Skip to content

Gucci Guilty by Gucci

Women 2010

Brand
Gucci

Description

Gucci Guilty by Gucci is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2010, the nose behind this composition is Aurélien Guichard. The top notes are pink pepper, mandarin and bergamot; the heart notes include lilac, peach, geranium, jasmine and blackcurrant; and the base notes consist of patchouli, amber, white musk and vanilla.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 29%
  • Spring 23%
  • Summer 13%
  • Autumn 36%
  • Day 48%
  • Night 52%

Key notes

Community

9,883 votes

  • Positive 78%
  • Negative 17%
  • Neutral 5.0%
positive reviews 9.9 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentAutumn CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

23,773 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

7,185 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

4,810 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Gucci Guilty

Main accord floral Year 2010 Gender Women Perfumer Aurélien Guichard

Gucci Guilty by Gucci is an oriental floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2010, the nose behind this composition is Aurélien Guichard. The top notes are pink pepper, mandarin and bergamot; the heart notes include lilac, peach, geranium, jasmine and blackcurrant; and the base notes consist of patchouli, amber, white musk and vanilla.

Spices Flowers Fruits, vegetables and nuts White flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

3,034 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

3,282 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

1,528 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

1,271 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Monty Phyton

    I give the men’s version 8.5/10: a blend of nut, wood and musk. It evolves like the women’s version but is softer, more delicate and addictive, without any fruity notes. They share a warm base. If it were a colour, it would be off-white or pale pink with a golden halo. The men’s lasts all day, the women’s just four hours and that’s it. Why rush to fade? It reminds me of Kenzo’s ‘Flower’, Al-Rehab’s ‘Red Rose’ or Nina Ricci’s ‘Mademoiselle’ but without the sweetness. Zero sexy. It is maternal and angelic, starting with citrus and pepper before turning into a freshly laid blanket, nothing like detergent. With no great projection, I use it at home for reading; an ‘autodisfrutable’ aroma for any season. 🕯️ 7.5/10.🔥

    Reply
  2. Lara Valentina

    The opening is excessive. It improves during the dry-down, but the longevity is very poor. Personally, it smells very synthetic and nothing special. Just another commercial fragrance. Suitable for daily wear only.

    Reply
  3. This perfume is a cliché made into a scent. That woman is no longer young, nor innocent, nor immature; she takes risks. She wears heels and a briefcase, possibly in red or leopard print, large glasses, gold jewellery and quality clothing; classic yet sensual. Her second language is luxury and money. Women who know how the world works and how to make the most of it. Nothing youthful about it.

    Reply
  4. Mademoiselle

    Sophisticated. I am updating my 2015 review: at 24, I found it very sober; it had nothing to do with me as I wore Converse and t-shirts and used lighter scents. Today, eight years later, the little bottle returns; I swapped it with my mother for another perfume and the story changes. It now represents me better. It is talcum-like, but it no longer smells of baby powder or like Kenzo’s Flower; instead, it is elegant and sophisticated, for an empowered woman. Pink pepper gives it character, while the vanilla-fruity base adds sweetness so it is not annoying or smells of ‘old lady’. I made the mistake of using it in the heat and it was a disaster, becoming heavy; better on cool days to show its beauty. Longevity is better in this climate. I am delighted today.

    Reply
  5. I bought a travel size, an excellent option to try without committing to 50 or 100ml. The opening is attractive: pepper and bergamot with flowers, a slightly sweet bouquet; I detect geranium, lilac and above all jasmine. After an hour, the dry-down and base take shape: patchouli, musk and vanilla. A touch elegant or sober; I like it for autumn-winter or evenings. Do not use it in summer or above 30°C, I did and it was annihilated. Subtle presence, little trail, sits close to the skin. Medium longevity, 3-5 hours. Perhaps it is not very memorable; I like it but I do not love it. Scent 8/10, Trail 7/10, Longevity 7/10.

    Reply
  6. It is alright but it does not fascinate me. If you love florals, you might like it. The opening is very strong and it is hard to distinguish notes, but after 10 minutes you detect much floral with a fruity touch that adds sweetness; I feel it is a bit flat, without many facets. In the final notes, I only detect the amber, which is the only thing I like 😅. It works better in cool seasons, elegant but not casual. Ideal for the office; an elegant woman without being the centre of attention, more bearable for daily life. It will not disappoint but it will not impress either; if you are looking for something original and imposing, it is not your choice. Very low trail, medium longevity (4 to 6h).

