Skip to content

Paper by Commodity

Men Women

Brand
Commodity

Description

Paper by Commodity is an oriental woody fragrance designed for men and women. The top notes feature iso e super; the heart reveals cedar; and the base settles on sandalwood.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 26%
  • Spring 25%
  • Summer 16%
  • Autumn 33%
  • Day 73%
  • Night 27%

Key notes

Community

605 votes

  • Positive 45%
  • Negative 24%
  • Neutral 31%
positive reviews 605 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageIntimate Best momentAutumn CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

Top 1 note
Heart 1 note
Base 1 note

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

1,095 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

557 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

246 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Paper

Main accord woody Gender Men · Women

Paper by Commodity is an oriental woody fragrance designed for men and women. The top notes feature iso e super; the heart reveals cedar; and the base settles on sandalwood.

Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

191 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Intimate

208 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

259 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

176 votes

Community reviews

11 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. A fragrance that leaves me completely indifferent. I hadn’t had that feeling for a long time. The “worst” bit is its opening. Overall, very weak and not recommendable at all.

    Reply
  2. Creamy, silky, slightly sweet sandalwood that feels molecular and also as if accompanied by suede or cashmere. A second-skin scent, as intended, totally unisex, to accompany you in any circumstance and occasion. I don’t dislike this perfume at all. My problem is that after a few minutes it blends so much with the skin that I can barely perceive it. If I try hard I can notice it close to the skin for about 4 hours, but I see it as almost impossible for others to perceive it. I wouldn’t buy it because it’s too subtle. However, if that doesn’t bother you and you’re looking for something 100% for personal enjoyment, I don’t think it’s a bad fragrance. Even so, I think there are similar options on the market for a lower price.

    Reply
  3. Elias.santal

    In the opening and the dry down I find it an unpleasant fragrance. It smells like floor cleaning detergent to me. I can’t stand it. Sorry.

    Reply
  4. dario_vetiver

    It’s the first time I’ve tried one of these molecular perfumes and it’s been disconcerting. When I sprayed this on paper, I hated it instantly, but yesterday I tried it on skin and I liked it. I don’t know how to describe it. Synthetic cleanliness? White paper and glue? Is that Iso E Super? I also notice a sweet, woody and creamy touch that I imagine must be the sandalwood. But, well, it’s a smell I struggle to distinguish… the thing is I smell my skin and it doesn’t smell like my skin, it smells like “something” but like “nothing” at the same time. It’s strange. I decided to layer it with another perfume and I felt the scent more distinct and it lasted quite a few more hours, so it does something. The Expressive version is my favourite. The Personal (-) has that purely chemical smell so unpleasant that I’ve smelt in other perfumes, I had to wash my wrists… and the Bold (+) is woodier, it loses its charm. There’s no way this could bother anyone, including people with a sensitive sense of smell and allergy sufferers because this has no sillage at all and is skin. Very inoffensive, light, clean, soft, minimalist and non-existent. I wouldn’t buy it because the price is high for what it is and I imagine there will be perfumes with this molecule that are cheaper and that fulfil their purpose of boosting performance.

    Reply
  5. It’s the first time I’ve tried one of these molecular perfumes and it’s been disconcerting. When I sprayed this on paper, I hated it instantly, but yesterday I tried it on skin and I liked it. I don’t know how to describe it. Synthetic cleanliness? White paper and glue? Is that Iso E Super? I also notice a sweet, woody and creamy touch that I imagine must be sandalwood. But wow, it’s a smell I struggle to distinguish… the thing is I smell my skin and it doesn’t smell like my skin, it smells like “something” but like “nothing” at the same time. It’s strange. I decided to layer it with another perfume and I felt the scent sharper and it lasted quite a few more hours, so it does something. The Expressive version is my favourite. The Personal (-) has that purely chemical smell so unpleasant that I’ve smelt in other perfumes, I had to wash my wrists… and the Bold (+) is woodier, it loses its charm. There’s no way this could bother anyone, including people with a sensitive sense of smell and allergies because this has no sillage at all and is skin. Very inoffensive, light, clean, soft, minimalist and non-existent. I wouldn’t buy it because the price is high for what it is and I imagine there will be perfumes with this molecule that are cheaper and that fulfil their purpose of boosting performance.

    Reply
  6. ChiaraBenjoin

    In the opening and in the dry-down I find it an unpleasant fragrance. It smells like floor-cleaning detergent to me. I can’t bear it. Sorry.

    Reply
  7. A fragrance that leaves me completely indifferent. I hadn’t had that feeling for a long time. The “worst” bit is its opening. Overall, very weak and not recommendable at all.

    Reply
  8. Hoy toca oler bien

    It has left me totally indifferent, something that hasn’t happened for ages. The worst part is the dry-down: very weak and not at all recommended.

    Reply
  9. Creamy, silky sandalwood with a sweet touch that gives a molecular sensation, as if you were wearing suede or cashmere. It smells like a second skin, unisex and suitable for any occasion. It didn’t put me off, but after a few minutes it blends in so much with the skin that it’s barely noticeable. If I try hard, I can smell it up close for about four hours, but I doubt others would pick it up. I wouldn’t buy it because it’s too subtle, although if you’re looking for something just for yourself, it’s not bad. I think there are similar options that are cheaper.

    Reply
  10. Danipramanti

    In the opening and as it dries, it smells like floor detergent, an unpleasant fragrance I just can’t stand.

    Reply
  11. SeekerofHugs

    My first attempt with these molecular perfumes and it has been bewildering. I hated it on paper instantly, but on skin yesterday I liked it. I don’t know how to define it: synthetic cleanliness? White paper and glue? Perhaps it’s Iso E Super. I also notice a sweet, woody, and creamy touch, which I imagine is the sandalwood, but it’s a hard scent to distinguish. It smells like ‘something’ but also like ‘nothing’, which is strange. I layered it with another and the aroma became sharper and lasted longer, so it works. The Expressive version is my favourite; the Personal (-) smells like pure chemicals and I had to wash my wrists, while the Bold (+) is more woody and loses its charm. It’s impossible for it to bother anyone, not even the sensitive or allergic, because it has no sillage and is pure skin. Very harmless, light, clean, soft, minimalist and non-existent. I wouldn’t buy it for the high price for what it is, and there are surely cheaper options with this molecule that fulfil its function.

    Reply