Men
L’Extase Caresse de Roses
Acordes principales
Descripción
L'Extase Caresse de Roses by Nina Ricci is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2016, the nose behind this composition is Francis Kurkdjian. The top notes are pear and bergamot; the heart notes include Turkish rose, Bulgarian rose, peony, lily of the valley, and raspberry; while the base notes consist of white musk, violet, and patchouli.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Pear
-
Corazón
Turkish rose
-
Base
white musk
Comunidad
822 votos
- Positivo 75%
- Negativo 18%
- Neutral 7.2%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para L’Extase Caresse de Roses y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
21 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I’m eagerly waiting for it here in Buenos Aires. I’m looking for a rose perfume, and although L’Extase doesn’t appeal to me, the description of this one seems different. I want to try it; surely it will be delicate with excellent longevity. I imagine it as a winter scent for women aged 35 and above.
I tried it yesterday; it smells like grandmothers’ talcum powder, lovely… but it didn’t win me over.
I absolutely love it. I’ve never smelled the original L’Extase. I perceive sweet roses (not so much caramelised) and at one moment thought it was Tresor In Love mixed with citrus. The bottle conveys something dark and sensual, like an exotic dancer, but the scent is delicate, fresh, sweet, and prim, like a classical ballet dancer tending to every movement. On my skin, it smells sweet and fresh, the rose stands out, and it lasts a long time (at 10 hours, people told me it smelled great). I would buy it again.
The L’Extase line promises to envelop you in an aromatic and erotic veil, inspired by minaudière bags and the scent of skin. Caresse de Roses is the first flanker, inspired by Guillaume Henry’s Calisto bracelet. After my previous dismissive review, revisiting the 2016 collection, I believe it is one of the best fragrances of the year (though 2016 was a cold year for launches). Nina Ricci used to be ruthless with florals, and while Caresse lacks that old audacity, it demonstrates coherence and bravery. As its name suggests (‘Caress of Roses’), it combines Bulgarian and Turkish roses with sweet and fresh nuances, nothing like sparkly sugar, but smoothed with a diffuse caramel. It blends with aquatic peony and notable white musks, which is satisfying as they are now used in ghostly quantities. Sometimes a violet powder or the acidity of raspberry/bergamot emerges, but I don’t detect pear or patchouli (yes in the original). Although the premise is bare skin, it doesn’t smell that way (unless you smell caramelised roses). It’s invigorating but less sensual than the original, more prudish and twee; however, in intimacy, it has more secrets. The original had a powerful trail; this is modest but more versatile and forgiving of over-application. It’s a ‘pretty’, frivolous fragrance, but in retrospect, one of the best of 2016.
The L’Extase line seeks to envelop you in an aromatic and erotic veil, inspired by minaudière bags and the scent of skin. Caresse de Roses is the first flanker, inspired by Guillaume Henry’s Calisto bracelet. After my previous dismissive review, revisiting the 2016 collection, I believe it is one of the best fragrances of the year (though 2016 was a cold year for launches). Nina Ricci used to be ruthless with florals, and while Caresse lacks that old audacity, it demonstrates coherence and bravery. As its name suggests (‘Caress of Roses’), it combines Bulgarian and Turkish roses with sweet and fresh nuances, nothing like sparkly sugar, but smoothed with a diffuse caramel. It blends with aquatic peony and notable white musks, which is satisfying as they are now used in ghostly quantities. Sometimes a violet powder or the acidity of raspberry/bergamot emerges, but I don’t detect pear or patchouli (yes in the original). Although the premise is bare skin, it doesn’t smell that way (unless you smell caramelised roses). It’s invigorating but less sensual than the original, more prudish and twee; however, in intimacy, it has more secrets. The original had a powerful trail; this is modest but more versatile and forgiving of over-application. It’s a ‘pretty’, frivolous fragrance, but in retrospect, one of the best of 2016.
Mmm, not what I expected. It’s overpowering and even gives me a headache. Reminds me of Lola by Marc Jacobs; it smells like perfume for ladies over 70. Try before you buy blindly, as I did.
I am trying it out as it arrived today. But right from the start, it is nothing like I expected from a rose flanker of L’Extase… The rose accord here is much more in the spirit of Parisienne, a rose that is both young and mature, rather dry, with a bitter note (both characteristic of violet), and, like its source perfume, a certain powdery quality that resembles a little tablet (I’m thinking of the ‘yapa’ here in Argentina) rather than talcum powder.
I like rose scents, but while this is pleasant, it has nothing to make it better or more novel than the original. I am grateful I didn’t buy it blindly, as on my skin it lasts only an hour before leaving behind that clean musk scent, which is unappealing; I wouldn’t buy it even on offer.
