Skip to content

Contradiction by Calvin Klein

Women 1997

Perfumer
Ann Gottlieb

Description

Contradiction by Calvin Klein is a woody floral musky fragrance for women. Launched in 1997, this composition was created by Ann Gottlieb and Daniela Andrier. The top notes unfold with lily, peony, lily of the valley, orchid, gardenia, and rose; the heart reveals eucalyptus, lilac, jasmine, and blackberry; while the base settles on sandalwood, musk, and tonka bean.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 21%
  • Spring 28%
  • Summer 18%
  • Autumn 32%
  • Day 71%
  • Night 29%

Key notes

Community

2,715 votes

  • Positive 73%
  • Negative 22%
  • Neutral 5.2%
positive reviews 2.7 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I owned it

7,040 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

2,039 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,194 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Contradiction

Main accord floral Year 1997 Gender Women Perfumer Ann Gottlieb · Daniela Andrier

Contradiction by Calvin Klein is a woody floral musky fragrance for women. Launched in 1997, this composition was created by Ann Gottlieb and Daniela Andrier. The top notes unfold with lily, peony, lily of the valley, orchid, gardenia, and rose; the heart reveals eucalyptus, lilac, jasmine, and blackberry; while the base settles on sandalwood, musk, and tonka bean.

White flowers Flowers Fruits, vegetables and nuts Woods and mosses Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

787 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

928 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

424 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

367 votes

Community reviews

39 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. I absolutely love it. It’s unique and different, smelling of brand-new pencil. Simply beautiful.

    Reply
  2. MariaConstanza

    They’ve already described it well, but now that I have it back, I want to share the joy of wearing it. What a marvel! Sweet without being cloying, sophisticated without being ostentatious; it’s beautiful. I adore it.

    Reply
  3. Contradiction truly lives up to its name: modern yet classic, fresh yet intense, urban and sophisticated. From the start, it conveys that minimalist 90s Calvin Klein vibe with a feminine floral twist. The opening is sparkling, with green and citrus notes that refresh and prepare for a luminous floral heart. Here, lilac, peony, and orange blossom create an elegant, clean bouquet with a soapy touch of neatness and style. As it dries down, sandalwood, musk, and tonka bean soften the blend, leaving a warm, creamy base that balances the florals. The result projects confidence and delicacy, ideal for a cosmopolitan woman. The trail is moderate, elegant, and non-invasive; the longevity is good for its era (around 6–8 hours). I see it as perfect for the office, meetings, or dates, as it conveys cleanliness, sophistication, and personality without excess. It’s floral, elegant, and urban—a 90s classic that combines freshness and warmth. A gem worth returning to.

    Reply
  4. Jess Jiménez

    With more of an 80s edge than a 90s one, this is how I see Contradiction… Citrusy and fresh, it opens with lime (though it’s not listed, that’s how I perceive it), but it feels more like lime essence and stays there. Occasionally I notice the mentholated touch of eucalyptus or the talcum-like quality of white flowers, but these are fleeting hints; I never really detect the sweetness of the blackberry or tonka bean. At the end, I sense the woody sandalwood, which is quite present. For fresh spring or autumn days, informal commitments, or everyday office wear when you want to feel fresh, it’s a good option. I don’t see it as 100% feminine; rather, it’s unisex, neither cloying nor overwhelming. With an excellent price, it’s super economical, with a decent trail but poor performance, and a clean, minimalist bottle that looks very nice… I find it cheerful and like it, though not to the point of loving it.

    Reply
  5. This was my perfume at 15; my mum let me choose the first one, and I picked the one that “smelled the weirdest,” and now reading reviews, I understand I wasn’t far off the mark—it truly is super unique. I bought it again as an adult, and the packaging has changed slightly, and the scent feels different from what I remember, presumably due to reformulations. On my skin, the fresh aroma is very volatile, and after an hour, it leaves a hint of slightly vintage flowers, like an inexpensive body cream. Still, it was worth it for the olfactory nostalgia.