    Reply
  7. If I had to describe it in three words: elegant, neat and exquisite. The notes that stand out most are pink pepper, citrus and patchouli. Excellent projection and longevity; I live in a tropical country and despite the sweat, the scent lasts. It gives me great confidence and makes you look good at any time and place.

    Reply
  8. Seductive and glamorous. I first saw it in a commercial in 2010 with Evan Rachel Wood, whom I admire, and I was hooked by the marketing; I knew I wanted it. Although it was always on my wishlist, I did not dare to buy it; ten years later I decided and I have no regrets. It is a subtle and sophisticated EDT; I think it could be unisex, but also quite sensual. I imagine a contemporary and mysterious woman using it. Lilac is the predominant note, beautifully balanced. It is a spiced oriental floral with fruity touches. Ideal to wear at night, especially for elegant events. However, I would like it to last longer. It maintains poor longevity and a soft trail, considering its price. The presentation is superb, it looks luxurious; it is luxurious.

    Reply
  9. Paulivargs

    I wore it today in winter and as mentioned above, it smells like sweet pastilles. It is soft and pleasant, although the opening is a bit heavy for me and passes through a very vanilla scent, then it becomes soft and pleasant. It is not of great trail nor very impressive, and perhaps its name is ambitious for what it is. For daily winter use. Normally I use Coco Mademoiselle and this ‘talcum’ scent seems less organic to me than Chanel’s; moreover, although it may seem strange, Mademoiselle feels fresher. Anyway, I liked Gucci’s Guilty and I will continue using it to see if I get used to it.

    Reply
  10. I detect a very marked body cream scent. Simple, nothing special. Smells like body cream and nothing more.

    Reply
  11. Unforgettable, I picked it up from the Oriental family on Fragrantica and it was a total hit: it lasts all day, sophisticated, and makes me feel like a boss in my private office. Semi-sweet with a powerful softness.

    Reply
  12. A pleasant surprise: it smells of luxury and exclusivity, matching the packaging perfectly. The only drawback is that it lasts very little; for the price, it’s not worth it, but if you want to treat yourself, it’s worth trying.

    Reply
  13. I wore it today, in October. With knit dresses, it looks perfect. It’s elegant with a defined personality. Ideal for evening, special dates, or parties. Although it has that ‘Chanel touch’.

    Reply
  14. I’d ignored Gucci Guilty for years due to negative reviews, but it has surprised me. The opening didn’t grab me, but when the lilacs with pink pepper arrive, it smells elegant and wearable: great for dates or winter daily wear. Key tip: spray sparingly, as it’s not fresh and if you overdo it, the powdery touch (like musk) becomes annoying. It reminds me of baby powder, but subtler. Curiously, I look vintage, like a 1920s flapper XD. Seriously, the longevity and sillage on me are good; I’m surprised others say it lasts only 3 hours. It’s quality; the lilacs are fine and delicious, but never buy blindly: you must test. It’s wearable only if you dress up, not for tracksuit days.

    Reply
  15. clau cheirosa

    I find it very sexy and unisex; a man can wear it well. It opens with lots of pepper and peach, and in the dry-down, you sense sandalwood. Unfortunately, it lasts a breath, about two hours, so you need to reapply. For the price, there are better options; perhaps Guilty Intense performs more.

    Reply
  16. rafajurado

    Smells very good, fresh, floral, and elegant. But it’s so subtle that you stop smelling it quickly (a pity). Ideal for daily wear and for any woman.

    Reply
  17. VainillaDulce

    I like Guilty, though it doesn’t excite me. Citrus opening that fades quickly, leaving an almost imperceptible base. Then comes the peach like a shooting star, followed by talcum lilacs reminiscent of Flower by Kenzo, which over time become floral, with a touch of patchouli, amber, and shy vanilla. It’s soft, feminine, and subtle; sillage and longevity are moderate to soft. Ideal for those seeking delicate flowers.

