Skip to content

Chic by Carolina Herrera

Women 2002

Description

Chic by Carolina Herrera is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2002, this composition was created by Alberto Morillas and Jacques Cavallier Belletrud. The top notes unfold with red freesia, neroli, and Bulgarian rose; the heart reveals freesia, valley lily, mandarin flower, and orange blossom; while the base settles on white musk, sandalwood, and vanilla.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 12%
  • Spring 36%
  • Summer 30%
  • Autumn 22%
  • Day 75%
  • Night 25%

Key notes

Community

1,168 votes

  • Positive 81%
  • Negative 16%
  • Neutral 3.5%
positive reviews 1.2 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I owned it

3,055 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

955 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

566 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Chic

Main accord white-floral Year 2002 Gender Women Perfumer Alberto Morillas · Jacques Cavallier Belletrud

Chic by Carolina Herrera is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2002, this composition was created by Alberto Morillas and Jacques Cavallier Belletrud. The top notes unfold with red freesia, neroli, and Bulgarian rose; the heart reveals freesia, valley lily, mandarin flower, and orange blossom; while the base settles on white musk, sandalwood, and vanilla.

White flowers Flowers Woods and mosses Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

348 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

375 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

139 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

127 votes

Community reviews

33 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Rookiescent

    I first discovered it in the early 2000s and was instantly captivated by the scent, alongside other jewels of the era such as Pleasure and my beloved Romance. However, being young and just starting out, I couldn’t afford it, so I could only enjoy it from afar as a colleague wore it. I adored working with her; she smelled wonderful, was super professional and kind, yet possessed an aura of distinction and elegance, very chic, just like her perfume.

    Reply
  2. Perla Vencis

    Thanks to a friend, I was lucky enough to try it; she gifted me a decant. Upon applying it, I immediately knew it was a turn-of-the-millennium fragrance with two great noses behind it. On me, the Bulgarian rose is notable and doesn’t fade (though there are white florals); as it dries down, this rose blends with a bouquet of whites such as jasmine, neroli, and orange blossom, with a slightly powdery and clean dry-down. Being a proposal from over twenty years ago, it isn’t explosive but rather delicate and clean. It lives up to its name: it is discreet and elegant. The trail is subtle and lasts about five hours on my skin.

    Reply
  3. Laura Guerra

    The first time I tried it was a sample my dad gifted me when I was 21, and I fell in love at once. My ex-partner heard about my wish and bought it for me. The scent lives up to its name: it is exactly what defines a chic woman. The bottle is a dignified representation of the modern, minimalist style of the 2000s. I adore it and want to own it again ❣️

    Reply
  4. Laura Guerra

    The first time I smelled it was a sample my dad gave me when I was 21 and I fell hopelessly in love. My boyfriend at the time gave it to me knowing how much I desired it. Its scent lives up to the name it’s exactly that: a scent for a chic woman. The bottle is a dignified representation of the modern and minimalist style of the 2000s. I love it and want to have it again ❣️

    Reply
  5. AlineTan_val

    I first smelled it on a free sample that came with the Carolina Herrera 212 Sexy. That was my first designer perfume, and although I liked it, I preferred the Chic. At 20, I felt it was youthful without being childish and elegant without being mature—the perfect scent for my age. The sample ran out, so I bought the large bottle; on the second use, it spilled all over my wardrobe. The room was saturated with Carolina Herrera Chic for days. I bought it again six years later, only to find it had been reformulated. It had certain notes from the original version, but I didn’t like it. Now it seems very heavy; I don’t know if it’s the original, but it doesn’t smell like my 20-year-old self. It’s a white floral that overwhelms, makes me dizzy, and harasses me until I get a headache. Since then, I’ve hated white floral notes.

    Reply
  6. I owned it years ago and wouldn’t buy it again. It didn’t displease me, but I never adored it. It’s a fresh, floral scent with moderate longevity, quite soft at first but which later becomes very intimate.

    Reply
  7. Smells incredibly clean, not sexy at all. It’s a citrus floral, timeless and rich for going fresh to work without drawing attention. Instead of Chic, it should be called Clean, xD. I wouldn’t buy it again; there are far more interesting options out there.

    Reply
  8. Rosario.90

    My mum had this in 2004 and it was a wonderful scent: sweet lemon, fresh and very feminine. Years later, I smelled it again and noticed they had reformulated it. It was one of the biggest disappointments of my life 😢. It was delicious and addictive; now it smells like nothing, generic and boring.

    Reply
  9. I’ve worn this for years; it’s an all-rounder: floral but not overpowering, soft and never cloying, perfect for everyday wear or the office.

    Reply
  10. I used it for years; it’s very versatile. It’s not that overpowering floral that invades everything, but rather a correct, soft scent without much intensity. Perfect for work and everyday wear.

    Reply
  11. Mainly smells of white flowers, with a sandalwood base giving it a lovely woody touch. Pleasant, feminine, fresh and versatile.