    Reply
  6. Very good perfume. Ideal for everyday wear, making you feel nicely scented without excess. I love the lily-of-the-valley and fresh floral scent. The eucalyptus is quite noticeable, not in a caramel way but like dried leaves. It has lots of personality without being overpowering. Warm and clean at the same time, elegant yet casual. It seems to smell like oxygen. It has a unisex touch; perhaps I say this because it’s not vanilla-based or overly sweet, nor excessively floral or fruity. It’s hard to categorise, and its longevity and trail are good. I don’t know how it will be after reformulation; the one I bought was years ago on Wallapop, and I don’t know what year it was. I would buy it again if I didn’t have so many perfumes.

    Reply
  7. I bought this perfume blind because of a deal 🤭. I read a bit because I used Calvin fragrances in the 90s with lovely memories of their clean, citrusy, and fresh scents, but upon receiving Contradiction, I was pleasantly surprised. Unlike what I expected, it’s something fresh and clean with a citrus presence, a floral fragrance like a great bouquet of delicate flowers, with subtle hints of sandalwood (which is one of my favourites) that give a talcum softness, nothing heavy or ostentatious. It’s not entirely warm either, as it has fresh notes between blackberry and jasmine, not citrus, so it’s not fresh; I’d say it’s a “warm floral hug.” It lasts many hours on skin and clothes. It’s the type of perfume where people say, “You smell so good.” My bottle is nearly finished, and I’ll buy again because it lasts forever, and I’ll try the Calvin fragrances from that era.

    Reply
  8. Karen Campos

    Contradiction is unique for me; it doesn’t resemble anything I’ve smelled before. I describe it as floral, sweet, and woody. I can’t identify each flower, just the blend, sweetened with tonka bean which, together with the eucalyptus, gives it a spiced touch very different from any other floral. It’s very feminine, light, and perfect for everyday wear. With medium longevity and a moderate to soft trail, as after a few hours I feel it very personally. I see it as super suitable for the office and enclosed spaces. Highly recommended.

    Reply
  9. On my skin, it’s very soft and lasts about 5 hours. It’s versatile and comfortable. At first spray, I feel it like eucalyptus tea with white flowers, but as it dries down, it reminds me a lot of Benetton Hot.

    Reply
  10. It’s not heavy, but it has presence, as its name suggests, it’s contradictory 😅. It’s exquisite; that touch of eucalyptus makes it unique. I think it’s for a casual style, with jeans, a basic t-shirt, and trainers. Or even trousers, loose blouses, and heels. It’s not elegant at all; it’s ideal for daily wear, the office, outings after work, informal meetings, and catching up with friends. In summer, it loses its sparkle and doesn’t have much potential; it suits autumn, winter, and fresh spring days better. It has good longevity and a moderate trail. I think it should be a must-have in any wardrobe, as it’s distinct and very wearable.

    Reply
  11. charlotinable

    I tried it twice and went absolutely crazy; the trail is soft yet stays put without ever fading. The bottle is pure minimalism, and the metallic cap adds an elegant touch to the dressing table. It smells floral with woody and a hint of spicy-soapy notes; what a pity they’ve discontinued it, I’d buy it again without hesitation. Simply elegant.

    Reply
  12. I used it back in 1998 when Escape had just launched and switched to this. I love it and still do, even after all these years. It’s a refined, minimalist fragrance; on my skin, it smells like spiced lily. It has excellent longevity and a moderate trail. It brings back memories, and I would use it again.

    Reply
  13. carolanais

    Autumn has arrived in Argentina, my favourite season for this perfume masterpiece that I adore. I’m already on my fifth or sixth bottle, and it still sounds modern despite being over 25 years old. It’s versatile and youthful. On my skin, the eucalyptus stands out, giving freshness, alongside lilies, lilies-of-the-valley, and lilacs; more than raspberry, I detect blackcurrant. The base of tonka bean, musk, and sandalwood lasts for hours, especially on clothes. It’s a hug for cold days. I love Calvin Klein; I hope for a tribute for the 25th anniversary of Contradiction.