I love this perfume. It seems youthful and elegant. It’s soft, projects moderately, although I would like it to project and last much longer. The bottle is beautiful.
I love this perfume. It feels youthful and elegant. It is soft and projects moderately, although I wish it projected and lasted much longer. The bottle is beautiful.
Fresh rose, smells natural, nothing synthetic. For those who like roses, it’s excellent. Delicate, feminine, with a herbal touch. Good longevity, elegant floral. I like it very much; I would use it more in the morning, but if you really like it and it’s a summer night, I think it would work too.
Fresh rose, smells natural with nothing synthetic about it. For those who enjoy roses, this is an excellent perfume – delicate, feminine, with a herbal touch. Good longevity, elegant floral; I like it very much and would wear it more in the morning, though if you love it and it’s a summer evening, I think it would work too.
A more sober and less cloying rose than its sibling Rose Extase. Much more intense yet not overly sweet. It feels powdery from the very start. I recommend it for spring and daytime wear. It is one of my great loves that I will continue to buy, and I hope it remains available despite being discontinued. Thank you, Kurkdjian, for this beautiful L’Extase trilogy of Rose Extase and Caresse de Roses.
On my skin, it comes out aquatic and juicy, I suppose that’s the pear. It’s not sweet, but juicy. The rose is immediately noticeable, mature and velvety, a flower I’ve never perceived in other perfumes, I think it’s the peony. As it dries, I feel a talc-y floral but not old-ladyish. With a juicy or aquatic base, the interplay of rose, violet, and patchouli makes it earthy and satin-like, if a fragrance can generate that. It doesn’t impose itself; there are stronger ones, but I think the point of this style is for people to smell your neck very close.
On my skin, it comes out aquatic and juicy, I suppose it’s the pear. I don’t feel a sweet pear, but a juicy one. The rose is noticed immediately, a mature and velvety rose, a flower I had never perceived in other perfumes, I think it’s the peony. In its dry-down, I feel an aldehydic floral, but not old-fashioned. With a touch of juicy or aquatic base, that blend of rose, violet, and patchouli makes it earthy and satin-like, if a fragrance can generate that sensation. It’s not a perfume that imposes itself, there are more potent ones, but I think the point of this style is for people to smell your neck very close.
I bought it because it was on a good price (30ml; I buy quite a lot in that size as I have several and never finish any), and when I’m in a low mood, buying a perfume fills my heart. I read encouraging reviews and this happened: it didn’t disgust me, nor did it drive me mad. I should have guessed it was soft, tender, and clean, whereas I prefer power scents, but it’s always good to have some different, wearable ones for hot weather. It’s autumn now, and as soon as I smelled it, it sounded familiar; yes, I have a very similar one in my collection, Gucci Bamboo, it’s its little sister. I liked it, but as I said, it didn’t impress me and it’s nothing special.
It’s a lovely fragrance, romantic and dreamy. It doesn’t overwhelm me, but it’s pleasant enough to enjoy. The notes are well-placed. It projects well for 2 hours, then it feels very close to the skin. However, it’s worth highlighting that it’s a good perfume; the quality is felt in the balance and its luminous sparkles. Would I buy it again? Yes, without a second thought.
It’s a lovely, romantic, and dreamy fragrance. It doesn’t drive me mad, but it’s pleasant enough to enjoy. The notes are well-placed. It projects well for about two hours before settling close to the skin. However, it is a good perfume; you can feel the quality in the balance and those luminous sparkles. Would I buy it again? Yes, without a second thought.
To be honest, I’m not losing faith, but every time I try it, it disappoints me more. I searched high and low for recommendations, only to find a disaster upon purchase. It smells of acidic, shrill rose, nothing soft. It is very old-fashioned, as I knew, but since I liked roses, I now have a fear of them. I’ve tried layering but it doesn’t work with anything… the trail is low and by lunchtime it’s already skin-scented. Ideal for daily wear and enclosed spaces, though.
To be honest, I don’t want to lose faith in this fragrance, but every time I give it a chance, it disappoints me more. I searched high and low following recommendations, and when I finally tried it, it was awful. It’s an acidic, shrill kind of rose, nothing soft. It is certainly very distinguished, though I already knew that before owning it; I loved roses, but after this perfume, I’ve developed a fear of them. I’ve tried layering it, but nothing I’ve tested compares… its trail is low, and after an hour, it’s barely on the skin. That said, it is ideal for daily wear and enclosed spaces.
Perfect for everyday wear, it smells of fresh roses with a hint of sugar, possessing a tenderness that whispers rather than shouts. It evokes a fragile, sweet, and very feminine girl.