    Reply
  12. It was my favourite fragrance for years, the one you love and think you’ll never change. I started using it in 2004 and adored it. In 2006 or 2007 they changed some notes and I hated it. I even hated Carolina Herrera for doing so. I never had a perfume I liked as much as the original formula of Chic.

    Reply
  13. marisol santilla

    Very feminine, aromatic and super chic. I really loved it; it has excellent longevity and projection. Highly recommended.

    Reply
  14. On me it’s floral, fresh and clean. Very feminine and mature, good for the heat if used moderately because the floral charge is strong. It has a wide trail and lasts about eight hours. It goes well in the office or with executive attire, adding formality. It’s already discontinued, so I use it with care. If you like Ralph Lauren Romance or Estée Lauder Pleasures, you can buy it blind. It also reminds me of Kenzo Air, but more informal.

    Reply
  15. I adore it, besides it brings back good memories of my adolescence. On my skin it smells citrusy, sometimes I notice neroli and orange blossom, which is delicious. It’s clean, fresh and perfect for everyday wear. Ideal for summer.

    Reply
  16. I bought it for the bottle, but on my skin I only sense the rose and a touch of citrus. There’s no freesia, sandalwood, musk or vanilla. It sounds like Ralph Lauren Romance, another rose scent that doesn’t stand out.

    Reply
  17. I had it years ago and I liked it, but I’m not sure if I could handle that scent today.

    Reply
  18. Adonai ortigoza

    To me it feels heavy for very hot days, like today where it’s 30 degrees in my city. I don’t find it exquisite in the heat, but in the cold it feels warm and delicious.

    Reply
  19. It’s not my style, they gave it to me as a gift, I used it out of obligation and in the end I put it away in a drawer.

    Reply
  20. EtherealFlora

    My mother had it until they discontinued it. I liked it a lot and used it from time to time to go to school because I thought it smelled richer than my perfumes. It’s floral, elegant and slightly woody. It reminds me of rainy days and New Year’s parties when we went out to buy gifts, or of her coat. It had good longevity. I think it was the best of Carolina Herrera and the most elegant, although I like CH L’eau and 212 which are more casual.

    Reply
  21. EtherealFlora

    My mother had it for years until they took it off the market; I absolutely loved it and she would sometimes put it on me for school because it smells richer than my perfumes. It’s floral elegant and with a woody touch. It brings back memories of rainy days and New Year’s parties when we went shopping for gifts or my mother’s coat. Also it lasted for ages. I think it was the best of Carolina Herrera and the most elegant although I like CH L’eau and 212 which are more casual.

    Reply
  22. It’s not really my style. I was given it as a present and wore it out of obligation, but in the end, I just tucked it away in a drawer.

    Reply
  23. I love this fragrance, it has accompanied me all my life and I never get tired of it. I find it rich and on my skin it’s very long-lasting, which is what I look for in a perfume. I still use it to this day despite having others; it will always remain among my favourites.

    Reply
  24. lunita1981

    Super elegant and long-lasting floral scent, perfect for mature women.

    Reply
  25. I used to wear it a classmate at uni and I loved it. One day I asked her what perfume she was wearing and she took out her CHIC bottle to spray my wrists… it was love at first sniff and since then many bottles have passed through my dressing table. But the last one I used two or three years ago seemed to last forever; perhaps they changed the formula or I bought the wrong one but it didn’t smell the same anymore I hated it and never bought it again. I must smell it again one day and discover what happened in our love story.

    Reply
  26. A colleague used this at university and I adored it. One day she asked me to spray my wrists, and it was love at first sniff; since then, many bottles have passed through my vanity. However, the last one I used a couple of years ago seemed to last forever and didn’t smell the same. I ended up hating it and never bought it again. I must smell it one day to discover what happened in our love story.

    Reply
  27. On Fragrantica, someone once said CH didn’t make good perfume, and I agree. Chic was a gift that didn’t suit me; it smells utterly ordinary. I never felt special wearing it; in fact, I’d only use it if I felt terrible and wanted to blend in.

    Reply
  28. In a review on CH (I think on the English version of Fragrantica), someone opined that Carolina Herrera doesn’t make good perfumes… and I couldn’t agree more. Regarding Chic, it was a gift and I didn’t like it. It seemed like a very ordinary scent. It didn’t say anything to me, and I didn’t feel ‘special’ wearing it. To say I only felt like using it on days when I felt unwell, ugly, and just wanted to go unnoticed, I think says it all.

    Reply
  29. blankis68

    I must admit I finished an entire 100ml bottle of this perfume. I simply got used to it; I can’t say I loved it. Now I know that the note that dominated on me was freesia. I can’t claim I detected sandalwood. Personally, I enjoy fragrances that contain it within their notes. It’s pleasant, feminine… A work colleague told me I smelled of strawberry, but she didn’t mean the fruit; she was alluding to ‘a well-bred girl, a pampered girl’, saying my perfume smelled expensive. Would I buy it again? No. I’ve found prettier ones that combine much better with my skin chemistry. It has good longevity and presence.

    Reply