    Reply
  14. Normally, I think perfume bottles are a bit of a nonsense, but I like the minimalism and solidity of this one. It’s one of the quintessential functional perfumes: it stays close to the skin and works all year round. The scent is sparkling and not offensive; it reminds me of Nivea cream but with mint. Once it settles, I notice lilies, peonies, and blackberries over a light base of musk and wood. It’s delicate, pleasant, and versatile.

    Reply
  15. This is one of those perfumes my partner Spartacus would call ‘a pig’ in the best sense: an impossible mix that works. Lily with eucalyptus, raspberry, and sandalwood. It has originality, doesn’t resemble anything else, and although people compare it to Armani Mania, they share that clean, fresh spirit ideal for the office. It’s clean, with a soapy air that I like. It has personality: you either love it or hate it, which is better than vanilla clones. Its performance is excellent, lasting 8 hours without being overpowering. For me, it’s a clean floral, talc-like, and with sandalwood. The lily has greasy nuances; you can smell the muguet and eucalyptus. The rose adds texture. Over time, it becomes more woody and loses its initial sparkle. It smells clean, soapy, and very nineties, that typical amaretto-peach touch of the 90s without actually having peach. Don’t buy blindly; test on skin. They say it’s discontinued but you can find it online. It’s going to disappear, and it will be a shame.

    Reply
  16. What great performance it has; it must be my third bottle since launch. When it runs out, I think it was the last, but time passes and I get it again; I need it. I love those minimalist 90s bottles. On my skin, the opening flowers aren’t so noticeable; I feel more the woods, eucalyptus, and tonka bean; jasmine predominates among so many flowers. It’s not pretentious; it embraces and accompanies you. Everyone likes it; I receive compliments. It’s not a bomb or sexy; it’s unisex and looks beautiful on men. I choose it again because the new ones don’t surprise me. Today, I can’t find any that resembles it.

    Reply
  17. I had it at 20 and bought it again at 42; the fragrance is the same, incredible! It made me fall in love again. I wanted something rich to wear at home during the quarantine, and nothing beats this. Long-lasting; with four sprays, I last all day. It’s talc-like, clean, and not too sweet. It feels feminine and seductive; there’s nothing like it on the market. I recommend it 100%.

    Reply
  18. I had it at 20 and now I buy it at 42; the fragrance is the same, incredible! I fell in love again; I wanted something rich to wear at home during the lockdown. Long-lasting; with four touches it covers the day: talcum-powdery, clean, not sweet. It feels feminine and seductive; there’s nothing like it. I recommend it 100%.

    Reply
  19. María Jacqueline

    It’s wonderful, very well structured. If you apply it moderately but with patience, you leave heart-shaped trails wherever you go. It’s a vintage that’s very current; younger generations don’t know it and, being unisex, everyone likes it. Lily and orchid emerge, an intense floral; then I catch something sweet of blackberry or black raspberry, but the eucalyptus lowers that note and refreshes. Finally, I sense musk, tonka bean and just a touch of sandalwood. A perfume gift. Edit: I used the whole bottle but won’t buy it again because of the longevity; on me and in summer it lasts 2–3 hours. It fell with the reformulation.

    Reply
  20. María Jacqueline

    It’s wonderful and very well structured. If you use it moderately but with impact, you leave hearts wherever you go; it’s a very current vintage that pleases all generations and both sexes. The opening is lily and orchid, an intense floral. Then I notice the blackberry or raspberry, but the eucalyptus comes to the rescue to refresh it. At the end, I feel the musk, tonka bean, and a just-right pinch of sandalwood. It’s a gift, nothing contradictory. Edited: I’ve already used the bottle but won’t buy it again because in summer it lasts only 2 or 3 hours; it fell with the reformulation.