    Reply
  18. On my skin it starts very citrusy, changing to lilacs in 10 minutes. The pink pepper is barely noticeable; in the base, there’s peach and jasmine. Half an hour later, subtle vanilla and more intense pink pepper, perhaps because my fixation is good for that note. At the very end, a shy trace of patchouli. It starts promising, but the longevity is lamentable: at most 2 hours. Compared to Angel or Midnight Poison, which last over 12 hours on me, I give it 3/10. Not worth it for the high price.

    Reply
  19. A good scent, semi-sweet and pleasant. But it has a huge flaw: it doesn’t last absolutely anything! It vanishes, disappears, and evaporates instantly. What a pity because the perfume is lovely and expensive. I can’t say more.

    Reply
  20. One of my favourites: elegant, unique and super sexy. It’s the ultimate scent for conquering.

    Reply
  21. Yadorán d'Vinea

    Gucci Guilty is a massive hit that I initially found promising with its lilac and pink pepper notes, which I adore. However, while many critics are harsh, I have to agree with them. It simply doesn’t deliver on its promises. The lilac is beautiful and fresh, but the pink pepper is overwhelmingly dominant, suffocating the rest of the blend, and it lasts an eternity. The fruits are sweet and easy to identify, while the patchouli and amber merely soften the mixture. Ironically, the fragrance seems to blame itself: they use dehydrated lilac, a timid pepper and a minimal sweetness that goes unnoticed. It has that baby powder note everyone mentions, with a restrained pepper and a dry sweetness, creating a dull structure with no impact. The bottle is gold but the concept is modest, almost self-satirical. Unfortunately, it boycotts itself by setting unnecessary limits. It’s a shameless guilt trip without any real intent. The trail is very faint and the longevity is average, almost scarce. There are some good points, but in my opinion, it’s a casual mediocrity with a tiny touch of sophistication.

    Reply
  22. My girlfriend’s perfume… I love her and with this scent I love her even more. I don’t know many women’s perfumes, but Alien by Mugler, Chanel n°5 new, Organza by Givenchy, Amarige by Givenchy, Grand Amour by Annick Goutal and this Gucci are by far the best; I adore smelling them on an attractive woman. I don’t wear it myself so I can’t review it, but I know it well. If I had to rate it: scent 10, longevity 9. That said, the trail is medium-low, which makes it very intimate and close to the skin.

    Reply
  23. sebastianprada

    I adore this perfume; its sweetness and elegance are 100%. I feel super confident wearing it and, despite being an eau de toilette, it lasts quite a while. I can already imagine the parfum version would last forever. Also, I don’t get bored of its scent, something that happens with other perfumes. 100% recommended for any taste and age.

    Reply
  24. I used it in the same year it was released. It’s a peculiar, little-imitated, elegant and striking scent, even a bit unusual. I felt we had a good connection, but honestly, I have a better relationship with its predecessor, Gucci by Gucci. Nevertheless, I recommend it.

    Reply
  25. Mademoiselle

    I also detected a bit of baby powder. The pepper didn’t bother me at all. The peach, tangerine and amber create a subtle, delicate sweetness, feminine and not cloying. On my skin, it felt elegant and sophisticated; I thought it would be more casual, but it turned out not to be. It had nothing to do with me; I felt as if the perfume was dressing me. We just didn’t click. I gave the sample bottle to my mum and on her the smell is wonderful, it comes out beautifully. By this, I don’t mean it’s only for older ladies; perfumes are about personalities, not age. On my skin, the longevity and projection were very scarce, skin-scented and didn’t last more than three hours, even for me it was hard to find. But on my mum it worked very well. It’s all about pH levels.

    Reply
  26. I had high expectations when trying it in the perfumery, but honestly, I was disappointed. At first sniff, I literally felt as if a handful of baby powder had been thrown in my face. It has a good trail but the longevity leaves something to be desired, at least on me. It’s not elegant; it’s much more casual and suitable for mild to cold seasons. I think the fragrance has nothing to do with the image projected in the advertising. It could be a great perfume for someone else, but not for me.

    Reply
  27. mamamundi

    It sounds too masculine to me, despite many seeing it as feminine; perhaps it’s that oriental note that makes it so for me. Nevertheless, it is elegant, warm, with good projection and trail, which is why people remember it.

    Reply