5/10.
I had it years ago and it complimented me greatly, with excellent longevity. Now that I’ve repurchased it, it smells the same, but the opening is strong and the leather is noticeable, although it fades very quickly (or perhaps my skin does). In conclusion, on my skin it becomes soft, pleasant, and feminine, but very close to the skin and faint on clothes.
It’s a classic oriental with good sillage and longevity. It smells of a mature woman; if you’re young, it’s not for you. It’s a nice classic scent, but it makes me feel like an old lady, which is nothing pleasant for my profile.
I’ll be brutally honest: I was looking for something for everyday wear, a floral-citrus-woody scent, elegant and feminine, and I found it. It’s a perfect balance; it neither shouts nor goes unnoticed. It reminds me of L’EAU by Carolina Herrera (now discontinued); I’d say CH is its older, more intense, and characterful cousin. I chose between 20 options thinking of autumn; I wanted a sweet floral-woody scent. The sales assistant showed me everything, but most were strong vanilla or musky rose scents. On smelling, CH stood out. The others, like Ninna Ricci Venus or Fame Parfum, had that vanilla with tropical fruits and sweet woods I wasn’t after. If you buy it, clarify what it is NOT: it’s not gourmand, not vanilla, not tropical, not synthetic, not cloying. It’s not a typical pink musk. It’s citrus at the start, then becomes more complex with a sweet floral-woody dry down. That sweetness isn’t dessert-like; it’s elegant, thanks to the praline and orange blossom. The citrus notes (lime, grapefruit, bergamot) provide freshness and acidity. Then come the woods and flowers (jasmine, rose) for femininity and sophistication. The woods, patchouli, and leather add intensity and sensuality, ideal for cooler weather. The musk cleanses and envelops. The longevity holds up, lasting even after a shower. It’s for day and night, work or gatherings, without veering into extremes. In person, it’s a woman with presence, elegant, mysterious, powerful, and leaves a mark without raising her voice.