    Reply
  21. FraganteCinthya24

    It’s a perfume worthy of the 90s. I love it; it’s intense, unique, and easily unisex. The opening is a delicate floral breeze that gives way to almost masculine sandalwood, and at the end, you clearly feel the eucalyptus. For me, the fruits aren’t noticeable, but this combination of flowers, wood, and eucalyptus is relaxing, intimate, and personal. The eucalyptus takes away the warmth; it has strong personality but isn’t intrusive. Using it in the afternoon is fine. It has very good longevity and will definitely make you stand out among this sea of perfumes that smell like sweets and pancakes.

    Reply
  22. What a great double surprise I had when buying Contradiction: I remembered the presentation but not the scent, and upon finding it at a good price, I decided to buy it blindly. The surprise was that it has a huge resemblance to the discontinued Very Valentino. They share DNA because they have the same creator, Daniela Roche Andrier; they are different brands but curious, as Contradiction came out a year earlier. The Very Valentino was for the romantic, tender girl, while Contradiction is the same girl but with the audacity of eucalyptus, making her formal yet casual. Undoubtedly, it’s a discovery that makes me happy; it’s worth it for being a non-mass-market scent, with good longevity, and at a very good price.

    Reply
  23. I’m a man, masculine and straight, and I love this perfume. Wearing it is brilliant if you don’t overuse the sprays. It’s different and comfortable, neither too fresh nor very floral. I’ve read it smells of sandalwood, but in my house I have sandalwood candles and it doesn’t resemble them at all. I notice more the flowers and the musk. This is my opinion. Totally unisex. Scent: 9, projection: 7.5, longevity: 7, versatility: 9.

    Reply
  24. I’m a man and I absolutely love this perfume. If you don’t overdo the sprays, it’s brilliant: distinctive, comfortable, neither too fresh nor overly floral. Some detect sandalwood, but I have sandalwood candles at home and they don’t resemble it at all; I notice more the flowers and musk. Totally unisex. Scent: 9, Projection: 7.5, Longevity: 7, Versatility: 9.

    Reply
  25. A delicious fragrance with great personality. Although I perceive it as floral, I consider it unisex due to its potency and presence. It opens with floral notes and sandalwood, both competing until the sandalwood dominates and musk and tonka bean emerge, becoming predominantly masculine. It lasts around 8 hours with a notable trail. It works better on my skin than the men’s version.

    Reply
  26. pathypooh

    I first encountered it 20 years ago and liked it, but didn’t buy it. The bottle is beautiful, minimalist and very much of the 90s. Now that I own it, it’s a scent unlike anything I’ve tried; I couldn’t recall what it smelled like, but it’s fantastic. It has great personality and I adore it, though it is fresh and intense. It’s not something to buy blindly, but I love the difference.

    Reply
  27. silvana esther

    I couldn’t and never will be able to wear this perfume. The moment I smelled it, I didn’t like it. Very intrusive and seems unisex. I tried it, but I really couldn’t stand it on my skin. What a pity.

    Reply
  28. silvana esther

    I couldn’t and never will be able to handle this perfume. As soon as I smelled it, I didn’t like it. Very intrusive, seems unisex. I tried to wear it but really couldn’t stand it on my skin. What a pity.

    Reply
  29. The good thing is that it lasts a long time and has a trail, a worthy child of the 90s, with character and strength. But another blind buy that didn’t work for me. Imagine a play where three characters fight to be the lead and the third is shrill. For me it was Contradiction: wearing it was overwhelming. They say it’s well-blended, but nothing could be further from the truth. I detected lily, eucalyptus and sandalwood, with lots of sandalwood, all trying to stand out. I can understand why someone might like it, but I would never recommend it blindly. Essential to try it first. I see it as an autumn-winter scent.

    Reply
  30. Let’s start with the good: it lasts a long time and has a trail, a worthy child of the 90s, with character and strong. But another blind test that didn’t work for me. Imagine a play with three characters who can’t stand each other and fight to be the protagonists. For me, it was like that; I found it overwhelming to wear. They say it’s well blended, but nothing could be further from the truth. The notes I smelled were lily, eucalyptus and sandalwood, with so much sandalwood, all trying to stand out. I can understand why someone might like it, but I would never recommend it blindly. Essential to try it first. I use it in autumn and winter.

    Reply