Imari 2015 by Avon

I fell in love with fragrances again after five years without using them. Out of curiosity, I tried one of my sister’s Imari bottles and was utterly struck by that unique, peculiar scent. It created an addiction until I bought the bottle and finished it quickly. It doesn’t last on skin or clothes, but that woody touch and its boundary with masculinity make it irreplaceable. I already want to buy another just for its own sake.

In the Avon catalogue it is listed as oriental. I tried it and must let it macerate so the oxygen can do its work. Right now, I only smell a citrus top note heavy with aldehyde, smoke, powder, spicy notes that tickle my nose, and lots of mouldy wood. I will give it another edit once it is no longer dizzying. EDIT: I put it on a mouillette and it took a full day to please me. I think its dry-down is lovely, but the opening torments me. EDIT 2: It macerated but still didn’t convince me. I gifted it to my grandmother. It has good longevity but projects little; the jasmine and powdery patchouli with a slight creamy vanilla sweetness are most noticeable. My grandmother liked it more without that powdery part that made me dizzy.

It opens aldehydic and floral, with the wood gradually becoming apparent. I don’t think it is a youthful scent. Pleasant if you like classic perfumes.

The classic Imari is a floral woody, vintage fragrance that remains current thanks to its good performance and quality. It is sober and elegant; it lasts all day, though with less intensity, which I notice with movement and on washed clothes. The trail is wide. If you like classic, formal, creamy fragrances with white flowers and woods (not romantic or sweet) that go with you, this is a must. In my opinion, it is slightly unisex, tending towards the feminine due to the floral combination (I almost don’t perceive the vanilla). The main accord is woody, almost astringent, neutral white floral, creamy like body lotion, and powdery with a talc finish. Honestly, I love it; it suits any season and occasion, from work to special events. Who will like it: lovers of Chanel’s aldehydic canon.

A classic that I should have had. I had not used it before, but recently I was sent a deo and a sample that lasted a long time on my skin, with great persistence and fixation, perhaps because it is woody and not too sweet. I became a fan because it is a chameleon, elegant and classic, talc-like but very floral despite the aldehydes which do not bother. Very pleasant and worth it. Given its affordable price, it is a luxury to own it without fear of being vulgar or overused. Highly recommended. Thank you Avon for these delights.

I must say I am a heterosexual man and yet I use this fragrance. It has an incredibly talc-like rose and geranium that I adore, giving me a Victorian sense of elegance, cleanliness, and an aura that warms the space. The iris feels dry and powdery, with a hint of vanilla at the base that rounds off the composition. Only at the start does it feel fresh due to the citrus and aldehydes, giving the sensation of wearing fluffy white cotton clothes ideal for cold, night-time climates. As it is not very sweet, it is perfectly unisex; I recommend men to try it on skin. The first time it reminded me a lot of Axe Musk, which I love.

It’s a cheap perfume that surprises me with its potency and longevity, excellent value. On my skin, the talc note stands out from the start; I don’t detect any citrus. It’s like throwing oneself onto a mountain of talc, a bit excessive. But for me, who adores powdery notes, it’s a wonderful bargain.

I only own the eau de toilette and it already seems intense; I imagine the perfume is even stronger. At least I didn’t buy the perfume directly, as if I had, I wouldn’t be able to wear it. The cologne is a classic scent with a very subtle sweet touch, nothing gourmand. I don’t smell much vanilla, but I assume it adds sweetness as it dries down; initially it’s stronger, but once dried it becomes richer and more enjoyable. It is powdery and quite formal. I think everyone should wear what they like, though there is a tendency based on age. In my case, I wouldn’t recommend it for teenagers or very young women, but rather for middle age and beyond. I wouldn’t recommend it for quinceañeras or twenties, although if it’s their taste, there’s no objection. I feel it’s not entirely feminine; it has a unisex hint that doesn’t convince me; I prefer well-feminine perfumes. I highly recommend it for women who love classics, perhaps a bit woody, intense, with a unisex touch or those who enjoy more masculine scents.

It is quite unisex at first, strong, but then dries down powdery. I find it similar to Chanel No. 5; it reminds me of Hinds’ pink cream. When dried it leaves rich powdery roses, nothing synthetic, and its longevity is impressive: on my skin it exceeds 12 hours.

It is a citrusy but mature and warm perfume, more for winter. It has a floral touch, but I definitely smell lemon at the beginning, quite strong. I wouldn’t recommend it for teenagers, rather for women over 35 who like harder and unisex scents.